Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : BAHASTRA

The rhetorical strategies of the Quran Kusen Kusen; Zainal Rafli; Emzir Emzir
BAHASTRA Vol 40, No 2 (2020): Bahastra
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/bahastra.v40i2.16991

Abstract

This research was aimed to analyze translation strategies in the Quran. The content analysis method with the qualitative approach used in the research. The data in this study are words, phrases, sentences in the text of the translation of the ayahs of the Glorious Qur'an surah Albaqarah ayah 1 to ayah 286. The procedure applied in the analysis of the data is the inductive model procedure. The development model of the rhetorical strategies used by Toulmin model. The results showed the model development strategies IV (G.W. B àC). The other model used the alternative model. It is another model appeared aside from what Toulmin has given, W. B àC. Model W. B àC is used as much as 7 times or of 17.5%. The next strategy model that also is a widely used is alternative models W.B. Q àC and the model V is used 5 times (12.5%). Next is the model of strategy III (Ground + Warrant àClaim), used four times or by 10% and the model I (Ground àClaim), model II (Ground-n àn-Claim), model W àC, and model W. R àC each used 1 time or amounting to 2.5%. All of the claims are expressed using complex rhetorical strategies. A claim supported by more than one fact either parallel or not parallel. There are few facts and data (ground), reinforced with a justification or validation data (warrant), reinforced again with power support (backing support) to strengthen one or more than one claim.
Directed Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Method and Students' Critical Thinking Level in Editing Scientific Articles Asep Supriyana; Emzir Emzir; Endry Boeriswati
BAHASTRA Vol 39, No 2 (2019): Bahastra
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (518.841 KB) | DOI: 10.26555/bahastra.v39i2.14699

Abstract

The aim of this research is to explain the use of the DRTA method and the level of critical thinking in improving students' ability in editing scientific articles. The method used in this research is experimental research. The result shows that using the DRTA method affected the ability to edit scientific articles if it is in accordance to the students’ level of critical thinking (high and low). Learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have high critical thinking scales are different from learning outcomes of editing scientific articles of students who have low level of critical thinking. Students who were treated with the DRTA Method had higher level of critical thinking and had significant differences from those who had low levels of critical thinking. The acquisition of the average score showed the students who studied with the DRTA method and had a high critical thinking level are 90.1, while the score of the students who had a low critical thinking level are 79.3.