Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Reconstruction Of The Jurisprudential-Maqāṣidī Method In The Division Of Joint Property In Polygamous Marriages In Indonesia Kemas Muhammad Gemilang; Jumni Nelli; Rahman Alwi; Mohammad Abdi Almaktsur; Mardiana Mardiana; Alief Akbar Musaddad
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21205

Abstract

The division of joint marital property in polygamous marriages cannot always be resolved by applying the chronology of marriage as stated in Article 94 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). In practice, assets may be mixed, transformed, reinvested, increased in value, or used across more than one household, while the parties’ contributions may be material or non-material. This article reconstructs a jurisprudential-maqāṣidī method for adjudicating such disputes by systematizing judicial reasoning and evaluating it through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the Marriage Law, the KHI, and selected court decisions on joint property and polygamy; secondary materials consist of scholarly works on marital property, judicial discretion, substantive justice, and Islamic family-law reform. Legal materials were collected through document study and analyzed qualitatively-prescriptively by identifying legal norms, mapping legally relevant facts, extracting ratio decidendi, comparing patterns of judicial reasoning, and testing those patterns against maqāṣidī parameters. The analysis shows that Article 94 KHI provides a necessary normative foundation but not an operational method for tracing transformed or mixed assets and evaluating unequal contributions. Judicial reasoning, particularly Supreme Court Decision No. 266 K/AG/2010, demonstrates that a mechanical one-half division may be corrected when evidence shows substantial inequality in contribution and fulfilment of maintenance obligations. This article reconstructs those dispersed considerations into five stages: normative classification, asset tracing and transformation analysis, contribution assessment, controlled correction of mechanical division, and maqāṣidī justification. The novelty lies not merely in combining jurisprudence and maqāṣid, but in converting case-specific judicial considerations into a systematic decision-making procedure with objective limits on judicial discretion.
Pemeliharaan Anak dan Perwalian Tinjauan Hukum Islam di Indonesia Mhd Syahrizan; Jumni Nelli
Bertuah: Jurnal Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Bertuah: Jurnal Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Datuk Laksemana Bengkalis, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56633/jsie.v6i2.1269

Abstract

Anak merupakan anugerah sekaligus amanah dari Allah Swt. yang harus dijaga dan dipenuhi hak-haknya, baik dalam hal kasih sayang, pendidikan, maupun kesejahteraan hidupnya. Dalam Islam, pemeliharaan anak (hadhanah) dan perwalian (wilayah) memiliki peran yang sangat penting dalam memastikan bahwa anak tumbuh dalam lingkungan yang baik dan mendapatkan hak-haknya sesuai dengan syariat Islam. Hadhanah adalah hak dan kewajiban orang tua atau pihak lain yang bertanggung jawab atas pengasuhan, pendidikan, dan pemenuhan kebutuhan dasar anak, terutama ketika anak masih berada dalam usia belum baligh. Dalam Islam, ibu lebih diutamakan dalam pemeliharaan anak, terutama bagi anak yang masih kecil, kecuali jika terdapat alasan yang menghalanginya, seperti ketidakmampuan atau kondisi lain yang merugikan anak. Wilayah atau perwalian adalah tanggung jawab seorang wali dalam mengurus kepentingan anak, baik dalam aspek kehidupan sehari-hari maupun dalam urusan hukum, seperti pernikahan dan pengelolaan harta. Wali yang paling utama adalah ayah, kemudian kakek dari pihak ayah, dan seterusnya sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam fikih Islam.
Reconstruction Of The Jurisprudential-Maqāṣidī Method In The Division Of Joint Property In Polygamous Marriages In Indonesia Kemas Muhammad Gemilang; Jumni Nelli; Rahman Alwi; Mohammad Abdi Almaktsur; Mardiana Mardiana; Alief Akbar Musaddad
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 5 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i5.21205

Abstract

The division of joint marital property in polygamous marriages cannot always be resolved by applying the chronology of marriage as stated in Article 94 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). In practice, assets may be mixed, transformed, reinvested, increased in value, or used across more than one household, while the parties’ contributions may be material or non-material. This article reconstructs a jurisprudential-maqāṣidī method for adjudicating such disputes by systematizing judicial reasoning and evaluating it through maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. This normative legal research applies statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials consist of the Marriage Law, the KHI, and selected court decisions on joint property and polygamy; secondary materials consist of scholarly works on marital property, judicial discretion, substantive justice, and Islamic family-law reform. Legal materials were collected through document study and analyzed qualitatively-prescriptively by identifying legal norms, mapping legally relevant facts, extracting ratio decidendi, comparing patterns of judicial reasoning, and testing those patterns against maqāṣidī parameters. The analysis shows that Article 94 KHI provides a necessary normative foundation but not an operational method for tracing transformed or mixed assets and evaluating unequal contributions. Judicial reasoning, particularly Supreme Court Decision No. 266 K/AG/2010, demonstrates that a mechanical one-half division may be corrected when evidence shows substantial inequality in contribution and fulfilment of maintenance obligations. This article reconstructs those dispersed considerations into five stages: normative classification, asset tracing and transformation analysis, contribution assessment, controlled correction of mechanical division, and maqāṣidī justification. The novelty lies not merely in combining jurisprudence and maqāṣid, but in converting case-specific judicial considerations into a systematic decision-making procedure with objective limits on judicial discretion.