Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.072
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Undiksha Jurnal Optimasi Sistem Industri JURNAL PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT JURNAL MAHKAMAH Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Jurnal Darussalam: Jurnal Pendidikan, Komunikasi dan Pemikiran Hukum Islam Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Al-Iktisab: Journal of Islamic Economic Law Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Academy of Education Journal RESLAJ: RELIGION EDUCATION SOCIAL LAA ROIBA JOURNAL JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bima Abdi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology AL-SULTHANIYAH IIJSE El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat J-CEKI
Fatimah Zahara
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 40 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Unes Law Review

 1 
Implementation of Restorative Justice, The Intent of Punishment, and Legal Clarity In Indonesia Lubis, Fauziah; Zahara, Fatimah; Hamidah, Wanda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1521

Abstract

This study looks at the fairness of restorative justice, the goal of punishment, and the need of legal certainty. According to the study's findings, restorative justice is still only being applied theoretically. In this instance, it emphasizes that the formalistic, long-established ideas of justice that have arisen in society and are applied in Indonesian customary law assemblies serve as the foundation for the genuine aim of sentencing. In contrast, the notions of individual deterrence and general deterrence call for actions to be absolute in order to produce a deterrent impact. Afterward, the idea of reform or rehabilitation was further developed. The use of restorative justice emphasizes the recovery of victims' material losses as a result of the perpetrators' unlawful acts, both physically and psychologically. This is done through a consensus-building process involving the perpetrator, the victim, the perpetrator's family, and the victim's family, as well as, if necessary, the community and the appropriate authorities. With relation to legal norms and values, this research methodology is normative juridical along with theories, legal doctrine, jurisprudence, applicable rules and regulations, as well as pubiications pertinent to the research topic. According to the study's findings, restorative justice is a noble form of justice when instances of illegal behavior have happened. Therefore, repair or restoration is crucial if the victim is to be rehabilitated or healed from the suffering he has endured on a material, physical, or psychic level. To be clear, restorative justice does not apply to all crimes; rather, it only does so in circumstances involving crimes against children, minor offenses, women in conflict with the law, and drug-related offenses. In order to provide clarity, there should be a firmness if the offender does not want to make restitution even though it is deemed capable of doing so in terms of material capabilities. There also needs to be concrete sanctions so that restorative justice is not only limited to other options; the legal framework for it should be expanded to the Constitution.
Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Pembelian Sepeda Motor Baru Mengenai Kerusakan Rangka Esaf Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Ibnu Taimiyah dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Rahmawati Lubis, Nila; Zahara, Fatimah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Motorcycle vehicles at this time are one of the primary vehicles used by the majority of people in daily activities. So that a motorcycle vehicle that is safe and suitable for use is a great hope of the community, especially in the frame which is the most important part of a vehicle. Lately cases that are rife in the community are damage to the eSAF frame resulting in broken and porous Honda brand vehicles, several incidents of broken motorcycles in the middle of the road, this is what attracts the author's attention to examine more deeply about what causes it and how Ibn Taymiyah's perspective and the Consumer Protection Law on this problem. This research is qualitative research with an empirical normative approach method using a type of research approach, namely library research. The results of this study show that there are rampant cases of damage to Honda motorcycle frames because they use eSAF type frames that are not good from previous types of frames, while from AHM explained that every product they market has been checked and is suitable for use. According to Ibn Taymiyyah in the principle of buying and selling is not justified this practice, because the frame is in the vehicle and not visible, there should be liability for damage suffered by consumers. And in terms of consumer protection, precisely in article 7 letters a-g has not been effectively applied in this broken frame problem
Co-Authors A, Irham Wandira Annisa Rahmi, Annisa ARDIANSYAH ARDIANSYAH Aricanes, Erisando Aulia, Dini Bambang Sugiharto Barus, Irwan Irawadi Desnita Elida Elfi Barus, Elida Elfi Faizal Chan Fikri Hidayatullah, Muhammada Bimo Hadania, Nuratun Hamidah, Wanda Hasibuan, Eliza Hanum Hasibuan, Muhammad Syahyuti Hasibuan, Toibah Hutabarat, Syahputri Issaura Sherly Pamela Khairani, Siti Khalid Lestari, Widiya Indah Lubis, Ahmad Mabrur Lubis, Fauziah Lubis, Junita muhammad Syahbudi, muhammad Murdani, Muhammad Muthmainnah, Indah Sri Nst, Mhd Ilham Pulungan, Madinah Rahmawati Lubis, Nila Rambe, Rachmat Husein Reza, M Fahmi Ritonga, Nadiyah Roihanah Siregar, Gindo Siregar, Hotma Sari Sitepu, Yuni Larasanti Nurhasanah Br Sugesti, Tuti Suheri, Muhammad Sukiati Sukiati Syafruddin Syam Tarigan, Tetty Marlina Tussyadiyah, Halimah Wahono, Wahyu Wandira A, Irham wilanda, yoli Wisnu Wardana, Wisnu Yazid, Imam` YENNI SAMRI JULIATI NASUTION, YENNI SAMRI JULIATI Zarkawi, Ahmad Farhan Zebua, Yuniman