Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.492
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Jurnal Ushuluddin Transformatif Islamika : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab Al-Qisthu: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Hukum SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Indonesian Research Journal on Education Faedah: Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Mitsaqan Ghalizan TATHO: International Journal of Islamic Thought and Sciences
Ardi Akbar Tanjung
Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
REKONSTRUKSI METODOLOGI MEDIASI PERCERAIAN MELALUI TEORI MEDIASI EVALUASI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM Muhammad Hanafi; Sanawiah Sanawiah; Ardi Akbar Tanjung
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 18 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v18i2.24002

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the concept of evaluative mediation proposed by Laurence Boulle, evaluate its suitability as a mediation method in divorce cases from the perspective of Islamic law, and reconstruct a new methodology that can serve as an alternative mediation approach for resolving divorce disputes. The main issue in this study is the lack of a structured and adaptive mediation methodology in divorce mediation practice, resulting in mediation that tends to be procedural and ineffective in achieving substantive reconciliation. This study employs a normative legal method combined with a limited empirical approach through interviews with mediators, psychologists, and Islamic law scholars. The approaches used include conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches, with qualitative analysis integrating normative and empirical data. The research results indicate that evaluative mediation is characterized by the mediator’s active role in providing assessments, guidance, and rational and psychological considerations to the parties. This approach is considered more adaptive in addressing the emotional complexity of divorce conflicts. From an Islamic legal perspective, this method does not conflict with the principles of ishlah and the hakam mechanism; in fact, it aligns with efforts to achieve peace, justice, and the public interest. Therefore, evaluative mediation can be reconstructed as a more substantive methodology for divorce mediation through the integration of legal and psychological aspects.
Co-Authors Abdul Helim Achmadi Ahamed Sarjoon Razick Ahmad Habibi Apriyadi Noor Ariyadi Ariyadi Ariyadi, Ariyadi Bahran Citrariana, Shesanthi Dlaifurrahman, Muhammad Elvi Soeradji Elvi Soeradji elvi soeragji Febicha Hanifah Hasyim Guntur Satrio Pratomo Ibrahim Mohamed, Adil Hassan Jubba, Hasse Kamsi Kelik Wardiono Khairil Anwar Khudzaifah Dimyati Lian Diana Mohammed Razi Ellathodi Muhammad Hanafi Muhammad Wahdini Muslimah Muslimah Nikmah Nikmah Norcahyono Norcahyono Pangalopan Sigumondrong sadiani Sadiani Sadiani Samsul Bahri Sanawiah Sodiq, Yanwar Sudirman Sudirman Susilo, Adib . Syahroni, Akhmad Syahruji, Syahruji Syarifuddin Syarifuddin Wardah Yuspin Yusi Primawati