Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.86
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Legalitas Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Novelty PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Hasanuddin Law Review JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Jurnal Ners Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Collegium Studiosum Journal Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Perspektif Hukum Hang Tuah Law Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Etika Kesehatan (JHEK) Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian dan Inovasi Unizar Law Review
Ninis Nugraheni
Faculty Of Law, Hang Tuah University
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Disclosure of Confidential Medical Record of The Patient of Corona Virus Disease 2019 Mokhamad Khoirul Huda; Yulianto; Ninis Nugraheni; Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak; Sadjijono
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Vol. 15 No. 2 (2021): Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology
Publisher : Institute of Medico-legal Publications Pvt Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i2.14815

Abstract

This study aimed to find out the disclosure of confidential medical record of Covid-19 patients from legalnorms, ethics and medical disciplines in Indonesia. This research used normative juridical methods whichhad a pre-descriptive characteristic.This research found the disclosure of confidential medical record ofthe Covid-2019 patients can be opened for the benefit of the patient’s health, fulfilling the demands of lawenforcement officials in the context of law enforcement, the patient’s own request, or based on statutoryprovisions.This research is very useful for the community, hospitals, educational institutions and thegovernment to provide legal protection to society to not be exposed by Covid-2019. The disclosure ofconfidential medical record of Covid-19 patients is permitted in relation to the patient’s initials, gender,place of residence, age and health status.
PROBLEMATIKA EKSEKUSI RESI GUDANG SEBAGAI OBYEK JAMINAN Ninis Nugraheni
ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Vol 3, No 2 (2017): Juli - Desember 2017
Publisher : Departemen Hukum Perdata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36913/jhaper.v3i2.56

Abstract

Resi Gudang merupakan dokumen bukti kepemilikan atas barang yang disimpan di Gudang yang diterbitkan oleh Pengelola Gudang. Resi gudang sebagai agunan dapat dibebani Hak Jaminan Atas Resi Gudang (Hak Jaminan) sebagai jaminan kebendaan. Jika dikaitkan dengan sifat hak kebendaan, maka Penerima Hak Jaminan (kreditor) memiliki hak mendahului dari kreditor-kreditor yang lain. Akan tetapi dalam pelaksanaannya ternyata eksekusi Hak Jaminan memunculkan beberapa permasalahan, yang mengakibatkan kurang memberikan jaminan perlindungan hukum bagi kreditor. Kreditor mempunyai hak parate eksekusi atas objek jaminan, yaitu melalui penjualan objek jaminan resi gudang yang hanya dapat dilakukan atas sepengetahuan pihak pemberi Hak Jaminan. Pelaksanaan eksekusi diharapkan dapat dilaksanakan dengan lebih sederhana, cepat dan biaya murah, namun dalam kenyataannya, penjualan obyek jaminan berdasarkan hak untuk menjual obyek jaminan atas kekuasaan sendiri hanya dapat dilakukan atas sepengetahuan pihak pemberi hak jaminan, dengan melakukan pemberitahuan secara tertulis. Hal demikian dapat disalahgunakan oleh Kreditor yang beritikad buruk, dengan melakukan penjualan secara semena-mena dengan alasan bahwa hal tersebut telah diberitahukan kepada pemberi hak jaminan, dan tidak ada keberatan dari pemberi hak jaminan. Di sisi lain, ketentuan tersebut juga dapat membuat kedudukan Kreditor menjadi lemah, karena pemberi hak jaminan dapat beralih belum menerima pemberitahuan tertulis, sehingga eksekusi dapat digagalkan.
Public Procurement Contract for Goods and Services Following the Presidential Decree Number 12 of 2020 on the Stipulation of the Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) Pandemic as a National Disaster Ninis Nugraheni; Hening Prabawa Arifanda; Alifihan Astaftiyan
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 7, No 2 (2020): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Covid-19 Pandemic affects many sectors. Therefore, the Indonesian Government passed the Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2020 to manage the Pandemic. Unfortunately, this regulation has evoked various interpretations on the disaster contingency as a foundation to apply force majeure condition. The Government’s policies of budget refocusing and reallocation to manage the Covid-19 Pandemic have brought significant effects on goods and services procurement contracts. This condition may lead the Government into default, and it is force majeure. Therefore, the Government is discharged from any liabilities. Consequently, it may injure contractors of procurement. This study aims to investigate the actuality of such procurement contracts following the Presidential Regulation. This study is a normative law research. Based on the Presidential Regulation, the force majeure condition is likely to be applied on procurement contracts. However, the condition does not immediately nullify or terminate the contracts. They remain legally valid and binding. In case of a condition permanently prevents debtor to fulfill obligations, contract can be terminated. In case of a condition temporarily prevents the contract’s implementation, the best solution to encourage conducive business climate is renegotiation that is legalized by contract addendum.Kontrak Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pasca Berlakunya Keppres No. 12 Tahun 2020 tentang Penetapan Bencana Non-Alam Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) sebagai Bencana NasionalAbstrakPandemi Covid-19 berdampak pada banyak faktor dan membuat pemerintah Indonesia memberlakukan Peraturan Presiden No. 12 tahun 2020 (Perpres 12/2020). Akan tetapi, peraturan ini memunculkan banyak interpretasi tentang kemungkinan bencana untuk menjadi alasan penerapan keadaan kahar. Kebijakan pemfokusan ulang dan realokasi anggaran oleh pemerintah untuk mengatasi Covid-19 membawa dampak signifikan pada kontrak pengadaan publik. Kondisi ini dapat dikategorikan sebagai keadaan kahar, karena menyebabkan pemerintah gagal memenuhi kewajiban dalam kontrak. Oleh sebab itu, pemerintah diberhentikan dari tanggung jawab apa pun, dan hal ini dapat merugikan kontraktor. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa eksistensi Kontrak Pengadaan Publik setelah berlakunya Perpres 12/2020. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Mempertimbangkan Perpres 12/2020, keadaan kahar kemungkinan akan diterapkan pada kontrak pengadaan. Namun, kondisi ini tidak serta merta membatalkan atau mengakhiri kontrak. Kontak tersebut tetap sah secara hukum dan terbatas. Hal ini harus mempertimbangkan apakah pandemi saat ini dapat mengakibatkan keadaan kahar. Dalam hal suatu kondisi yang secara permanen mencegah debitur untuk melakukan kewajibannya, kontrak akan berakhir. Dalam hal suatu kondisi yang secara sementara mencegah kontrak untuk dilaksanakan, negosiasi ulang yang ditindaklanjuti dengan adendum kontrak adalah solusi terbaik yang mendorong iklim bisnis yang kondusif.Kata kunci: Covid-19, keadaan kahar, kontrak pengadaan publik.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v7n2.a5 
Capability Versus Imparsiality of Doctors as Medical Disputes Mediators Muhammad Afiful Jauhani; Ninis Nugraheni; Mohammad Zamroni
SOEPRA Vol 6, No 2: Desember 2020
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24167/shk.v6i2.2553

Abstract

Abstract: In medical dispute resolution through mediation, a mediator with the medical qualification will be easier to facilitate the mediation process because of their expertise related to substance, but health workers which have high solidity towards the profession which will make it difficult for them to be impartial.The principal aim of this thesis was to study the doctor’s capability and doctor’s impartiality as a mediator in medical disputes. The issue will be discussed normatively juridically through the statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach with Malaysia, Australia, and Netherland as the comparative country.From this research, it can be concluded that the capability of doctors as mediators of medical disputes lies in the gravity levels of doctors who are commensurate with the context of the dispute. Malaysia, Australia, and the Netherlands have required that mediators need to have an understanding of the substance and have technical knowledge of the problem at hand. A doctor’s impartiality as a mediator in medical disputes will have a tendency of partisanship and conflicts of interest.Keywords: Capability, Impartiality, Doctor, Mediator, Medical Dispute
Crowdfunding-Based Fiduciary Warrant in Providing Capital Loans for Small and Medium Enterprises Ninis Nugraheni
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 6 ISSUE 3, DECEMBER 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/halrev.v6i3.2201

Abstract

Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are organized through people's creativity in developing human and natural resources. However, investment challenges often affect their implementation and production processes, necessitating solutions, such as capital loans from banks and other entities. Crowdfunding is an online loaning service that provides easily accessible loans to SME startups, though a warrant to protect creditors from losing money to ingenuine people is necessary. Therefore, this study examines the appropriateness of a fiduciary warrant as a SMEs collateral object. When fiduciary is used as a loan warrant, debtors are allowed to use collateral objects in their production processes. To make a fiduciary warrant effective, legal protection is required. This study used juridical-normative that relied on legal norms in legislation and court verdicts dealing with societal organizational issues. The results showed that crowdfunding-based credit is an alternative with more straightforward procedures compared to conventional entities.
Klausula Eksonerasi Oleh Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Rumah Wishnu Kurniawan; Ninis Nugraheni
Perspektif Hukum VOLUME 17 ISSUE 2
Publisher : Faculty of Law Hang Tuah University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/ph.v17i2.157

Abstract

The exenoration clause is an exclusion / liability exclusion clause in a housing sale and purchase agreement. The purpose of writing this scientific article is to find out the accountability of business actors for offers submitted to prospective consumers and restrictions on the inclusion of standard clauses containing exenoration clauses in the offer of buying and selling houses as a legal protection effort for consumers. The results of the study indicate that the treaty law in Indonesia essentially assumes that brochures have binding legal force. This binding strength is based on the fact that the brochure is a binding form of supply as specified in the Consumer Protection Act which is based on the principle of good faith at the pre-contractual stage. Judging from the freedom of contract the standard agreement with an exoneration clause does not meet the subjective and objective requirements as specified in Article 1320 BW, thus the exoneration clause stated by the business actor in the brochure as a bidding instrument does not have binding power. Provisions for transferring accountability, actions in the form of business actors are not responsible for changes in specifications contained in brochures violating Article 18 paragraph (1) letters a, c, and d of Consumer Protection Act. And has an effect on null and void (nietig / null and void).
The Liability of Unilateral Termination by Government on Goods and Service Procurement Contract Anton Cahyono; Ninis Nugraheni; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v2i1.78

Abstract

The increasing development in Indonesia, particularly the development of public facilities and infrastructures makes many public contracts, commonly called governmental goods and service contract, increase as well. It is a contract which one of the parties involves the government. In Indonesia, goods and service procurement contracts are not always well-conducted as expected. Lawsuits, which one of those is the liability from one party, may reveal in such contracts. Therefore, this study would discuss about an issue of unilateral contract termination on good-and-service procurement contract along with its solution. Referring to legal regulation related to governmental good-and-service procurement contract, President’s Regulation No. 54 Year 2010 on Governmental Goods and service Procurement and had been amended by President’s Regulation No. 4 Year 2015 about the Forth Amandment of President’s Regulation No. 54 Year 2010 about Governmental Goods and service Procurement.
The Moveable Goods as a Collateral Object in Warehouse Receipt System Ninis Nugraheni
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v2i1.79

Abstract

The Law of Warehouse Receipt (Act No. 9/2006 about Warehouse Receipt System) has defined a new collateral object called Warehouse Receipt. Warehouse Receipt is a proof of ownership of a commodity that can be negotiable, exchanged and pledged. This article used Normative Juridical Assessment by assessing and analyzing the primary, secondary and tertiary legal material. It is related to the Law of Banking, generally in collateral, and particularly in Act No. 9/2006 about Warehouse Receipt System. Warehouse Receipt as a negotiable instrument can be classified into moveable goods. Such classification is based on an argument that Warehouse Receipt has an economical value. Thus, it can be used as a collateral object. Warehouse receipt as a pledged moveable good may comply with the terms of execution in pledge.
The Legal Principle of Collateral in Fintech Lending Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti; Anindya Prastiwi Setiawati; Ninis Nugraheni
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, OCTOBER 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v3i2.80

Abstract

Simple procedures and quick service on fintech lending gives an ease for fulfilling capital needs. Indeed, it does not require any collateral which may constrain debtors to deal with it. However, although this activity brings convenience, efficiency, quickness, and simplicity in lending services, many possible risks such as debtors’ delayed payment or even default which may burden the creditors are likely to follow as well. Without any collateral as assurance, the risks may become much higher on fintech lending as the creditor becomes a concurrent creditor who only has relatively individual rights whose position is equal to the other creditors, no droit de suite principle, and the claim is individual with general assurance.
Legal Protection of HARA Platform Users on the Service of Electronic Data Interchange Nikmah Mentari; Ninis Nugraheni; Muhammad Annas
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol 14, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/novelty.v14i1.a25547

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The digital era of technology has cut the role of third parties and made it easier for services to be run peer-to-peer; where parties can connect directly at a business scale. Business relations is always accompanied by contracts. However, nowadays conventional contracts have undergone disruption with the existence of blockchain technology. A smart contract is a contract model that uses technology that can execute the contents of the contract automatically. The existence of this technological sophistication also has implications for the exchange of data, particularly personal data. Personal data can be easily accessed through the data exchange process, but it is feared that data misuse will occur. In order to prevent the Electronic Data Interchange of personal data using this technology, data must be protected.Purpose/Objective Study: This study aims to examine the legal protection of users of the HARA platform who use smart contracts in electronic data interchange services.Design/Methodology/Approach: This research is normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches.Findings: In this case, the protection includes preventive and repressive protection. Preventively through legislation with the presence of laws on ITE and laws on Personal Data Protection as well as internal regulation of platform providers, while repressively lawsuits can be carried out through litigation and non-litigation channels.Paper Type: Research Article
Co-Authors Adriano Adriano Adriano Adriano, Adriano Ahmad Fadhli Busthomi Al-Hasni, Fariz Alifihan Astaftiyan Andika Persada Putera Andika Persada Putra Anindya Prastiwi Setiawati Ansow, Gevano Anton Cahyono Asmuni Bambang Ariyanto Chomariyah Denik Wuryani Devi Melinda, Evelyn Eurika Winata Handayani, Baiq Yulia Handayani, Syofini Hari Pudjo Nugroho Heni Pujiastuti Hening Prabawa Arifanda Indrawati Irawan, Tri Pamungkas Ippilianingrum Isfihan, Emirlad Kurniawan, Hansen Kurniawan, Yuli Lalu Anugrah Nugraha M. Khoirul Huda Mela Karina Maya Riza Mohammad Zamroni Mohammad Zamroni Mokhamad Khoirul Huda Muhammad Afiful Jauhani Muhammad Annas Nanang Widodo Nikmah Mentari Noor, M. Tauchid Nugroho, Hari Pudjo Nurlaela, Wiwik Qonitah Annur Aziza Rahmatullah, Dyko Rindianti, Devy Febrina Sadjijono Sari, Betty Yunita Shi, Ng Phi Soetarno Sutarno Sutarno Sutarno Sutarno Sutarno Tri Pamungkas Ippilianingrum Irawan Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti Winata, Eurika Wishnu Kurniawan Yoan Nursari Simanjuntak Yudhantaka, Lintang Yulianto Yulianto