Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Traditional Knowledge on the Intellectual Property of the Indigenous People of Tenganan Pegringsingan Bali Kuspraningrum, Emilda; Cholil, Yuliati; Flambonita, Suci
Arena Hukum Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01802.3

Abstract

The potential of traditional knowledge of the indigenous people of Tenganan Pegringsingan, Manggis District, Karang Asam Regency, Bali, leads readers to a new insight that this potential can be measured through the concept of Intellectual Property Rights. This is in accordance with the parameters listed in WIPO and the mandate of Government Regulation No. 56 of 2022 concerning Public Intellectual Property. However, this potential has not been identified as an intellectual property right. This article explores the diverse traditional wisdom within the indigenous community of Tenganan that potentially has an intellectual property right. This traditional wisdom is recorded as part of the knowledge in the Intellectual Property Rights regime using a proprietary system. This study employs a qualitative method with hermeneutic analysis to explore the traditional wisdom of the indigenous people of Tenganan and its potential for protecting intellectual property rights. The results of this study aim to identify the traditional knowledge of the Tenganan indigenous community and classify it within the intellectual property rights regime as regulated in Indonesia’s Intellectual Property Rights Law, with the expectation of supporting the communal intellectual property of the Tenganan people.
Provisions for The Use of Foreign Workers in Indonesia Flambonita, Suci; Emilda Kuspraningrum; Suartini
Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34304/jf.v12i1.82

Abstract

The use of foreign workers in Indonesia is intended to transfer knowledge and SKILL. Various requirements must be met as a condition if the entrepreneur/company wishes to bring in foreign workers. The purpose of placing foreign workers in Indonesia; first, is to meet the need for skilled and professional workers in certain fields that cannot be filled by Indonesian Migrant Workers; second, accelerating the process of national development by accelerating the process of technology transfer or knowledge transfer, especially in the industrial sector; third, provide expansion of employment opportunities for Indonesian Migrant Workers; fourth, increase foreign investment as a support for development capital in Indonesia. This type of research uses normative methods by analyzing legal provisions with statutory and case approaches, is descriptive analysis in nature which aims to describe, inventory, and analyze regarding the provisions governing foreign workers in Indonesia through library research. The discussion in this study is an effort to avoid legal problems and the excessive use of foreign workers, the government must carefully determine the policies to be taken in order to maintain a balance between foreign workers and domestic workers. The manpower aspect, especially in terms of the obligation to use Indonesian workers and the necessity to hold industrial training, transfer of knowledge and technology as well as work permits for foreign workers is an absolute requirement in relation to the use of labor.
Tinjauan Hukum Hak Royalti Pencipta Lagu Melalui Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional Cahyani, Puput; Emilda Kuspraningrum; Deny Slamet Pribadi
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 17 No. 2 (2025): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v17i2.3512

Abstract

Latar Belakang: Hak cipta merupakan hak eksklusif yang terdiri dari hak moral dan hak ekonomi yang diberikan kepada pencipta atas karya mereka. Hak ini bertujuan untuk melindungi kepentingan pencipta agar mendapatkan manfaat ekonomi dari karyanya. Dalam PP Nomor 56 Tahun 2021, Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional (LMKN) memiliki kewenangan untuk menarik, menghimpun, serta mendistribusikan royalti dari pihak yang menggunakan lagu dan/atau musik secara komersial. Royalti ini diberikan kepada pemegang hak cipta yang telah bergabung dalam Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif (LMK) maupun yang belum bergabung. Namun, distribusi royalti hanya dilakukan kepada anggota LMK, sementara pencipta yang tidak tergabung tidak menerima hak ekonominya berupa royalti. Metode Penelitian: Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan menganalisis bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, serta menggabungkan peraturan perundang-undangan dan teori hukum yang relevan untuk mengkaji kedudukan hukum Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif Nasional (LMKN) dalam pengelolaan royalti pencipta lagu dan akibat hukumnya bagi pencipta yang belum menjadi anggota LMK. Hasil Penelitian: Pencipta yang belum bergabung ke LMK, royalti yang dihimpun oleh LMKN disimpan hingga dua tahun, setelah itu dialihkan menjadi dana cadangan jika pencipta tidak bergabung ke LMK dalam batas waktu selama 2 tahun. Mekanisme seperti ini dimaksudkan untuk melindungi hak ekonomi pencipta, Namun dapat mengganggu hak eksklusif pencipta, mengingat royalti hanya didistribusikan jika pencipta terdaftar dalam LMK karena di dalam peraturan memuat aturan yang bersifat administratrif. Aturan ini menimbulkan ketidakseimbangan karena hak ekonomi pencipta non-anggota LMK tidak sepenuhnya terlindungi tanpa pemenuhan persyaratan administratif yaitu bergabung ke LMK Kesimpulan: Pengelolaan royalti yang diatur berdasarkan PP Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 bertujuan melindungi hak ekonomi pencipta, namun menimbulkan ketidakseimbangan karena hanya anggota LMK yang menerima royalti, sementara pencipta non-anggota LMK kehilangan hak ekonominya jika tidak memenuhi syarat administratif berupa keanggotaan LMK.    
Asas Iktikad Baik Dalam Pencegahan Dan Penyelesaian Tindakan Penyerobotan Nama Domain (Cybersquatting) Di Indonesia Jedi Aleksander; Emilda Kuspraningrum; Febri Noor Hediati
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 17 No. 2 (2025): AGUSTUS
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v17i2.3629

Abstract

Background: Every person has the right to own a domain name based on the principle of first come first served registration. However, cybersquatting occurs when domain names are registered earlier using registered trademarks or other well-known names, causing harm and violating the rights of others. Cybersquatting poses legal issues because perpetrators exploit weaknesses or gaps in the first-come, first-served principle, which does not involve substantive examination. The principle of good faith plays an important role in protecting those harmed by domain name registrations under the law, especially considering that Indonesian legislation has not yet specifically regulated cybersquatting. Research Metodes: This research employs a doctrinal research method, which involves examining legal principles, norms, doctrines, and relevant statutory provisions, both from primary and secondary legal sources, to answer the research questions raised in the study. Findings: This research shows that, besides the Law on Information and Electronic Transactions, the principle of good faith in the context of domain names is also found in several other regulations, namely the Trademark Law, Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP), and PANDI Policy. Referring to these regulations, the principle of good faith has specific forms and limitations that can serve as benchmarks to assess whether the process of registering and using a domain name violates good faith, where violations of this principle may be indicated as acts of cybersquatting. Good faith can be used as a legal protection instrument to prevent and resolve cybersquatting, even though there is no specific regulation regarding cybersquatting in Indonesia. However, prevention still needs improvement because the domain name registration system lacks substantive examination related to trademarks, thus leaving opportunities for domain registrations that potentially infringe on the trademark rights of others. Conclusion: There is a need to establish a stricter examination mechanism within the domain name registration system to prevent cybersquatting from occurring at the initial stage of registration. Given the strong correlation between domain names and trademarks, the absence of a trademark-linked examination process allows the registration of domain names that may potentially conflict with the trademark rights of other parties. This measure would also serve to strengthen the authority of registrars and registries to reject domain name applications that do not meet the requirements of good faith, thereby helping to prevent acts of cybersquatting.
Pelindungan Tari Ganjur Sebagai Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Masyarakat Kutai di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara Dwiputri, Nafila Maulani; Emilda Kuspraningrum; Khairunnisa Noor Asufie; Lily Triyana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3373

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas tentang perlindungan Hak Cipta terhadap Tari Ganjur, yang merupakan seni budaya tradisional adat Kutai di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Tari Ganjur memiliki nilai historis dan budaya yang penting, terutama dalam konteks upacara adat Erau yang diselenggarakan oleh Kesultanan Kutai Kartanegara Ing Martadipura. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis eksistensi Tari Ganjur dalam perspektif hukum kekayaan intelektual serta mengevaluasi perlindungan hukum yang telah dilakukan terhadap tarian tersebut. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah socio-legal research dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa Tari Ganjur belum diakui sebagai kekayaan intelektual komunal melalui Sertifikat Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal (KIK). Selain itu, masih terdapat tantangan dalam pengembangan dan perlindungan hak cipta bagi kreasi tari Ganjur yang dilakukan oleh sanggar-sanggar tari di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara. Penelitian ini menyarankan perlunya penguatan kebijakan daerah dalam perlindungan dan pemanfaatan kekayaan intelektual seni budaya, serta mendorong partisipasi aktif dari komunitas lokal dalam menjaga warisan budaya tradisional.
Transfer of Land Ownership through a Binding Agreement of Sale and Purchase under the Hand (Comparative Study Reviewed in the Perspective of Civil Law and Islamic Law) Jamil, Robby Awaluddin; Kuspraningrum, Emilda; Damanik, Amsari
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 5 No. 6 (2024): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v5i6.1168

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal strength of the binding sale and purchase agreement under the hand and analyze the legal protection for the buyer if the seller commits a Default on the binding sale and purchase agreement. This research is a doctrinal research. In practice, in the implementation of the Sale and Purchase Agreement, there are still many development actors who do not make the Sale and Purchase Agreement in front of a notary in the form of an authentic deed, but make it in the form of a deed under hand. A Sale and Purchase Agreement made with an authentic deed and a deed under hand has a fundamental difference in terms of its evidentiary strength. The Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement in its implementation in the community cannot always run smoothly, sometimes some factors limit the engagement in continuing or until it becomes invalid, The case can be known that PPJB can be asked for compensation if it is not by the agreement of the parties in the agreement, which in this case the seller commits a breach of performance, while the buyer, in this case, is in good faith by fulfilling what has been As stated in the PPJB, the Agreement can be cancelled if it is not by the subjective conditions or the objective requirements of the agreement as stipulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code.