Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

The Position of the Attorney General’s Office as the Single Prosecutor in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Muhammad Irwan; Suprapto Suprapto; Mulyani Zulaeha; Achmad Faishal
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v5i1.130

Abstract

This study aims to critically examine the institutional position of the Public Prosecutor’s Office as the sole prosecutorial authority (single prosecutor) within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The core legal issue addressed concerns the authority and functional role of the Prosecutor’s Office as the exclusive body responsible for prosecution, particularly as mandated in Article 1 of Law No. 11 of 2021, which amends Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method, this study focuses on the analysis of normative ambiguity, using both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the single prosecutor concept normatively reinforces the centralization of prosecutorial powers in the hands of the Public Prosecutor's Office. Nonetheless, ambiguities persist regarding the interpretation of the limits of this authority, especially in its interactions with other law enforcement agencies and in the practical implementation of the dominus litis principle. Therefore, a comprehensive legal interpretation is imperative to prevent overlapping jurisdictions and to uphold the coherence and consistency of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Penguatan Pemahaman Restorative Justice Bagi Aparatur Desa dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Sosial dan Lingkungan Mulyani Zulaeha; Muhammad Yasir; Muhammad Azianoor Ilmy; Achmad Faishal; Suprapto Suprapto; Anang Sophan Tornado; Soffyan Angga Fahlani; Cindyva Thalia Mustika
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v6i2.11798

Abstract

This community service program aimed to strengthen village officials’ understanding of restorative justice for resolving social and environmental conflicts in Gudang Hirang Village, Banjar Regency. The results indicated a significant improvement in the officials’ ability to identify minor conflicts, conduct neutral restorative justice-based mediation, and draft written agreements that prioritize victim recovery without recourse to formal judicial proceedings. Enhanced understanding of restorative justice directly contributed to community harmony in Gudang Hirang Village. A local wisdom-based dispute resolution mechanism involving village officials, community leaders, Babinsa, and Bhabinkamtibmas effectively prevented the escalation of social and environmental conflicts and resolved them through familial approaches. This model reduces court caseloads for minor cases while promoting active community participation in maintaining order and social justice. Program sustainability can be ensured through the establishment of a Restorative Justice House, the development of village mediation SOPs, and periodic mentoring by the service team, thereby institutionalizing restorative justice principles as the primary instrument for maintaining peace at the village level. The program employed lectures with PowerPoint presentations, case discussions, interactive question-and-answer sessions, and pre-tests and post-tests. Equipment used included laptops, microphones, a sound system, mobile phones, and an LCD projector.