Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.34
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Wacana Hukum DE JURE Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Hukum Islam Jurnal Cita Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM UIR LAW REVIEW Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Jurnal Selat Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Jurnal Yudisial PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Pagaruyuang Law Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Borneo Law Review Journal LEGAL BRIEF Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy ARSY : Jurnal Aplikasi Riset kepada Masyarakat Hukum Responsif : Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati Cirebon JHCLS Indonesian Community Journal Yuridika Jurnal El-Thawalib Bina Hukum Lingkungan SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan SASI Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) Lex Scientia Law Review Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia Jurnal El-Thawalib
Suparto Suparto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Riau
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 63 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 63 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
The Role Of A Dignified Judge Within The Scope Of Judicial Power In Indonesia Efendi Ibnususilo; Suparto Suparto; Aryo Akbar; Faishal Taufiqurrahman
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.4889

Abstract

The supervisory function of the Judicial Commission at that time was met with a lot of resistance from judges, which eventually led to the submission of a judicial review of Law No. 22/2004 on the Judicial Commission to the Constitutional Court, which the Constitutional Court granted. With the granting of the judicial review petition, the Judicial Commission's supervisory function over judges ceased to exist. This raises the question of whether the judges will be able to carry out their duties fairly without external supervision. Purpose Study: Can these judges still carry out their duties fairly without external supervision? If so, then what is the role of these dignified judges within the scope of judicial power in Indonesia? This article uses normative legal research that analyzes relevant secondary data related to the role of dignified judges within the scope of judicial power. This research concludes that a dignified judge is a judge who works professionally based on ethical integrity, moral integrity and intellectual integrity. In order for this to be done, it is necessary to have supervision, both internally and externally. This research shows that there are still many judicial mafias in Indonesia, one of which comes from the judges themselves. this shows that there are still judges who do not work professionally by ignoring ethical and moral values so that many decisions are made that harm justice in society
JOB LOSS INSURANCE PROGRAM APPLICABLE IN INDONESIA BASED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION AND ITS COMPARISON WITH OTHER COUNTRIES Suparto Suparto
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v5i2.768

Abstract

One of the regulations in the field of employment issued by the Government of Indonesia is Government Regulation No. 37 of 2021 concerning the Implementation of the Job Loss Insurance Program. This regulation is very important in the midst of rampant layoffs by companies as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of a job loss insurance program for employees affected by termination of employment. The research method uses a normative juridical approach with secondary data. Based on the research results obtained that Comparison job loss insurance program in Indonesia with other countries lies in the coverage, requirements and premium contributions. Job loss guarantee or unemployment insurance in Indonesia and other countries have the same goal, which is to financially support individuals who do not have jobs as long as the individual is looking for work. This policy has been carried out since 1935 and 1940 by the United States and Canada against the background of the Great Depression around 1930, then Thailand began to implement an unemployment insurance scheme in 2004. In 2016, there were 73 (seventy-three) countries that had implemented the unemployment insurance scheme. Each country creates an unemployment insurance policy with a different model but the goal remains the same, which is to achieve adequate protection against the risk of job loss by expanding coverage to ensure workers affected by layoffs receive compensation. Based on a comparison with several other countries, it was found that the job loss insurance scheme was effective in overcoming the number of unemployed, especially during an economic recession and was able to protect workers who were laid off by maintaining their level of welfare.
Reconstructing the Enforcement Power of Civil Judgments through a National Enforcement Officer to Achieve Effective Judicial Enforcement A. Wafi; Ellydar Chaidir; Efendi Ibnususilo; Suparto Suparto; Surizki Febrianto
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 4 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i4.21062

Abstract

This study examines the crisis of enforcement efficacy in the Indonesian civil justice system—a structural irony in which the coercive power of state bailiffs has proven ineffective. Even when a judicial decision has attained the status of inkracht van gewijsde (final and binding), empirical evidence reveals a stagnation in the realization of rights, thereby fundamentally undermining the essence of legal protection for litigants. Employing a normative legal research methodology grounded in conceptual, statutory, and cross-jurisdictional comparative approaches, the study utilizes primary legal sources (legislation and relevant legal instruments), secondary sources (scholarly journals from the last decade, legal doctrine or communis opinio doctorum, and official reports), and tertiary sources; data were collected via documentation techniques and analyzed using a deductive-qualitative method. The findings indicate that reconstructing enforcement power through a "National Enforcement Officer" model is essential to bridge the gap between court judgments and the actual realization of the prevailing party's rights. This model enhances the professionalism of enforcement officials, inter-agency coordination, and the oversight of enforcement proceedings, ensuring they operate effectively and proportionately. Consequently, enforcement ceases to be merely an administrative stage and becomes an integral component of effective judicial enforcement, guaranteeing the actual implementation of court rulings
Co-Authors A Admiral A. Wafi Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna Admiral , Admiral Admiral Admiral Admiral Admiral Admiral Admiral Ardiansyah Ardiansyah Ardiansyah Ardiansyah Aryo Akbar Beni Murtadi Chatarina Umbul Wahyuni David Hardiago Dedy Gusniawan Deni Jaya Saputra Despan Heryansyah Efendi Ibnu Susilo Efendi Ibnususilo Ellydar Chaidir Ellydar Chaidir Ellydar Chaidir Ellydar Chaidir Ellydar Chaidir, Ellydar Esanov, Azamat Esirgapovich Esy Kurniasih Fadhel Arjuna Adinda Faishal Taufiqurrahman Faishal Taufiqurrahman Halimah Abdul Manaf Heni Pujiastuti John Woodward Jose Gama Santos Kim Hyeonsoo M. Rafi Meidizon Monika Melina Muhammad Faizal Pahlevi Namazovna, Sultanova Dilshoda Naurah Dwirengganis Riata Putri Normurotovna, Zamira Esanova Pahmi Amri Puti Mayang Seruni Rahmad Hidayat Harahap Rani Fadhila Syafrinaldi Riauan, Muhd Ar. Imam Santos, Jose Gama Selvi Afriani Suardi Surizki Febrianto Surizki Febrianto Surizki Febriyanto Susilo, Efendi Ibnu Umi Muslikhah Wira Atma Hajri Zainal