Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Cyber Crime Dengan Konten Pornogafi I Kadek Arya Sumadiyasa; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; I Made Minggu Widyantara
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3443.372-377

Abstract

Era globalisasi telah membawa perubahan dan kemajuan yang cepat dalam kehidupan tanpa batasan jarak dan waktu. Kemajuan juga telah menimbulkan keresahan baru dengan munculnya kejahatan yang canggih dalam bentuk cybercrime, salah satunya yaitu penyebaran konten pornografi melalui sarana internet yang masuk kedalam cybercrime yang merupakan kejahatan dengan menggunakan teknologi informasi. Permasalahannya adalah : 1) Bagaimanakah pengaturan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penyebaran konten pornografi melalui sarana internet yang di kualifikasikan sebagai Cyber Crirme? dan 2 Bagaimanakah Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penyebaran konten Pornografi melalui sarana internet yang di kualifikasikan sebagai Cyber Crirme? Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaturan hukum terhadap cyberporn yang disebarkan melalui internet; dan untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban pidana dalam terjadinya penyebaran konten pornografi melalui internet. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode normatif. Pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku cybercrime penyebar konten pornografi dapat ditinjau pada Pasal 282 KUHP dan Pasal 27 ayat (1) UU ITE, serta Pasal 4 UU Pornografi. Serta upaya penanggulangannya dilakukan dengan upaya preventif dan represif. Diharapkan nantinya pengaturan yang saat ini berlaku dapat memberika efek jera serta meminimalisir terjadinya penyebaran konten pornografi dengan kualifikasi cybercrime.
Sanksi Hukum Bagi Petugas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan yang Terlibat Peredaran Narkotika di Lingkungan Lembaga Permasyarakatan I Kadek Pasek Saputra; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; I Made Minggu Widyantara
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3444.378-383

Abstract

As a developing country with the state ideology Pancasila, it is not enough for the State of Indonesia to be able to dedicate itself as a prosperous country. Viewed from a legal perspective, there are behaviors that are in accordance with the prevailing norms and there are also behaviors that deviate from the prevailing norms. Nevertheless, it is necessary to have legal sanctions regulating the life of the nation and state. In the criminal justice system in Indonesia, the correctional institution has a position as a place of guidance and implementation of what has been decided by the court for the convicted person. There are two problem formulations that will be discussed further related to the criminal act of looting, including how the classification of abuse of power carried out by prison officers against the circulation of narcotics that occurs in prisons and how to impose legal sanctions for prison officers who are involved in narcotics trafficking in prisons? From the formulation of the problem, the discussion is carried out using normative research methods. The abuse of authority of correctional officers is regulated in Law no. 12 of 1995 concerning Correctional Facilities.
PROSES PENANGGUHAN PENAHANAN DENGAN JAMINAN PADA TINGKAT PENYIDIK BERDASARKAN PASAL 31 KUHAP I Made Arya Kusuma Winata; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; I Made Minggu Widyantara
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3449.403-408

Abstract

Hukum bukanlah mata-mata sekedar pedoman untuk dilihat dan dibaca atau diketahui saja, melainkan untuk dilaksanakan dan ditaati, dari segala peraturan hukum adalah bersifat mengatur dan memaksa anggota masyarakat untuk patuh mentaatinya, sehingga keseimbangan tiap-tiap hubungan dalam masyarakat dapat dicapai. Maksud dan tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa “syarat dan prosedur yang harus dipenuhi pemohon agar dapat dilakukannya penangguhan penahanan dan dasar pertimbangan bagi penyidik untuk menangguhkan penahanan dengan jaminan” Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif pada peraturan perundanh-undangan, teori hukum dan pendapat sarjana. Dari penelitian hukum yang dilakukan, persyaratan dan prosedur yang harus dipenuhi pemohon agar dapat dilakukan penangguhan dan penahanan adalah penahanan harus ditetapkan oleh instansi Kepolisian yang menahan dan dasar pertimbangan bagi penyidik untuk menangguhkan penahanan dengan jaminan adalah Pasal 31 ayat (1) UU No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Penjualan Daging Anjing Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 I Made Bramastra De Putra; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; I Putu Gede Seputra
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3450.409-415

Abstract

Dogs are one of the favorite and much-loved pets, but this does not prevent the illegal sale of dog meat as a food ingredient. Considering that there is no clear criminal sanction from the illegal sale of dog meat from the government, the research aims to examine the accountability of the perpetrators of selling dog meat from a consumer protection perspective and the criminal sanction for the perpetrator based on law. This research was conducted with a normative method with conceptual approach and statutory approach. From the result the researcher found that the perpetrator must be responsible to consumers based on the Consumer Protection Law Article 4 letter a, which guarantees the safety, comfort and security of consumption of goods and / or services, and the perpetrator may be subject to a maximum fine of 2 billion rupiah or a maximum imprisonment of 5 years for violating the provisions in Article 8 based on the consumer protection law article 62 paragraph 1.
Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penjambretan Mengakibatkan Matinya Korban I Putu Bayu Suryadinatha; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.2.3478.452-456

Abstract

Increasing crime mugging, crime that commits crime by confiscating valuables. Based on this research, the writer raises the formulation the problem: 1. How regulation mugging criminal sanctions, 2. How imposition criminal sanctions for the perpetrator that results as result mugging. This type research uses the normative method, with an invited-invited, conceptual, case approach. regulation mugging criminal is articles 362-367 of Criminal Code concerning robbery, where mugging regulated in Criminal Code, so crime mugging refers to article 365 paragraph (3) criminal act robbery with violence. Perpetrators mugging which result in death may be subject to Article 365 paragraph (3) with a maximum penalty 15 years in prison. regulation mugging crime based on Articles 362-367 Criminal Code because mugging included in category violent crime which deals with the elements article 365 paragraph (3) robbery with violence. Mugging subject to imprisonment and imprisonment for the mugging subject to a maximum imprisonment of 15 years. Mugging is regulated in article 362 if not with violence and 365 paragraph (3) if it is done with violence. For law enforcers, it is better if law enforcers use the Man In The Street model in providing protection to the community.
Kewenangan Pemerintah Kota Denpasar dalam Penerapan Jalur Khusus Sepeda I Putu Aldi Wira Kusuma; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Luh Putu Suryani
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4122.473-478

Abstract

Realizing an environmentally friendly city of Denpasar is one of the balancing concepts in the development of an environmentally friendly city. Changing the mode of transportation to environmentally friendly transportation, such as the use of bicycles, can prevent congestion. One of the government's real actions is the government's authority on bicycle lanes as a necessity for the community. The purposes of this study are to reveal the form of authority of the Denpasar City Government in Streamlining the Application of Bicycle Paths and forms of legal protection for bicycle lane users based on Law Number 22 Year 2009 in Denpasar City. The type of legal research used in this research is empirical legal research with a statutory approach. The data collection techniques were carried out by reading, recording, quoting, summarizing and analyzing the data and information obtained from the relevant agencies, namely the Denpasar City Transportation Service. After obtaining primary legal materials and secondary legal materials which are then processed and analyzed systematically, data is obtained that the authority of the Denpasar City government in making the use of bicycle lanes effective is to provide bicycle lane facilities at several points scattered in the Denpasar City area, such as on Jalan Sudirman , Jalan Letda Made Putra, Jalan Letda Tantular and at several other points. Meanwhile, legal protection for bicycle lane users contains the rights of bicycle lane users, such as the mandatory provision of bicycle lane facilities by the government to ensure the safety and comfort of cyclists, freedom from fear in traffic, and avoidance of traffic hazards.
Sengketa dalam Perkawinan Kedua Tanpa Izin Istri Pertama I Gede Agus Dedy Andika; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4125.490-495

Abstract

Marriage according to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage is an inner and outer bond between a man and a woman to form a happy household. The authority of polygamy is not absolute in the hands of the husband, but there are other conditions that must be met, namely obtaining permission from the judge (court). The purposes of this study are to analyze the regulation of criminal sanctions in a second marriage without the permission of the first wife and the legal consequences of a second marriage that does not meet the applicable legal provisions. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. Sources of legal materials used are primary and secondary sources of legal materials. Data collection techniques were carried out by examining existing library materials which were then analyzed systematically. The results of the study reveal that criminal sanctions are given in the second marriage without providing incorrect information based on the criminal provisions in PP No. 9 of 1975 which is a lex specialis of the Criminal Code. The legal consequence of the second marriage is that if the husband has remarried or is polygamous without the knowledge of the first wife, the first wife can sue by submitting a request for annulment of the marriage contained in Articles 22-29 of the Marriage Law.
Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Melakukan Penahanan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Sosial Media Louis Muda Adam Gesi Radja; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4144.602-606

Abstract

Authority is what is called formal power, power comes from legislative power (given by law) or from executive administrative power. Authority, which usually consists of several powers, is power over a certain group of people or power over an area of ​​government. The purposes of this study are to analyze the arrangement of the prosecutor's authority in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media and the prosecutor's obstacles in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media. The research method applied in this research is normative legal research with a statutory and a conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by means of a literature study. The of used are primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of legal materials. After the legal material has been collected, it will then be processed and analyzed using the method of processing legal materials systematically and presented descriptively. The results of the study reveal that the prosecutor's authority is regulated in the criminal procedural law code, the prosecutor's authority law. Which includes several laws, among others, Law no. 16 of 2004 which regulates the prosecutor's office, so that from the law it can be ascertained about the rights and powers of the prosecutor so that law enforcers, especially the prosecutor's office, can make detentions in accordance with the rules that have been in force, so that there is no abuse of authority by law enforcers, especially prosecutors and as The prosecutor's office should be obliged to realize equality for all Indonesian citizens who are being entangled in criminal, civil and other cases.
Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penipuan Jual Beli Tanah (Studi Kasus : Putusan No. 74/Pid.B/2017/Pn Gin) Ngakan Made Wira Diputra; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Luh Putu Suryani
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4167.651-655

Abstract

Crime on this earth will never end. The most frequent criminal treatment in the community is the crime of fraud related to an object. The crime of fraud has been regulated starting from Article 378 to Article 395 of the Criminal Code. This study aims to examine the criminal sanctions against the crime of fraud in the sale and purchase of land and reveal the judges' considerations against the perpetrators of the crime of fraud in the sale and purchase of land according to the case study: Decision No. 74/Pid.B/2017/PN Gin. This study uses a normative legal research method with a legislation approach and a case study approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials collected by library and interview techniques. Furthermore, the research data was processed and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study revealed that the criminal sanction applied was in the form of a principal sentence by looking at the indictment of the public prosecutor which applied more to Article 378 of the Criminal Code so that in the case study the defendant was sentenced to a year in prison. The Panel of Judges made this decision after hearing statements from the defendant, victim witnesses, and evidence presented by the public prosecutor
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pencemaran Lingkungan Hidup Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Cipta Kerja Kadek Dicky Candra Mahendra; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Luh Putu Suryani
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4196.678-682

Abstract

Human activities that are less controlled, make a clean and healthy living environment less and less, this is because the earth is currently getting older and the activities of humans themselves are not properly preserving the environment. Humans have a role and responsibility to empower the environment to maintain the ecosystem. However, the current reality is that most environmental crimes often involve corporations. This study aims to examine the regulation of criminal acts by corporations in the perspective of the Copyright Act and to reveal criminal sanctions against corporations that commit acts of environmental pollution in terms of the Copyright Act. This research uses a normative research type, with a Legislative approach. As for what is used as primary data, namely Law Number 32 of 2009, Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is the legal basis for knowing criminal arrangements and criminal sanctions against corporate criminal liability for environmental pollution in terms of the work copyright law. Data were collected using library research techniques. After the research data has been collected, it is processed by elaboration, namely combining the sources of the primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials with deductive and inductive logic. The results of this study indicate that corporate crime is essentially a functional act and is in the form of an inclusion offense. The criminal sanction of imprisonment is 1/3 to the management of the corporation.
Co-Authors A. A. Risma Purnama Dewi A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A Ngurah Adhi Wibisana A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A. Kompiang Dhipa Aditya A.A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi A.A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi Aditya Ryan Hidayat Agus Wija Atmaja Agus Yogik Palguna Alda Vidia Vergionita Anak Agung Gede Budhi Warmana Putra Anak Agung Gede Oka Wisnumurti Anak Agung Gede Ryan Januar Anak Agung Made Angga Harta Yana Anak Agung Ngurah Bagus Arya Bhaskara Anak Agung Rai Gayatri Artha Yani Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Arimbawa, Kadek Pageh Arini, Desak Gde Dwi Ayu Prasetya Dewi Ayu Prasetya Dewi Ayu Prasetya Dewi Ayu Prasetya Dewi Ayu Putri Arisandy Carmelita Juliana Putri Benny Carmelita Juliana Putri Benny Charles Ferguson Lagaribu De Ornay Cok Rai Kesuma Putra Cok Rai Kesuma Putra Cokorda lstri Dharmasatyari Dendy Martono Prabowo Dewa Ayu Risma Pranasita Dewa Ayu Warta Meilaningsih Dewa Gede Agung Semarabawa Dewanti Arya Maha Rani Dewi, A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi, A.A. Sagung Laksmi Diah Gayatri Sudibya Dila May Sekarsari Dinda Dian Pratiwi Dwi Nova Indriyani Emanuella Theo Charoline emanuella0103@gmail.com Ferdinandus Kila Ganitri, Ni Nyoman Ayu Ratih Gaviota Adrian Yohan Gede Agung Wirawan Nusantara Gede Agung Wirawan Nusantara Gede Arjun Setiawan Gede Dius Waisnawa Cahyadi George Pascallyus Firman Agung Glenn Merciano Eben Rohi Gusti Ayu Nyoman Jassya Novasari Hartini Sarifan Herla Panji Wahyuda I Dewa Ayu Mira Pradewi I Dewa Gede Atmadja I Dewa Gede Atmadja I Dewa Gede Pramana adhi I Dewa Gede Pramana Adhi I Dewa Ketut Alit Catur Mahaputra I Dewa Putu Gede Putra Sedana Jaya I G A A Gita Pritayanti Dinar I G.A.A.Gita P.Dinar I Gde Artha I Gde Artha I Gede Aditya Triyana I Gede Aditya Triyana I Gede Agus Allezandro Suputra I Gede Agus Dedy Andika I GEDE ARIMBAWA I Gede Eka Suantara I Gede P Astika Juniartha I Gede Putu Bagus Priyadi Wittadarma I Gede Sathya Narayana Andrade I Gede Sathya Narayana Andrade I Gede Windu Merta Sanjaya I Gede Yoga Paramartha Duarsa I Gusti Agung Ayu Candra Nigrat I Gusti Agung Ayu Gita Pritayanti Dinar I Gusti Agung Istri Arinda Praminingrat I Gusti Ayu Suanti Karnadi Singgi I Gusti Bagus Suryawan I Gusti Made Jaya Kesuma I Gusti Made Yudha Pramana I Gusti Made Yudha Pramana I Gusti Ngurah Agung Bagus Bima Putra I Gusti Ngurah Agung Bija Karang I Gusti Ngurah Ananta Wardana I Gusti Ngurah Ananta Wardana I Gusti Ngurah Wira Sanjaya I Kadek Agus Widiastika Adiputra I Kadek Ari Putra I Kadek Arya Sumadiyasa I Kadek Aryatmaja I Kadek Bayu Antara I Kadek Candra Karunia Bagiarta Putra Sugiantara I Kadek Dwi Melana Putra I Kadek Dwipyana I Kadek Edy Sanjaya I Kadek Oza Ananda Putra I Kadek Pasek Saputra I Kadek Sudikma I Kadek Wahyu Dwipayana I Kadek Windi Pranata Putra I Kadek Yukik Okta Dwipayana I Ketut Adi Wira Wijaya Kesuma Atmaja I Ketut Arya Darmawan I Ketut Gede Satria Wibawa Aryana I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi I Ketut Sukadana I Ketut Widia I Komang Aditya Sanjaya I Komang Agus Edi Suryawan I Komang Agus Muliawan I Komang Arya Kusumantara I Komang Wahyu Permana I Made Aditya Mantara Putra I Made Ananda Hardiantha I Made Ananda Hardiantha I Made Anandha Ida Rusmantara I Made Anoraga Okky Dharmala I Made Ardena I Made Ardena I Made Arjaya I Made Arya Kusuma Winata I Made Bramastra De Putra I Made Gandra I Made Gede Wiradana I Made Jaya Wiguna I Made Jaya Wiguna I Made Karnadi I Made Minggu Widyantara I MADE MINGGU WIDYANTARA, I MADE MINGGU I Made Ngurah Adi Kusumadewa I Made Ode Dwiyana Putra I Made Pasek Asmaradana I Made Pria Dharsana, I Made Pria I Made Rai Gentha Prayita I Made Suartana I Made Suwitra I Made Vidi Jayananda I Nyoman Bagiastra I Nyoman Gede Bayu Krisnantha Dwipayana I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Rama Cahyadi Putra I Nyoman Sri Agus Rusnama I Nyoman Subamia I Nyoman Subamia I Nyoman Subamia I Nyoman Subamia I Nyoman Subarnia I Nyoman Sujana I Nyoman Sutama I Nyoman Trian Prananta Wibawa I Nyoman Trian Prananta Wibawa I Putu Aditya Pramana I Putu Aditya Pramana I Putu Aditya Putra Bahari I Putu Agus Suarnegara I Putu Aldi Wira Kusuma I Putu Aris Wiradinata I Putu Bayu Suryadinatha I Putu Dicky Suryantha I Putu Dony Setiawan I Putu Gede Budihartawan I Putu Gede Fajar Riski Andika I Putu Gede Seputra I Putu Krisna llham Wiantama I Putu Mirta Utama I Putu Pande Juli Artana I Putu Rama Aditya Prapta I Putu Satria Adhi Darma I Putu Suwantara I Putu Wahyu Putra Suryawan I Putu Yogi Mahardika Pratama Bismasana I Wayan Angga Pratama I Wayan Angga Pratama I Wayan Arthana I Wayan Arthanaya I Wayan Arthanaya I Wayan Bayu Suryawan I Wayan Dedi Supriadi I Wayan Gede Swecana I Wayan Rideng I Wayan Sujana I Wayan Sunarta I Wayan Sunarta I Wayan Wesna Astara I Wayan Yoga Pratama Putra I.B Gede Agustya Mahaputra Ida Ayu Gede Kristina Dewi Ida Ayu Ide Dinda Paramita Ida Ayu Made Wahyuni Dewi Ida Ayu Putu Widiati Ida Ayu Putu Widiati Ida Ayu Samhita Chanda Thistanti Ida Ayu Wayan Widyastuti Ida Bagus Gede Agustya Mahaputra Ida Bagus Mahendrajaya Ida Bagus Mayun Andika Putra IGAA Candra Ningrat Indah Permatasari Istadevi Utami Rahardika Josep Robert Khuana Josep Robert Khuana Jyoti KaniaCri Kadek Agung Yudha Mahadewa Kadek Agus Indra Ana Putra Kadek Bagus Rakyan Dana Sinatra Kadek Darmayanti Putri Kadek Darmayanti Putri Kadek Dicky Candra Mahendra Kadek Dini Destianingsih Kadek Jaya Kartika Kadek Novita Dewi Kadek Novita Dewi Kadek Pageh Arimbawa Kadek Rizky Bhaswara Ardiwenatha Kadek Widhiantari Ningsih Karma, Ni Made Sukaryati Ketut Adi Wirawan, Ketut Adi Kevin Jerrick Pangestu Kevin Umbu Hiwa Ninggeding Kharisma Nanda Sattwika Khresna Wisantya Komang Ajus Nada Putra Komang Angga Pradana Komang Arya Ananta Setyawan Komang Ayu Handayani Komang Ayu Sintia Dewi Komang Gede Dipayana Komang Saeramessatya Purwadi Sastra Leonito Ribeiro Leonito Ribeiro Louis Muda Adam Gesi Radja Luh Made Mutiasari Luh Putu Sudini Luh Putu Suryani Luh Putu Suryani Made Mahadwiva Surya Krishna Made Mahayana Agastia Made Minggu Widiantara Made Minggu Widiantara Made Rai Diascitta Hardi Sentana Manik Sastri, I. I. D. A. Marantika, I Putu Mega Marselina Yunita Seravina Maudy Aulia Putri Muhammad Alfian Dwi Saputra Mulyawati, Kade Richa Nanditamaha Mulia Alodia Saraswati Ngakan Gede Bagus Widyagraha Ngakan Made Wira Diputra Ni Kadek Candra Dewi Ni Kadek Dewi Agustina Ni Kadek Erika Ni Kadek Erika Ni Kadek Febriana Ni Kadek Madya Yani Ni Komang Triana Diah Mahadewi Ni Komang Triana Diah Mahadewi Ni Komang Wulan Prayatni Kana Ni Luh Gede Nita Ary Widiani Ni Luh Gede Novianti Ni Luh Gita Saraswati Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati Ni Luh Made Mehendrawati Ni Luh Niken Ayu Tresna Ni Luh Putu Amanda Cahayani Ni Made Ayu Trimayukti Ni Made Noviana Ruth Yolanda Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Ratna Suwari Ni Made Sinthya Kusuma Arisanthi Ni Nyoman Alit Meilinda Suasthi Ni Nyoman Alit Meilinda Suasthi Ni Nyoman Putri Purnama Santhi Ni Nyoman Putri Purnama Santhi Ni Putu Eka Dharma Yanti Ni Putu Eka Noviyanti Ni Putu Laksmi Krisnina Maharai Ni Putu P Novi Widiantari Ni Putu Yuni Suantika Putri Ni Wayan Nita Dewi Nyoman Andi Widjaya Nyoman Ariawan Agus Ardika Nyoman Dita Ary Putri Pande Komang Satya Parama Hamsa Pande Komang Tegar Iswara Pande Nyoman Jaya Budiarta Pande Putu Thalia Alma Pusaka, Semerdanta Putra Prawira Satya Utama Putu Adi Pratama Putu Anggelita Putri Putu Anggelita Putri Putu Ayu Candradiva Saraswati Putu Ayu Sarina Selsa Oktaviani Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna Putu Diah Premana Putri Putu Diah Wiska Sasmitha Putu Marita Maharani Putri Putu Nadya Prabandari Putu Nandita Dewi Putu Pebri Theresia Ananda Putu Suryani . Putu Wisnu Nugraha Rafizah Abu Hassan Rai Bagus Cahyadi Wicaksana Ratu Agung Dewangga Arinatha Gunawan Sang Bagus Nyoman Wahyuda Putra Simon Nahak Siti Aishah Styawati, Ni Komang Arini Sujana, I Nyoman Suryani, Luh Putu Swetasoma, Cokorda Gede Thomas Saputra Tia Nur Larasati Wibisana, Anak Agung Ngurah Adhi Widiati, Ida Ayu Putu Yolanda Hana Teli