Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.337
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dedikasi Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurisprudence Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan Suara Forikes Health Notions Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Varia Justicia Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Khazanah Hukum AL-Ishlah : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bestari (JPMB) Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi PEDAMAS (Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Jurnal Jurisprudence
Natangsa Surbakti
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi

 1 
Execution Of Court Decisions In The Form Of Confirmation Of Narcotics Evidence For The State (Case Study Of Execution Of Decision No 39/Pid.Sus/2020/PN, BYL) Suwandi, Oki; Surbakti, Natangsa; Iksan, Muchamad
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 4 No. 8 (2023): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v4i8.684

Abstract

This research examines the perspective on the execution of court decisions on narcotics evidence confiscated for the state. The purpose of this study is to find out the implementation of the execution of seized narcotics evidence for the State in terms of criminal law and Narcotics Law. The research uses empirical and juridical approach methods. The execution of the court's decision on narcotics evidence is contained in ruling No. 39/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.BYL stated that the narcotics evidence seized is for the state. The destruction of evidence of narcotics is regulated in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, and the Attorney General's decision number: KEP-089/J.A/1988 concerning Settlement of Confiscated Goods in Articles 12 to 14. The results of this study show how the mechanism for completing the process of confiscation of seized narcotics evidence for the state is viewed from the perspective of criminal law. This researcher wants to explain what is the mechanism for implementing criminal case decisions regarding seized narcotic evidence for the State. Judging from the importance of destroying narcotics confiscated goods, it is necessary to know the procedure for destroying narcotics confiscated goods so that they are more in line with the procedures described in the law. As stated that the purpose of administering criminal procedural law in Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) is to achieve and obtain or at least approach material truth (substantial truth) namely the complete truth of a criminal incident by applying the provisions of criminal procedure law honestly and appropriately.
Review Of The Punishment Of Substitute Money And Its Consequences In The Criminal Act Of Corruption (Study Of Decision Number 51 / Pid. Sus-Tpk/2020/Pn. Smg) Mukayatsyah, Romli; Surbakti, Natangsa; Iksan, Muchamad
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Vol. 4 No. 10 (2023): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/jist.v4i10.754

Abstract

Payment of substitute money is an additional crime imposed by the panel of judges to recover state financial losses, as in Decision Number 51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2020/PN. Smg. The verdict is interesting to examine, what is the result of the panel of judges imposing additional penalties in the payment of substitute money in accordance with the purpose of the law, as well as how the view according to Islam. The study aims to analyze the consequences of the panel of judges imposing an additional criminal judgment on the payment of substitute money in Decision Number 51/Pid.Sus- TPK/2020/PN. Smg and his views according to Islam. The research is normative legal research, with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach, legal materials in the form of primary, secondary, and non-legal, the object of research is Decision Number 51 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2020 / PN. Smg. Techniques for collecting legal materials with literature studies, with deductive analysis methods. The results of the study, as a result of which the judge's consideration did not clearly outline the calculation of state money used by the convict, imperfect defects, and non-achievement of legal objectives. Additional penalties for payment of substitute money according to Islam can be imposed on the convict because the property of Allah SWT is a mandate that must be accounted for its use
Co-Authors Absori Absori Afiful Ikhwan Agiyanto, Ucuk Aidul Fitriciadia Azhari Anggoro, Purwadi Wahyu Aprilia, Lina Arief Budiono Bahari, Roni Binar Sapto Nugroho Dewi Kusuma Diarti Dewi Kusuma Diarti Dewi Kusuma Diarti Dita Nadya Anastasya Eka Yektiningsih Ganindya, Brestiara Hangabei, Sinung Mufti Hartanto Harun Harun Iksan Iksan Iswanto Iswanto Karyono Karyono Kelik Wardiono Khudzaifah Dimyati Kuswardani Kuswardani Kuswardani, Kuswardani Marisa Kurnianingsih Moh. Indra Bangsawan Muchamad Iksan Muhammad Bayu Saputro Mukayatsyah, Romli Nuria Siswi Enggarani Pambudi, Rizal Ragilia Putri Wandansari Rika Yunita Hardiyati Rohayu H, Rina Samodra, Nerisia Bunga Saputro, Muhammad Bayu Subeno, Handoyo Supanto Supanto Suwandi, Oki Trisno Raharjo Trisno Raharjo Ucuk Agiyanto Waljinah, Sri Wardah Yuspin Yudanto Yudanto Yulian Dwi N