Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Khul' Menurut Imam Syafi'i dan Imam Hanbali: Mencari Relevansinya di Indonesia Edi Kurniawan; Ulul Albab Fadhlan; Illy Yanti
AL-HUKAMA Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : State Islamic University (UIN) of Sunan Ampel

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/alhukama.2020.10.1.150-170

Abstract

Khul' or divorce requested by a wife is one of the causes marital termination. According to Imam Syafi'i, khul' is a divorce (talak) with an 'iddah of three menstruat cycles. In contrast, for Imam Hanbali, khul' is fasakh in which its 'iddah is one menstrual cycle and its legality does not require a judge's decision. This difference has dissimilar legal implications when it is applied in Indonesia. Therefore, this article aims to seek the both relevancies in the context of Indonesian law, especially under the Compilation of Islamic Law and the nature of the religious practice of Indonesian Muslims. After examining the relevant literature sources, this article shows that, both Imam Syafi'i and Imam Hanbali agree that khul' is like a buy-sell contract, and hence a judge's decision is not required. However these both agremeents are not relevance under the Compilation of Islamic Laws, but the Imam Hanbali's fiqh in which khul' as fasakh would be difficult to seek its relevance. Thus, the fiqh of Imam Syafi'i is more appropriate, since beside it is used as a basis for the Compilation of Islamic Laws the majority of Indonesian Muslims embrace the Syafi’i mazhab.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Doen Pleger dan Dader Menurut Hukum Pidana Islam dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Widya Astuti; Ishaq Ishaq; Edi Kurniawan
JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC AND LAW STUDIES Vol 4, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Antasari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (58.004 KB) | DOI: 10.18592/jils.v4i1.3697

Abstract

Tulisan ini mendiskusikan pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap orang yang menyuruh untuk melakukan penganiayaan terhadap orang lain (doen pleger) dan atau orang yang disuruh (dader) menurut hukum pidana Islam dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). Kedua hukum ini bertujuan untuk menimbulkan efek jera kepada pelaku tindak pidana serta pengajaran kepada orang lain untuk tidak mengikutinya. Hanya saja, adanya perbedaan sumber hukum pada kedua hukum ini berimplikasi kepada perbedaan sanksi kepada doen pleger dan dader. Untuk mengungkap perbedaan sanski ini, tulisan ini menggunakan pendekatan kajian hukum perbandingan. Data-data didapatkan dari sumber kepustakaan yang relevan. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa dalam hukum Islam, doen pleger dikenakan hukuman taʻzir, sementara menurut KUHP sanksi kepada doen pleger sama dengan dader atau orang yang melakukannya. Perbedaan sanksi ini akibat perbedaan sumber keduanya, hukum Tuhan dan hukum manusia. Namun persamaannya terletak pada sama-sama memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku tindak pidana serta pengajaran kepada orang lain untuk tidak menirunya.
Distorsi Terhadap Maqasid Al-Syari‘ah Al-Syatibi di Indonesia Kurniawan, Edi
Al-Risalah Vol 18 No 2 (2018): December 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1287.186 KB) | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v18i2.301

Abstract

Distorsi artinya pemutarbalikan suatu fakta, aturan serta penyimpangan. Dihubungkan dengan maqāṣid al-syarīʿah al-Syāṭibī, maksudnya pemutarbalikan dan penyimpangan dalam mentafsir, mengguna dan menerapkan maqāṣid tersebut untuk tujuan tertentu. Tulisan ini mendiskusikan distorsi terhadap maqāṣid al-syarīʿah al-Syāṭibī di Indonesia. Sampelnya adalah Siti Musdah Mulia, Budhy Munawar Rachman dan Nasaruddin Umar. Untuk menguji distorsi tersebut, tulisan ini menggunakan analisis perbandingan. Tulisan ini menunjukkan bahwa distorsi terhadap maqāṣid al-syarīʿah al-Syāṭibī diakibatkan oleh sikap tidak amanah dalam menggunakan data, pandangan dunia (worldview) dan kerangka epistemologi (epestemic framework) yang bermasalah, dimana maqāṣid al-syarīʿah al-Syāṭibī dijadikan sebagai alat untuk membela lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT), atau untuk mempertahankan pandangan tentang pluralisme agama serta untuk meliberalkan kaidah al-ʿibrah bi maqāṣid al-syarīʿah lā bi ʿumūm al-naṣṣ aw bi khuṣūṣ al-sabab.
Early Marriage, Human Rights, and the Living Fiqh: A Maqasid al-Shariʻa Review Kurniawan, Edi; Handesman, Handesman; Rahmadi, Rahmadi; Najib, Khairun
Al-Risalah Vol 20 No 1 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (676.826 KB) | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v20i1.565

Abstract

Human rights activists and the educated urban society strongly criticize the practice of early marriage, including the classical fiqh on which it is based. They have repeatedly proposed amendments to article 7 of the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning age restrictions on marriage. This paper is a response to these groups’ views with the formulations, first, what are the factors and the problems of early marriage and their status in the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīʻa?; second, what worldview that projects the human rights activists’ criticism in the midst of living fiqh and maqāṣid al-sharīʻaʼs review on it? This paper is a combination of field and literary studies. Samples are taken from the living fiqh or the doctrine of Shāfiʻī School which exists in the Malay community of Tebo Ulu, Jambi Province and supported by relevant literature. This paper concludes that, in early marriage, the harms are far greater than the benefits. Hence, according to the holistic understanding of maqāṣid al-sharīʻa, the marriageable age needs to be regulated by law. However, the above groups’ criticism is not completely justifiable because early marriage is also closely related to the state's failure in improving the welfare of its citizens, providing educational facilities, as well as differences in worldview between human rights activists and article 284 of the Criminal Law Code on adultery and traditional customs of Malay and other Indonesia’s indigenous custom that need to be resolved.
The Islamization of Suku Anak Dalam in Jambi and Animism Claims: From Aqidah to Fiqh al-Salah Consolidation Alhusni, Alhusni; Kurniawan, Edi; Mulyatin, Prisma
Al-Risalah Vol 21 No 1 (2021): June 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1021.497 KB) | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v21i1.794

Abstract

This paper discusses the Islamization of Suku Anak Dalam (Jambi’s people of the jungle/the SAD) in Jambi as well as proves that the Islamization has moved from the realm of aqidah to the deepening of fiqh, especially fiqh al-ṣalāh, unlike previous researchers’ accusations who generalized that animism is still attached to the the SAD who have converted to Islam. This paper applies field study principles combining qualitative and quantitative research methods by applying sociocultural anthropology theory, with a research object being the SAD residing in Pelempang Village, Muaro Jambi. This paper concludes that SAD’s Islamization has succeeded in removing animist teachings that are not in line with Islamic values. However, SAD’s understanding of fiqh al-ṣalāh is still relatively low. This is due to a low level of education, inability to read and write, remote geographical locations, barriers between the SAD and other residents, and the absence of teachers of fiqh al-ṣalāh who teach actively and consistently in the area.
From the Debate on the Legality of Waqf al-Ahlī to its Implementation in Southeast Asia: Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore Pirmani, Ulfa; Kurniawan, Edi; Najmi
International Journal of Law and Society Vol 3 No 2 (2024): International Journal of Law and Society (IJLS)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijls.v3i2.81

Abstract

The debate on the heresy of waqf al-ahlī (family endowment) in the early 20th century significantly impacted its legality in Muslim countries. In Southeast Asia, with samples from Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore, they followed the majority opinion of ulama. They implemented it in the law to improve the management of waqf al-ahlī. This paper examines the legality of waqf al-ahlī from the perspective of fiqh and the Law and its implementation model in the three countries through extensive literature study. The results reveal that the debate on the legality of waqf al-ahlī is more influenced by socio-economic and political factors and misunderstandings about the purpose of waqf rather than theological considerations. Therefore, most Muslim scholars recognise this type of waqf, and it is implemented by most Muslim countries, including the three countries that are the objects of this study. Comparative analysis shows that Singapore achieves higher productivity and efficiency in managing waqf al-ahlī than Indonesia and Malaysia. These findings refute the view of waqf al-ahlī as heresy and emphasise the importance of good governance, a comprehensive legal framework, and efficient management to optimise the potential of waqf al-ahlī as an instrument of sustainable socio-economic development.
FROM HERETICAL FATWA TO JUDICIAL REVIEW: SALAFI, ULAMA, AND COMMUNAL CONFLICT IN ACEH Alhusni; Mustajab, Muhammad; Kurniawan, Edi
Penamas Vol 37 No 1 (2024): Volume 37, Issue 1, January-June 2024
Publisher : Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan Agama Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31330/penamas.v37i1.753

Abstract

The Salafi preaching style in Aceh has prompted a response from the Aceh Ulema Consultative Council (MPU/Majelis Permusyawaratan Ulama) through a heretical fatwa on several Salafi teachings leading to communal conflict in Aceh. This article analyzes the socio-political background of the fatwa’s emergence, its impact on socio-religious conflict in Aceh, and Salafists’ resistance through a judicial review of the MPU’s legality. Combining literature and field studies, this paper demonstrates that the socio-religious conflict between Salafists and Acehnese society stems from the former’s truth claims regarding khilāfiyya issues. This is evident in the Salafi preaching style, which criticizes and hereticates some traditional Acehnese Muslim practices, that generated antagonistic responses from the MPU, society, and the Aceh government. The conflict has intensified after Salafists challenged the MPU’s legality in the Supreme Court of Indonesia despite its decline, which further solidified opposition to Salafi teachings and led to their marginalization in Aceh. This paper recommends that promoting tolerance by both parties is essential to resolving the conflict.
Recent Studies on the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʻah of Abū Isḥāq al-Shāṭibī:: A Systematic Literature Review Kurniawan, Edi; Mustaniruddin, Ahmad; Rizani, Akhmad Kamil; Muchimah; Zaenuri, Ahmad; Muttaqin, Muhamad Zaenal
AJIS: Academic Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/ajis.v10i1.11282

Abstract

This article examines the recent studies on al-Shāṭibī's maqāṣid al-sharīʻah (the highest purpose of Islamic Law) through a systematic literature review covering the years 2018-2023. Despite the growing interest in al-Shāṭibī's maqāṣid al-sharīʻah in contemporary discourse, research on this topic remains uncharted and unquantified. This article seeks to address the knowledge gap by examining the strengths and weaknesses of current studies and identifying potential areas for future research. This article employs a systematic literature review (SLR) as its research methodology, examining 20 scholarly articles selected from 139. This article concludes that scholars have studied al-Shāṭibī's maqāṣid al-sharīʻah across various fields, including Law, fiqh, health, language, comparative methodology, daʻwah, Sunnah, and logic. However, these studies rely heavily on literature review methods, with little to no empirical data. Thus, the key novelty of this article lies in uncovering a persistent theoretical bias in current research on maqāṣid, which limits its relevance to real-world legal and social challenges. This finding reveals an urgent need for more applied research that bridges al-Shāṭibī's normative theories with contemporary societal dynamics. This article underscores an opportunity for further research to build on al-Shāṭibī's maqāṣid al-sharīʻah theory through empirical data and to investigate new issues, including technology, education, banking, and Islamic finance.
Ulema and Tolerance Fiqh: A Critical Examination of the 2024 MUI Fatwa Commission’s Ijtima’ on the Inter-Religious Relations Kurniawan, Edi; Yahya Shaykh Ahmad; Muhammad Romli Samae, Syarif Bin
Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation
Publisher : Pusat Kajian Moderasi Beragama dan Ideologi Pancasila UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/jrm.v4i1.98

Abstract

This article examines the construction of tolerance fiqh in the 2024 Resolution of the Ijtima' Nasional VIII of the Fatwa Commission of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI), which includes perspectives on interreligious relations, greetings across faiths, and tolerance in the context of religious festivities. The issuance of these guidelines is closely tied to Indonesia's religious diversity, requiring clear normative guidance and boundaries rooted in Islamic law to promote harmonious interfaith interaction. Therefore, this article looks at the ideas and boundaries of tolerance found in the guidelines by using the principles of maqāṣid al-sharīʻah (the higher goals of Islamic law) and fiqh al-aqalliyyāt (Islamic laws for minorities). It further explores the legal reasoning, normative structure, and socio-religious implications within Indonesia's pluralistic society. This literature-based study uses the 2024 resolution as the primary source, supported by secondary materials, including journals and classical works in fiqh and uṣūl al-fiqh. This article concludes that the guidelines for tolerance in Islamic law clearly separate beliefs, worship, and social interactions. This distinction allows for mutual respect and interfaith tolerance while upholding boundaries, such as prohibiting interreligious greetings, using religious symbols from other faiths, and participating in non-Muslim religious celebrations. The resolution thus maintains a firm commitment to ḥifẓ al-dīn (protection of religion) while providing measured flexibility in social engagement. This article contributes to developing a contextual and balanced Islamic legal methodology for managing religious diversity in Indonesia.
Viral Humanitarian Imagery: The Impact of #AllEyesonRafah on Global Social Media Dynamics Luhuringbudi, Teguh; Liza, Fitri; Kurniawan, Edi; Masuwd, Mowafg Abrahem; Alrumayh, Safa Husayn
Kalijaga Journal of Communication Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Communication and Islamic Broadcasting Study Program, Faculty of Da'wah and Communication, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/kjc.71.04.2025

Abstract

This study examines the impact of viral humanitarian imagery, focusing on the AI-generated image campaign with the hashtag #AllEyesonRafah on global social media dynamics. It explores how the imagery influences public awareness and encourages responses to humanitarian issues in Rafah, Palestine. The study aims to identify a pattern linking social media use to social mobilization driven by humanitarian imagery. Data were collected through analysis of digital content posted by public figures and humanitarian organizations, employing a qualitative approach informed by relevant communication theories. Primary sources included posts by public figures such as Bella Hadid, Ariana Grande, and Paramore, which significantly increased engagement. The analysis integrates three theories: Mark Granovetter’s Social Network Theory to examine the viral spread of AI-generated imagery on platforms like X, Instagram, and TikTok; Stuart Hall’s Representation Theory to analyze global public interpretations of these images; and Marshall McLuhan’s “Medium is the Message” Theory to assess how social media platforms and visual formats shape perception of the Rafah crisis. Findings indicate that viral humanitarian imagery not only raises awareness but also drives tangible global audiences. The study confirms social media’s role as an agent of social change, with its novelty lying in the detailed explanation of emotions in visual communication. The limitations of this study include the focus on one aspect of social media and the lack of longitudinal analysis, while suggestions for further research include a broader exploration of audience interactions and offline dimensions of similar phenomena.