Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.409
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Sosiohumaniora Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Tadulako Law Review Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Konstitusi Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Bina Hukum Lingkungan International Journal of Supply Chain Management Buletin Ilmiah Marina : Sosial Ekonomi Kelautan dan Perikanan ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan ACTA DIURNAL : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan JUSTISI Cepalo Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran Jurnal Konstitusi Bina Hukum Lingkungan Media Bina Ilmiah Student Research Journal LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang, dan Agraria Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Maret Priyanta
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 43 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Spatial Justice Within Ocean Grabbing Practices In Sea Fence Case: A Normative Review Of Coastal Area Utilization Syariefah Maolani; Maret Priyanta; Imamulhadi Imamulhadi
Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum VOLUME 10 ISSUE 2 APRIL 2026
Publisher : PDIH Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/jidh.v0i0.6944

Abstract

Urgensi keadilan spasial dalam penelitian hukum terletak pada kemampuannya sebagai instrumen untuk menguji apakah norma hukum di Indonesia telah mencerminkan hak atas ruang yang berkeadilan atau justru melegitimasi eksklusi spasial, seperti adanya fenomena ocean grabbing. Penelitian ini berfokus pada kasus Pagar Laut di Tangerang sebagai manifestasi dari ocean grabbing tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi yuridis normatif untuk menganalisis kerangka hukum struktural yang justru memungkinkan ketidakadilan spasial. Temuan mengungkapkan masalah inti yang teridentifikasi adalah konflik normatif fundamental antara rezim hukum privat dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (UUPA) dan rezim hukum publik dalam Undang-Undang Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil (UU PWP3K). Konflik ini kemudian ditambah oleh peraturan pelaksana yang memberi celah privatisasi tanah pesisir. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa ocean grabbing yang diamati bukanlah kesalahan prosedural semata, melainkan kesalahan struktural dari sistem hukum. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini merekomendasikan adanya harmonisasi peraturan secara fundamental dengan memprioritaskan UU PWP3K sebagai hukum positif yang yurisdiksinya berlaku di wilayah pesisir, guna mewujudkan keadilan spasial dan menghentikan fenomena ocean grabbing di masa depan.
LEGAL HARMONIZATION BETWEEN THE OMNIBUS LAW AND BASIC AGRARIAN LAW (UUPA) IN PROTECTING INDIGENOUS RIGHTS Ulfia Hasanah; Nia Kurniati; Maret Priyanta
Cepalo Vol 9 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v9no2.3930

Abstract

Harmonizing the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and the Omnibus Law is crucial for protecting indigenous rights in Indonesia. The UUPA emphasizes people’s sovereignty over land and recognizes customary land rights, whereas the Omnibus Law focuses on liberalizing land management to accelerate investment and national projects. As a rule of law country, Indonesia must balance economic growth with human rights protection, including those of indigenous communities. Law No. 6 of 2023 on Job Creation has intensified challenges, as the Omnibus Law’s streamlined land permits grant the government broad powers often overlooking customary rights. To address this, the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) mechanism should be implemented to align development with indigenous rights. Additionally, revising the Omnibus Law’s derivative regulations to explicitly recognize customary land rights and establishing a dedicated agency to resolve related disputes are necessary. A holistic policy reform reflecting the UUPA’s principles while accommodating the Omnibus Law will ensure development that is both just and sustainable. Improved harmonization will allow Indonesia to pursue economic progress without sacrificing social justice and indigenous rights.
Sustainable Infrastructure Legal Policy in Indonesia: A National Strategic Project Approach for National Development Maret Priyanta; Cut Sabina Anasya Zulkarnain
Sriwijaya Law Review Volume 7, Issue 1 January 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1108.pp1-18

Abstract

Infrastructure development is the top priority of the Indonesian government. The development of transportation network infrastructure is expected to support the growth of national and international economies by connecting regions and opening public and commodity access. The new integrated growth cities were developed to reduce the burden of Jakarta as the central government and economic national centre. Legal aspects become one of the main issues in realising government politics in developing infrastructure. The national strategic project approach became a mechanism to connect a new development centre, such as the Metropolitan Bandung Area, through infrastructure development. However, its implementation requires a legal and regulatory basis with various technical, social, and economic considerations, including anticipating its environmental impact. This research paper aims to give an academic review of the problem of infrastructure development in Indonesia. The normative legal approach is based on the law's theory, concepts, and principles by considering the technical aspects to develop alternative solutions to provide legal certainty in developing infrastructure in Indonesia. The rules for spatial planning are a key issue in developing infrastructure related to random locations and land acquisition. This conflict becomes a major obstacle in developing new primate cities in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Adhyatma, Sulaeman Amiruddin A. Dajaan Imami Cut Sabina Anasya Zulkarnain Dicky Muslim Dietriech Geoffrey Bengen Dwiharyani, Ellyna Dzahabiyyah, Nenden Eva Anggraini Evan Devara Frisca Imanuel Suryadi Ida Nurlinda Ihwan Sutiawan Jibril, Abubakar Muhammad Kholik, Saeful Mr Imamulhadi Muhandis Sidqi, Muhandis Nadia Astriani Nasjwa Annisa Putri Natalia, Indriyane Vera Nia Kurniati Nia Kurniati Nur Azizah, Syifa Saeful Kholik Saeful Kholik Salsabila, Rewita Sigid Suseno Siswandi, Gusman Siti Sarah Afifah Sukarsa, Dadang Epi Supraba Sekarwati Syariefah Maolani Ulfia Hasanah Verdad Chabibullah Abdallah Iman Wildan Siregar Yani Pujiwati Yani Pujiwati Yulinda Adharani Yulinda Adharani Yulinda Adharani, Yulinda Zahra Justicia Rahmah Zainal Muttaqin Zainal Muttaqin Zulkarnain, Cut Sabina Anasya