Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.383
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Pembaharuan Hukum Privat Law Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jurnal Yudisial Unnes Law Journal Yuridika LamLaj Unnes Law Journal : Jurnal Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Tata Wijayanta
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Jl. Sosio Yustisia No. 1 Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281
Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
DEVELOPMENT OF THE HERITAGE CENTER AS BANKRUPTCY CURATOR Wijayanta, Tata; Adistia, Sheva Trisanda
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 11, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v11i1.34435

Abstract

This study aimed to find out and analyze the implications of the regulation of the Curator in Law No. 37 of 2004 on the Semarang Heritage Agency and the development of the Heritage Agency as bankruptcy curator. This study was empirical normative legal research that combined normative legal research and empirical legal research presented in a descriptive qualitative analysis. This research found that the change in Law No. 37 of 2004 was to add another curator besides the Heritage Agency. The results of the study and discussion show that the implication of setting the curator as the administrator and insolvency of bankruptcy assets is that the number of cases handled by the institution is divided into two, but in practice it is less than the curator and the developments that occur at the Property and Heritage Agency of Semarang in general are with the tasks of administering third party money and specifically the separation of duties on heritage and state curator (bankruptcy).
Practice of Applying Affidavits in Bankruptcy Law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Rado Fridsel Leonardus; Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha; Tata Wijayanta
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): October, 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.37204

Abstract

Civil law regulates the means of evidence as outlined in Article 1866 of the Civil Code/Article 164 HIR/Article 284 RBg which consists of written evidence, witness evidence, allegations, confessions and oaths. The existence of an Affidavit certainly makes it easier to resolve a Civil Case, especially in cases regarding Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The existence of an Affidavit is one aspect that confirms that the process of proving a legal problem in Indonesia is undergoing adjustments in line with the very rapid development of law in this Era of Globalization. The application of Affidavits in Bankruptcy and PKPU legal processes is important in their development. This research uses Normative Legal Research using the method of the Statute Approach. Article 299 of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations explains that the procedural law that applies in resolving Bankruptcy cases and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations is Civil Procedure Law. Written evidence is significant in the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU process, although the process still prioritizes simple evidence. Affidavit is a written statement by someone who is considered an expert containing an explanation of a particular event object, which is then signed and submitted as written evidence in the trial. In Indonesia, an Affidavit cannot be classified as an Authentic Deed and does not have perfect evidentiary properties, but an Affidavit can be used as ordinary documentary evidence to support other evidence and help judges decide Bankruptcy & PKPU cases efficiently in order to support a simple evidentiary process and considering the short examination time.
Co-Authors Adistia, Sheva Trisanda Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha Ari Hernawan Ari Hernawan Destri Budi Nugraheni Erma Defiana Putriyanti Erma Defiana Putriyanti Faizin Sulistio Fajri Matahati muhammadin Haniah Ilhami Hapsari, Recca Ayu Hapsari Hasrul Halili Herliana Herliana Hery Firmansyah Hery Firmansyah Irna Nurhayati Kunthoro Basuki Leonardus, Rado Fridsel Ms. Herliana NOVITASARI Novitasari Novitasari Rado Fridsel Leonardus RB. Sutanto Retno Supartinah Rizky Wirastomo Sandra Dini Febri Aristya Sandra Dini Febri Aristya Sheva Trisanda Adistia Stanislav Vladimirov Mladenov Sugiri, Bambang Sujayadi ., Sujayadi Sukarmi Yonatan Yudha, Alexander Yovie Pratama