Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

Integration of Child-Raising Values in Islam and The Philosophical Thought of Stoicists Zulkarnain Putra Laksmana; Thoat Setiawan; Isa Ansori; Mohammad Ikhwanuddin; Dian Berkah
Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 19, No. 6 : Al Qalam (November 2025)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Amuntai Kalimantan Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35931/aq.v19i6.5094

Abstract

This article examines the integration of Islamic parenting values with the principles of Stoic philosophy, particularly within the framework of developing strong, religious, and rational character in children. Islam, through the concept of hadhanah, emphasizes the importance of parents' role in caring for and educating children by balancing physical, emotional, spiritual, social, and intellectual aspects. On the other hand, Stoicism emphasizes the principles of self-control, wisdom, courage, and justice as moral foundations for facing life. This research uses a qualitative approach based on literature, reviewing various Islamic and Stoic philosophical literature, and analyzing relevant verses from the Quran. The results show that these two value systems have strong convergence in aspects of character education, instilling virtue, and developing emotional resilience in children. Islam emphasizes the importance of role models, advice, habituation, and supervision in educating children, while Stoicism strengthens the mental aspect through emotional control and a focus on controllable matters. The integration of the two offers a parenting approach that is relevant to the challenges of the times, both in the ever-changing digital and social contexts.
The Best Partner for the Family Review of Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ “Khiyārukum Khiyārukum Linisāihim” in the Book of Sunan Al-Tirmiżī Nur Mazaya Hurin In; Mohammad Ikhwanuddin; Salman Al Farisi; Thoat Stiawan; Gàndhung Fajar Panjalu
Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 20, No. 1 : Al Qalam (January 2026 - Special Edition: Islamic Studies)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Al-Qur'an (STIQ) Amuntai Kalimantan Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35931/aq.v20i1.5884

Abstract

In the Islamic context, the quality of the relationship between husband and wife is greatly influenced by the husband's character, which is measured based on the hadith "Khiyārukum Khiyārukum Linisāihim," narrated in the Sunan al-Tirmidhi. This study aims to analyze the normative meaning of this hadith, particularly in relation to the husband's character within the family. The research methodology employed is qualitative, using a library research approach and the Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ technique to verify the sanad and matn of the hadith, along with a syarah analysis to understand the relevance of the hadith's content to the husband's character in building a sakinah family. The findings of this study indicate that the quality of a husband's faith is reflected in his treatment of his wife, which includes love, justice, responsibility, and gentleness. This discovery contributes to understanding the importance of the husband's character in creating marital harmony and reducing the potential for divorce. In conclusion, this research affirms that this hadith is not only theologically relevant but also practical in establishing a sakinah, mawaddah, and rahmah Islamic family. Future research is expected to further explore the application of the values in this hadith within the context of modern social realities.
CONTEXTUAL THEMATIC INTERPRETATION OF CHILD MARRIAGE IN THE QUR’AN: RECONSTRUCTING MATURITY AND SOCIAL ETHICS IN INDONESIA Thoat Stiawan; Nurcahaya Nurcahaya; Mualimin Mochammad Sahid; Mohammad Ikhwanuddin; Erna Dewi
MUSHAF: Jurnal Tafsir Berwawasan Keindonesiaan Vol 6, No 1 (2025): Contemporary Issues in Qur'anic Interpretation: Bridging Tradition and Modernity
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/mushaf.v6i1.11928

Abstract

Child marriage remains a persistent social problem in Indonesia, despite significant legal reforms, notably the enactment of Law No. 16 of 2019 which raised the minimum legal age of marriage to nineteen years. However, empirical realities indicate that the practice continues to be widespread, largely reinforced by literalist religious interpretations that neglect the ethical spirit and broader objectives of Islamic jurisprudence. In response to this challenge, this study aims to critically re-examine Qur’anic verses that are frequently invoked to justify the marriage of minors through a contextual thematic interpretation (tafsīr mawd}ū’ī). This research employs a qualitative methodological framework by systematically identifying and thematically categorizing Qur’anic verses related to marriage, maturity (bulūgh), and intellectual discernment (rusyd), and parental responsibility. These verses are analyzed within their socio-historical context of revelation (asbāb al-nuzūl), followed by a contextual reinterpretation that engages contemporary legal norms and social realities in Indonesia. The findings demonstrate that although the Qur’an does not stipulate a specific chronological age for marriage, it consistently emphasizes comprehensive maturity, including physical, psychological, emotional, and financial readiness as a fundamental prerequisite. Furthermore, child marriage in the Indonesian context is shown to produce significant harm, particularly in relation to educational attainment, reproductive health, and long-term socio-economic justice. Such consequences contradict the ethical objectives of Islamic law (Maqās}id al-Sharī’ah), especially the protection of life, intellect, lineage, and human dignity. Accordingly, this study argues that a contextual thematic interpretation of the Qur’an provides a robust ethical and normative foundation to challenge literalist readings that legitimize child marriage. It further contributes to strengthening religiously grounded support for child protection policies and fostering a more humanistic and socially responsive Islamic discourse in contemporary Indonesia.
Dialektika Sosiologi Hukum terhadap Pantangan Menikah di Bulan Molod (Rabiul Awal) pada Masyarakat Kacongan Sumenep Madura Amirah Rifdah; Salman Al Farisi; Mohammad Ikhwanuddin
PADARINGAN (Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi) Vol 8, No 03 (2026): PADARINGAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/pn.v8i03.19456

Abstract

Marriage during the month of Molod (Rabiul Awal) is consistently avoided by the majority of the Kacongan community in Sumenep, Madura, despite the absence of explicit Islamic sharia prohibitions. This study examines how these taboos are formed as social realities, maintained as living law, and dialectically conflict with normative Islamic law. The research method used is qualitative with a sociological legal approach and field research, through observation, interviews, and documentation, supplemented by marriage statistics at the Religious Affairs Office (KUA) in Sumenep City District from 2023–2025. The findings indicate that the taboos are formed through historical-religious narratives, myths, and the Javanese-Madurese primbon knowledge system. Public perceptions are diverse; traditional leaders support them culturally and empirically, religious leaders reject them theologically and normatively, while the general public tends to comply pragmatically. KUA data confirms that the marriage rate in the month of Molod (Rabiul Awal) is consistently below 4% compared to the month of Dzulhijjah, which reaches more than 20% annually. Analyzed through the theory of the Social Construction of Reality by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann and the concept of Living Law by Eugen Ehrlich, these taboos constitute a socially constructed and binding legal reality outside the formal legal system. The dialectic between customary living law and Islamic law occurs in a real conflict. However, this conflict does not become an open conflict between communities, but rather a dynamic dialectic in which the two normative systems confront each other without either completely displacing the other.