Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Research Trends: Argument Driven Inquiry (ADI) Model in Science Learning Anggita Meilina Putri; Endang Purwaningsih; Purbo Suwasono; Muhammad Ikhbar Ihsan; Monika Ruth Cahayana; Kafa Pramitha Anggraini Indhira Artanti
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 12 No 3 (2026)
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v12i3.14184

Abstract

This study aims to analyze research trends regarding the Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) model in science education. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted using the Scopus database, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. From an initial 20 records identified, 11 high quality original articles published between 2019 and 2025 met the strict inclusion criteria. The findings indicate that while publication numbers appear to fluctuate, this is largely attributed to ongoing data indexing for the year 2025 rather than a decline in academic interest. The ADI model is most frequently implemented at the secondary school level, particularly in Physics and Chemistry. Results demonstrate that ADI significantly enhances scientific argumentation, conceptual mastery, and critical thinking. Furthermore, technical modifications such as rADI and MADI have proven effective in addressing diverse student needs and classroom constraints. In conclusion, ADI serves as a robust framework for 21st-century science learning, though future research must prioritize long-term sustainability studies and teacher professional development to ensure successful implementation across broader educational contexts.
Pengaruh model pembelajaran problem-based learning (PBL) dipadu dengan group investigation (GI) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada pelajaran fisika Aurelia Astria L. Jewaru; Purbo Suwasono; Asim Asim
Berkala Fisika Indonesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisika, Pembelajaran dan Aplikasinya Vol. 12 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/bfi-jifpa.v12i2.20338

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa yang menggunakan model PBL-GI terhadap siswa yang menggunakan model PBL. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan jenis quasi-experiment, Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Sampel penelitian berasal dari siswa kelas XI IPA SMAN 2 Malang tahun pelajaran 2018/2019 yang dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Diperoleh kelas XI IPA 4 sebagai kelas eksperimen (KE) dan XI IPA 3 sebagai kelas kontrol (KK). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa pada kelas PBL-GI (KE) lebih tinggi dari siswa kelas PBL (KK). Hal ini dibuktikan dengan uji-t, diperoleh thitung = 3,021 dengan Sig. = 0,002.
POLA DAN KESENJANGAN INTEGRASI PBL, STEAM, DAN METACOGNITIVE PROMPTS TERHADAP BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA Maharani, Novemia; Parno, Parno; Suwasono, Purbo; Hartatiek, Hartatiek
EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Vol 11 No 2 (2026): EduFisika: Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Volume 11 Nomor 2 August 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika FKIP Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59052/bjvbrs47

Abstract

This systematic literature review maps and synthesizes empirical evidence on Problem Based Learning (PBL), STEAM/STEM, and metacognitive prompts in relation to students’ critical thinking skills. Guided by the PRISMA 2020 framework, studies were retrieved from Scopus and screened through identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion stages, resulting in 31 empirical articles published between 2021 and 2025. The findings show an increasing publication trend peaking in 2024, with secondary-school contexts and quasi-experimental designs predominating. PBL was the most frequently represented component (64.5%), followed by STEAM/STEM (41.9%) and metacognitive strategies (12.9%). Most studies reported positive contributions to critical thinking through distinct mechanisms: PBL through problem-solving, STEAM/STEM through interdisciplinary learning, and metacognitive strategies through regulation of thinking processes. However, none of the 31 studies simultaneously integrated PBL, STEAM/STEM, and metacognitive prompts with critical thinking within a coherent learning design. This finding reveals a clear empirical gap and supports the development and validation of an integrated PBL–STEAM model supported by metacognitive prompts, particularly for secondary science and physics education.