Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.216
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Jurnal Ius Constituendum Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan JURNAL MERCATORIA Jurnal Yuridis Media Iuris Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Jurnal Supremasi International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian (EJPP) UNES Journal of Swara Justisia International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance IBLAM Law Review Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam
Shinta Hadiyantina
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
IMPLIKASI KEKOSONGAN REGULASI DALAM PRAKTIK PENYEBARAN KAMPANYE HITAM OLEH BUZZER DI MEDIA SOSIAL I Gede Mahada Arsadana; Dhiana Puspitawati; Shinta Hadiyantina
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 12 No 1 (2025): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v12i1.10028

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi mempengaruhi segala aspek, terutama dalam penyelenggaraan pemilu yang sangat terlihat pengaruhnya terhadap kampanye pemilu melalui media sosial. Dalam implementasinya kampanye pemilu terdapat adanya kampanye hitam (Black Campign) yang dilakukan oleh Buzzer dengan akun palsu untuk mempengaruhi opini public melalui berita bohong dan pencemaran nama baik. Penelitian ini secara yuridis normatif menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasi penelitian ini perlu diaturnya secara tegas mengenai adanya pelanggaran pemilu yang utamanya dilakukan oleh Buzzer lewat media sosial dan dalam implikasinya kampanye hitam harus berdasarkan asas Juber dan Jurdil dalam pembentukan pengaturannya yang nantinya bila ditemukan suatu pelanggaran harus adanya delik aduan untuk ditindak lanjuti yang memerlukan waktu paling lambat 7 hari, bila lewat batas waktu tersebut adanya pelanggaran tidak dilanjutkan, maka dari itu dapat dikonsepkan dengan di temukannya pelanggaran pemilu dapat langsung di laporkan atau sebagai delik umum yang nantinya lembaga yang berwernang dalam menindak adanya kampanye hitam harus dapat bersinergi dengan baik mulai dari Lembaga Bawaslu, KPU, Kepolisian agar terciptanya pemilu damai dan berkeadilan. Perlu adanya pengaturan yang jelas dalam UU Pemilu mengenai kampanye yang dilakukan oleh Buzzer, baik dari pengaturan, penyelenggaraan dan sanksinya harus disesuaikan.
Ambiguity in APIP Supervisory Findings and the Limits of Administrative Court Jurisdiction in Indonesia Awaludin Nur Ihfan; Shinta Hadiyantina; Riana Susmayanti
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i2.13807

Abstract

This study examines the ambiguity of the phrase “APIP Supervision Results” in Article 2(2) of Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2015, which has led to inconsistent judicial interpretations and legal uncertainty regarding the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court in reviewing alleged abuse of authority. While existing studies primarily address the general relationship between administrative courts and supervisory mechanisms, they have not sufficiently analyzed the plurality of APIP supervisory regimes and their implications for jurisdictional limits. Employing normative legal research with statutory, case, conceptual, and philosophical approaches, this study analyzes regulatory frameworks and divergent court decisions to identify interpretative inconsistencies. The findings reveal that APIP supervision operates within a pluralistic and fragmented regulatory structure, encompassing multiple forms beyond regular and specific-purpose supervision, thereby rendering a purely formal interpretation inadequate. This study argues that limiting the meaning of “APIP Supervision Results” to specific supervisory typologies undermines legal certainty and restricts access to judicial protection. Accordingly, it proposes a shift toward a substantive interpretative approach based on normative criteria capable of accommodating diverse supervisory practices. The novelty of this research lies in its systematic reconstruction of the concept of APIP supervision results through a substantive-normative framework that integrates the plurality of supervisory regimes with theories of authority and legal certainty. Its contribution is to provide a doctrinal basis for clarifying the limits of administrative judicial authority and to offer practical guidance for achieving consistency in judicial interpretation, thereby strengthening legal certainty and administrative justice in Indonesia.
Quo Vadis Presidential Threshold : Implications of The Constitutional Court Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 on The Election of The President and Vice President of Indonesia Redam Guruh Krismantara; Istislam; Shinta Hadiyantina
NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/negrei.v6i1.15240

Abstract

Leadership succession became one of the reform agendas embodied in the amendments to the constitution. One significant change introduced through the amendments was the direct election of the president and vice president as a single ticket by the people. This direct election mechanism was intended solely to strengthen Indonesia's presidential system. However, the implementation of presidential and vice-presidential elections has given rise to various issues, particularly regarding the presidential threshold requirement that must be met by political parties or coalitions of parties proposing candidates. The presidential threshold regulation in positive law is set out in Article 222 of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. This provision has been repeatedly subjected to judicial review before the Constitutional Court and was consistently rejected until Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024, in which the Court declared the presidential threshold unconstitutional. This research examines the regulation of the presidential threshold and the legal implications following Decision No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024. The method used in this study is normative juridical, employing statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary sources collected through library research. The issuance of this decision eliminates the threshold requirement that has long posed challenges in the nomination of presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs. The Court stated that all political parties participating in elections are entitled to propose their own presidential and vice-presidential candidate pairs to ensure the availability of alternatives, in accordance with the original intent of the constitutional.
Authority of Administrative Court in Establishing Administrative Sanctions for Local Government Officials Who Do Not Implement Administrative Court Verdict Bima Saputra; Shinta Hadiyantina; Riana Susmayanti
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1040

Abstract

This study is motivated by the lack of adherence among local government officials in executing decisions issued by the Administrative Court (PTUN). Furthermore, there is a legal inconsistency between Law Number 51 of 2009, which amends Law Number 5 of 1986 on Administrative Courts, and Law Number 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. This discrepancy concerns the sanction mechanisms for government officials who disregard PTUN rulings, potentially leading to ineffective enforcement. The research aims to examine the existing administrative sanction regulations and develop an optimal sanction framework for local government officials who fail to comply with PTUN decisions. Utilizing a normative approach, the findings reveal two distinct methods for enforcing administrative sanctions. Consequently, the author advocates for regulatory reform by redefining Administrative Court authority, enabling it to impose administrative sanctions on non-compliant officials. This adjustment is intended to reinforce the principle of separation of powers and ensure legal certainty.
Co-Authors Abdul Rachmad Budiono Alfira Yushardinar Sudrajad Amelia Ayu Paramitha Amir, Irfan Angga Dwi Prasetyo Anindita Purnama Ningtyas Arini Jauharoh Awaludin Nur Ihfan Bambang Sugiri Bayu Nando Prayoga Bima Saputra Dewi Cahyandari Dewi Cahyandari Dhiana Puspitawati Djumikasih Dwi Kukuh Verdyandika Endang Sri Kawuryan Ferio Wabarca Hutabarat Fery Rochmad Ramadhan Hendry Tholabah Ilman Naif I Gede Mahada Arsadana Immanuela Yolanda Indah Dwi Qurbani Intan Meitasari Istilam Istilam Istislam Muhammad Luthfi Ghifari Muhammad Zufar Aiman Nur Faisyah Prasetyo Nugroho Qurni Annamalia Redam Guruh Krismantara Reka Dewantara Riana Susmayanti Riana Susmayanti Rini Purwandari Siti Anisa Fatmawati Siti Faridah Sudarsono Sudarsono Sudarsono Sukarmi, Sukarmi Syakir Prayoga Tiara Maharani Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara