p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.147
P-Index
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies

Juridical analysis of the authority of judges to decide on sentencing cases from the perspective of proportionality and the principle of justice Simbolon, Citra Irwan; Fadlan, Fadlan; Jihad, Kaspol
Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): May
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jomaps.v1i2.1731

Abstract

Purpose: This research examines the legal regulation of judges’ authority in deciding sentencing cases through the lens of proportionality and the principle of justice, with a focus on the implementation, obstacles, and judicial efforts in the Batam District Court Class 1A. It aims to explore how judicial authority aligns with statutory provisions and societal expectations of fairness. Methodology/Approach: The study adopts a normative juridical method through literature review, complemented by an empirical juridical (sociological juridical) approach using field study. This combination provides both theoretical perspectives and empirical insights into judicial practices, creating a holistic understanding of the topic. Results/Findings: The findings indicate that the authority of judges to impose sentences is regulated under Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power and specifically Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In practice, judges at the Batam District Court Class 1A encounter several obstacles, including incomplete or absent witness testimonies and occasional internal conflicts among judicial panels. Such challenges often affect the decision-making process. However, judges continue to adhere to Article 183 as a guiding legal foundation in delivering verdicts. Conclusions: Although judicial authority in sentencing is legally well-established, its practical implementation faces obstacles. Ensuring proportionality and justice requires judges not only to apply statutory provisions but also to incorporate evolving societal values in their reasoning. Limitations: The study is limited to one court and specific cases, restricting generalizability across all Indonesian courts. Contribution: This research enriches discourse on judicial authority by integrating normative and empirical perspectives and offering practical recommendations for reinforcing proportionality and justice in judicial decision-making.
Juridical analysis of the authority of judges to decide on sentencing cases from the perspective of proportionality and the principle of justice Simbolon, Citra Irwan; Fadlan, Fadlan; Jihad, Kaspol
Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic and Practice Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): May
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jomaps.v1i2.1731

Abstract

Purpose: This research examines the legal regulation of judges’ authority in deciding sentencing cases through the lens of proportionality and the principle of justice, with a focus on the implementation, obstacles, and judicial efforts in the Batam District Court Class 1A. It aims to explore how judicial authority aligns with statutory provisions and societal expectations of fairness. Methodology/Approach: The study adopts a normative juridical method through literature review, complemented by an empirical juridical (sociological juridical) approach using field study. This combination provides both theoretical perspectives and empirical insights into judicial practices, creating a holistic understanding of the topic. Results/Findings: The findings indicate that the authority of judges to impose sentences is regulated under Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power and specifically Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. In practice, judges at the Batam District Court Class 1A encounter several obstacles, including incomplete or absent witness testimonies and occasional internal conflicts among judicial panels. Such challenges often affect the decision-making process. However, judges continue to adhere to Article 183 as a guiding legal foundation in delivering verdicts. Conclusions: Although judicial authority in sentencing is legally well-established, its practical implementation faces obstacles. Ensuring proportionality and justice requires judges not only to apply statutory provisions but also to incorporate evolving societal values in their reasoning. Limitations: The study is limited to one court and specific cases, restricting generalizability across all Indonesian courts. Contribution: This research enriches discourse on judicial authority by integrating normative and empirical perspectives and offering practical recommendations for reinforcing proportionality and justice in judicial decision-making.
Co-Authors Ade Kuncoro Ridwan Adhitia Adhitia Aliatul Hana, Nurul Aminah, Titik Andi Putra Pratama, Guswanda Andi Suhendra Andre Gunawan Andriani, Tania Puji Andrini, Annisa Rizky Anggara, Risky Apridony, Apridony Aris Munandar Arrofik, Arrofik Asfani, Rahimah Assa, Ambo Aulia, Sirrul Azanna, Dwitya Okky Azhar, Aditya Batubara, Putri Fadila Brawijaya, Noldi Bulan, Puti Lindung Bungasia Bungasia Chandra, Fernando Chikita, E. Arlinda Darwis Anatami Delviane, Annisa Dicky Erizon Dimas Putra Prihananto Doni Gusmardi Dwi Sahputra, Rifaldi Dwiretnani, Annisaa E. Arinda Chikita Eka Fitriana, Rosilia Eniyanti3, Eniyanti3 Erlys, Erlys Erniyanti Erniyanti Etty Sri Wahyuni Fadhil, Sayid Fadhila Fadhila Fadhila, Nurul Fadillah, Muhammad Haris Fadjriani, Lia FAJAR SETIAWAN Fernando, Ricky Septian Firdaus Firdaus Fitri Yanti Katili Fitria, Lailatul Gabriel Simson Tamba Gotama, Andri Guswanda Andi Putra Pratama H.M. Soerya Respationo Hamdi, Satria Harry Kurniawan Henry Aspan Idham Idham Idham Idham ika indriyani Indah Sugandi Indah Wijayanti, Titising Irawati Irawati Irfan Nofri Ismahani, Siti Istiyanto, Ryan Jemmy Rumengan Jihad, Kaspol Juhani, Hasan Bin Jumardin, Jumardin Khairunnisa Khairunnisa Kirtan, Tivonli Lia Fadjriani Lubis, Irfan Husein Lubis, Irpan Husein Mashalan, Fahima Muhammad Yadi Muhlis, Muhammad Yusuf Mukhti, Mukhti Muktashim Billah Mulyana, Hani Rizki Nabila Gelasia Herta Ananda Natalia Tampubolon, Sofia Ng, Paulus Jimmytheja Nur Harilda, Dhea Nur Indah Sari Arbit Nurkhotijah, Siti Panca Gunawan Harefa Parameshwara Parameshwara Parameshwara, Parameshwara Parroha Patar Siadari, Lagat Pasaribu, Juhrin Prameswari Annisa Putri Prasetiasari, Christiani Prasetyasari, Christiani Purba, Kezia Nur Elizanti Purwanti, M. M. Fajar Puspita Amanda, Belafida Putra, Randi Rian Putri, Delfia Diana Qisthy Leonarza Rahadi Pratama Rahmat Januar Noor Raja Zulkifli Ramadhan, Faris Ramon Nofrial Ramon Nofrial, Ramon Respationo, Soerya Revo Christanto Riza Rosalya Rohana, R Rosli, Rozaini Rudiyanto Rudiyanto Rumengan, Angelina E. Sabrina, Azra Batrisyia Salmanda, Dandi Sayid Fadhil Sembiring, Ibrahim Siadari Parohha, Lagat Siadari, Lagat Paroha Patar Simanjuntak, Victor Daniel Simbolon, Citra Irwan Sinaga, Gopal Gospel Siska Septiria Nosari Siswanto Siagian, Agus Sitanggang, Cansa Namira Siti Nurkhotijah Sitohang, Citra Permata Sri Wahyuni Suhendra Suhendra Sukirno, Yacobus Syaputra, Roni Tuti Herningtyas Washliati, Laily Washliaty, Laily Wawan Hermawan Wulandari, Dita Eli Yose Rizal Zulfiati, Ria