Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.905
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Syntax Idea Qiyas : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION Dikmas: Jurnal Pendidikan Masyarakat dan Pengabdian Jurnal Impresi Indonesia POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Inovasi Global Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Corpus Juris : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Hedwig A. Mau
Universitas Jayabaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Mahkamah Konsitusi dalam Menetapkan Norma Baru yang Berkaitan dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi Nomor  90/PUU-XXI/2023) Hotjen Simamarta; HedwIg Adianto Mau; Mardi Chandra
Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Vol. 3 No. 02 (2026): APRIL - MEI 2026
Publisher : PT. Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas kepastian hukum kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menetapkan norma baru yang berkaitan dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023. Permasalahan utama dalam penelitian ini adalah akibat hukum putusan tersebut terhadap kewenangan legislasi serta kepastian hukum kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam menjalankan fungsi pengujian undang-undang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Bahan hukum yang digunakan terdiri atas bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang dianalisis secara kualitatif normatif melalui interpretasi sistematis, argumentatif, dan preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 menimbulkan akibat hukum berupa perubahan makna Pasal 169 huruf q Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Putusan tersebut tidak hanya menafsirkan norma, tetapi juga membentuk syarat alternatif mengenai pencalonan presiden dan wakil presiden. Kondisi ini menimbulkan perdebatan karena Mahkamah Konstitusi dinilai bergerak dari fungsi negative legislator menuju kecenderungan sebagai positive legislator. Dengan demikian, putusan tersebut memberikan kepastian hukum secara praktis, tetapi sekaligus menimbulkan persoalan kepastian hukum kelembagaan mengenai batas kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan pembentuk undang-undang.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM TENTANG PENGAKTIFAN KEMBALI PRAJURIT TNI BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENINJAUAN KEMBALI MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA TERHADAP PENIADAAN PIDANA TAMBAHAN PEMECATAN Ahmad Jaeni; Maliki Setyawan; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Rudy M Ramdan
Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): May
Publisher : Goodwood Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/jshe.v6i3.3955

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the legal implications of the dismissal of Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) soldiers, particularly when a Military Court's review decision revokes the dismissal penalty. It explores whether soldiers, once dismissed for legal violations, should be entitled to reinstatement if the dismissal penalty is nullified. Research Methodology: The research uses a qualitative approach with document studies and interviews. Document studies analyze legal documents, court rulings, and administrative regulations, while interviews involve legal experts, TNI personnel, and stakeholders in military law. Results: The findings suggest that the revocation of the dismissal penalty in a review decision can be considered a novum (new legal fact), nullifying the legal basis for the dismissal. As a result, the dismissal becomes invalid, and the soldier may be entitled to apply for reinstatement in the military. Conclusions: The study concludes that soldiers whose dismissals are revoked in a review decision should have the right to seek reinstatement. However, current regulations do not provide for such a provision, highlighting the need for regulatory changes to accommodate this right. Limitations: The study is limited by the availability of relevant legal cases and the absence of administrative regulations on reinstating dismissed soldiers. Further research may be needed to explore broader implications for TNI personnel. Contributions: This research contributes to the understanding of legal processes regarding military personnel, offering recommendations for policy reforms in military justice and personnel management.
POLITIK HUKUM PENGISIAN JABATAN APARATUR SIPIL NEGARA OLEH PRAJURIT TNI Hasan Efendi; Mardi Candra; Hedwig A. Mau
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 7 (2026): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Juli 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v3i7.2669

Abstract

his research aims to analyze the legal politics of appointing Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) personnel to State Civil Apparatus (ASN) positions and the resulting legal implications. The study is grounded in recent regulatory developments, namely Law Number 20 of 2023 concerning the State Civil Apparatus and Law Number 3 of 2025 amending Law Number 34 of 2004 concerning the TNI, which allow active military personnel to occupy civil positions but spark debates regarding their compatibility with principles of civilian supremacy, military professionalism, bureaucratic neutrality, and the merit-based system. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, analytical, and conceptual approaches. Analysis is conducted using Legal Politics Theory and Legal Harmonization Theory. The findings reveal that legal policy has shifted from a strictly restrictive model to an accommodative-restrictive model. Nevertheless, placement practices beyond legal provisions result in weakened neutrality, accountability, TNI professionalism, and ASN meritocracy, as well as legal disharmony. Consistent implementation of regulations and legal harmonization are necessary to maintain a balance between defense interests and civil bureaucratic professionalism.
Kepastian Hukum Target Penyelesaian Restorasi Gambut dan Mangrove Pasca Berakhirnya Masa Tugas Badan Restorasi Gambut dan Mangrove Grenada Grenada; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Mardi Chandra
Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia Vol. 3 No. 05 (2026): MEI 2026
Publisher : PT. Intelek Cendikiawan Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji kepastian hukum penyelesaian target restorasi gambut dan mangrove pasca berakhirnya masa tugas Badan Restorasi Gambut dan Mangrove (BRGM) pada 31 Desember 2024. BRGM merupakan lembaga nonstruktural yang dibentuk melalui Peraturan Presiden Nomor 120 Tahun 2020 dengan mandat merehabilitasi 1.200.000 hektar lahan gambut dan 600.000 hektar mangrove. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah: (1) bagaimana kedudukan hukum dan implikasi kelembagaan setelah berakhirnya masa tugas BRGM terhadap penyelesaian target restorasi gambut dan mangrove; dan (2) bagaimana kepastian hukum negara dalam menjamin penyelesaian target restorasi gambut dan mangrove pasca berakhirnya masa tugas BRGM. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berakhirnya masa tugas BRGM menimbulkan persoalan kepastian hukum karena Pasal 34 Perpres 120/2020 hanya mengatur pengalihan kewenangan secara umum tanpa mekanisme koordinasi yang rinci. Pengalihan fungsi restorasi kepada Kementerian Kehutanan, Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup/BPLH, dan Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan berpotensi menimbulkan fragmentasi kewenangan dan inkonsistensi pelaksanaan restorasi. Kepastian hukum negara dalam menjamin penyelesaian target restorasi belum sepenuhnya optimal karena lemahnya desain koordinasi kelembagaan, kekosongan normatif mekanisme transisi, dan minimnya jaminan keberlanjutan pendanaan. Diperlukan penguatan regulasi yang memuat mekanisme koordinasi nasional, penetapan lembaga koordinator, serta sistem pengawasan terpadu.
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PEMEGANG SAHAM YANG MENOLAK MENYETORKAN MODAL SAAT PERSEROAN MENINGKATKAN MODAL Gemalya Adji Pangestu Dama; Maryano Maryano; Hedwig Adianto Mau
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, April 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v2i1.2800

Abstract

This research examines the legal liability of shareholders who refuse to contribute capital when a company increases its capital, potentially disrupting the company's financial stability and harming creditors and third parties. Using normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the legal construction of capital contribution obligations and the forms of legal accountability. The findings indicate that the obligation to contribute capital is essentially a right that shareholders may exercise, yet under certain circumstances it may give rise to legal liability when performed in bad faith and causing harm to the company. Refusal to contribute capital not only results in share dilution but may also trigger legal accountability, including exceptions to limited liability through the piercing the corporate veil doctrine. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations in the articles of association and shareholders' agreements to prevent disputes and ensure legal certainty.
THE PROBLEM OF CORRUPTION LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT CAUSES STATE LOSSES SINCE THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA NUMBER 25 / PUU-XIV / 2016 DECISION Muhammad Zaki; Tofik Y Chandra; Hedwig Adianto Mau
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): JULY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (429.644 KB) | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v1i3.204

Abstract

are increasingly widespread, so that the boundaries of the characteristics of acts of corruption and the characteristics of acts that are not corrupt but characterized by very detrimental to the state and society become difficult to distinguish, and lead to uncertainty about how to formulate groups. his crime. This research is a normative legal research that uses primary and secondary legal sources with library research collection techniques through legislation approach, historical approach and case approach. The results obtained are the legal considerations of the judges of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia in the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 25/PUU/XIV/2016 in Article 2 Paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption in Decision Number 25/ PUU-XIV/2016 which grants the abolition of the phrase “can” is to create legal certainty for the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) regarding discretionary policies or decisions or the implementation of the Ermessen freies principle which is criminalized as a criminal act of corruption because it is detrimental to state finances.
HOW TO ENFORCE CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST NARCOTICS ABUSE OF NEW TYPES OF VARIANTS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN INCLUDED IN LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2009 CONCERNING NARCOTICS Lukas Pardamean E. Marbun; Hedwig; Mohamad Ismed
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): JANUARY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i1.531

Abstract

Today, many different narcotics, psychotropics, and other illegal drugs emerged. These new variants are not/have not been regulated by law number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. This research uses Normative Juridical methodology. The data used for the formulation of the problem is secondary data consisting of primary, secondary and tertiary legal documents. The results of the analysis show that in order to implement the provisions of Article 6 paragraph (3) of the Narcotics Law, it is necessary to stipulate a Regulation of the Minister of Health concerning Changes in the Classification of Narcotics, which is the last position where this research was written. Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2021 concerning changes to the classification of narcotics. Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2021 concerning changes to the classification of narcotics which are guidelines for law enforcement against drug abuse with new variants in Indonesia are still deemed ineffective and efficient and do not accommodate all needs -the need for law enforcement against narcotics abuse, especially narcotics with new types of variants. An alternative policy formulation to Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the formulation policy that is deemed suitable for implementation in the future is to revise Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics in particular to expand the meaning related to narcotics in the provisions of Article 1 number 1 and/or Article 6 paragraph (1).
Criminal Liability of Online Gambling Perpetrators in Indonesia According to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law Sherly Bantu; Wira Franciska; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 9 (2024): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v3i9.5414

Abstract

Online gambling has become increasingly prevalent over a long time due to the ease of access and the ability to play from anywhere with an online association. The reason for this consideration is to look at and analyze the legal provisions against online gambling offenders in Indonesia. The research method used in this study can be a normative legal approach supported by experimental law with graphic depiction. In extension, important information is also used as supporting material for additional information. For control checks, legitimate and standardized check strategies are used. From the search results regarding the legal provisions against the perpetrators of online betting violations in Indonesia, it appears that the legal authority against online betting violations is the criminal sanction against online betting based on Article 45 of Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions, but the punishment for the perpetrators is lower than the threat of criminal sanctions in Article 303 of the Criminal Code, so it does not have an inhibiting impact on the perpetrators of online betting violations. Criminal liability for online betting offenses in Indonesia is the responsibility of the perpetrators of online betting offenses indicated by the existence of criminal offense components. In addition, the activity component is one of the most important components in criminal liability, because a person cannot be sentenced if he does not commit an act that is classified as an act rejected by the law.
KEWENANGAN LEGISLASI DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH TERKAIT RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG DAERAH KEPULAUAN Abubakar Watihelu; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Rotua Valentina Sagala
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, April 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v2i1.2425

Abstract

This research is motivated by the limited legislative authority of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) in the formulation of the Archipelagic Regions Bill, which is constitutionally participatory rather than decisional in nature. Although the DPD possesses representative legitimacy as a regional chamber and is authorized to propose and deliberate bills related to regional matters, final legislative approval remains vested in the House of Representatives and the President. This condition creates a gap between regional representation and the effectiveness of the DPD in advocating for the interests of archipelagic regions. This study employs the theory of authority and the theory of distributive justice as its theoretical framework. This research adopts a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. The statutory approach examines constitutional provisions and legislation governing the legislative authority of the DPD. The conceptual approach explores doctrines of authority and the theory of distributive justice, particularly in assessing the allocation of legal benefits and burdens affecting archipelagic regions, while the analytical approach evaluates the consistency between existing legal norms and the practical exercise of the DPD’s legislative authority in the formulation of the Archipelagic Regions Bill. The findings indicate that the legislative authority of the DPD in the formulation of the Archipelagic Regions Bill is normative, procedural, and symbolic, lacking binding decisional power. These limitations have resulted in an uneven realization of distributive justice for archipelagic regions within the national legal framework. This study concludes that an ideal construction of the DPD’s legislative authority requires strengthening its role during deliberative stages, restructuring more effective coordination mechanisms with the House of Representatives, and optimizing its oversight function to ensure that the enactment and implementation of the Archipelagic Regions Law effectively realize distributive justice for archipelagic regions
TANGGUNG JAWAB HUKUM PERUSAHAAN PENYEDIA JASA PEMBAYARAN (PJP) TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN KANAL PEMBAYARAN UNTUK TRANSAKSI ILEGAL Immanuel Maykael Martono Reinhard Hutagaol; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Gatut Hendro Tri Widodo
CORPUS JURIS : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): CORPUS JURIS : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, April 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/corpusjuris.v2i1.2433

Abstract

The rapid development of digital payment systems through Payment Service Provider (PJP) companies has significantly enhanced transaction efficiency; however, it has also created legal issues related to the misuse of payment channels for illegal activities such as money laundering, online fraud, and illegal gambling. The central legal problem concerns the unclear boundaries of legal liability imposed upon PJPs when their payment channels are misused by merchants or users. This research applies the theory of legal certainty and the theory of legal liability to assess the extent to which Indonesian positive law regulates the scope of obligations, fault, and liability of PJPs within the digital payment ecosystem. This study employs normative legal research using statute approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, and comparative approach. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources including legislation governing payment systems, anti-money laundering, and information technology, as well as secondary legal materials derived from legal doctrines and scholarly writings. Data collection was conducted through library research and analyzed qualitatively using grammatical and systematic interpretation methods. The findings indicate that Indonesian positive law does not yet provide clear and definitive limitations regarding PJP liability, resulting in legal uncertainty and potential over-criminalization. In principle, PJPs cannot be held criminally liable in the absence of intent, gross negligence, or participation in unlawful acts. The liability of PJPs is more appropriately positioned within the administrative and risk-based compliance framework, including the obligation to implement prudential principles, Know Your Customer (KYC), and Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CFT) measures. Accordingly, more comprehensive regulatory clarification is required to ensure legal certainty, protect the digital payment industry, and strengthen the effectiveness of preventing financial cybercrime
Co-Authors Abdul Tatuh Sowakil Abubakar Watihelu Adi Rohman Fajar Afrial Dantez Agus Prambowo Sulistiyo Ahmad Jaeni Anggoro Budi Santosa Barra Bimantara Ginting Candra, Mardi Ester Simanungkalit Gatut Hendro Tri Widodo Gatut Hendro TW Gemalya Adji Pangestu Dama Grenada Grenada Hasan Efendi Hotjen Simamarta Immanuel Maykael Martono Reinhard Hutagaol Ismail Ismail Isnandar Aristo Prabowo Joko Sriwidodo Juanda Juanda Juanda Juanda Julianto Nugroho Khalimi Khalimi Lourenzia Hattu Lukas Pardamean E. Marbun Maliki Setyawan Mardi Chandra Maryano, . Mohamad Ismed Mohamad Ismed Mohammad Saleh Muhammad Zaki Padri Zelvian Parulian Hasiholan Siagian Ramlani Lina Sinaulan Rotua Valentina Sagala Rudy M Ramdan Santrawan Paparang Sharon Sharon Sherly Bantu Sufrin Ridja Tine Yowargana Tofik Y Chandra Tofik Yanuar Chandra Umar Suryadi Bakry Windi Ardiansyah Wira Franciska Yanni Yanni