Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

Memahami Penggunaan Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dalam Perspektif Legislative Model di Indonesia Ayuni, Qurrata
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 16, No 1 (2025): JNH VOL NO 1 JUNI 2025
Publisher : Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v16i1.4621

Abstract

This article analyzes the application of Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution as the constitutional basis for the State of Emergency (Hukum Tata Negara Darurat) in Indonesia. The study is driven by the historical tendency to abuse emergency powers and the marginalization of the legislature’s role in declaring a state of danger. The main question addressed is: How can the provisions of Article 12 be understood and applied within the framework of the Legislative Model to ensure legislative involvement and oversight over presidential emergency powers? The purpose of this study is to explain how Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution can be interpreted within this framework to strengthen legislative oversight and provide a normative foundation for emergency law reform in Indonesia. This research employs a doctrinal method, using conceptual and statutory approaches. The findings show that Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution not only grants authority to the President but also mandates the involvement of the House of Representatives (DPR) in determining the conditions and consequences of an emergency through legislation. The conclusion highlights the urgent need to reform emergency-related regulations in line with Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution and to establish a clear mechanism for legislative oversight.AbstrakTulisan ini menganalisis penerapan Pasal 12 UUD 1945 sebagai dasar konstitusional dalam Hukum Tata Negara Darurat (HTN Darurat) di Indonesia. Kajian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh kecenderungan historis penyalahgunaan kewenangan darurat dan pengabaian peran legislatif dalam penetapan keadaan bahaya. Permasalahan utama yang dikaji adalah: Bagaimana pengaturan dalam Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dapat dipahami dan diterapkan dalam kerangka Legislatif Model guna menjamin keterlibatan dan pengawasan lembaga legislatif terhadap kewenangan darurat Presiden?Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menjelaskan bagaimana Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dapat diinterpretasikan dalam kerangka tersebut, guna memperkuat peran pengawasan legislatif terhadap kewenangan darurat Presiden dan memberikan dasar pembaruan hukum kedaruratan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah doktrinal dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 12 UUD 1945 bukan sekadar memberi kewenangan kepada Presiden, tetapi juga mengatur keterlibatan DPR dalam menetapkan syarat dan akibat pelaksanaan keadaan darurat melalui undang-undang. Simpulan menekankan pentingnya pembaruan regulasi dengan karakter kedaruratan yang merujuk pada Pasal 12 UUD 1945 dan memperjelas mekanisme pengawasan legislatif.
Emergency War Arrangements In ASEAN: A Comparative Analysis Susanto, Ardi; Ayuni, Qurrata
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Hague Conventions include a general participation clause and is regarded as customary international law, meaning that ASEAN countries are considered bound by the norms contained within the convention. The declaration of war as stated in the Hague Convention III of 1907 was adopted in Article 11 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which, to date, has not provided further regulations governing the implementation of legislative and executive powers concerning the declaration of war. Therefore, it is necessary to look at the constitutional arrangements for the state of war in ASEAN countries through comparative law study to determine and observe the pattern of these arrangements to be implemented in Indonesia. The results of research regarding the practice of war in 10 ASEAN countries. Firstly, the constitutional pattern in ASEAN countries follows the parliamentary model. Secondly, there are checks and balances between parliament and the government during a state of war. Thirdly, in a state of war or other emergencies, it is necessary to extend the term of office of the parliament and the president. Fourthly, the extension and termination of a state of war or other emergency is in the hands of parliament. Fifthly, the existence of a time limit is necessary during a state of war. Sixthly, exceptions in a state of war include constitutional amendments prohibited, the parliament may not be dissolved, and can restrict or suspend human rights. Lastly, in Indonesia, it is necessary to include the DPD in the declaration of a state of war.
Pendekatan Fusi dalam Pengadilan Islam Indonesia: Memadukan Prinsip-Prinsip Islam dengan Praktik Mediasi Keluarga Asia dalam Kasus Perceraian Wirdyaningsih; Rini Maryam; Qurrata Ayuni; Raihanah Abdullah
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 11 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v11i1.14848

Abstract

This study explores the role of mediators in Indonesia’s Islamic Courts, focusing on their unique integration of Islamic principles with Asian family mediation practices in divorce cases. Unlike the theoretical model of mediation, which emphasizes mediators as neutral facilitators without providing advice, mediators in Indonesia’s Islamic Courts adopt a distinctive approach. They incorporate Islamic values, often offering moral and religious guidance, while also drawing on Asian family-court traditions that prioritize familial harmony and community involvement. This study uses the qualitative framework to analyze divorce mediation approach in court and its dynamics in divorce cases. Moreover, observation and interview are methods that applied to get comprehensive picture in the mediation process such as the individual experiences of each party, the dynamics of the relationships between the parties and between the parties and the mediator, and the mediator's perspective on the case, the parties, and the resolution of the case. In-depth interviews were conducted with non-judge mediators and the disputing parties at the South Jakarta Religious Court.  This paper highlights how these mediators navigate cultural, religious, and legal dimensions to address divorce disputes. The findings reveal a fusion mediation model that challenges conventional Western approach  offering insights into culturally sensitive dispute resolution in Islamic legal contexts
The Challenges of Covid-19 National Economic Recovery in Indonesia: The Need for Accountability during Emergency Qurrata Ayuni
University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): OCTOBER
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/ubelaj.8.2.98-114

Abstract

This paper discusses the challenge of accountability of Indonesia national economic recovery policies in the COVID-19 pandemic emergency. There are pros and cons to ensuring the accountability of the national economic recovery policy in the legal and legislative aspects. This paper finds three main issues; First, there is an oversized power that the government has in reallocating the state budget. Second, there is the potential for immunity for irregularities in state finances with the argument of national economic recovery. Third, the need for checks and balances from the state power branch to carry out supervision. Using a normative juridical study, this paper emphasizes the importance of the role of the legislative and judicial branches of power in ensuring accountability for the use of state finances on the pretext of a COVID-19 emergency
POLITICAL LEGAL FORMATION OF LEGAL REGULATIONS USING THE CARRY-OVER MECHANISM AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNMENT Mohammad Raihan; Qurrata Ayuni; David Aprizon Putra
Bengkoelen Justice : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jbengkoelenjust.v14i1.33328

Abstract

Legal politics in the formation of a draft law into law requires a mechanism with a process that is not simple. The process of forming statutory regulations is regulated in Law Number 15 of 2019 concerning the Formation of Legislative Regulations. The planning and preparation stage begins with the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas). In the Prolegnas, it is planned and prepared an agenda for any bills which will be the task of the House of Representatives to be discussed for the next 1 (one) to 5 (five) years and are only valid during the term of office of the DPR in that period. Therefore, a mechanism for "inheriting" the bill from the previous period to the next period is needed to ensure the continuity of the bill discussion process or it can be called a " carry-over " mechanism which basically has the main objective of continuing the discussion of the bill so that it reaches the enactment stage. raised in this paper is "What is the process of forming legislation with a carry-over mechanism and its relationship to the general principles of good governance?" The research method used in this journal is normative legal research method, which refers to legal norms contained in laws and court decisions, as well as legal norms prevailing in society. The results of this research show that Prolegnas, as the first step in determining what bills can be drafted using the carry over concept , is a form of legal politics in the formation of laws. It is hoped that the formation of laws through the carry-over concept can perfect the process of forming laws and regulations that pay attention to the effectiveness and sustainability of development planning and are in accordance with the formation of good laws and regulations. Keywords: Legal Politics, Draft Law, Carry-Over.
Implementasi Bantuan Sosial pada Era Pandemi Covid-19: Evaluasi Aspek Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Dumilah Ayuningtyas; Humaatul Islam; Sahfira Ulfa Hasibuan; Cindy Margaretha; Naurah Naziihah; Nisa'atul Maharanita Fitrianingrum; Ayudina Larasanti; Qurrata Ayuni
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 8 No 1 (2022): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v8i1.796

Abstract

The Covid-19 virus has spread worldwide at an alarming rate, infecting millions who are expecting government assistance during the pandemic. This research aimed to evaluate the distribution process of the social assistance provided by the Indonesian government during the Covid-19 pandemic. A quick online survey was conducted on 279 respondents from 12 provinces in Indonesia. Furthermore, interviews were also conducted with seven informants to strengthen the quick survey's results, a form of triangulation method. The results show that most respondents felt that the distribution of social assistance during the pandemic was not transparent and on target, partly due to separate budget allocations between several ministries, inaccurate data and unintegrated data. Strengthening the role of local government and increasing the involvement of community organizations as well as the flexibility to adjust the form and mechanism of social assistance, are the recommendations of this study.
The Hajj Ministry and the Politics of Religious Capital in Indonesia Ayuni, Qurrata; Febriyanto, Satrio; Charles Simabura; Nurizal Ismail
al-'adalah Vol 23 No 1 (2026): Al-'Adalah
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24042/adalah.v231.30996

Abstract

The establishment of the Ministry of Hajj and Umrah (Kemenhaj) in 2025 raises important constitutional questions. Within Indonesia’s non-confessional state framework, the relationship between state and religion appears to be shaped more by economic considerations than by ideological commitments. This paper suggests that state regulation of the Hajj may serve purposes beyond the spiritual welfare of pilgrims, potentially reflecting a broader logic in which worship is positioned as a form of capital. This argument is developed through three lines of inquiry. First, the state’s selective engagement with sharī’ah by regulating economically significant practices such as Hajj and zakat, while leaving private acts of worship like prayer unregulated, points to a predominantly economic rationale. Second, the substantial funds managed by BPKH (Rp171 trillion), its mega-project in Mecca in collaboration with Danantara, and a Rp34.5 trillion investment partnership with Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund suggest that Hajj governance has increasingly taken on the characteristics of state-managed enterprise. Third, the creation of a religion-specific ministry raises concerns about institutional inequality, potential fragmentation, and fiscal fairness, particularly regarding the use of public funds from taxpayers of all faiths to support an institution serving Muslims exclusively. Drawing on doctrinal legal research, this paper concludes that the formalization of Hajj governance may reflect not only a commitment to serving the ummah, but also an accumulation of religious capital that warrants closer scholarly attention
CONSTITUTIONALITY TEST: JUDICIAL REVIEW OF MINING LICENSE PRIORITIZATION FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS IN INDONESIA Ayuni, Qurrata; Arsil, Fitra
Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development Vol. 9, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The enactment of Government Regulation No. 25/2024 has sparked constitutional debate in Indonesia. The regulation prioritizes Special Mining Business Permit Areas (Wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan Khusus, WIUPK) for religious organizations, raising critical questions about distributive justice and democratic resource governance under Article 33(3) of the 1945 Constitution. This study examines the constitutionality of this policy by asking whether the prioritization of WIUPK for religious organizations, as reviewed in Constitutional Court Decision No. 77/PUU-XXII/2024, violates Article 33(3) of the 1945 Constitution and what implications this holds for Indonesia's natural resource management paradigms and constitutional interpretation. Using doctrinal legal research, this study analyzes legal documents through constitutional and political economy lenses, particularly regulatory capitalism and rentier state theory, to interpret the Court's decision and its governance implications. This study finds that religious organization involvement, though appearing as democratization, in fact represents a strategic rent reallocation within regulatory capitalism. The Constitutional Court's deference to open legal policy reflects a shift from substantive to formalistic interpretation, as it declined to review PP No. 25/2024 and treated WIUPK prioritization as a non-justiciable policy matter, potentially enabling rent-seeking under the guise of religious empowerment. Addressing the underexplored intersection of judicial review and religious capitalism, this research indicates that judicial avoidance through the political question doctrine may facilitate elite capture in natural resource governance, offering a theoretical framework for analyzing semi-state actors. The study proposes three regulatory alternatives: (1) technical capacity-based prioritization, (2) hybrid eligibility with professional mining expertise, and (3) enhanced judicial review to balance religious empowerment with constitutional mandates of social justice.