Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

Peran Kepemimpinan Perempuan Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Pada Pemerintahan Di Kota Metro Perspektif Siyasah Syar'iyyah ‎ ‎, Aziza Aziz Rahmaningsih; Murdiana, Elfa; Selviana, Umniyatus
Siyasah Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Siyasah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Publisher : IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/siyasah.v2i2.6227

Abstract

Perempuan menjadi isu yang sering menjadi perbincangan publik. Peran perempuan dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat bukan hanya sebagai proses pembangunan, tetapi juga sebagai fondasi berstruktur kuat,Pemimpin adalah seorang yang memimpin sebuah Wilayah. Di dalam memimpin Wilayah seorang pemimpin harus mempunyai ilmu kepemimpinan. Hasil dari Penelitian menunjukan peran kepemimpina n perempuan di Kecamata n Metro Pusat adalah memberika n pelayana n da n Kebijaka n yang bai k kepada masyarakat sesuai denga n visi-misi Kecamata n Metro Pusat terutama tentang E-service yang memberika n pelayana n secara elektroni k dala m artia n bahwa kecamata n Metro Pusat suda h dapat memberika n pelayana n yang bebas berbasis elektroni k sehingga memudahka n masyarakat untu k mendapatka n pelayana n yang cepat da n tepat yaitu sesuai dengan tujuan Siyasa h syar’iyya h yaitu kepemimpina n yang menuju pada kemaslahata n bai k dunia maupu n di akhirat.
Kedudukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang di Tinjau Dari Hierarki Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Hanum, Roro Hanum; Murdiana, Elfa; Bahari, Raha
Siyasah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Siyasah Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Publisher : IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/siyasah.v3i2.8090

Abstract

Abstrak : In the context of law and regulations in Indonesia, the concept of hierarchy is vital for ensuring control over regulations that could potentially harm society both materially and non-materially. This concept is rooted in Hans Kelsen's theory of legal norms, which posits that legal norms have hierarchical levels, with grundnorms at the top. These norms are interrelated and form a coherent legal order. However, the application of this hierarchy is influenced by political factors that shape the constitutional system.One significant legal instrument reflecting this hierarchy in Indonesia is the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu), which holds an equivalent position to regular laws in the Indonesian presidential system. It is essential to clearly define the term "compelling urgency" as the basis for issuing a Perppu to ensure that the President's actions remain within objective limits. Understanding and reviewing this legal hierarchy is crucial for maintaining the quality and enforcement of regulations in Indonesia. In this framework, legal comprehension revolves around official laws, and all aspects of law, norms, rules, and legal actions must align with the applicable laws. The evolution of legislation impacts various aspects of society, and a precise understanding of hierarchy and the concept of judicial review is indispensable for upholding the quality of law and justice in Indonesia.
STRATEGI ADVOKAT DALAM MENGATASI SENGKETA TANAH WARISStrategi Advokat Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Mustika Bangsa dalam Mengatasi Sengketa Tanah Waris di Lampung Zidan, Muhammad; Murdiana, Elfa; Ningsih, Rahmah; Setiawan, Wahyu
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v20i2.5200

Abstract

This research provides a comprehensive picture of the experience of Mustika Bangsa Legal Aid Institute advocates in resolving inheritance land disputes. This paper focuses on the formulation of advocates' strategies, discussing the various rarities and approaches used by advocates to effectively resolve inheritance disputes. In contrast to previous studies, which mostly discuss the role of advocates, this study centers on the concept of strategies used by advocates in resolving inherited land disputes.  A strong and structured strategy is key to achieving the desired outcome in the legal process. This study uses qualitative research for the inquiry process in investigating scientific and humanitarian issues with different traditions. The qualitative design enabled the author to map texts that speak of advocates' strategies, disputes, and legacy landscapes experienced in the context of this study. The results of the study emphasize the importance of advocates' strategies in achieving desired outcomes in the legal process. The research shows that a well-planned strategy can significantly increase the effectiveness of resolving disputes, evidenced by the satisfaction of clients assisted by Mustika Bangsa Legal Aid Institute in Metro. Through this research, the author hopes to contribute to broader efforts to create effective and sustainable advocate strategies in inheritance dispute resolution
Keadilan Anak Perspektif Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak: Menilik Strategi Implementasi Diversi Di Kepolisian Dan Pengadilan Negeri Kota Metro Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Restroaktif Murdiana, Elfa
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 1 No 02 (2017): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v1i02.875

Abstract

Being introduced the concept of diversion arranged in constitution of child criminal justice system 2012 gives the different nuance for the implementation of child criminal justice system in Indonesia. Therefore, the implementation of diversion concept becomes a definiteness that must be noticed. In realizing the retroactive justice for children, the implementation of law becomes one of the important components. Thus, it is need to be understood the strategy of implementation carried out by the upholder as the law structure. This is a library research by using documentation as the data collection technique. The result of the research shows that the preparation of facilities and infrastructure in handling the diversion problem for children is one of the implementation strategies done by the state court of Metro. Whereas, the investigation in police resort of Metro has not had special space used, so that it can be one of the constraint faced by the institution of diversion implementer if considered from the culture aspect.
Telaah Nilai Kepastian dan Keadilan pada Regulasi Mahar dalam Pembangunan Hukum Keluarga Murdiana, Elfa; Zulaikha, Siti; Mahmudah, Nurul
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v5i1.3367

Abstract

Explicitly, a dowry is not found in the legal protection of marriage, but normatively it is read firmly in Chapter V articles 30 to 38 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. In Article 2 Paragraph 1 of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that "Marriage is legal, if it is carried out according to the laws of each religion and belief". The explanation of the article emphasizes that there is no marriage if it is not carried out according to religion and belief in accordance with the 1945 Constitution, in which a marriage will be declared valid if a dowry has been paid in it. This study will describe the dynamics of dowry in the meaning of religion and culture associated with several regulations carried out through a policy and cultural approach. The data collection techniques used were interviews and an inventory of policies on marriage and dowry which were described inductively to find the dowry formulation as part of the Ius Constituendum on Marriage Law in Indonesia. The indecisiveness of the Marriage Law as a Formal Gezet in the implementation of marriage is indicated as a factor causing the various meanings and implementation of the dowry, like the pillars and conditions of marriage. So that the essence of the dowry as the actualization of the role of women to express their rights in marriage is still injured because the dowry is actualized as a bargaining transaction between the two families of the groom and the bride. So that the high dowry actually makes women the object of transactions that reduce their rights in the implementation of marriage. Efforts to change the legal umbrella of marriage in Indonesia should be carried out for the sake of certainty and justice of marriage law for all Indonesian people, especially in the concept of dowry payments so that it can be used as the basis for the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia. It is hoped that the dowry regulation can be clearly broken down in creating legal certainty and justice.
Nusyuz Menurut Pemikiran Sayyid Qutb dalam Tafsir Fi Zilalil Qur’an Qadri, Busran; Murdiana, Elfa; Bustomi, Ahmad
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 6 No 1 (2022): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v6i1.5140

Abstract

Nusyuz has always been related to the wife's non-compliance with her husband. Therefore, there is a difference in resolving nusyuz cases committed by husbands and wives. If nusyuz is performed by the wife, then the husband has the right to advise the wife, separate the bed, and hit with a note of not hurting. Whereas, when nusyuz is done by the husband, there is a tendency for the wife to should give up some of her rights in order to carry out a peace agreement. The purpose of this study is to enlighten the reader regarding how the concept of nusyuz is based on Sayyid Qutb’s thoughts. Kind of this study is library research, employing normative and sociological approaches. The purpose of this study is to understand Sayyid Qutb's understanding of nusyuz concept. The data in this research is taken from a tafsir book written by Sayyid Qutb entitled Tafsir Fi Zilalil Qur’an, books, and scientific research relevant to nusyuz. Afterward, in analyzing data, the researcher uses the theory formula explained by M. Quraish Shihab about the Qur’an interpreted method. This study explained that nusyuz is an act in which a person (husband or wife) accentuates and elevates by disobeying, and who does not do their obligation as a husband or wife and its solutions depend on his/her position in the household, education, family, and country's condition.
Dissenting Opinion Hakim Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang Pada Perkara Hak Asuh Anak Bagi Ibu Yang Murtad Agustin, Cleo Nadia; Murdiana, Elfa; Setiawan, Wahyu; Manasikana, Adellia; Nurli Darmawati, Sifa
Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Vol 20, No. 2, November 2025
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/ai.vi.12954

Abstract

This study examines the dissenting opinion in a child custody case following apostasy at the Tanjung Karang Religious Court, Class 1A, as a reflection of the dynamic interplay between Islamic family law, substantive justice, and child protection principles. The main research problem concerns how the judges’ legal reasoning patterns are formed within this context of differing opinions and to what extent the dissenting opinion contributes to reinforcing the principles of maslahah mursalah, maqasid al-shari‘ah, and the best interest of the child. Employing a qualitative methodology with a juridical-empirical approach, this study adopts a case study design on Decision No. 948/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Tnk, supported by in-depth interviews with the presiding judges and comparative analysis of national and international jurisprudence. The findings reveal two dominant paradigms in judicial reasoning: the normative-formalistic paradigm, which emphasizes hifz al-dīn (protection of religion), and the substantive-contextual paradigm, which prioritizes the child’s welfare as the core orientation of justice. The dissenting opinion functions as a form of rechtsvinding (judicial legal discovery), bridging textual legal interpretation and social realities to achieve more humanistic justice. This study recommends further comparative research across Muslim-majority countries such as Malaysia, Egypt, and Morocco to enrich the global discourse on Islamic law that is adaptive and responsive to the best interests of the child.
IMPLEMENTASI TRANSPARANSI DAN AKUNTABILITAS KPU PADA PENGHITUNGAN SUARA PILKADA 2024 Fadia Farhan, Shandra; Murdiana, Elfa; Aziz Rahmaningsih, Aziza
JOURNAL EQUITABLE Vol 11 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : LPPM, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37859/jeq.v11i1.11047

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas oleh Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Kota Metro dalam tahapan penghitungan suara pada Pilkada 2024. Transparansi dan akuntabilitas merupakan aspek penting dalam penyelenggaraan pilkada yang demokratis, terutama dalam proses penghitungan suara yang krusial dan rentan menimbulkan kecurigaan publik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, melalui analisis dokumen terhadap Peraturan KPU Nomor 17 Tahun 2024 serta wawancara mendalam dengan penyelenggara pilkada dan masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KPU Kota Metro telah menerapkan prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas melalui keterbukaan akses informasi, publikasi hasil penghitungan, serta pelibatan saksi dan pengawas. Namun demikian, implementasinya masih menghadapi sejumlah kendala, antara lain keterbatasan penyampaian informasi secara real time dan belum optimalnya pemahaman serta partisipasi masyarakat dalam mengawasi proses penghitungan suara. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi akademik terhadap pengembangan studi tata kelola pemilu dan siyasah syariyah, khususnya mengenai pentingnya nilai keterbukaan dan akuntabilitas lembaga dalam membangun kepercayaan publik terhadap penyelenggara pilkada.
MENGGAGAS PAYUNG HUKUM BAITUL MAAL WATTANWIL (BMT) SEBAGAI KOPERASI SYARI’AH DALAM BINGKAI IUS CONSTITUENDUM Murdiana, Elfa
Jurnal Penelitian Vol 10, No 2 (2016): JURNAL PENELITIAN
Publisher : LP2M IAIN kUDUS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/jp.v10i2.1816

Abstract

Baitul Maal Wat Tanwil (BMT) merupakan lembaga keuangan mikro syari’ah yang secara faktual telah memberikan pengaruh positif terhadap berlangsungnya pembangunan ekonomi di Indonesia. BMT sebagai koperasi syari’ah berada di bawah naungan Dinas Koperasi, konsekuensinya , segala aktivitas keuangan yang terjadi dilindungi oleh kebijakan Undang-undang Koperasi. Namun secara faktual keberadaan UU Koperasi justru belum mampu memberikan dasar hukum yang sesuai dengan praktik BMT yang ada. Oleh karenanya pembentukan aturan hukum yang pasti merupakan hal yang tak bisa ditunda lagi mengingat keberadaan BMT kian tumbuh dan semakin berkembang baik dari aspek jumlah maupun permodalannya. Dengan dibatalkannya UU Koperasi No.17 Tahun 2012 maka perlu bagi BMT memiliki aturan hukum tersendiri sebagai payung hukum bagi aktivitas BMT sebab Koperasi dan BMT (yang disejajarkan dengan Koperasi Syari’ah) berbeda secara operasional dan prinsip. Oleh karenanya pembentukan Undang-Undang Koperasi Syari’ah sebagai dasar Hukum BMT harus segera dilaksanakan. Dalam rangka pembentukan UU Koperasi Syari’ah dalam kerangka Ius Constituendum  maka hendaknya perlu diperhatikan 3 nilai dasar , nilai dasar tersebut adalah: pertama Nilai Keadilan yang mendasari secara filosofis terbentuknya suatu aturan hukum ( Filosofiche Geltung ) dimana dasar ini merupakan suatu landasan ideal yang mengandung cita-cita kolektif masyarakat tentang nilai luhur yang  terkandung dalam Pancasila dan UUD 1945. Kedua adalah nilai kemanfaatan yang mendasari secara sosiologis ( soziologische geltung) agar hukum memiliki kekuatan berlaku dimasyarakat. Ketika adalah nilai kepastian yang lahir sebagai dasar yuridis suatu aturan hukum( Juridische Geltung), dasar ini terkait dengan  persyaratan formal pembentukan suatu peraturan selanjutnya Landasan politis artinya bahwa keberadaan suatu aturan hukum merupakan suatu upaya menuangkan cita-cita kolektif masyarakat Indonesia dalam suatu aturan hukum melalui kekuatan politis yang ada dengan kata lain dasar ini memiliki keterkaitannya dengan kekuasaan yang berperan sebagai
Tafsir Konstitusional Batasan Moralitas, Rasionalitas dan Ketidakadilan Yang Intolerable dalam Pengujian Kebijakan Hukum Terbuka Rayhan, Alendra Nauval Mufti; Safaat, Muchamad Ali; Murdiana, Elfa; Arssa, Ria Casmi
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 33 No. 2: MEI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol33.iss2.art2

Abstract

The discourse on legal policy has entered a new chapter in the judicial review of laws at the Constitutional Court. This new chapter is characterized by the Constitutional Court becoming increasingly open to reviewing open legal policies. Consequently, decisions previously deemed as open legal policies, such as cases concerning the presidential threshold, parliamentary threshold, and several other open legal policy cases, have begun to be granted by the Court. However, the ambiguity of meaning regarding morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice as limitations in the review of open legal policies creates obstacles for subsequent reviews. To that end, the researcher aims to seek the interpretation as well as the criteria of these limitations as the initial boundaries of open legal policy, formulated as: what is the meaning of the limitations of morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice in the review of open legal policy? This study employs a normative juridical research method with a conceptual approach that dissects the concept of limitations on open legal policy and a case approach utilizing Constitutional Court decisions that provide interpretations of the limitations of morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice. The purpose of employing these approaches is to ensure that the interpretation of the limitations of open legal policy holds constitutional value and reflects legal certainty within the concept of the rule of law. The researcher utilizes 16 (sixteen) decisions to discover this interpretation. Through these decisions, it is found that there are 6 (six) metrics of morality, 5 (five) metrics of rationality, and 4 (four) metrics of intolerable injustice commonly used by the Constitutional Court in reviewing open legal policies. These metrics are used to prove the constitutionality of open legal policies in the judicial review of laws