Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

Social Cohesivity of The Indonesian Muslim Community During the Ramadan Shalihin, Nurus; Yusuf, M; Hulwati, Hulwati
Islam Realitas: Journal of Islamic and Social Studies Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): June 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/islam_realitas.v9i1.6169

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the social cohesiveness of Indonesian Muslim communities during Ramadan. Moral sense, sense of belonging, social har mony, sense of security, and tolerance in this study are used as indicators to understand social cohesiveness.  Data were collected through questionnaires with 600 respondents randomly selected in three districts/cities in West Sumatra and Yogyakarta provinces. The study found that two indicators of social cohesion were in the high category, namely a sense of morality (3.39 or 84.75%) and social harmony (3.30 or 82.50%), while three other indicators of social cohesion were in the medium category, namely a sense of belonging (2.34 or 58.50%), a sense of security (2.54 or 63.50%), and tolerance (2.70 or 67.50%). Thus, the social cohesion of the Muslim community during Ramadan is in the moderate category, with an average of 2.85 or equivalent to 71.17 percent. This study concludes that Ramadan has not contributed significantly to building social cohesiveness. The ambiguity of faith, which is ambiguous in understanding reality; sacred and profane, can be identified as one of the reasons why Ramadan has not been able to build social cohesiveness.
Analisis bibliometrik perkembangan penelitian tentang perjuangan ulama menggunakan Vosviewer Darmawan, Budi; Shalihin, Nurus; Nopriyasman, Nopriyasman
Daluang: Journal of Library and Information Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : UPT Perpustakaan Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/daluang.v3i2.2023.17824

Abstract

Purpose. This research aims to investigate the prominent Ulama figures who have played significant leadership roles in Indonesian society throughout history. These Ulama have been instrumental in various aspects, including social, political, and religious realms. The article delves into the evolution of research publications related to the struggles of Ulama from 2010 to 2023.Methodology. The method employs a descriptive bibliometric analysis focused on the struggle of Ulama, using specific keywords like “Perjuangan” and “Ulama” on the Dimensions platform, within the timeframe of 2010 to 2023.Results and discussion. The results reveal fluctuations in the number of publications, ranging from a peak of 786 in 2018 to only 70 in 2023, with a significant spike in 2017. The research network involves three clusters of authors, highlighting diversity in the field. Overlay Visualization demonstrates strong author relationships, with some forming influential networks. The Indonesian Institute of Science had a notable impact on many writers. Density Visualization identifies active authors and Co-occurrence analysis reveals four keyword clusters, with “Islam” and “Indonesia” as primary foci. A trend shift occurred in 2020, with new keywords gaining prominence such as “Education, Women, Politic, and Law”. These data shows that research on the theme of the ulama's struggle still has many opportunities.Conclusions. The bibliometric analysis of ulama struggle research (2010-2023) provides information about publication fluctuations, close collaboration. Diversity, changing trends, and research potential that has not yet been fully explored regarding the struggles of ulama  is used to encourage and determine the focus for further research on the struggles of ulama.
Intensity of Cultivating Radicalism Values in Kindergarten Level Integrated Islamic Schools Nurus Shalihin; Yulia Yulia; M Yusuf; Ujang Wardi
AT-TA'LIM Vol 31, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15548/jt.v31i1.831

Abstract

This study aims to look at the intensity of radical values cultivation towards early childhood and how it implies the different variants of each Integrated Islamic School. This article uses a mixed method approach. Quantitative approach is used for data collection using lift. And a qualitative approach is used to analyze the data. There are twelve kindergartens that are used as population in this study. In each population, five teachers and seven student guardians were selected by random sampling. The study found that the level of intensity of radicalism values inculcation in Islamic Schools is at the level of fanaticism with 76.65%, coercion of will with 66.58%, hard attitude with 59.87%, and prejudice with 51.40%. It was further reported that the percentage in IISN schools was 80.25, 63.29, 62.25, and 54.25 and ISSA schools have 87.25, 64.05, 75.00, and 7.05 respectively. Meanwhile, the schools without any affiliation to any institution or organization recorded 73.05%, 72.75%, 52.75%, and 48.25% respectively. This simply shows that the radical values observed in Integrated Islamic Schools are closely related to ideological, political, and economic interests.
Perspektif Siyasah Syari'ah terhadap Ketidakstabilan Regulasi dan Kepercayaan Investor Global: Studi Kasus Relokasi Tekno-Industri di Asia Tenggara bobby ferly; Nurus Shalihin Nurus; Ikhwan Matondang Ikhwan; Muchlis Bahar Muchlis Bahar; Elfia Elfia
Al-Mutharahah: Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Sosial Keagamaan Vol. 23 No. 01 (2026): Al-Mutharahah : Jurnal Penelitian dan Sosial Keagamaan
Publisher : LPPM Institut Agama Islam Diniyyah Pekanbaru

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46781/al-mutharahah.v23i01.2071

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of regulatory instability on global investor trust from the perspective of Siyasah Syari'ah, with a focus on techno-industrial investment relocation in Southeast Asia during 2024–2025. Using a qualitative normative-juridical method with a comparative case study approach, this research examines three pivotal cases: Apple's iPhone 16 ban in Indonesia, Tesla's Gigafactory cancellation, and NVIDIA's expansion into Vietnam. The study applies three core Siyasah Syari'ah concepts Gharar Siyasi (political uncertainty), Hifz al-Mal (protection of wealth), and Maslahah Mursalah (public interest) as analytical lenses to evaluate government investment policies. Findings reveal that Indonesia's erratic protectionist approach, including sudden product bans and an oversized bureaucracy, constitutes Gharar Siyasi, thereby undermining investor confidence and causing capital flight to Vietnam, which demonstrably applied the principle of Maslahah through incentive-based policies (Decree 182/2024). The study concludes that legal certainty is both a rational economic requirement and a moral-religious obligation in Islamic governance. Policy recommendations are offered for Indonesia to reform its regulatory approach toward a more transparent, incentive-oriented, and Shari'ah-compatible investment environment.
Negotiating Da'i Authority in the Digital Da'wah Landscape from Perspectives of Da'wah Management Students Ivan Sunata; Nurus Shalihin; Awis Karni; Irta Sulastri; Hariya Toni
Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies Vol 20 No 01 (2026): Ilmu Dakwah: Academic Journal for Homiletic Studies
Publisher : Faculty of Da'wah and Communication, UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/idajhs.v20i01.46898

Abstract

This study aims to explore how Da’wah Management students interpret, assess, and form religious authority criteria for da’i figures in the digital era. The change in the da’wah ecosystem from institutional space to digital space causes an epistemic shift in the construction of religious authority. This study departs from the lack of studies that specifically examine how young audiences, in this case university students, confirm da’i authority through participatory mechanisms in social media such as YouTube, TikTok, and Instagram. Using a qualitative approach with a descriptive-narrative method, data were obtained from twelve students of the Da’wah Management Study Programme through an open-ended questionnaire distributed online. The analysis was conducted using the Miles and Huberman model which includes the stages of data condensation, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that da’i authority is formed mediatically, affectively, and interactively. Students view da’i as the main figure who not only conveys religious teachings, but also acts as a spiritual counsellor and moral guardian. Criteria for da’i authority include depth of Islamic knowledge, relevant communication style, personal consistency, and ethics in delivery. This research confirms that in the digital context, religious authority is no longer static or hierarchical, but is formed through a dynamic relationship between credibility, digital performativity, and active selection by an increasingly religiously literate audience.
Comparative Analysis of the Marriage Age Dispensation in Islamic Family Law in Indonesia and Algeria Ibnu Amin; Nurus Shalihin; M Sholihin; YS Tenra Septu Amin; Lendrawati Lendrawati
Madania: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman Vol 30, No 1 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/madania.v30i1.11293

Abstract

This study aims to analyze comparatively the legal policy regarding the granting of marriage dispensation in the Islamic family law system in two Muslim-majority countries, namely Indonesia and Algeria. The focus of the study is directed at how regulations in each country regulate the age limit for marriage and the mechanism for granting marriage age dispensations, as well as how these norms are rooted in the principles of Islamic law that are influenced by the national legal structure. This research uses a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach and comparative legal analysis, through an examination of laws, implementing regulations, official state documents and classical and contemporary Islamic legal literature. The results of the study show that Indonesia through Law Number 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Law Number 16 of 2019 sets the age of marriage of 19 years for men and women, but still opens up dispensation space through the judicial channels as stipulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2019. Algeria in the revised Code de la Famille in 2005 sets a minimum age of 19 years without distinction between sex, with the granting of a more administrative dispensation governed by the civil courts, but giving judges broader authority to give consideration to their verdicts without more specific technical instructions. Both countries use the principle of benefit as a normative justification, but differences in social, political and legal contexts make the implementation of marriage practiced in different frameworks. The conclusion of this study is that the legal formulation of marriage dispensation in Indonesia and Algeria reflects legal ijtihad efforts that are adaptive to changing times, but still require social control and protection of children's rights within the framework of justice and benefit values.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis secara komparatif kebijakan hukum mengenai pemberian dispensasi nikah dalam sistem hukum keluarga Islam di dua negara berpenduduk mayoritas Muslim, yakni Indonesia dan Aljazair. Fokus kajian diarahkan pada bagaimana regulasi di masing-masing negara mengatur batas usia perkawinan dan mekanisme pemberian dispensasi usia nikah, serta bagaimana norma tersebut berakar pada prinsip-prinsip hukum Islam yang dipengaruhi oleh struktur hukum nasional. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan perbandingan hukum (comparative legal analysis), melalui telaah terhadap undang-undang, peraturan pelaksana, dokumen resmi negara serta literatur hukum Islam klasik dan kontemporer. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan utama Indonesia dan Aljazair dalam dispensasi nikah terletak pada mekanisme peradilan, ruang diskresi hakim, dan orientasi perlindungan anak. Indonesia melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 menetapkan usia menikah 19 tahun serta membuka dispensasi melalui mekanisme yudisial yang diatur rinci dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 5 Tahun 2019. Regulasi ini menekankan kepentingan terbaik bagi anak melalui pertimbangan psikologis, kesehatan, pendidikan, dan sosial sehingga diskresi hakim lebih terbatas secara prosedural. Sebaliknya, Aljazair melalui Code de la Famille  revisi 2005 juga menetapkan usia minimal 19 tahun, tetapi tanpa pedoman teknis khusus mengenai dispensasi. Akibatnya, hakim memiliki ruang diskresi lebih luas dalam mempertimbangkan alasan sosial, budaya, dan kemaslahatan keluarga. Temuan ini menunjukkan Indonesia lebih berorientasi pada perlindungan anak berbasis regulasi, sedangkan Aljazair menekankan fleksibilitas penafsiran hakim dalam hukum keluarga Islam.  
Negotiating Eschatology Online: Netizens' Reception of Ustadz Zulkifli Muhammad Ali's Youtube Da'wah Ivan Sunata; Irta Sulastri; Bukhari; Nurus Shalihin; Wakidul Kohar
Jurnal Fuaduna : Jurnal Kajian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/fuaduna.v9i2.10107

Abstract

This study examines how YouTube audiences interpret eschatological Islamic da‘wah messages delivered by Ustadz Zulkifli Muhammad Ali within the digital public sphere. Employing a qualitative reception analysis, the research draws on Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding framework to categorize audience interpretations into preferred, negotiated, and oppositional readings. The data were collected from user comments posted on the YouTube video “The End of the Age is Very Near” and systematically analyzed using NVivo 12 Plus. The findings reveal that negotiated and oppositional readings are more prominent than preferred readings, indicating a critical and reflexive mode of audience engagement. Many responses articulate skepticism, satire, and selective acceptance of the eschatological message, as viewers attempt to contextualize the da‘wah within broader social realities, religious knowledge, and contemporary concerns. These patterns suggest that digital da‘wah audiences do not merely consume religious messages but actively interpret, contest, and reframe them. This study contributes to the growing scholarship on digital da‘wah and religion online by demonstrating that religious meaning on social media is produced through dialogic and contested processes, where religious authority and interpretation are continuously negotiated in platform-mediated environments.
Authoritative Sources of Qur’anic Interpretation in the Tafsir Study Community of the Batak Angkola Society Hasiah Hasiah; Nurus Shalihin; Novizal Wendry; Desri Ari Enghariano; Sufrin Efendi Lubis
Jurnal Ushuluddin Vol. 33 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jush.v33i2.38013

Abstract

This study examines the authoritative sources utilized by the Tafsir study community within the Batak Angkola society in Padangsidimpuan City for interpreting the verses of the Qur’an. The objective is to identify and analyze the primary references employed by this community to understand and convey Qur’anic interpretations. A qualitative research method with an ethnographic approach was used. Data were collected through participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and a literature review relevant to the study. The findings reveal that the Tafsir study community relies on a combination of classical and modern tafsir as their main sources for Qur’anic interpretation. Additionally, local culture influences distinctive interpretive patterns among the Batak Angkola society, although some community members face challenges in integrating local cultural elements into their interpretations. The study concludes that the authoritative sources used by the Tafsir community reflect a dynamic adaptation between Islamic teachings and local culture; however, not all members incorporate local culture into their interpretations. Ultimately, this interpretive study produces a unique and contextual approach to Qur’anic exegesis.
Penalaran Hukum Hakim Dalam Memberikan Izin Poligami (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Bukittinggi Nomor 575/Pdt.G/2024/Pa.Bkt) Rifan Saputra; Nurus Shalihin; Elfia Elfia; Aulia Rahmat
AL-IMAM: Journal on Islamic Studies, Civilization and Learning Societies Vol 7 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : IDRIS Darulfunun Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58764/j.im.2026.7.187

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal reasoning employed by judges in granting permission for polygamy in the Decision of the Bukittinggi Religious Court Number 575/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Bkt. The research focuses on the judges' interpretation of the legal provisions governing polygamy, their considerations in assessing the first wife's consent, the applicant's financial capability, and personal character, as well as the forms of rechtsvinding (judicial law-finding) and legal reasoning applied in the decision-making process. This research adopts a qualitative approach using a case study design. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews with the judge who examined and decided the case, while secondary data were collected from the court decision, statutory regulations, the Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam), and relevant scholarly literature. Data were collected through interviews, document analysis, and library research, and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which consists of data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that the judges' legal reasoning was not limited to the literal application of statutory provisions but involved systematic, teleological, and sociological interpretation by considering the facts established during the trial, the principles of justice, public benefit (maslahah), and the protection of wives and children. The first wife's consent was not regarded as the sole basis for granting permission for polygamy but was evaluated alongside the applicant's financial capacity, responsibility, and personal integrity. Financial capability was assessed contextually without applying a fixed income threshold, while the applicant's character was evaluated through evidence concerning moral conduct, responsibility, and social behavior. The study concludes that the judges' reasoning reflects the implementation of rechtsvinding by integrating legal certainty, justice, and expediency to produce decisions that prioritize family protection and substantive justice.