Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.832
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Badamai Law Journal Banua Law Review Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah International Journal of Sociology and Law KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara INJURLENS Open Access DRIVERset
Suprapto Suprapto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The Position of the Attorney General’s Office as the Single Prosecutor in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System Muhammad Irwan; Suprapto Suprapto; Mulyani Zulaeha; Achmad Faishal
International Journal of Law, Environment, and Natural Resources Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): April Issue
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/injurlens.v5i1.130

Abstract

This study aims to critically examine the institutional position of the Public Prosecutor’s Office as the sole prosecutorial authority (single prosecutor) within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The core legal issue addressed concerns the authority and functional role of the Prosecutor’s Office as the exclusive body responsible for prosecution, particularly as mandated in Article 1 of Law No. 11 of 2021, which amends Law No. 16 of 2004 on the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method, this study focuses on the analysis of normative ambiguity, using both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that the single prosecutor concept normatively reinforces the centralization of prosecutorial powers in the hands of the Public Prosecutor's Office. Nonetheless, ambiguities persist regarding the interpretation of the limits of this authority, especially in its interactions with other law enforcement agencies and in the practical implementation of the dominus litis principle. Therefore, a comprehensive legal interpretation is imperative to prevent overlapping jurisdictions and to uphold the coherence and consistency of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Penguatan Pemahaman Restorative Justice Bagi Aparatur Desa dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Sosial dan Lingkungan Mulyani Zulaeha; Muhammad Yasir; Muhammad Azianoor Ilmy; Achmad Faishal; Suprapto Suprapto; Anang Sophan Tornado; Soffyan Angga Fahlani; Cindyva Thalia Mustika
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v6i2.11798

Abstract

This community service program aimed to strengthen village officials’ understanding of restorative justice for resolving social and environmental conflicts in Gudang Hirang Village, Banjar Regency. The results indicated a significant improvement in the officials’ ability to identify minor conflicts, conduct neutral restorative justice-based mediation, and draft written agreements that prioritize victim recovery without recourse to formal judicial proceedings. Enhanced understanding of restorative justice directly contributed to community harmony in Gudang Hirang Village. A local wisdom-based dispute resolution mechanism involving village officials, community leaders, Babinsa, and Bhabinkamtibmas effectively prevented the escalation of social and environmental conflicts and resolved them through familial approaches. This model reduces court caseloads for minor cases while promoting active community participation in maintaining order and social justice. Program sustainability can be ensured through the establishment of a Restorative Justice House, the development of village mediation SOPs, and periodic mentoring by the service team, thereby institutionalizing restorative justice principles as the primary instrument for maintaining peace at the village level. The program employed lectures with PowerPoint presentations, case discussions, interactive question-and-answer sessions, and pre-tests and post-tests. Equipment used included laptops, microphones, a sound system, mobile phones, and an LCD projector.
Kewajiban Sosial Jabatan Notaris Terkait Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Kurang Mampu Sonya Ade Kirana; Suprapto Suprapto
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Juli
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i2.10227

Abstract

Notaris sebagai pejabat umum memiliki kewajiban untuk memberikan pelayanan hukum kepada masyarakat sebagai bagian dari pelaksanaan fungsi jabatannya. Salah satu kewajiban tersebut diatur dalam Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris yang mewajibkan Notaris memberikan jasa hukum di bidang kenotariatan secara cuma-cuma kepada orang yang tidak mampu. Pengaturan tersebut merupakan wujud tanggung jawab sosial Notaris dalam mendukung prinsip persamaan di hadapan hukum dan akses terhadap keadilan. Namun, dalam pelaksanaannya masih terdapat berbagai permasalahan, terutama terkait tidak adanya pengaturan yang jelas mengenai kriteria masyarakat tidak mampu serta mekanisme pelaksanaan pemberian jasa hukum secara cuma-cuma. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan kewajiban Notaris dalam memberikan jasa hukum secara cuma-cuma berdasarkan Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris serta menganalisis kriteria yuridis masyarakat tidak mampu sebagai penerima jasa hukum tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, sekunder, tersier yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan dianalisis secara preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewajiban Notaris memberikan jasa hukum secara cuma-cuma merupakan kewajiban hukum yang bersifat imperatif dan mencerminkan fungsi sosial jabatan Notaris sebagai officium nobile. Akan tetapi, Pasal 37 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris masih mengandung kekaburan norma karena tidak memberikan definisi maupun indikator yang jelas mengenai masyarakat tidak mampu. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengaturan yang lebih komprehensif mengenai kriteria penerima jasa hukum cuma-cuma dan mekanisme pelaksanaannya guna memberikan kepastian hukum serta menjamin efektivitas pelaksanaan kewajiban Notaris dalam praktik kenotariatan di Indonesia secara adil, terukur, konsisten, dan berkelanjutan.
Co-Authors Achmad Bangsawan Achmad Faishal Achmad Faishal Anang Shophan Tornado Anang Sophan Tornado Cindyva Thalia Mustika deni nofrizal Eddie Faishal, Achmad Gusti Muhammad Raja Hadin Muhjad Ifrani Ifrani Indah Ramadhany Laila Yunita Latifah Latifah Lina Majdina Mispansyah Mispansyah Muhammad Azianoor Ilmy Muhammad Hendri Yanova Muhammad Irwan Muhammad Yasir Mulyani Zulaeha Mulyani Zulaeha Mulyani Zulaeha Mustika, Cindyva Thalia Nani Arianti Nisa Amalina Adlina Nurunnisa Nurunnisa poppy rezki adiatma Rahmida Erliyani Rahmida Erliyani Rosyid Ari Prabowo Salamah Salamah Saparyanto Saparyanto Saprudin Saprudin Selva Omiyani* Siswahyudianto Soffyan Angga Fahlani Sonya Ade Kirana Zainal Arifin