Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Legal Protection of BP Batam Port Assets from the Perspective of the Security Directorate Bahtiar Bahtiar; Dwi Afni Maileni; Agus Riyanto; Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i4.3234

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines the legal protection of BP Batam’s port assets from the perspective of the Security Directorate (Ditpam), focusing on civil liability, administrative safeguards, and coordination. Batam’s port infrastructure forms part of a strategic free-port regime and therefore constitutes state assets essential to logistics, investment, and connectivity. The study asks how the legal status of those assets is constructed, how Ditpam functions within the institutional framework, and what legal remedies are available when assets are damaged, occupied, misused, or exposed to governance failures. The research employs a normative juridical method based on statutory, conceptual, and institutional analysis, supported by official reports and relevant empirical materials. The analysis shows that BP Batam’s port assets enjoy a relatively strong legal foundation because they form part of state property managed under a special regulatory regime. Nevertheless, effective protection depends not only on formal ownership status but also on security supervision, orderly land administration, lawful asset utilization, and timely coordination with other authorities. The article concludes that legal protection will remain incomplete unless regulatory clarity, institutional capacity, and governance accountability are strengthened simultaneously.
Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Hasiholan Gultom; Alwan Hadiyanto; Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i1.13407

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the law enforcement mechanism of money laundering offences within the Indonesian criminal justice system, particularly as it relates to the proof of predicate crimes and the optimisation of asset forfeiture, examined from the perspectives of legal certainty, justice, and legal utility. The background of this research is grounded in the complexity of money laundering practices, which not only disguise the proceeds of crime but also risk undermining the effectiveness of punishment when the proof of predicate offences is not established systematically. The urgency of this study lies in the need to shift from a sectoral approach toward a systemic analysis of law enforcement that positions sequential proof and asset recovery as central elements of eradication efforts. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches, drawing upon Radbruch’s Formula to examine the consistency between positive legal norms and judicial practice. The findings reveal that the principal challenge does not stem from regulatory insufficiency, but from inconsistent patterns of proof in establishing the linkage between predicate offences and money laundering, as well as a formalistic tendency that has not fully optimised asset forfeiture. The study concludes that law enforcement oriented toward substantive justice must place the proof of predicate offences as the foundational argumentative basis before determining the fulfillment of money laundering elements. The novelty of this research lies in its systemic-philosophical approach, integrating normative legal analysis with justice theory to strengthen its contribution to the development of Indonesian national criminal law.   Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis mekanisme penegakan hukum tindak pidana pencucian uang dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia yang berbasis pada pembuktian tindak pidana asal dan optimalisasi perampasan aset, ditinjau dari aspek kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan hukum. Latar belakang penelitian didasarkan pada kompleksitas praktik pencucian uang yang tidak hanya menyamarkan hasil kejahatan, tetapi juga berpotensi melemahkan efektivitas pemidanaan apabila pembuktian tindak pidana asal tidak dilakukan secara sistematis. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada kebutuhan untuk menggeser pendekatan sektoral menuju analisis sistemik penegakan hukum yang menempatkan pembuktian berjenjang dan asset recovery sebagai inti pemberantasan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual melalui Formula Radbruch guna menguji konsistensi antara norma hukum positif dan praktik peradilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kendala utama bukan pada kekurangan regulasi, melainkan pada pola pembuktian yang belum konsisten dalam menilai keterkaitan antara tindak pidana asal dan pencucian uang, serta kecenderungan formalistik yang belum sepenuhnya mengoptimalkan perampasan aset. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penegakan hukum yang berorientasi pada keadilan substantif harus menempatkan pembuktian tindak pidana asal sebagai fondasi argumentatif sebelum menetapkan terpenuhinya unsur pencucian uang. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada pendekatan sistemik-filosofis yang mengintegrasikan analisis normatif dan teori keadilan untuk memperkuat kontribusi terhadap pengembangan hukum pidana nasional.
Informed Consent sebagai Dasar Persetujuan Dalam Perjanjian Terapeutik Terminasi Kehamilan Dian Wiris Woro Wardani; Rizki Tri Anugrah Bhakti; Alwan Hadiyanto
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MARCH
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i1.13936

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal position of informed consent as the basis for the validity of therapeutic agreements in the termination of pregnancy and to examine the legal consequences of negligence within the framework of health law. The study is grounded in the high medical risk associated with pregnancy termination and the persistence of normative issues concerning the standards of valid consent, potential disharmony in emergencies, and the lack of systematic integration among constitutional, contractual, and legal accountability dimensions. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that informed consent constitutes a substantive juridical requirement that determines the legality of medical procedures, limits the authority of healthcare professionals, and serves as the basis for determining civil, administrative, and criminal liability based on compliance with professional standards and causal relationships. Accordingly, the legal validity of therapeutic termination of pregnancy is not determined by administrative formalities, but by the fulfillment of substantively valid consent. The novelty of this research lies in the formulation of an integrative conceptual framework that links the constitutional legitimacy of the right to health, the structure of therapeutic agreements, and the regime of legal accountability within a unified normative system.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan informed consent sebagai dasar keabsahan perjanjian terapeutik dalam terminasi kehamilan serta menilai konsekuensi hukum kelalaiannya dalam kerangka hukum kesehatan. Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh tingginya risiko medis terminasi kehamilan dan masih adanya persoalan normatif terkait standar persetujuan yang sah, potensi disharmoni dalam kondisi kegawatdaruratan, serta belum terintegrasinya dimensi konstitusional, kontraktual, dan pertanggungjawaban hukum secara sistematis. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa informed consent merupakan syarat yuridis substantif yang menentukan legalitas tindakan medis, membatasi kewenangan tenaga kesehatan, serta menjadi dasar penentuan tanggung jawab perdata, administratif, dan pidana berdasarkan kepatuhan terhadap standar profesi dan hubungan kausal. Dengan demikian, keabsahan terminasi kehamilan terapeutik tidak ditentukan oleh formalitas administratif, melainkan oleh terpenuhinya persetujuan yang sah secara substantif. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada perumusan kerangka konseptual integratif yang menghubungkan legitimasi konstitusional hak kesehatan, struktur perjanjian terapeutik, dan rezim pertanggungjawaban hukum dalam satu sistem normatif terpadu.