Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.44
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mizan (e-Journal) JURNAL ISTINBATH JURNAL TAPIS Al-Mawarid Jurnal Hukum Islam JURNAL MAHKAMAH As-Salam: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Adzkiya : Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah KONSEP DAN TUJUAN PADA TINJUAN BISNIS SYARIAH Jurnal Supremasi Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum IJouGS: Indonesian Journal of Gender Studies Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam SETARA: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Moderatio : Jurnal Moderasi Beragama Siyasah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Elfa Murdiana
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Metro
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 38 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 38 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Peran Kepemimpinan Perempuan Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Pada Pemerintahan Di Kota Metro Perspektif Siyasah Syar'iyyah ‎ ‎, Aziza Aziz Rahmaningsih; Murdiana, Elfa; Selviana, Umniyatus
Siyasah Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Siyasah : Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Publisher : IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/siyasah.v2i2.6227

Abstract

Perempuan menjadi isu yang sering menjadi perbincangan publik. Peran perempuan dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat bukan hanya sebagai proses pembangunan, tetapi juga sebagai fondasi berstruktur kuat,Pemimpin adalah seorang yang memimpin sebuah Wilayah. Di dalam memimpin Wilayah seorang pemimpin harus mempunyai ilmu kepemimpinan. Hasil dari Penelitian menunjukan peran kepemimpina n perempuan di Kecamata n Metro Pusat adalah memberika n pelayana n da n Kebijaka n yang bai k kepada masyarakat sesuai denga n visi-misi Kecamata n Metro Pusat terutama tentang E-service yang memberika n pelayana n secara elektroni k dala m artia n bahwa kecamata n Metro Pusat suda h dapat memberika n pelayana n yang bebas berbasis elektroni k sehingga memudahka n masyarakat untu k mendapatka n pelayana n yang cepat da n tepat yaitu sesuai dengan tujuan Siyasa h syar’iyya h yaitu kepemimpina n yang menuju pada kemaslahata n bai k dunia maupu n di akhirat.
Kedudukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang di Tinjau Dari Hierarki Perundang-Undangan Indonesia Hanum, Roro Hanum; Murdiana, Elfa; Bahari, Raha
Siyasah Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Siyasah Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Publisher : IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/siyasah.v3i2.8090

Abstract

Abstrak : In the context of law and regulations in Indonesia, the concept of hierarchy is vital for ensuring control over regulations that could potentially harm society both materially and non-materially. This concept is rooted in Hans Kelsen's theory of legal norms, which posits that legal norms have hierarchical levels, with grundnorms at the top. These norms are interrelated and form a coherent legal order. However, the application of this hierarchy is influenced by political factors that shape the constitutional system.One significant legal instrument reflecting this hierarchy in Indonesia is the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (Perppu), which holds an equivalent position to regular laws in the Indonesian presidential system. It is essential to clearly define the term "compelling urgency" as the basis for issuing a Perppu to ensure that the President's actions remain within objective limits. Understanding and reviewing this legal hierarchy is crucial for maintaining the quality and enforcement of regulations in Indonesia. In this framework, legal comprehension revolves around official laws, and all aspects of law, norms, rules, and legal actions must align with the applicable laws. The evolution of legislation impacts various aspects of society, and a precise understanding of hierarchy and the concept of judicial review is indispensable for upholding the quality of law and justice in Indonesia.
STRATEGI ADVOKAT DALAM MENGATASI SENGKETA TANAH WARISStrategi Advokat Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Mustika Bangsa dalam Mengatasi Sengketa Tanah Waris di Lampung Zidan, Muhammad; Murdiana, Elfa; Ningsih, Rahmah; Setiawan, Wahyu
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v20i2.5200

Abstract

This research provides a comprehensive picture of the experience of Mustika Bangsa Legal Aid Institute advocates in resolving inheritance land disputes. This paper focuses on the formulation of advocates' strategies, discussing the various rarities and approaches used by advocates to effectively resolve inheritance disputes. In contrast to previous studies, which mostly discuss the role of advocates, this study centers on the concept of strategies used by advocates in resolving inherited land disputes.  A strong and structured strategy is key to achieving the desired outcome in the legal process. This study uses qualitative research for the inquiry process in investigating scientific and humanitarian issues with different traditions. The qualitative design enabled the author to map texts that speak of advocates' strategies, disputes, and legacy landscapes experienced in the context of this study. The results of the study emphasize the importance of advocates' strategies in achieving desired outcomes in the legal process. The research shows that a well-planned strategy can significantly increase the effectiveness of resolving disputes, evidenced by the satisfaction of clients assisted by Mustika Bangsa Legal Aid Institute in Metro. Through this research, the author hopes to contribute to broader efforts to create effective and sustainable advocate strategies in inheritance dispute resolution
Keadilan Anak Perspektif Undang-Undang No.11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak: Menilik Strategi Implementasi Diversi Di Kepolisian Dan Pengadilan Negeri Kota Metro Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Restroaktif Murdiana, Elfa
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 1 No 02 (2017): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v1i02.875

Abstract

Being introduced the concept of diversion arranged in constitution of child criminal justice system 2012 gives the different nuance for the implementation of child criminal justice system in Indonesia. Therefore, the implementation of diversion concept becomes a definiteness that must be noticed. In realizing the retroactive justice for children, the implementation of law becomes one of the important components. Thus, it is need to be understood the strategy of implementation carried out by the upholder as the law structure. This is a library research by using documentation as the data collection technique. The result of the research shows that the preparation of facilities and infrastructure in handling the diversion problem for children is one of the implementation strategies done by the state court of Metro. Whereas, the investigation in police resort of Metro has not had special space used, so that it can be one of the constraint faced by the institution of diversion implementer if considered from the culture aspect.
Telaah Nilai Kepastian dan Keadilan pada Regulasi Mahar dalam Pembangunan Hukum Keluarga Murdiana, Elfa; Zulaikha, Siti; Mahmudah, Nurul
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 5 No 1 (2021): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v5i1.3367

Abstract

Explicitly, a dowry is not found in the legal protection of marriage, but normatively it is read firmly in Chapter V articles 30 to 38 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. In Article 2 Paragraph 1 of Law No. 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that "Marriage is legal, if it is carried out according to the laws of each religion and belief". The explanation of the article emphasizes that there is no marriage if it is not carried out according to religion and belief in accordance with the 1945 Constitution, in which a marriage will be declared valid if a dowry has been paid in it. This study will describe the dynamics of dowry in the meaning of religion and culture associated with several regulations carried out through a policy and cultural approach. The data collection techniques used were interviews and an inventory of policies on marriage and dowry which were described inductively to find the dowry formulation as part of the Ius Constituendum on Marriage Law in Indonesia. The indecisiveness of the Marriage Law as a Formal Gezet in the implementation of marriage is indicated as a factor causing the various meanings and implementation of the dowry, like the pillars and conditions of marriage. So that the essence of the dowry as the actualization of the role of women to express their rights in marriage is still injured because the dowry is actualized as a bargaining transaction between the two families of the groom and the bride. So that the high dowry actually makes women the object of transactions that reduce their rights in the implementation of marriage. Efforts to change the legal umbrella of marriage in Indonesia should be carried out for the sake of certainty and justice of marriage law for all Indonesian people, especially in the concept of dowry payments so that it can be used as the basis for the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia. It is hoped that the dowry regulation can be clearly broken down in creating legal certainty and justice.
Nusyuz Menurut Pemikiran Sayyid Qutb dalam Tafsir Fi Zilalil Qur’an Qadri, Busran; Murdiana, Elfa; Bustomi, Ahmad
Tapis: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Vol 6 No 1 (2022): Tapis : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat of Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/tapis.v6i1.5140

Abstract

Nusyuz has always been related to the wife's non-compliance with her husband. Therefore, there is a difference in resolving nusyuz cases committed by husbands and wives. If nusyuz is performed by the wife, then the husband has the right to advise the wife, separate the bed, and hit with a note of not hurting. Whereas, when nusyuz is done by the husband, there is a tendency for the wife to should give up some of her rights in order to carry out a peace agreement. The purpose of this study is to enlighten the reader regarding how the concept of nusyuz is based on Sayyid Qutb’s thoughts. Kind of this study is library research, employing normative and sociological approaches. The purpose of this study is to understand Sayyid Qutb's understanding of nusyuz concept. The data in this research is taken from a tafsir book written by Sayyid Qutb entitled Tafsir Fi Zilalil Qur’an, books, and scientific research relevant to nusyuz. Afterward, in analyzing data, the researcher uses the theory formula explained by M. Quraish Shihab about the Qur’an interpreted method. This study explained that nusyuz is an act in which a person (husband or wife) accentuates and elevates by disobeying, and who does not do their obligation as a husband or wife and its solutions depend on his/her position in the household, education, family, and country's condition.
Dissenting Opinion Hakim Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang Pada Perkara Hak Asuh Anak Bagi Ibu Yang Murtad Agustin, Cleo Nadia; Murdiana, Elfa; Setiawan, Wahyu; Manasikana, Adellia; Nurli Darmawati, Sifa
Al-Izzah: Jurnal Hasil-Hasil Penelitian Vol 20, No. 2, November 2025
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/ai.vi.12954

Abstract

This study examines the dissenting opinion in a child custody case following apostasy at the Tanjung Karang Religious Court, Class 1A, as a reflection of the dynamic interplay between Islamic family law, substantive justice, and child protection principles. The main research problem concerns how the judges’ legal reasoning patterns are formed within this context of differing opinions and to what extent the dissenting opinion contributes to reinforcing the principles of maslahah mursalah, maqasid al-shari‘ah, and the best interest of the child. Employing a qualitative methodology with a juridical-empirical approach, this study adopts a case study design on Decision No. 948/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Tnk, supported by in-depth interviews with the presiding judges and comparative analysis of national and international jurisprudence. The findings reveal two dominant paradigms in judicial reasoning: the normative-formalistic paradigm, which emphasizes hifz al-dīn (protection of religion), and the substantive-contextual paradigm, which prioritizes the child’s welfare as the core orientation of justice. The dissenting opinion functions as a form of rechtsvinding (judicial legal discovery), bridging textual legal interpretation and social realities to achieve more humanistic justice. This study recommends further comparative research across Muslim-majority countries such as Malaysia, Egypt, and Morocco to enrich the global discourse on Islamic law that is adaptive and responsive to the best interests of the child.
The Victim's Best Interest Principle in Islamic Law: An Examination of the Substance of Sexual Violence in Muslim Majority Countries in the Contemporary Era Elfa Murdiana; Nunung Rodliyah; Rudi Natamiharja; M. Nur Fathoni; Gautam Kumar Jha
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): MilRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, IAIN Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v5i1.10654

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the principle of the best interests of victims is accommodated within the legal frameworks for protecting victims of sexual violence in Muslim-majority countries. It critically explores the normative and practical gap between Islamic legal principles—particularly the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) and honor (ḥifẓ al-‘irḍ)—and the operation of positive law in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Egypt. The central questions addressed are how victim protection is conceptualized and regulated within the legal systems of these three countries, and whether the best interests of victims have been established as the primary normative and policy orientation. This study employs a normative juridical method, utilizing comparative and conceptual approaches, and analyzes statutory regulations, legal doctrines, court decisions, and relevant academic literature. The findings reveal that, despite recent legal reforms, existing regulatory frameworks remain predominantly perpetrator-oriented. Victim protection is often treated as supplementary rather than foundational, resulting in limited access to justice, insufficient recovery mechanisms, and weak institutional responsiveness to victims’ needs. Building on a Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah perspective, this article proposes a legal reconstruction that re-centers the protection of victims as a core objective of Islamic and national legal systems. It argues that the principle of the best interests of victims is not only compatible with Islamic law but is inherently embedded within its ethical and purposive framework. Accordingly, the study recommends strengthening substantive legal norms, procedural safeguards, institutional coordination, and legal culture to ensure holistic and equitable victim protection. The academic contribution of this article lies in its integration of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah with comparative victimology, offering a normative framework that bridges Islamic legal theory and contemporary human rights discourse. It advances the discussion on victim-centered justice by providing a contextualized Islamic legal justification for prioritizing victims’ interests within modern legal systems.
Co-Authors Agus Hamdani Agustin, Cleo Nadia Ali, Zezen Zainul Aprina Chintya Aprina Chintya, Aprina Ardliansyah, Moelki Fahmi Bahari, Raha Dela Oktora, Nency Destalia E.P. E.P., Destalia Elfa, Elfa Murdiana Gautam Kumar Jha Hanum, Roro Hanum Hary Kurniawan Kosim, Nandang M. Nur Fathoni Manasikana, Adellia Mufliha Wijayati Mufliha Wijayati Mufliha Wijayati Mufti Rayhan, Alendra Nauval Natamiharja, Rudi Nely, Nely Rahma Wati Nency Della Oktora Nunung Rodliyah Nurli Darmawati, Sifa Nurul Mahmudah, Nurul Oktora, Nency Della P, Toto Andri Qadri, Busran Rahmah Ningsih, Rahmah Selviana, Umniyatus Siti Zulaikha Sudiono, Titut Talib Ibrahim, Muhammad Titut Sudiono Titut Sudiono Titut Sudiono Toto Andri P Wahyu Setiawan Zarfina Yenti zezen zainul ali Zidan, Muhammad ‎ ‎, Aziza Aziz Rahmaningsih