Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Pembaharuan Hukum Privat Law Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Yudisial Yuridika LamLaj Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Tata Wijayanta
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jl. Sosio Yustisia No. 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PERKEMBANGAN PERBEDAAN PENDAPAT (DISSENTING OPINION) DALAM PUTUSAN KEPAILITAN DI PENGADILAN NIAGA JAKARTA PUSAT Tata Wijayanta
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 19, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6142.963 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.19073

Abstract

Abstract
ACTOR SEQUITUR FORUM REI: A THEORITICAL STUDY Sujayadi, Sujayadi; Wijayanta, Tata; Herliana, Herliana
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 7 Number 2 March 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.896

Abstract

The actor sequitur forum rei principle is the primary basis for determining the relative competence of civil courts in countries that adopt civil law systems. In this article, the role of the actor sequitur forum rei will be examined theoretically by analyzing theories related to personal jurisdiction, categorization of jurisdiction, and procedural justice theory. The analysis results indicate that actor sequitur forum rei is founded on the theory of power and is classified as a "connected" jurisdiction with a general nature, as jurisdiction is linked to the defendant's domicile. It enables the defendant to be sued in the forum of their domicile at any time and for any reason. Additionally, according to procedural justice theory, actor sequitur forum rei is shown to provide the defendant with protective aspects.
Child Protection Post the New Marriage Law: How Indonesian Religious Court Interpreting the Urgency in Child-age Marriage Ilhami, Haniah; Nugraheni, Destri Budi; Wijayanta, Tata
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054

Abstract

The amendment of the Law of Marriage in 2019 introduces the new concept of Dispensation of Marriage by providing some additional provisions: the obligations to provide the urgency of marriage and the specific supporting evidence in proving the urgency. This article aims to examine the interpretations of judges in Religious Court on defining the urgency of child-age marriage and the implementation of the supporting evidence in cases of Dispensation of Marriage. Based on the identification, the author analyzes the main questions about the protection of children's rights on those interpretations. Based on the normative legal research that examines the Rulings of Religious Court on the case of Dispensation of Marriage, this article uses the Nonprobability Sampling techniques, specifically the purposive sampling which refers to certain criteria, the author finds the inconsistencies in the interpretation of the urgency of marriage and the implementation of providing the supporting evidence, which influenced by 2 (two) factors,  the Formal Regulation and the principle of judge’s independence. As a result, the author suggests detailed regulations regarding the supporting medical evidence, as well as the improvement of comprehensive and equal understanding for judges about the concept of child protection. Comparing to previous studies, this article shows its originality through a broader object study and comprehensive research analysis with more emphasis on juridical aspect, therefore that arguments and conclusions are built on a strong analytical foundation.
Bankruptcy Indicator Frameworks Used In Cross-Country Reviews (Indonesia – Russia Bankruptcy Law) Hapsari, Recca Ayu Hapsari; Tata Wijayanta; Irna Nurhayati; Stanislav Vladimirov Mladenov
Nurani Vol 24 No 1 (2024): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v24i1.22023

Abstract

The differences and similarities in the legal frameworks of Cross-country will shed light on the effectiveness of their respective bankruptcy systems. This research employs a comparative analysis of bankruptcy laws in Indonesia and Russia, with a focus on determining debtor bankruptcy indicators. The methodology comprises qualitative research using normative and empirical juridical approaches to analyze bankruptcy laws in Indonesia and Russia, focusing on determining debtor bankruptcy indicators. Indonesian law focuses on debtors' ability to pay using default lawsuits. In contrast, Russian law traditionally uses the impossibility of payment as a benchmark for insolvency and focuses on meeting creditors' claims. Key indicators of debtor bankruptcy in Indonesia include the inability to fully satisfy creditors' claims and meet mandatory payments. This emphasis on financial obligations plays a critical role in determining insolvency in Indonesian bankruptcy law.
Criminalizing Civil Law Actions of Default into Criminal Acts of Fraud: A Human Rights Perspective Yonatan; Wijayanta, Tata; Sugiri, Bambang; Sukarmi; Sulistio, Faizin
Yuridika Vol. 39 No. 3 (2024): Volume 39 No 3 September 2024
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v39i3.51329

Abstract

The terms "Default" and "Fraud" and/or “Embezzlement” are often interchanged without clarity of meaning in many discussion forums, both oral and written. This confusion can be seen from the many court decisions that acquit defendants from prosecution which have permanent legal force. The public often hears that law enforcers carry out criminalization, such as witnesses becoming suspects, suspects becoming defendants and so on by shifting the civil legal action of Default to criminal act of Fraud and/or Embezzlement. Using 'criminalization' and 'criminalized' in this article is considered inappropriate, so it has been replaced by 'criminalizing' and 'criminalized'. If there is an action to shift the civil legal act of Default into a criminal act of Fraud and/ or Embezzlement, so from a human rights perspective, it is against the law. By using normative legal research methods, this paper examines how to differentiate civil legal acts of Default from criminal acts of Fraud and/or Embezzlement, how to apply civil compensation in cases where there are already criminal legal remedies, and what is the legal and human rights perspective when criminalization occurs. This paper uses a statutory approach and a case approach. The results show: First, there is a real difference between civil legal acts of Default and criminal acts of Fraud and/ or Embezzlement; Second, the application of compensation can be carried out through criminal and civil procedural law mechanisms; Finally, criminalizing civil legal acts into criminal acts is a form of violation of human rights.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Independensi Kurator dalam Mengurus dan Membereskan Harta Pailit Novitasari; Wijayanta, Tata
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): September
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v1i2.26

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui dan mengkaji permasalahanindependensi Kurator dalam melaksanakan tugas membereskan harta pailit terhadapmunculnya gugatan dari debitor pailit, (2) mengetahui dan mengkaji tolok ukur menentukanindependensi Kurator dalam melaksanakan tugasnya membereskan dan mengurus hartapailit serta, dan (3) perlidungan hukum terhadap Kurator dalam melaksanakan tugasnya.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif empiris. Data yang digunakan dalampenelitian ini berasal dari data primer dan data sekunder. Data primer diperoleh melaluiwawancara dengan alat pedoman wawancara, sedangkan data sekunder diperoleh melaluimetode dokumentasi dengan alat studi dokumentasi dan analisis data dilakukan secarakualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa gugatan terhadap Kurator yang dilakukanoleh debitor maupun kreditor pada dasarnya dari beberapa kasus yang dialami Kurator,hanya bertujuan untuk menghambat proses pemberesan harta pailit, akibatnya biayakepailitan membengkak, terutama dalam hal biaya pengamanan aset yang harus ditanggungKurator dan waktu untuk membereskan menjadi lebih lama, kemudian tidak ada ketentuanmengenai tolok ukur/parameter independensi Kurator, sehingga sulit mengidentifikasiKurator independen atau tidak dalam melaksanakan tugasnya, dan Undang Undang Nomor37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang tidakmemberikan secara tertulis mengenai perlidungan hukum terhadap profesi Kurator dalammelaksanakan tugasnya. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah: (1) independensi Kurator bukanpenyebab utama munculnya gugatan oleh debitor maupun kreditor, (2) independensi Kuratorsulit diindentifikasi, dan (3) perlindungan hukum terhadap Kurator telah diatur dalam UUD1945 dan kode etik AKPI sebagai salah satu organisasi Kurator. Berdasarkan kesimpulantersebut, maka disarankan: (1) perlu diatur ketentuan mengenai sanksi dari munculnyagugatan yang dilakukan oleh debitor maupun kreditor terhadap Kurator yang bertujuanmenghambat proses pemberesan; (2) perlu diatur ketentuan mengenai tolok ukur/parameterindependensi Kurator; dan (3) tidak perlu dibuatkan aturan khusus mengenai perlidunganhukum terhadap profesi Kurator.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE HERITAGE CENTER AS BANKRUPTCY CURATOR Wijayanta, Tata; Adistia, Sheva Trisanda
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v11i1.34435

Abstract

This study aimed to find out and analyze the implications of the regulation of the Curator in Law No. 37 of 2004 on the Semarang Heritage Agency and the development of the Heritage Agency as bankruptcy curator. This study was empirical normative legal research that combined normative legal research and empirical legal research presented in a descriptive qualitative analysis. This research found that the change in Law No. 37 of 2004 was to add another curator besides the Heritage Agency. The results of the study and discussion show that the implication of setting the curator as the administrator and insolvency of bankruptcy assets is that the number of cases handled by the institution is divided into two, but in practice it is less than the curator and the developments that occur at the Property and Heritage Agency of Semarang in general are with the tasks of administering third party money and specifically the separation of duties on heritage and state curator (bankruptcy).
Practice of Applying Affidavits in Bankruptcy Law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Rado Fridsel Leonardus; Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha; Tata Wijayanta
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): October, 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.37204

Abstract

Civil law regulates the means of evidence as outlined in Article 1866 of the Civil Code/Article 164 HIR/Article 284 RBg which consists of written evidence, witness evidence, allegations, confessions and oaths. The existence of an Affidavit certainly makes it easier to resolve a Civil Case, especially in cases regarding Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The existence of an Affidavit is one aspect that confirms that the process of proving a legal problem in Indonesia is undergoing adjustments in line with the very rapid development of law in this Era of Globalization. The application of Affidavits in Bankruptcy and PKPU legal processes is important in their development. This research uses Normative Legal Research using the method of the Statute Approach. Article 299 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations explains that the procedural law that applies in resolving Bankruptcy cases and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations is Civil Procedure Law. Written evidence is significant in the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU process, although the process still prioritizes simple evidence. Affidavit is a written statement by someone who is considered an expert containing an explanation of a particular event object, which is then signed and submitted as written evidence in the trial. In Indonesia, an Affidavit cannot be classified as an Authentic Deed and does not have perfect evidentiary properties, but an Affidavit can be used as ordinary documentary evidence to support other evidence and help judges decide Bankruptcy & PKPU cases efficiently in order to support a simple evidentiary process and considering the short examination time.
Regulating Court Jurisdiction to Protect Weaker Parties: An Overview of the Indonesian Civil Justice System Sujayadi, Sujayadi; Wijayanta, Tata; Herliana
Yuridika Vol. 38 No. 2 (2023): Volume 38 No 2 May 2023
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v38i2.43835

Abstract

It is necessary to facilitate an easy access to the courts to protect weaker parties. This can be achieved by regulating the personal jurisdiction of the court, so that weaker parties can easily access the courts. In Indonesian civil justice system, some regulations have been implemented to protect weaker parties through the jurisdiction of the courts. This article will elaborate those regulations and their obstacles in protecting the access of consumers, workers, women and children, and foreigners to the Indonesian courts. Statutory approach with reference to the general principles of the court personal jurisdiction and the principles of access to justice for the weaker parties will be employed. This article finds that some regulations related to the court personal jurisdiction in Indonesia provide protection to the weaker parties by allowing them to submit their claim to the court where they reside against the counterparty. However, lack of consistency may hinder the implementation.
STUDI EVALUATIF PERAN HAKIM AD HOC dALAM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INdUSTRIAL dI PENGAdILAN HUBUNGAN INdUSTRIAL YOGYAKARTA Wijayanta, Tata Wijayanta; Hernawan, Ari
Yustisia Vol 3, No 1: April 2014
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v3i1.10102

Abstract

AbstractThe research aim to evaluate the role of ad hoc judges in the settlement of industrial relation disputes, as well as to explore further what are the obstacles which may occur in the course of performing their duties. The research is a normative-empiric legal research. The data research comes from secondary data derived from literature studies and primary data from field researches. The data analyzed by qualitatively. The results of this research will show that ad hoc judges are appointed by the Supreme court and assigned to cases by the President of the court of Industrial Relations. Since its establishment, there has only been two appointments of ad hoc judges (one from the enterpreneur and the other from the labor union), and the court has tried and decided upon 104 cases (2006-2011). The most paramount obstacle turns out to be the lack of knowledge of the ad hoc judges in civil procedural laws while trying and deciding cases before them.Keywords: court of Industrial Relations, Ad hoc JudgeAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi peran hakim ad hoc dan untuk mengkaji hambatan-hambatan yang dialami hakim ad hoc dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (PHI). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris bersumber pada data sekunder dan data primer melalui penelitian kepustakaan dan penelitian lapangan Data dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa hakim ad hoc diangkat oleh Mahkamah Agung dan ditunjuk dalam suatu perkara oleh Ketua PHI. Sejak didirikan PHI yogyakarta hanya terdapat dua hakim ad hoc yang masing-masing merupakan perwakilan dari pengusaha dan pekerja. Sebanyak 104 perkara diperiksa dan diputus oleh PHI yogyakarta antara 2006-2011. Hambatan utama yaitu kurangnya pengetahuan dan pemahaman hakim ad hoc tentang hukum acara perdata yang menghambat ketika para hakim ad hoc ini harus memeriksa dan memutus perkara.Kata kunci:  Pengadilan hubungan industrial, Hakim ad hoc
Co-Authors Adistia, Sheva Trisanda Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha Ari Hernawan Destri Budi Nugraheni Erma Defiana Putriyanti Erma Defiana Putriyanti Faizin Sulistio Fajri Matahati muhammadin Haniah Ilhami Hapsari, Recca Ayu Hapsari Hasrul Halili Herliana Herliana Herliana Hermawan, B.E Hery Firmansyah Hery Firmansyah Irna Nurhayati Kunthoro Basuki Leonardus, Rado F Leonardus, Rado Fridsel NOVITASARI Novitasari Novitasari Rado Fridsel Leonardus RB. Sutanto Retno Supartinah Rizky Wirastomo Sandra Dini Febri Aristya Sandra Dini Febri Aristya Stanislav Vladimirov Mladenov Sugiri, Bambang Sujayadi ., Sujayadi Sukarmi Yonatan Yudha, Alexander Yovie Pratama