Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
7.148
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Demokrasi Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) JURNAL KEPEMIMPINAN DAN PENGURUSAN SEKOLAH Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Skala Kesehatan Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Law_Jurnal UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Journal of Social Research Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Delicti : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi Lareh Law Review Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Aspiration of Health Journal
Ismansyah Ismansyah
Universitas Andalas
Religion Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 73 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam

 1 
PERANAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI (SYÂHID) TERHADAP SUATU PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN PIHAK DALAM AKTA NOTARIS (Studi Perkara Nomor 269/Pid.B/2015/PN.PDG) Dia Ikhsan; Ismansyah Ismansyah
Alhurriyah Vol 4, No 1 (2019): Januari-Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (748.648 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v4i1.1438

Abstract

Notary is one of the general officers authorized to create an authentic deed and other authorities as intended in the law. Notary  can be called as a notary as a witness, suspect and accused in the event of an act against the law of the Outentic deed made in a notary public. The problem in this writing is 1) the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the parties in Notarial deed and 2) the judgment of judges in the verdict No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the party in notarial deed.  The research method used is a method of normative juridical approach empirical. The result of the study of notarial roles as witnesses of the Act against the law by the party in notarial deed came to fulfill the call as a witness in the interest of an investigation, a notary called for investigation Must be approved by the notary Honorary assembly and give information on what is provided by the Parties both oral and written in writing. Notary is called and needs his presence in the examination of criminal matters, in capacity as a general officer who makes authentic deed, it is necessary for his testimony of what is seen, heard and supporting evidence in the creation of authentic deeds The criminal matter, 2) the judgment of judges in the Decree No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law conducted by the party in Notarial deed is a notary only as a witness called the court to be heard his description of the conduct of the law Done by the defendant is about the forgery of the SS signatures to make the letter of authorization selling and besides notary also called a witness from the notary party who is a witness in the making of the selling power deed.
Notary’s Responsibility in Making of Deed Due to Land Acquisition Containing Criminal Corruption Yogi Maron; Ismansyah Ismansyah; Azmi Fendri
Alhurriyah Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (566.164 KB) | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2331

Abstract

 As happened to the Notary Eli SatriaPilo, S.H, Mkn, who was appointed as the Notary who made the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the Land Acquisition activities for the Construction of Campus III of the State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Padang which was located in Sungai Bangek District, Padang in 2010. The method used was descriptive, in which describing the applicable legislation associated with legal theory in the facts and realities about the Notary’s Responsibility in Making Deed of Land Acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang in Sungai Bangek. This study used a Normative Juridical approach, in which researching by using and processing secondary data or literature related to the study. The data collected were in the form of primary data obtained from the District Court of Padang, secondary data obtained from secondary legal materials and primary legal materials. Based on the study, it was found that the role of Notary Eli Satria Pilo, in the land acquisition of campus III IAIN was proven to have misused the authority resulting in violation of the Notary Ethics Code and was responsible for accepting termination disrespectfully. Furthermore, he was also shown to be committing a Criminal Corruption made based on the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the land acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang, so that the State incurred losses of Rp. 1.946.701.050 (one billion nine hundred forty-six million seven hundred one thousand and fifty rupiahs). And he was responsible for receiving and carrying out the sentence that had been handed down by the District Court of Padang, a prison sentence of 4 (four) years, and paying a fine of Rp. 200.000.000 (two hundred million rupiahs). 
PERANAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI (SYÂHID) TERHADAP SUATU PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN PIHAK DALAM AKTA NOTARIS (Studi Perkara Nomor 269/Pid.B/2015/PN.PDG) Ikhsan, Dia; Ismansyah, Ismansyah
Alhurriyah Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Januari-Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v4i1.1438

Abstract

Notary is one of the general officers authorized to create an authentic deed and other authorities as intended in the law. Notary  can be called as a notary as a witness, suspect and accused in the event of an act against the law of the Outentic deed made in a notary public. The problem in this writing is 1) the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the parties in Notarial deed and 2) the judgment of judges in the verdict No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the party in notarial deed.  The research method used is a method of normative juridical approach empirical. The result of the study of notarial roles as witnesses of the Act against the law by the party in notarial deed came to fulfill the call as a witness in the interest of an investigation, a notary called for investigation Must be approved by the notary Honorary assembly and give information on what is provided by the Parties both oral and written in writing. Notary is called and needs his presence in the examination of criminal matters, in capacity as a general officer who makes authentic deed, it is necessary for his testimony of what is seen, heard and supporting evidence in the creation of authentic deeds The criminal matter, 2) the judgment of judges in the Decree No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law conducted by the party in Notarial deed is a notary only as a witness called the court to be heard his description of the conduct of the law Done by the defendant is about the forgery of the SS signatures to make the letter of authorization selling and besides notary also called a witness from the notary party who is a witness in the making of the selling power deed.
Notary’s Responsibility in Making of Deed Due to Land Acquisition Containing Criminal Corruption Maron, Yogi; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Fendri, Azmi
Alhurriyah Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2331

Abstract

 As happened to the Notary Eli SatriaPilo, S.H, Mkn, who was appointed as the Notary who made the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the Land Acquisition activities for the Construction of Campus III of the State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Padang which was located in Sungai Bangek District, Padang in 2010. The method used was descriptive, in which describing the applicable legislation associated with legal theory in the facts and realities about the Notary’s Responsibility in Making Deed of Land Acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang in Sungai Bangek. This study used a Normative Juridical approach, in which researching by using and processing secondary data or literature related to the study. The data collected were in the form of primary data obtained from the District Court of Padang, secondary data obtained from secondary legal materials and primary legal materials. Based on the study, it was found that the role of Notary Eli Satria Pilo, in the land acquisition of campus III IAIN was proven to have misused the authority resulting in violation of the Notary Ethics Code and was responsible for accepting termination disrespectfully. Furthermore, he was also shown to be committing a Criminal Corruption made based on the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the land acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang, so that the State incurred losses of Rp. 1.946.701.050 (one billion nine hundred forty-six million seven hundred one thousand and fifty rupiahs). And he was responsible for receiving and carrying out the sentence that had been handed down by the District Court of Padang, a prison sentence of 4 (four) years, and paying a fine of Rp. 200.000.000 (two hundred million rupiahs). 
PERANAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI (SYÂHID) TERHADAP SUATU PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN PIHAK DALAM AKTA NOTARIS (Studi Perkara Nomor 269/Pid.B/2015/PN.PDG) Ikhsan, Dia; Ismansyah, Ismansyah
Alhurriyah Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Januari-Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v4i1.1438

Abstract

Notary is one of the general officers authorized to create an authentic deed and other authorities as intended in the law. Notary  can be called as a notary as a witness, suspect and accused in the event of an act against the law of the Outentic deed made in a notary public. The problem in this writing is 1) the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the parties in Notarial deed and 2) the judgment of judges in the verdict No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the party in notarial deed.  The research method used is a method of normative juridical approach empirical. The result of the study of notarial roles as witnesses of the Act against the law by the party in notarial deed came to fulfill the call as a witness in the interest of an investigation, a notary called for investigation Must be approved by the notary Honorary assembly and give information on what is provided by the Parties both oral and written in writing. Notary is called and needs his presence in the examination of criminal matters, in capacity as a general officer who makes authentic deed, it is necessary for his testimony of what is seen, heard and supporting evidence in the creation of authentic deeds The criminal matter, 2) the judgment of judges in the Decree No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law conducted by the party in Notarial deed is a notary only as a witness called the court to be heard his description of the conduct of the law Done by the defendant is about the forgery of the SS signatures to make the letter of authorization selling and besides notary also called a witness from the notary party who is a witness in the making of the selling power deed.
Notary’s Responsibility in Making of Deed Due to Land Acquisition Containing Criminal Corruption Maron, Yogi; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Fendri, Azmi
Alhurriyah Vol 5 No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2331

Abstract

 As happened to the Notary Eli SatriaPilo, S.H, Mkn, who was appointed as the Notary who made the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the Land Acquisition activities for the Construction of Campus III of the State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Padang which was located in Sungai Bangek District, Padang in 2010. The method used was descriptive, in which describing the applicable legislation associated with legal theory in the facts and realities about the Notary’s Responsibility in Making Deed of Land Acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang in Sungai Bangek. This study used a Normative Juridical approach, in which researching by using and processing secondary data or literature related to the study. The data collected were in the form of primary data obtained from the District Court of Padang, secondary data obtained from secondary legal materials and primary legal materials. Based on the study, it was found that the role of Notary Eli Satria Pilo, in the land acquisition of campus III IAIN was proven to have misused the authority resulting in violation of the Notary Ethics Code and was responsible for accepting termination disrespectfully. Furthermore, he was also shown to be committing a Criminal Corruption made based on the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the land acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang, so that the State incurred losses of Rp. 1.946.701.050 (one billion nine hundred forty-six million seven hundred one thousand and fifty rupiahs). And he was responsible for receiving and carrying out the sentence that had been handed down by the District Court of Padang, a prison sentence of 4 (four) years, and paying a fine of Rp. 200.000.000 (two hundred million rupiahs). 
Co-Authors Ajang, Yupiter Anton Luter Apred Zenegger, Tigor Ardyan, Ardyan Aria Zurnetti, Aria Awilda Awilda Awilda, Awilda Azmi Fendri Bahary, Syamsul Berliana Suzeta Budiyanto Budiyanto Cantiqa, Karenina Dea Tri Afrida Dia Ikhsan Edita Elda Elwi Danil Fadhillah Sabri Fadillah Sabri Firmansyah Firmansyah Frana Andrianur Gerry Jardan Habibiellah Huda Harisa, Yossi Henni Muchtar Hidayat, Zulfian Hidayatullah, Tri Andika Ikhsan, Dia Indah Eka Putri Indy Zhafira Jardan, Gerry Jhon Tyson Pelawi Kevin Regianda Khairani Khairani Khairul Fahmi Khofifah Kusuma Wardani Kusuma Wardani, Khofifah Luter, Anton Marlina Marlina Maron, Yogi Maulani, Reza Sri Muhammad Yamin Lubis, Muhammad Yamin Mukhti, Putri Cempaka Mursalin, Adinda Faradilla Muslihannisa Muslihannisa Nanda, Novitra Nani Mulyati Nidya Sari, Tri Novitra Nanda Nur Afdhaliyah Nur Afdhaliyah Nursyahid Siregar Otong Rosadi Pratama, Yuda Amgu Purwantoro Agung Sulistyo Ramli Ramli Reza Sri Maulani Rias, A. Irzal Ridwan Rinaldi Sarza Rully, Jodie Angelia Sari, Santi Kumala Sarza, Rinaldi Satya Marta Ruhiyat Siska Elvandari Sitohang, Yeni Maria Rosalina Sofyan, Syofirman Subardy, Muhammad Rizky Suharizal, Suharizal Sukmareni Sukmareni, Sukmareni Susi Delmiati Suzeta, Berliana Syofiarti, Syofiarti Syofirman Syofyan Tri Andika Hidayatullah Wicaksana, Maharani Adhyaksantari Yasniwati, Yasniwati Yetti, Hafiza Yogi Maron Yoserwan Yoserwan Yoserwan Yoserwan, Yoserwan Yudari, Laras Yunita Eka Putri Yunita Eka Putri Zainul Daulay Zhafira, Indy