Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL

MODEL PENYELESAIAN CAROK BERDASARKAN CARA BERHUKUM ORANG MADURA Budimansyah, Budimansyah
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 2 ISSUE 2, JULY 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Tanjungpura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (709.722 KB) | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v2i2.33755

Abstract

Carok is a social reality for the Madurese whose existence is still recognized today. The essence of Carok is more closely related to Madurese cultural values, where Carok is based on the fact that the Madurese have experienced the so-called "Malo", this feeling is caused by the Madurese feeling that their self-esteem is being harassed so as to defend the abused self-esteem then the Madurese do Carok. Law enforcement on Carok can not only be done with a positivistic approach with the nature of rigidity and see that Carok is a black and white subject matter as set forth in the Criminal Code (Criminal Code), if Carok is solved only through criminal law mechanism then no wonder then when the Carok-Carok takes place, the way through the penal law can never touch the nature of Carok, why the Madurese do Carok, and what Carok means and the defense of self-esteem for the Madurese. This research is a normative legal research, the data source used in this study is in the form of secondary data, namely books, journals, legislation, documents and other writings relating to the problem being studied. This study aims to find the law in concreto that is an attempt to find out whether the law that is suitable to be implemented in reality is carried out or obeyed by the community in relation to the settlement of Carok, the data processing method is to use qualitative methods and data analysis is deductive. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the Carok settlement model is based on the way of judging Madurese is different from the settlement model provided by the law of the country where the way of judging Madurese is a cultural approach so that Carok as a problem that comes from culture can be resolved and muted, then the presence of criminal law as the last effort (ultimum remedium) is deemed necessary after it is first settled based on how to enact the Madurese.
REFORMULASI PENGATURAN HUKUMAN MATI DALAM UNDANG- UNDANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Budimansyah, Budimansyah; Arabiyah, Syarifah
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol 7, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 7 NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v7i1.50432

Abstract

AbstractCorruption is a criminal act that causes state financial losses, hampers national development, loses of social and economics community rights. But, the perpetrators of corruption cannot be sentenced to death, except in certain circumstances as regulated in the elucidation of Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption. That vacum of norm of the death penalty against the perpetrators of corruption causes for the inequality between the impact of corruption with that punishment. Different way to punish in the application of nisab restrictions for theft in islamic law, namely theft with a minimum loss of 1/4 dinar victims can be sentenced to cut off hands. The purpose of this study is to reformulate the regulation of the death penalty in the Eradication of Corruption act based on the application of nisab restrictions for theft in islamic law. This study is a normative legal research with the legislation and comparative approach. Legal material collection techniques by the literature study, and legal material analysis techniques by descriptive method of analysis with deductive reasoning. Based on this study revealed that the need for changes in the Eradication of Corruption act by expanding the meaning of certain circumstances in the explanation of Article 2 Paragraph (2), namely determining the minimum limit for state financial losses that can be sentenced to death. AbstrakTindak pidana korupsi merupakan tindak pidana yang merugikan keuangan negara, menghambat pembangunan nasional, merugikan hak-hak sosial dan hak-hak ekonomi masyarakat. Namun terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi tidak dapat dijatuhi hukuman mati kecuali dalam keadaan tertentu sebagaimana diatur dalam penjelasan Pasal 2 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Tidak diaturnya hukuman mati terhadap pelaku tindak pidana korupsi berimplikasi terhadap ketimpangan antara dampak yang ditimbulkan dari tindak pidana korupsi dengan ancaman hukuman yang dianggap terlalu ringan. Cara berhukum tersebut berbeda dengan penerapan batasan nisab dalam jarimah pencurian yaitu pencurian dengan minimal kerugian korban 1/4 dinar dapat dijatuhi hukuman potong tangan. Tujuandari penelitian ini adalah untuk melakukan reformulasi pengaturan hukumam mati dalam undang-undang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi berdasarkan batasan nisab dalam jarimah pencurian. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan perbandingan. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum melalui studi kepustakaan, sedangkan teknik analisis bahan hukum menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis dengan penalaran deduktif. Adapun temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah perlunya dilakukan perubahan terhadap undang-undang pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi dengan memperluas makna keadaan tertentu dalam penjelasan Pasal 2 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yaitu kerugiaan keuangan negara dalam batas minimal tertentu dapat dijatuhi hukuman mati.