Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.48
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics Englisia Journal Journal on English as a Foreign Language (JEFL) Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan k@ta Voices of English Language Education Society JEES: Journal of English Educational Study Linguistik Indonesia Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language LINGUA : Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature ABSYARA: Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Jurnal bahasa, sastra, seni, dan pengajarannya Academic Journal Perspective : Education, Language, and Literature ETERNAL: English Teaching Journal Jurnal bahasa, sastra, seni, dan pengajarannya
Evynurul Laily Zen
Universitas Negeri Malang
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching

 1 
Note-Taking: The Gender Difference on Students’ Perception Muhimatul Murtafi'ah; Muflihah Muflihah; Evynurul Laily Zen
Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/scope.v7i2.15361

Abstract

Most of previous studies conducted on the implementation of note-taking strategy, finding its effect and the students’ preferent on the note-taking strategies. However, this study investigates whether there is any difference in the students’ perception on note-taking based on the gender differences. This study was conducted on the sixth semester of  university students who had experienced implementing note-taking during the learning process by collecting the students’ perception on note-taking by using questionnaire and semi-structured interview as the data collection techniques. As this study investigated the comparison of both male and female students’ perception, the researchers used the quantitative research design. The result of this study indicates the opposite of most the previous studies have found. This result is not in line with the previous studies which discussed more below. Both male and female have a positive respond to the effectiveness of note-taking
Errors in Students’ Writing (Reports from ProWritingAid) Masitha Rahma; Evynurul Laily Zen
Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching
Publisher : Pusat Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30998/scope.v7i2.15528

Abstract

This research aims to find out the types of students’ writing errors which are detected and not by ProWritingAid, a language checker software.  This was a qualitative study using a document analysis method with ProWritingAid being the primary language learning instrument to analyze. To collect the data, 18 pieces of students’ writing carried out as the experimental task for this research was focused on writing personal letter. These writings were checked in the software, and manually rechecked by the researcher afterward. The results showed that ProWritingAid was able to detect 21 types of writing errors including missing pronoun, preposition, and determiner. Meanwhile, there were also undetected errors found, for example, unnecessary capitalization and missing punctuation. In conclusion, while ProWritingAid can help students to analyze their errors. However, human analysis is still needed due to the undetected errors. 
Co-Authors Abidah, Khilda Husnia Amri, Misbahul Andi Rusgandi, Muhammad Bunga Almia Gane Sari Devi Puspitasari Diba Ramadhana Edi Suharyadi Evi Eliyanah Febrianti, Della Harimurti, Keke Febrian Harits Masduqi Imatufariq, Siti Radibah Ira Maria Fran Lumbanbatu Karkono Karkono Luthfi Farihatun Nisa’ Majid, Rusni Hi. Maria Hidayati Maria Hidayati, Maria Marshalina, Afifah Masitha Rahma Masrokhin Masrokhin Masrokhin, Masrokhin Metaria, Metaria Moh. Safii Muflihah Muhimatul Murtafi'ah Muttahidah Nunung Suryati Nurenzia Yannuar Ratih, Elisa Rohi Qimmahtum Rosi, Fahrur Rully Aprilia Zandra Salma Azzahidah Sari, Ardiana Shabrina, Dinda Bunga Siti Nurjannah Siti Radibah Imatufariq Siusana Kweldju Suharmanto Suharmanto, Suharmanto,, Suharmanto, Utami Widiati Yani, Achmad Yazid Basthomi Yusnita Febrianti Zalva Fajhira Shabrina Putri