Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.329
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Mahasiswa Bimbingan Konseling Lentera Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Rechtsidee Mimbar Yustitia : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Unes Law Review Jurnal Simbur Cahaya JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora IIJSE Jurnal Anti Korupsi Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi J-CEKI
Ainul Azizah
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Siti Khodijah; Ainul Azizah; Aan Efendi
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): November : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v1i4.680

Abstract

In practice, children as victims of the crime of sexual intercourse find it difficult to fight for their rights in the form of legal protection as victims. Especially in the case of Cassation Decision Number 281 K/Pid.Sus/2019 and Appeal Decision Number 155/Pid.Sus/2018/PT.Mdn which are used as research objects, it is necessary to examine to what extent the legal protection of children's rights as victims of criminal acts is fulfilled. In this problem, it was discovered that regulations at that time did not really focus on victims, the criminal justice system at the time of the case process was still focused on the defendant as the perpetrator of the crime, while the victim was only passive because his legal interests were already represented by investigators and public prosecutors. Moreover, it was made worse by the weak regulations that existed at that time, causing the interests of children as victims of criminal acts to be neglected. However, if we look at future legal policies or existing regulations that have emerged at this time, it turns out that we have a strong direction towards legal protection for children as victims of criminal acts of sexual intercourse. At least the victim can play an active role in fulfilling and achieving legal protection, and is supported by criminal objectives and guidelines that are very different from the criminal objectives that were in effect at the time the case took place.
Pengintegrasian Mediasi Penal Sebagai Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Di Indonesia Totok Yanuarto; Pika Sari; I Gede Widihiana Suarda; Ainul Azizah
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/rechtens.v13i1.2845

Abstract

Tujuan artikel ini untuk menelaah dan mengevaluasi tentang pengintegrasian mediasi penal sebagai penyelesaian perkara pidana di tinjau dari perspektif pembaharuan hukum di indonesia. Jenis penelitian ini termasuk kedalam kategori yuridis-normatif, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan cara menelaah teori-teori, konsep-konsep, asas hukum serta peraturan perundang-undangan yang sesuai dan berkaitan dengan objek penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa dalam rangka menegakkan keadilan restorative dan pelaksanaannnya dilakukan dengan kesepakatan antara pelaku dan korban. Dikarenakan mediasi penal sebelumnya tidaklah pernah dilakukan di Indonesia maka sejatinya mediasi penal harus di integrasikan kedalam system peradilan pidana di Indonesia dan pengintegrasian tersebut sendiri dapat dilakukan dengan bentuk non penal policy yang dalam hal ini berarti dilakukan tanpa legislasi dan dapat pula dilakukan dengan lebih proper yaitu dengan penal policy yang pelaksanaannya dilaksanakan dengan penyusunan aturan mengenai mediasi penal mulai dari pengertian, asas, dan juga bentuk pelaksanaan integrasi penal di Indonesia. Kata Kunci:Mediasi, Penal, Perkara Pidana  Abstract The purpose of this article is to examine and evaluate the integration of penal mediation as a resolution of criminal cases from the perspective of legal reform in Indonesia. This type of research is included in the juridical-normative category, namely research carried out by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and statutory regulations that are appropriate and related to the object of research. The results of this research show that in order to uphold restorative justice and its implementation, it is carried out with an agreement between the perpetrator and the victim. Because penal mediation has never previously been carried out in Indonesia, penal mediation must actually be integrated into the criminal justice system in Indonesia and this integration itself can be carried out in the form of a non-penal policy, which in this case means it is carried out without legislation and can also be carried out more appropriately, namely by penal policy, the implementation of which is carried out by preparing rules regarding penal mediation starting from the meaning, principles and also the form of implementation of penal integration in Indonesia Keywords: Mediation, Penal, Criminal Case REFERENCES Andi Hamzah. 2009 Hukum Acara Pidana Edisi Kedua. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika. Braithwaite. 2006. Handbook of Restorative Justice “Shame. Shaming and Restorative Justice : A Critical appraisal”. New York : Routledge. Luhut Pangaribuan. 2006.  Hukum Acara Pidana Surat-Surat Resmi Di Pengadilan Oleh Advokat : Praperadilan. Eksepsi. Pledoi. Duplik. Memori Banding Kasasi. Peninjauan Kembali Edisi Revisi.  Jakarta : Djambatan. M Yahya Harahap. 2006. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Edisi Revisi. Jakartta : Sinar Grafika. Mark S Umbreit. 2001. Obstacles And Oppurtunities For Developing Victim Offender Mediation For Juveniles : The Experience Of Six Oregon. San Fransisco : CA : Joessey-Bass. Bani. Ferdinand Donu. and Frans Simangunsong. "Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup." Journal Evidence Of Law 2. no. 3 (2023). Garcia. Virginia. Hari Sutra Disemadi. and Barda Nawawi Arief. "The enforcement of restorative justice in Indonesia criminal law." Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 28. no. 1 (2020). Lesmana. CSA Teddy. "Implementasi Mediasi Penal Dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Studi Kasus Pada Satreskrim Polres Sukabumi Kota)." Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2. no. 2 (2020). Maknun. Luil. and Febrina Hertika Rani. "Perbandingan Konsep Penerapan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Negara Lain." Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6. no. 2 (2020). Oktobrian. Dwiki. Rani Hendriana. Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum. and Muhammad Lukman Nurhuda. "Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Kesepakatan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice Pada Tahapan Penyidikan." Litigasi 24. no. 1 (2023). Purnomo. Beja Suryo Hadi. "Kedudukan Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia." Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial 4. no. 2 (2018). Rizal. Moch Choirul. "Mediasi Penal Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam." Ulul Albab 18. no. 1 (2017). Septiyo. Tendy. Joko Setiyono. and Muchlas Rastra Samara. "Optimalisasi Penerapan Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana." Jurnal Yuridis 7. no. 2 (2020). Sudarsono. Cacuk. "Pelaksanaan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan." Unnes Law Journal 4. no. 1 (2015). Vasilenko. Aleksandra S.. Sergey A. Bukalerov. Natal’ya S. Gaintseva. and Anton V. Serous. "General Provisions of the Mediation Institution in Criminal Proceedings of European States." In Current Problems and Ways of Industry Development: Equipment and Technologies. pp. 906-913. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2021. Wangga. Maria Silvya E.. Pujiyono Pujiyono. and Barda Nawawi Arief. "Revocation of Political Rights of The Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Corruption." JILS 4 (2019).
Prinsip Keadilan Terhadap Pengecualian Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Diancam Pidana Di Bawah 5 Tahun M. Arief Amrullah; Ainul Azizah; Yougha Aulia Mahardi
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v2i4.923

Abstract

The existence of limitations on criminal penalties of more than 5 years and incapacity in Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code means that those who commit crimes with a penalty of less than 5 years are no longer required to be provided with legal advice. The objectives of this research are limiting the defense of assistance to perpetrators of criminal acts under 5 years in accordance with the criminal justice system, providing assistance to perpetrators who are under 5 years under the principle of justice, reformulating the provision of legal assistance for perpetrators under 5 years. in the future. This research uses doctrinal legal research methods. The method used is to study and analyze legal materials and legal issues related to legal developments and problems. Legal aid is everyone's human right, which is not only provided by the state and not as a mercy from the state, but is the state's responsibility in realizing equality before the law, access to justice, and fair trials. The provision of legal assistance only looks at the criteria that the person is an incapacitated person who has met the requirements. limitations or limitations but it is an obligation for the state which must provide legal assistance to all Indonesian people without exception.
Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama (Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Sampang Nomor: 69/Pid.B/2012/Pn.Spg) Subki, Tajus; Muntahaa, Multazaam; Azizah, Ainul
Lentera Hukum Vol 1 No 2 (2014): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v1i1.565

Abstract

Kebebasan beragama di Indonesia dapat dilihat di Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (UUD 1945) amandemen kedua pada Pasal 28E ayat (1) dan (2). Akan tetapi terdapat pula pembatasan dalam konstitusi tersebut. Warga negara yang tidak mentaati pembatasan tersebut, maka akan dikenakan sanksi sesuai dengan aturan dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Setelah diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1/PNPS/1965 tentang Pencegahan Penyalahgunaan dan atau Penodaan Agama, maka dalam KUHP ditambahkan Pasal 156a untuk menjerat tindak pidana penodaan agama. Dalam kasus yang Penulis analisis seharusnya Jaksa Penuntut Umum menggunakan dakwaan kumulatif dengan tetap memilih Pasal 156a huruf a KUHP dan Pasal 335 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP, hal tersebut karena kedua pasal tersebut bukan merupakan tindak pidana yang sejenis.Hakim menjatuhkan pidana penjara 2 (dua) tahun. Pasal 156a KUHP memberi ancaman pidana 5 (lima) tahun penjara. Ancaman tersebut memang tergolong sangat tinggi dan berat, karena pembuat undang-undang menganggap akibat yang ditimbulkan oleh tindak pidana penodaan agama sangat serius bagi negara dan masyarakat. Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Sampang seharusnya memvonis Terdakwa dengan menjatuhkan pidana penjara 4 (empat) tahun sesuai dengan tuntutan Jaksa Penuntut Umum, sehingga Hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana terhadap terdakwa sesuai dengan tujuan pemidanaan dalam teori gabungan. Kata Kunci: Tindak Pidana Penodaan Agama, Bentuk Surat Dakwaan, Tujuan Pemidanaan.
The Concept of Implementing The Policy of Rehabilitation of Drug Abuse Based On The Restorative Justice Approach By The Prosecutor's Office of The Republic Of Indonesia Jadmiko, Widhi; Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun; Ainul Azizah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2088

Abstract

This study discusses the policy of Guideline Number 18 of 2021 concerning the settlement of drug abuse cases through rehabilitation with a restorative justice approach as an implementation of the dominus litis principle by the Indonesian Attorney General's Office. The implementation of the drug abuse rehabilitation policy by the Indonesian Attorney General's Office based on the dominus litis principle is regulated in the Attorney General's Guideline Number 18 of 2021. This policy addresses the number of drug convicts that exceed capacity with a restorative justice approach. The dominus litis principle gives prosecutors great authority in controlling the legal process, including the decision to continue or stop prosecution based on sufficient evidence. In addition, this principle allows for the termination of prosecution if the perpetrator's actions are not considered a crime. This policy gives prosecutors the authority to determine legal settlements with rehabilitation, prioritizing the recovery of perpetrators and positive impacts on society. Rehabilitation focuses on changing the behavior of perpetrators through programs that help them overcome drug addiction and improve their social skills. In addition to providing legal protection and the rights of perpetrators, this approach also emphasizes the principle of fast, simple, and low-cost justice, and avoids complicated and expensive legal processes. The principle of restorative justice in this policy aims to improve the negative impacts of drug abuse, by emphasizing the physical, mental, social, and emotional recovery of perpetrators, so that they can return to being productive members of society.
Delik Suap dan Gratifikasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Studi Kasus Putusan Hakim dalam Praktik Penegakan Hukum Kahar, Muhammad Paeway Ebiem; Rahmatullah, Khoirul Lukman; Yuris, Faza; Azizah, Ainul; Prihatmini, Sapti
JURNAL ANTI KORUPSI Vol 13 No 1: Mei 2023
Publisher : PUSAT KAJIAN ANTI KORUPSI FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS JEMBER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jak.v13i1.40007

Abstract

ABSTRAK Praktik gratifikasi dan suap yang dilakukan oleh pejabat negara merupakan suatu masalah yang saat ini dihadapi bangsa Indonesia. Sepanjang ini perumusan peraturan mengenai perbuatan gratifikasi dan suap dibedakan berdasarkan adanya yang diperjanjikan. Artinya suap dapat berupa janji, sedangkan gratifikasi merupakan pemberian dalam arti luas dan bukan janji. Melalui putusan nomor Nomor 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Jkt.Pst perlu dipahami lebih lanjut bagaimana putusan tersebut memaknai suap dan gratifikasi dalam konteks tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali pemaknaan dan interpretasi hukum terkait suap dan gratifikasi dalam putusan pengadilan tersebut. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis isi terhadap putusan pengadilan, dengan mengidentifikasi argumen hukum yang digunakan, pendekatan hukum yang diadopsi, dan pertimbangan yang diberikan oleh hakim. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa putusan pengadilan tersebut memberikan pengertian yang jelas mengenai suap dan gratifikasi sebagai tindak pidana korupsi. Dalam konteks ini, suap diartikan sebagai pemberian atau janji pemberian kepada pejabat publik dengan tujuan mempengaruhi keputusan atau tindakan pejabat tersebut. Sementara itu, gratifikasi diartikan sebagai pemberian hadiah atau imbalan kepada pejabat publik sebagai bentuk penghargaan atau imbalan atas tindakan atau keputusan yang telah diambil.
Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencabulan (Putusan Nomor 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN.Sby) Afifah, Rinda Nur; Iriyanto, Echwan; Azizah, Ainul
MIMBAR YUSTITIA : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul 'Ulum Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52166/mimbar.v7i2.5198

Abstract

ABSTRACT Punishment is a sanction that causes pain or suffering that is intentionally inflicted on someone. Sentencing in Decision Number 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN.Sby is interesting to discuss in relation to the form of the indictment and the judge's consideration. The urgency of this research is to evaluate the form of the public prosecutor's indictment and the judge's consideration with the aim of providing ideas and solutions to the legal issues being studied. This research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and conceptual approach, and legal materials are analyzed using the deductive method. The result of this study is that the form of the alternative indictment of the public prosecutor is correct but the composition needs to be adjusted and the judge's consideration in applying the article is not in accordance with the facts in the trial. The form of the indictment is more appropriate to use an alternative whose formation is adjusted to the classification of the article charged and the judge's consideration is not in accordance with the facts at trial because the defendant is not proven to have committed several criminal acts, so that the application of concurcus realis in the decision is inappropriate. Keywords: Conviction, Indictment, Judge's Consideration ABSTRAK Pemidanaan merupakan sanksi yang menderitakan atau nestapa yang sengaja ditimpakan kepada seseorang. Pemidanaan pada Putusan Nomor 1361/Pid.B/2022/PN.Sby menarik untuk dibahas dikaitkan dengan bentuk surat dakwaan dan pertimbangan hakim. Urgensi penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi bentuk surat dakwaan penuntut umum dan pertimbangan hakim dengan tujuan untuk memberikan gagasan serta solusi terhadap isu hukum yang sedang diteliti. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual, dan bahan hukum dianalisis menggunakan metode deduktif. Hasil penelitian ini bahwa bentuk surat dakwaan alternatif penuntut umum sudah tepat namun susunannya perlu disesuaikan dan pertimbangan hakim dalam penerapan pasal yang tidak sesuai dengan fakta yang ada di persidangan. Bentuk surat dakwaan lebih tepat menggunakan alternatif yang formasinya disesuaikan dengan klasifikasi pasal yang didakwakan serta pertimbangan hakim yang tidak sesuai dengan fakta di persidangan karena Terdakwa tidak terbukti melakukan beberapa tindak pidana, sehingga penerapan concurcus realis dalam putusan tersebut menjadi tidak tepat. Kata Kunci: Pemidanaan, Surat Dakwaan, Pertimbangan Hakim
Restorative Approaches to Managing Children in Conflict with the Law Anwar, Iryana; Prihatmini, Sapti; Azizah, Ainul; Suarda, I Gede Widhiana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kyadiren
Publisher : PPPM, Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum (STIH) Biak-Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46924/jihk.v6i1.193

Abstract

This study investigates the regulation of action sanctions through a restorative approach for children in conflict with the law (ABH) within the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia. The objective is to analyze the alignment of these regulations with the principles of child protection and restorative justice. Utilizing a normative juridical method that incorporates statutory and conceptual approaches, the findings indicate that Article 82 of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law (SPPA Law) embodies a restorative justice approach, striving to balance community protection with the rehabilitation of ABH. However, the implementation is suboptimal, and many ABH continue to receive prison sentences. This suggests that the principles of the best interests of the child, the right to development, and respect for children’s views have not been adequately upheld. There is a need for further refinement of action sanctions to better align with restorative justice and address the needs of ABH.
Kebijakan Penerapan Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Di Indonesia I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Ainul Azizah; Ahmad Fahrudin
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i2.1642

Abstract

Ethnicity, religion, race and intergroup (SARA) are social elements that have an important role in human life, therefore, the freedom of each party must be respected and guaranteed. Religion is an important element of human existence and perhaps the most impressive element that can exert an important influence on the behavior of individuals. Indonesian positive law regulates punishment for perpetrators of religious blasphemy regulated in Article 156a of the Criminal Code. The initial purpose of enacting this article was against the backdrop of the many sects of belief and mysticism teachings that were considered heretical and not in accordance with the religious teachings of the Indonesian people. Article 156a of the Criminal Code is intended to prevent religious teachings from being distorted which are considered as the main teachings by the leaders or religious leaders concerned; and this rule protects religious peace in society and maintains the values of religious teachings that are maintained by the community from insults/humiliations and from teachings not to embrace a religion based on Belief in the One Supreme God.
Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Ainul Azizah; I Gede Widhianan Suarda; Mardiyono Mardiyono
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i2.1643

Abstract

Restorative justice or better known as restorative justice in the development of schools of law and punishment in human civilization, where the state returns the ius ponale and ius poniendi mandates to the community within the framework of healing, recovery and recovery. Restorative justice is a concept of thinking that responds to the development of the criminal justice system by focusing on the need to involve actors, communities and victims as a social recovery step in social relations. The principle of restorative justice is one of the principles of law enforcement in resolving cases which can be used as an instrument of recovery and has been implemented by the supreme court in the form of policy implementation (Supreme Court Regulations and Supreme Court Circulars). Restorative justice is considered a model of modern punishment that is more humane than the retributive justice used in the current justice system. One of the applications of this is the termination of the prosecution process by the prosecutor.
Co-Authors Aan Efendi Afifah, Rinda Nur Afrihasa, Balqis Nurdiniasari Ahmad Fahrudin Ahmad Mukhlasul Abidin Alex Prasetyo Amelia Nur Ramadhani Angga Wardana Anwar, Iryana Balqis Nurdiniasari Afrihasa Dinda Fefty Miranda Putri Dominikus Rato Echwan Iriyanto Fadhilla, Dhia Savira Fanny Tannuwijaya Fina Fakhriyah Ghufron, Nurul Habi Burrohim Halif Halif Hartono, Danang Tri I Gede Widhiana Suarda Jadmiko, Widhi Kahar, Muhammad Paeway Ebiem Khoidin, Muhammad Laely Wulandari M. Arief Amrullah M. Khoidin Mardiyono Mardiyono Moh. Ali Mohammad Arief Amrullah Multazaam Muntahaa Nur Fajrie Pika Sari Pintami Nanda Prihatmini, Sapti Prisma Diyah Ratrini Rahmatullah, Khoirul Lukman Sieldy Aprilia Utami Silaban, Rendy Tridolok Siti Khodijah Tajus Subki Totok Yanuarto Y A Triana Ohoiwutun Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana Yougha Aulia Mahardi Yuris, Faza