Tata Wijayanta
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jl. Sosio Yustisia No. 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Penerapan Prinsip Hakim Pasif dan Aktif Serta Relevansinya terhadap Konsep Kebenaran Formal Tata Wijayanta; Sandra Dini Febri Aristya; Kunthoro Basuki; Ms. Herliana; Hasrul Halili; RB. Sutanto; Retno Supartinah
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 22, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (380.723 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16243

Abstract

The conception of “formal truth” in civil procedure is about to become a debate among academicians and practitioners because it is deemed no longer relevant to achieve justice. Modern paradigm begins to consider that this concept should be given similar interpretation with material truth theory adhered by criminal procedure. Konsep kebenaran formal dalam acara perdata mulai menjadi perdebatan di antara para akademisi dan praktisi karena dianggap sudah tidak lagi relevan dan jauh dari rasa keadilan. Paradigma saat ini mesti mulai mempertimbangkan bahwa konsep kebenaran formal harus diberi pengertian yang sama dengan konsep kebenaran material dalam acara pidana.
KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN NIAGA DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERNIAGAAN LAIN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 Tata Wijayanta
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 20, No 2 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (175.229 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16309

Abstract

The research is a qualitative research. The data which is used are primary and sec­ondary data from library and field research. The research aims to analyze the authority of the commercial court to examine and settle commercial case. The definition and means of the other commercial case which have been examined and settled by the commercial court. The result of research shows that the commercial court has carried out the authority since 2001. Besides, commercial cases include trade mark case, patents, copy right and industrial designs. From 2001 up to 2006, four hundreds and seven (407) cases have been examined and settled by the court. The most are trade mark disputes, with two  hundreds and seventy two (272) disputes (91,4%).
PERKEMBANGAN PERBEDAAN PENDAPAT (DISSENTING OPINION) DALAM PUTUSAN KEPAILITAN DI PENGADILAN NIAGA JAKARTA PUSAT Tata Wijayanta
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 19, No 3 (2007)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (6142.963 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.19073

Abstract

Abstract
EKSISTENSI BALAI HARTA PENINGGALAN SEMARANG SEBAGAI PENGURUS DAN PEMBERES HARTA PAILIT Sheva Trisanda Adistia; Tata Wijayanta
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 10, No 2 (2022): JULI - DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v10i2.77537

Abstract

Abstract:This article aims to examine the effect of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Debt Payments which adds an Individual Curator in addition to Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) and what factors cause the Balai Harta Peninggalan not to be interested in it. The normative research method is supported by interviews which are presented descriptively. The data used are secondary data derived from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials and primary data derived from interviews. The method of collecting secondary data using the documentation method and the tools used is the study of documents and primary data through interviews with one of the curators of Balai Harta Peninggalan using an interview guide. The results showed that the amendment to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Debt Payments only caused the number of cases to be divided into two and the factors that influenced the disinterest of the Balai Harta Peninggalan were human resources which were considered inadequate than the Individual Curator.Keywords: Heritage Hall (BHP); Bankruptcy Estate; Curator.Abstrak:Artikel ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Pembayaran Utang yang menambah Kurator Perorangan disamping Balai Harta Peninggalan (BHP) dan faktor-faktor apa yang menyebabkan tidak diminatinya Balai Harta Peninggalan. Metode penelitian normatif didukung dengan wawancara yang disajikan secara deskriptif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang berasal dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier dan data primer yang berasal dari wawancara. Cara mengumpulkan data sekunder dengan metode dokumentasi dan alat yang digunakan adalah studi dokumen dan data primer melalui wawancara kepada salah satu kurator Balai Harta Peninggalan dengan alat pedoman wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Pembayaran Utang hanya menyebabkan jumlah perkara terbagi menjadi dua dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tidak diminatinya Balai Harta Peninggalan adalah sumber daya manusia yang dianggap kurang memadai daripada Kurator Perorangan.Kata Kunci: Balai Harta Peninggalan; Harta Pailit; Kurator.
ACTOR SEQUITUR FORUM REI: A THEORITICAL STUDY Sujayadi, Sujayadi; Wijayanta, Tata; Herliana, Herliana
Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Volume 7 Number 2 March 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23920/jbmh.v7i2.896

Abstract

The actor sequitur forum rei principle is the primary basis for determining the relative competence of civil courts in countries that adopt civil law systems. In this article, the role of the actor sequitur forum rei will be examined theoretically by analyzing theories related to personal jurisdiction, categorization of jurisdiction, and procedural justice theory. The analysis results indicate that actor sequitur forum rei is founded on the theory of power and is classified as a "connected" jurisdiction with a general nature, as jurisdiction is linked to the defendant's domicile. It enables the defendant to be sued in the forum of their domicile at any time and for any reason. Additionally, according to procedural justice theory, actor sequitur forum rei is shown to provide the defendant with protective aspects.
Child Protection Post the New Marriage Law: How Indonesian Religious Court Interpreting the Urgency in Child-age Marriage Ilhami, Haniah; Nugraheni, Destri Budi; Wijayanta, Tata
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 11 No. 1: April 2023 : Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v11i1.1054

Abstract

The amendment of the Law of Marriage in 2019 introduces the new concept of Dispensation of Marriage by providing some additional provisions: the obligations to provide the urgency of marriage and the specific supporting evidence in proving the urgency. This article aims to examine the interpretations of judges in Religious Court on defining the urgency of child-age marriage and the implementation of the supporting evidence in cases of Dispensation of Marriage. Based on the identification, the author analyzes the main questions about the protection of children's rights on those interpretations. Based on the normative legal research that examines the Rulings of Religious Court on the case of Dispensation of Marriage, this article uses the Nonprobability Sampling techniques, specifically the purposive sampling which refers to certain criteria, the author finds the inconsistencies in the interpretation of the urgency of marriage and the implementation of providing the supporting evidence, which influenced by 2 (two) factors,  the Formal Regulation and the principle of judge’s independence. As a result, the author suggests detailed regulations regarding the supporting medical evidence, as well as the improvement of comprehensive and equal understanding for judges about the concept of child protection. Comparing to previous studies, this article shows its originality through a broader object study and comprehensive research analysis with more emphasis on juridical aspect, therefore that arguments and conclusions are built on a strong analytical foundation.
Practice of Applying Affidavits in Bankruptcy Law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Leonardus, Rado Fridsel; Yudha, Alexander Yovie Pratama; Wijayanta, Tata
Unnes Law Journal Vol 9 No 2 (2023): Contemporary Issues on Law and Development: Social, Political and Legal Aspects
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.75588

Abstract

Civil law regulates the means of evidence as outlined in Article 1866 of the Civil Code/Article 164 HIR/Article 284 RBg which consists of written evidence, witness evidence, allegations, confessions and oaths. The existence of an Affidavit certainly makes it easier to resolve a Civil Case, especially in cases regarding Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The existence of an Affidavit is one aspect that confirms that the process of proving a legal problem in Indonesia is undergoing adjustments in line with the very rapid development of law in this Era of Globalization. The application of Affidavits in Bankruptcy and PKPU legal processes is important in their development. This research uses Normative Legal Research using the method of the Statute Approach. Article 299 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations explains that the procedural law that applies in resolving Bankruptcy cases and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations is Civil Procedure Law. Written evidence is significant in the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU process, although the process still prioritizes simple evidence. Affidavit is a written statement by someone who is considered an expert containing an explanation of a particular event object, which is then signed and submitted as written evidence in the trial. In Indonesia, an Affidavit cannot be classified as an Authentic Deed and does not have perfect evidentiary properties, but an Affidavit can be used as ordinary documentary evidence to support other evidence and help judges decide Bankruptcy & PKPU cases efficiently in order to support a simple evidentiary process and considering the short examination time.
Bankruptcy Indicator Frameworks Used In Cross-Country Reviews (Indonesia – Russia Bankruptcy Law) Hapsari, Recca Ayu Hapsari; Tata Wijayanta; Irna Nurhayati; Stanislav Vladimirov Mladenov
Nurani Vol 24 No 1 (2024): Nurani: jurnal kajian syari'ah dan masyarakat
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19109/nurani.v24i1.22023

Abstract

The differences and similarities in the legal frameworks of Cross-country will shed light on the effectiveness of their respective bankruptcy systems. This research employs a comparative analysis of bankruptcy laws in Indonesia and Russia, with a focus on determining debtor bankruptcy indicators. The methodology comprises qualitative research using normative and empirical juridical approaches to analyze bankruptcy laws in Indonesia and Russia, focusing on determining debtor bankruptcy indicators. Indonesian law focuses on debtors' ability to pay using default lawsuits. In contrast, Russian law traditionally uses the impossibility of payment as a benchmark for insolvency and focuses on meeting creditors' claims. Key indicators of debtor bankruptcy in Indonesia include the inability to fully satisfy creditors' claims and meet mandatory payments. This emphasis on financial obligations plays a critical role in determining insolvency in Indonesian bankruptcy law.
Criminalizing Civil Law Actions of Default into Criminal Acts of Fraud: A Human Rights Perspective Yonatan; Wijayanta, Tata; Sugiri, Bambang; Sukarmi; Sulistio, Faizin
Yuridika Vol. 39 No. 3 (2024): Volume 39 No 3 September 2024
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v39i3.51329

Abstract

The terms "Default" and "Fraud" and/or “Embezzlement” are often interchanged without clarity of meaning in many discussion forums, both oral and written. This confusion can be seen from the many court decisions that acquit defendants from prosecution which have permanent legal force. The public often hears that law enforcers carry out criminalization, such as witnesses becoming suspects, suspects becoming defendants and so on by shifting the civil legal action of Default to criminal act of Fraud and/or Embezzlement. Using 'criminalization' and 'criminalized' in this article is considered inappropriate, so it has been replaced by 'criminalizing' and 'criminalized'. If there is an action to shift the civil legal act of Default into a criminal act of Fraud and/ or Embezzlement, so from a human rights perspective, it is against the law. By using normative legal research methods, this paper examines how to differentiate civil legal acts of Default from criminal acts of Fraud and/or Embezzlement, how to apply civil compensation in cases where there are already criminal legal remedies, and what is the legal and human rights perspective when criminalization occurs. This paper uses a statutory approach and a case approach. The results show: First, there is a real difference between civil legal acts of Default and criminal acts of Fraud and/ or Embezzlement; Second, the application of compensation can be carried out through criminal and civil procedural law mechanisms; Finally, criminalizing civil legal acts into criminal acts is a form of violation of human rights.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Independensi Kurator dalam Mengurus dan Membereskan Harta Pailit Novitasari; Wijayanta, Tata
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): September
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v1i2.26

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui dan mengkaji permasalahanindependensi Kurator dalam melaksanakan tugas membereskan harta pailit terhadapmunculnya gugatan dari debitor pailit, (2) mengetahui dan mengkaji tolok ukur menentukanindependensi Kurator dalam melaksanakan tugasnya membereskan dan mengurus hartapailit serta, dan (3) perlidungan hukum terhadap Kurator dalam melaksanakan tugasnya.Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif empiris. Data yang digunakan dalampenelitian ini berasal dari data primer dan data sekunder. Data primer diperoleh melaluiwawancara dengan alat pedoman wawancara, sedangkan data sekunder diperoleh melaluimetode dokumentasi dengan alat studi dokumentasi dan analisis data dilakukan secarakualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa gugatan terhadap Kurator yang dilakukanoleh debitor maupun kreditor pada dasarnya dari beberapa kasus yang dialami Kurator,hanya bertujuan untuk menghambat proses pemberesan harta pailit, akibatnya biayakepailitan membengkak, terutama dalam hal biaya pengamanan aset yang harus ditanggungKurator dan waktu untuk membereskan menjadi lebih lama, kemudian tidak ada ketentuanmengenai tolok ukur/parameter independensi Kurator, sehingga sulit mengidentifikasiKurator independen atau tidak dalam melaksanakan tugasnya, dan Undang Undang Nomor37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang tidakmemberikan secara tertulis mengenai perlidungan hukum terhadap profesi Kurator dalammelaksanakan tugasnya. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah: (1) independensi Kurator bukanpenyebab utama munculnya gugatan oleh debitor maupun kreditor, (2) independensi Kuratorsulit diindentifikasi, dan (3) perlindungan hukum terhadap Kurator telah diatur dalam UUD1945 dan kode etik AKPI sebagai salah satu organisasi Kurator. Berdasarkan kesimpulantersebut, maka disarankan: (1) perlu diatur ketentuan mengenai sanksi dari munculnyagugatan yang dilakukan oleh debitor maupun kreditor terhadap Kurator yang bertujuanmenghambat proses pemberesan; (2) perlu diatur ketentuan mengenai tolok ukur/parameterindependensi Kurator; dan (3) tidak perlu dibuatkan aturan khusus mengenai perlidunganhukum terhadap profesi Kurator.