Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

EVALUATION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SCHOOL LITERACY MOVEMENT (GLS) PROGRAM IN BANTUL REGENCY Toruan, Andreanus Pattikawa Lbn; Setyo Putro, Nur Hidayanto Pancoro; Sudiyatno, Sudiyatno; Pusporini, Widowati; Andika, Jeffri Dian
JURNAL NALAR PENDIDIKAN Vol 13, No 2 (2025): JURNAL NALAR PENDIDIKAN
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian Mahasiswa Penalaran UNM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26858/jnp.v13i2.74230

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the achievement and differences in the implementation of the School Literacy Movement (GLS) program in elementary schools in Bantul Regency. This evaluative research employed a mixed-methods approach, utilizing the CIPP evaluation model with a quantitative descriptive orientation. Data were collected through questionnaires and interviews, involving respondents consisting of teachers and elementary students from one public and one private elementary school, namely SD Muhammadiyah Bendo and SD Negeri Sutran. The results at SD Muhammadiyah Bendo indicate that 28.13% fall into the "Very Good" category, 12.5% into the "Good" category, 21.88% into the "Fair" category, 18.75% into the "Poor" category, and 18.75% into the "Very Poor" category. Meanwhile, at SD Negeri Sutran, 25% are in the "Very Good" category, 40.6% in the "Good" category, 18.75% in the "Medium" category, 9.4% in the "Low" category, and 6.25% in the "Very Low" category. Overall, the findings reveal a distributional difference in survey results that reflects varying degrees of program success between the two schools. Based on the data distribution and the number of students in the lower categories, SD Negeri Sutran demonstrates a more consistent and comprehensive implementation of the GLS program compared to SD Muhammadiyah Bendo
Between policy and practice: Assessing implementation gaps in adaptive sex education for adolescents with intellectual disabilities Ardiyanti, Nanin; Sudiyatno, Sudiyatno; Pusporini, Widowati
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): September-November
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jpip.v18i2.92214

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the adaptive sex education program at SLB Negeri Manggar, the only special needs school in East Belitung Regency, Indonesia. Despite legal mandates and the recognized vulnerability of adolescents with intellectual disabilities to sexual violence and exploitation, a significant gap exists between the policy intent and the practical, standardized delivery of adaptive sex education in special schools. Challenges such as insufficient teacher training, limited parental support, and a lack of dedicated curriculum guidelines hinder effective program implementation. Using the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) evaluation model, this research focused specifically on the input (educator quality, facilities, stakeholder support) and process (integration, teaching methods, material delivery) components. A mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was employed, collecting quantitative data via questionnaires from 20 students and 20 parents, and qualitative data through in-depth interviews with five teachers and one vice-principal. Results indicate that the program is well-implemented overall (process achievement score: 80%). Educator competence and facility availability were categorized as "good," and parental support scored 75.11%. However, the study identified persistent challenges, including worn teaching aids, parents' discomfort in modeling appropriate behaviors, and the need for more consistent habituation at home. The findings confirm that while the program's structure is sound, systemic gaps in training, resource renewal, and holistic stakeholder engagement remain. This evaluation provides evidence-based recommendations for enhancing program quality, ensuring it more effectively safeguards and empowers students with intellectual disabilities.