Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.497
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Pembaharuan Hukum Privat Law Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Yudisial Unnes Law Journal Yuridika LamLaj Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Tata Wijayanta
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jl. Sosio Yustisia No. 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Yustisia

 1 
STUDI EVALUATIF PERAN HAKIM AD HOC dALAM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INdUSTRIAL dI PENGAdILAN HUBUNGAN INdUSTRIAL YOGYAKARTA Tata Wijayanta Wijayanta; Ari Hernawan
Yustisia Vol 3, No 1: April 2014
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.10102

Abstract

AbstractThe research aim to evaluate the role of ad hoc judges in the settlement of industrial relation disputes, as well as to explore further what are the obstacles which may occur in the course of performing their duties. The research is a normative-empiric legal research. The data research comes from secondary data derived from literature studies and primary data from field researches. The data analyzed by qualitatively. The results of this research will show that ad hoc judges are appointed by the Supreme court and assigned to cases by the President of the court of Industrial Relations. Since its establishment, there has only been two appointments of ad hoc judges (one from the enterpreneur and the other from the labor union), and the court has tried and decided upon 104 cases (2006-2011). The most paramount obstacle turns out to be the lack of knowledge of the ad hoc judges in civil procedural laws while trying and deciding cases before them.Keywords: court of Industrial Relations, Ad hoc JudgeAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi peran hakim ad hoc dan untuk mengkaji hambatan-hambatan yang dialami hakim ad hoc dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (PHI). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris bersumber pada data sekunder dan data primer melalui penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan Data dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa hakim ad hoc diangkat oleh Mahkamah Agung dan ditunjuk dalam suatu perkara oleh Ketua PHI. Sejak didirikan PHI yogyakarta hanya terdapat dua hakim ad hoc yang masing-masing merupakan perwakilan dari pengusaha dan pekerja. Sebanyak 104 perkara diperiksa dan diputus oleh PHI yogyakarta antara 2006-2011. Hambatan utama yaitu kurangnya pengetahuan dan pemahaman hakim ad hoc tentang hukum acara perdata yang menghambat ketika para hakim ad hoc ini harus memeriksa dan memutus perkara.Kata kunci:  Pengadilan hubungan industrial, Hakim ad hoc
DEADLINE SETTLEMENT OF PETITION FOR DECLARATION OF BANKRUPTCY BEFORE THE COMMERCIAL COURT AND THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES ACCORDING TO LAW NUMBER 37 OF 2004 ON BANKRUPTCY AND SUSPENSION OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS Tata Wijayanta
Yustisia Vol 7, No 3: December 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i3.15282

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and analyze (1) the regulation regarding the deadline for applications of bankruptcy, (2) the practice of the deadline regulation, and (3) the legal consequences when they do not heed the deadline. This research is a normative legal research supported by interviews with informants. The data were collected through documentation method with document study tool, while the data from the informants were collected through interviews by using interview manual tool. The secondary data were analyzed by content analysis with statute approach, while the analysis of the interview data was conducted through a qualitative analysis. The results and discussion show that the Bankruptcy and PKPU Act applies because the previous bankruptcy regulation was not effective because it did not regulate the deadline for settling bankruptcy, so that it’s  a long period of time. The regulation of deadline for bankruptcy settlement in 2015 was largely complied with the provisions of law. 87% of the verdicts (14 out of 16 verdicts) were made within less than 60 days, while 13% (2 verdicts) were made beyond the time period specified by law. The Bankruptcy and PKPU Act does not regulate any legal sanctions/effects in relation to the deadline for judges who handle bankruptcy petitions, however, the common sanctioning relates to the assessment of the judges’ performance.
Co-Authors Adistia, Sheva Trisanda Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha Ari Hernawan Ari Hernawan Destri Budi Nugraheni Erma Defiana Putriyanti Erma Defiana Putriyanti Faizin Sulistio Fajri Matahati muhammadin Haniah Ilhami Hapsari, Recca Ayu Hapsari Hasrul Halili Herliana Herliana Herliana Hery Firmansyah Hery Firmansyah Irna Nurhayati Kunthoro Basuki Leonardus, Rado Fridsel NOVITASARI Novitasari Novitasari Rado Fridsel Leonardus RB. Sutanto Retno Supartinah Rizky Wirastomo Sandra Dini Febri Aristya Sandra Dini Febri Aristya Sheva Trisanda Adistia Stanislav Vladimirov Mladenov Sugiri, Bambang Sujayadi ., Sujayadi Sukarmi Yonatan Yudha, Alexander Yovie Pratama