Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal)

DESKRIPSI KEMAMPUAN PEMAHAMAN KONSEP MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Muhammad Rizal Usman; Baharullah Baharullah; Kristiawati Kristiawati
JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Vol. 5 No. 1 Maret 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/mathedu.v5i1.3525

Abstract

This research is a descriptive qualitative research that aims to describe students' mathematical conceptual understanding in terms of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. The subjects of this study were 3 seventh grade students at MTS Guppi Rannaloe Kab. Gowa, each of which represents: visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles. The data in this study were obtained using research instruments, namely (1) the researcher himself; (2) learning style questionnaire; (3) concept understanding ability test; and (4) interview guidelines. The data analysis technique used is qualitative data analysis techniques, including: (1) data condensation, (2) data presentation, and (3) drawing conclusions and verification. From the results of this study it can be concluded that; (1) students with visual learning styles are able to fulfill 2 indicators, namely giving examples and non-examples of concepts, and expressing concepts in various forms of mathematical representation; (2) students with auditory learning style do not meet any of the indicators; (3) students with kinesthetic learning styles are able to fulfill 2 indicators, namely giving examples and non-examples of concepts, and expressing concepts in the form of mathematical representations.
PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA MELALUI MODEL DISCOVERY LEARNING Erni Ekafitria Bahar; Muhammad Rizal Usman; Indar Arum Pratiwi
JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Juli 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/mathedu.v5i2.3679

Abstract

This study is a development research that aims to produce mathematical learning tools on comparative material through a discovery learning model in class VII students of MTs Muhammadiyah Wuring that are valid, practical, and effective. The development model employed in this study referred to 4D development model, which consisted of define, design, develop, and disseminate. The resulted product is in the form of RPP and LKPD with a discovery learning model on comparative material that can train students ability to solve problems and can make students easily understand mathematical concepts and improve their learning outcomes. The learning tools that had been developed was then validated by tho experts. After validated, the learning device was tested at 22 students of class VII MTs Muhammadiyah Wuring. The result of the study show that the learning tools in the form of RPP and LKPD of the discovery learning model that have been developed have been validated and show that the averages are 3,7 and 3,5 respectively, with very valid criteria. The learning tools based on discovery learning is stated as practical and effective, because the results of the practically test reveal: (1) The percentage of feasibility of the learning tools RPP and LKPD is 93,62% and 88,89% with a very decent category, and (2) The teacher’s ability in managing the discovery learning model of mathematics learning is very good with an average of 3,56. This learning tools also meets the criteria of effectiveness, with: (1) The student learning outcomes obtained an average score of 76,67 with completeness percentage is 81,8%, (2) The student activity shows a very good category with an average of 3,59, (3) the result of observations on the ability of teachers to manage mathematics learning using the discovery learning model show an average of 3,56 with a very good category, (4) The students gave a positive response to the learning tools with the discovery learning model with a percentage of 86%. Therefore, the results of the study shows that the product of learning tools developed is categorized as valid, practical, and effective.
ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA PADA MATERI SPLTV DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF Nur Wahyuni Basir; Kristiawati Kristiawati; Muhammad Rizal Usman
JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Vol 5 No 3 (2022): JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) November 2022
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/mathedu.v5i3.4266

Abstract

The main problem in this research is how the students' mathematical reasoning ability on SPLTV material is viewed from the field independent and field dependent cognitive styles. This study aims to describe students' mathematical reasoning abilities on SPLTV material in terms of field independent and field dependent cognitive styles at SMA Muhammadiyah 9 Makassar. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative research. The instruments used are GEFT test, mathematical reasoning ability test and interview guide. The subjects used in this study were 6 students of class X SMA Muhammadiyah 9 Makassar, namely 3 students with field independent cognitive style with high, medium, low mathematical reasoning abilities and 3 students with field dependent cognitive style with high, medium, and medium mathematical reasoning abilities. low in solving problems related to SPLTV material. The results showed that students with field independent cognitive style with high category of mathematical reasoning ability were able to fulfill all indicators well except the ability to check the validity of arguments. Students in the medium category are able to fulfill 3 indicators well, namely the ability to submit conjectures, perform mathematical manipulations, compile evidence and give reasons for the correctness of solutions and are less able to meet the indicators of drawing conclusions. Students in the low category are able to fulfill 2 indicators well, namely the ability to submit conjectures and perform mathematical manipulations, are still lacking in compiling evidence and giving reasons for the correctness of solutions and still lacking in drawing conclusions. Students with field dependent cognitive style with high category mathematical reasoning abilities are able to fulfill 3 indicators of mathematical reasoning well, namely the ability to perform mathematical manipulations, compile evidence for the correctness of solutions and draw conclusions and are quite capable of proposing conjectures. Students in the medium category are able to fulfill 1 indicator well, namely the ability to make conjectures and are quite able to meet 3 indicators of mathematical reasoning ability, namely the ability to perform mathematical manipulations, compile evidence and give reasons for the correctness of solutions and draw conclusions. Students in the low category are still unable to fulfill all indicators of mathematical reasoning abilities except for the fifth indicator, students are not able to check the validity of arguments. Students with field independent and field dependent cognitive styles for the three categories have not been able to fulfill the fifth indicator, namely the ability to check the validity of arguments.