Articles
<![CDATA[Medical Negligence Dispute Settlement in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Deri Mulyadi1 , Elwi Danil2 , Wila Chandrawila3 , Kurnia Warman2]]>
<![CDATA[ Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 14 No. 4 (2020): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12304
<![CDATA[The doctor-patient relationship has a specificity that distinguishes it from the business actor relationship.Malpractice is a very general term. Medical malpractice, medical negligence, and medical risk are notregulated in Indonesia and requires medical knowledge to understand them. This is where the difficulty ofproving negligence and medical risk in solving medical negligence disputes. Medical negligence disputes inIndonesia are settled by litigation (criminal and civil) and non-litigation. Non-litigation medical negligencedispute settlement is a breakthrough in resolving medical negligence disputes in Indonesia, namely mediationand the Indonesian Honorary Medical Disciplinary Council or Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin KedokteranIndonesia (MKDKI). This study revealed that there are no clear rules regarding medical negligence, medicalrisk, and medical dispute resolution to produce identical rules based on structure, substance, and culture.The settlement of medical negligence disputes through mediation is an alternative in resolving medicalnegligence disputes in Indonesia to allow for legal certainty and legal protection for doctors and patients.]]>
<![CDATA[Protective Strategies for the Ownership of Traditional Medicine Knowledge ]]>
<![CDATA[Zainul Daulay1 , Kurnia Warman2]]>
<![CDATA[ Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 14 No. 4 (2020): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12305
<![CDATA[This paper discusses the ownership of traditional medicine knowledge by drawing empirical data on theexperience of the indigenous communities in Mentawai, Indonesia, and Sabah, Malaysia. For a long time,the acquisition of traditional medicine knowledge and the treatment of patients has been deemed the resultof cultural heritage handed down from generation to generation. However, the complexity of the knowledgeacquisition process and the skill displayed by the healer or kerei prove that traditional medicine knowledgequalifies as intellectual property. An appropriate protection strategy is identified based on the traditionalknowledge ownership map in indigenous communities. This study reveals that not every traditional medicineknowledge and practices are “common properties”. Therefore, the study suggests that traditional medicineknowledge, like any other intellectual properties, must be protected through intellectual property rights notonly to protect the cultural and economic rights of indigenous people but also to protect the environment.]]>
<![CDATA[JUDGE’S DECISION ON WORK TERMINATION DISPUTE IN INDONESIA AFTER CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 37/PUU-IX/2011 ]]>
<![CDATA[Neni Vesna Madjid]]>;
<![CDATA[Saldi Isra]]>;
<![CDATA[Kurnia Warman]]>;
<![CDATA[Mardenis Mardenis]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 18, No 2 (2018) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.2.2029
<![CDATA[Testing the provision of Article 155 section (2) Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower has been decided by the Constitutional Court (CC) through decision Number 37/PUU/IX/2011. Prior to the Constitutional Court decision, there are many various interpretations of undetermined clause. The Constitutional Court firmly states that the undetermined clause must be interpreted as “having a permanent legal force ".This study aims to analyze how the judges dismissed dispute of work termination cases in Indonesia after the decision. The research applied juridical normative method by using secondary data literature such as legal documents, previous studies and other references which are relevant to the judges' decision within the Supreme Court after the Constitutional Court decision. Based on the analysis temporary result, the judges within the Supreme Court in 3 regions (Padang, Pekanbaru and Jakarta Pusat) and the Supreme Court itself are not practically guided by the Constitutional Court decision. It obviously results in the lack of legal certainty for the parties, especially workers.Keyword: Constitutional Court, Industrial Relation Court, Interpretation, Supreme Court.]]>
<![CDATA[POLA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH ULAYAT DI SUMATERA BARAT (Sengketa antara Masyarakat vs Pemerintah) ]]>
<![CDATA[Kurnia Warman & Syofiarti]]>
<![CDATA[ Masalah-Masalah Hukum Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 41, Nomor 3, Tahun 2012 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (3157.064 KB)
|
DOI: 10.14710/mmh.41.3.2012.407-415
<![CDATA[Abstract Using of communal land by private enterprise has been also creating disputes in West Sumatra. The disputes are started from the unprocedure land procurement process. According to the law of land procurement in Indonesia, for getting land, a private enterprise should contact the land owners (or traditional communities) as the subject of communal land for making contract directly. As a matter of fact, they have got the land from the Local Government not from the people. The communities protested to the corporate activities on their land. Beside that, the private enterprises have got agrement with communities, but they did not follow it, for instance building plasma plantation for the communities. Key Word: disputes of communal land Abstrak Penggunaan tanah ulayat oleh para investor di Sumatera Barat, seringkali menimbulkan sengketa. Hal ini disebabkan karena penggunaannya tidak sesuai dengan yang seharusnya. Menurut hukum pertanahan di Indonesia, penggunaan lahan oleh para investor harus berhadapan langsung dengan pemilik tanah atau masyarakat adat sebagai pemilik hak ulayat dengan melaksanakan perjanjian. Pada kenyataannya, para investor justru langsung mendapatkan tanah tersebut melalui Pemerintah. Akibatnya masyarakat sebagai pemilik mengajukan protes atas kegiatan investor di atas tanah mereka yang kemudian hal ini memicu timbulnya sengketa tanah ulayat. Kata Kunci : sengketa tanah ulayat]]>
<![CDATA[PELATIHAN PENYUSUNAN PERATURAN NAGARI DI NAGARI SUNGAI BULUH TIMUR KECAMATAN BATANG ANAI ]]>
<![CDATA[Syofiarti Syofiarti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pengabdian Warta Andalas Vol 25 No 1 (2018): Warta Pengabdian Andalas ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Andalas ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This article discusses the activities of the Nagari Rule Drafting Training in Nagari Sungai Buluh TimurKecamatan Batang Anai. From this activity revealed that there is still no understanding of nagari device inarranging Nagari Regulation. This is because that Nagari Sungai Buluh Timur is a new nagari ofpemekaran. So far, the existing nagari regulation only regulates the general matters only and has nottouched upon the special case in accordance with the meaning of regional autonomy. In this training themethod used is to provide a basic knowledge of the formation of the nagari rules and training on theprocedures for the formation of the nagari rules. The nagari regulations are made according to the needsof the nagari by forming small groups. The implementation of this activity received a very enthusiastic response from the nagari device. At the end of the activity between the participants with the Bagian HAN of the Faculty of Law Unand gave birth to a part commitment to accompany the coming arrangement of the next Nagari Sungai Buluh Timur.]]>
<![CDATA[POLA HUBUNGAN HUKUM DALAM PEMANFAATAN TANAH ULAYAT DI SUMATERA BARAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Kurnia Warman]]>;
<![CDATA[Hengki Andora]]>
<![CDATA[ Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 26, No 3 (2014) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (339.038 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16031
<![CDATA[Communal land is the identity of indigenous communities whose existence is protected by the Constitution. Customary land is not only used for the purposes of indigenous peoples, but also exploited by the outsiders. This study examines how the pattern of the legal relationship between the indigenous people and to outsiders by using socio-legal research. This study was conducted in West Sumatera by limiting the study to the four natural resource sectors, namely plantations, water resources, mining and forestry. The results of this study indicate that the legal relationships that are not obvious to trigger disputes between indigenous people and outsiders. Tanah ulayat merupakan identitas masyarakat hukum adat yang diakui dan dilindungi keberadaannya oleh UUD 1945. Tanah ulayat tidak hanya digunakan untuk keperluan masyarakat hukum adat, namun juga dimanfaatkan oleh pihak luar. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana pola hubungan hukum antara masyarakat hukum adat dengan pihak luar dalam pemanfaatan tanah ulayat dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Penelitian ini dilakukan di Sumatera Barat dengan membatasi kajian pada 4 (empat) sektor sumberdaya alam, yaitu perkebunan, sumberdaya air, pertambangan dan kehutanan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ketidakjelasan hubungan hukum menjadi pemicu munculnya sengketa antara masyarakat hukum adat dengan pihak luar di dalam pemanfaatan tanah ulayat.]]>
<![CDATA[PROCUREMENT OF ULAYAT LAND FOR SUBSIDED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT IN HARAU DISTRICT LIMA PULUH KOTA REGENCY ]]>
<![CDATA[Inggir Deviandari]]>;
<![CDATA[Kurnia Warman]]>;
<![CDATA[Zefrizal Nurdin]]>
<![CDATA[ JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 7, No 1 (2021): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[STIH Putri Maharaja ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33760/jch.v7i1.416
<![CDATA[Ulayat rights are the rights that owned by a legal alliance, where the citizens of the community have the right to control the land. The Regional Regulation of West Sumatra Province, Article 2 paragraph (1) Number 6 of 2008 concerning Communal Land and Its Utilization states that the main principle of customary land is permanent based on the Minangkabau traditional philosophy “jua ndak makan bali, gadai ndak makan sando” (shall not bargaining; may not be pawned). The provisions of the regulation state that ulayat land may not be traded and may not be pawned, its ownership status may not change, except for importunate situation and condition, namely maik tabujua dalam rumah (for the death of family member), gadih gadang ndak balaki (wedding), rumah gadang katirisan (misfortune), mambangkik Batang tarandam (efforts to enforce). Land acquisition for the construction of subsidized housing is not a land acquisition according to Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Procurement for Public Interest. The formulation of the problems discussed are first, the process of acquiring communal land for the construction of subsidized housing in Harau District, Lima Puluh Kota Regency, secondly the land registration process after the acquisition of customary land occurs, thirdly the legal consequences of acquiring customary land used for the construction of subsidized housing in Harau District, Lima Regency. Dozens of Cities againts customary law communities. This study uses an empirical juridical approach with the aim of finding out whether the law in the book is in accordance with the law in action. The results of the research study indicate that the process of acquiring communal land for the construction of subsidized housing is carried out by buying and selling. The construction of subsidized housing is managed by a legal entity in the form of a Limited Liability Company. The status of land ownership is just as the user of the facility that called with Hak Guna Bangunan]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBUATAN AKTA PEMBAGIAN HAK BERSAMA DALAM PERALIHAN TANAH KARENA PEWARISAN DI KOTA BUKITTINGGI ]]>
<![CDATA[Beatrix Benni]]>;
<![CDATA[Kurniawarman Kurniawarman]]>;
<![CDATA[Anisa Rahman]]>
<![CDATA[ JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 5, No 1 (2019): JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[STIH Putri Maharaja ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (304.747 KB)
|
DOI: 10.33760/jch.v5i1.175
<![CDATA[The analysis of Article 51 PP 24/1997 explains the registration of the transfer of rights as yet there is no inheritance distribution, so that the inheritance is still in joint ownership, when the right holders agree to share their rights into the rights of each right holder then inheritance based on a joint rights deed made by PPAT. Article 111 paragraph (4) and paragraph 5 PMNA / KBN 3/1997 explain that at the time of registration of the transfer of rights if the heirs agree to give rights to inherited land to one person, it can be proven by deed of deed in the form of deed Notary or in the form deed under the hand. Implementation in Bukittinggi, registration of the transfer of rights cannot use the deed of distribution of inheritance which is carried out in conjunction with the process of inheritance but must be based on the deed of distribution of joint rights made by PPAT. The research issue raised in this article is to find out how the drafting of sharing of joint rights in the transfer of land due to inheritance? how is the distribution of inheritance to land as a joint asset in the family? The approach used by researchers is an Empirical Juridical approach. The results showed that the sharing of shared rights was made with a joint deed of rights distribution by PPAT with due observance to the provisions of Article 51 of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997. Distribution of inheritance to land as shared assets in the family in the city of Bukittinggi was based on an agreement between the heirs to give up their rights - however, as to who the heirs are entitled to, the land is based on the Civil Code applicable to the testator.]]>
<![CDATA[KEANEKARAGAMAN DALAM KESATUAN HUKUM: MODEL INTERAKSI HUKUM ADAT DAN HUKUM NEGARA DALAM HUKUM AGRARIA (STUDI KASUS DI SUMATERA BARAT) ]]>
<![CDATA[KURNIA WARMAN]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Media Hukum Vol 16, No 1 (2009): Juni ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.18196/jmh.v16i1.15470
<![CDATA[The regulation on agrarian resources can not be separated from adat law since they are located in the area where adat community lives. The lowest is their regulation by the state law, the greatest is the possibility for the adat law to fill in the substance of the regulation. The decentralization policy has opened the possibility for the local people to actualize the local adat law values through the legal products in the local area. This research studies the implementation of the actualization of the local values in the agrarian regulation in West Sumatra which is one of the areas which has a relatively strong adat law. Beside the implementation of adat law through the judicial process, this research is also focused on the integration between adat law and state law through the local legal products from the province level until the nagari (village) level. Based on the above considerations, the objective of the research is focused on three problems. They are: the first, how is the interaction between adat law and state law in the regulation of agrarian resources in West Sumatra before the era of decentralization? The second, how is the interaction between adat law and state law in the regulation of agrarian resources in West Sumatra in the era of decentralization, especially in the implementation of the system of nagari government? The third, how is the form of the integration between adat law and state law in pursuing the real legal certainty in agrarian sector?]]>
<![CDATA[PERAN SERTA MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN PADA KEGIATAN PERTAMBANGAN UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN PEMBANGUNAN BERKELANJUTAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Syofiarti Syofiarti]]>
<![CDATA[ Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2022): Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24246/jrh.2022.v7.i1.p19-36
<![CDATA[Tulisan ini mengkaji tentang peran serta masyarakat pada kegiatan tambang. Di satu sisi tambang memberikan keuntungan bagi pendapatan negara, di sisi lain berdampak pada lingkungan dan masyarakat. Karenanya kegiatan tambang seharusnya melibatkan masyarakat yang terkena imbas dari kegiatan. Lahirnya UU No. 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan UU No. 4 Tahun 2009 dan UU No.11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja semakin membatasi ruang bagi masyarakat untuk berperan serta dalam pengambilan keputusan, yakni pembatasan pada; penetapan wilayah tambang, AMDAL, dan perizinan. Ini merupakan bentuk pengabaian terhadap prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan pada Pasal 10 Deklarasi Rio yaitu democracy and public participation. Untuk itu seharusnya regulasi yang ada memberikan penguatan terhadap peran serta masyarakat dalam pengambilan keputusan pada kegiatan tambang. Adanya penguatan peran serta masyarakat merupakan bentuk penerapan hukum yang responsif, dimana hukum harus mampu menyerap aspirasi masyarakat luas serta mampu mengakomodasikan kebutuhan masyarakat dan bukan dibuat untuk kepentingan segelintir para elit. Disamping itu perlu juga diatur tentang; hak gugat masyarakat, penguatan peran serta masyarakat hukum adat, dan hak gugat warga negara.]]>
