p-Index From 2020 - 2025
9.705
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Humaniora Dialektika Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya Litera Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL) BAHASTRA BAHASA DAN SASTRA Lingua Cultura LITERASI: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Humaniora Semantik : Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Arbitrer Fon: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia KEMBARA Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra Jurnal Gramatika Indonesian Language Education and Literature International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS) Jurnal Orientasi Baru Briliant: Jurnal Riset dan Konseptual Transformatika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Aksara RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya Diglosia Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Kandai Adabiyyat: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Komposisi: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Seni Linguistik Indonesia Metalingua: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa Sawerigading SALINGKA Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Missio Suar Betang Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) Stilistika: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Bahtera Indonesia; Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Imajeri: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia SCAFFOLDING: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES) Jurnal Pena Indonesia Loa : Jurnal Ketatabahasaan dan Kesusastraan TANDA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Bahasa dan Sastra Journal of Pragmatics and Discourse Research Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran BAHASTRA Deiksis: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Aksara JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN MISSIO Majalah Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia

MODAL QUALIFIERS AS BOOSTER IN ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING OF THE THESIS DISCUSSION SECTION (MODAL QUALIFIERS SEBAGAI BOOSTER DALAM TULISAN ARGUMENTATIF PADA BAGIAN PEMBAHASAN TESIS) Yuliana Setyaningsih; R. Kunjana Rahardi; Refa Lina Tiawati
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 9, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2023.v9i1.6316

Abstract

The importance of using modal qualifiers as a component of argumentative writing in the discussion section of student theses has not been fully realized by students. In fact, this component greatly determines the level of strength of the argument as a vehicle for conveying scientific truth. Scientific truth can be tested through the strength of the argument that appears in the selection of the types of modal qualifiers that accompany the position statement. This study aims to describe the manifestation of the form and function of the modal qualifier as a booster in argumentative writing for thesis discussion. The research data is in the form of excerpts of claims which contain boosters from the thesis discussion section of students of the Indonesian Language Education Master’s Program at Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta. Data was collected by listening method with note-taking technique. Furthermore, the stages of classification and typification of data are carried out. The analytical method used in this study is the distributional analysis method and the content analysis method. The results of this study are the following forms of capital qualifiers as boosters: (1) definitely, (2) necessary, (3) must, (4) certainly, and variations in form. This study also found seven booster functions as follows: (1) affirming by showing confidence, (2) affirming by giving recommendations, (3) affirming by confirming something, (4) affirming by confirmation of clarity, (5) affirming by inferring purpose, (6) affirming of intent by ensuring, (7) affirming by suggesting something.
Socio-Political Hate Speech: Manifestations of Language Malfunctions in the Perspective of Cyberpragmatics R. Kunjana Rahardi; Septa Firda Utami
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 10, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2024.v10i2.8255

Abstract

The presence of language on the internet that appears on various platforms forces language to be interpreted in a multimodal way. This research aims to: (1) Describe the forms of language functioning in socio-political hate speech in public spaces; (2) Describe the pragmatic meaning of language use in socio-political hate speech in public spaces. The data for this research is in the form of excerpts of speech on social media which contain forms of the early functions of language in socio-political hate speech. Data was collected using the listening method, not listening in the sense of listening, but listening in the sense of reading the text. The extralingual matching analysis method is applied with social, social, cultural and situational extralinguistic context matching tools. This matching analysis method is also applied by matching cybertext contexts, including cybertexts with visual, spatial, aural, gestural and linguistic dimensions. The steps in carrying out analysis include identification, classification, typification, and interpretation. This research produces findings in the form of manifestations of the form and pragmatic meaning of socio-political hate speech in public spaces. Form manifestations include slurs, harassment, propaganda, innuendo, cynicism, sarcasm, innuendo. Manifestations of pragmatic meaning include: insulting, insulting, defaming, insinuating, and ridiculing
Unpacking Argumentative Fallacies in Indonesia's 2024 Presidential Debates: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Analysis Setyaningsih, Yuliana; Rahardi, R Kunjana; Rahmat, Wahyudi
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 11, No 1 (2025): Spring Issue (April-September)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2025.v11i1.9371

Abstract

This study examines the presence of argumentative inaccuracies in the 2023–2024 Indonesian presidential and vice-presidential debates through the lens of cognitive linguistics and contextual pragmatics. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were drawn from transcripts of five debate rounds and analyzed using Toulmin's model of fallacies combined with situational context theory. The research identifies five dominant fallacies: evading the issue, argument from ignorance, appeal to authority, ad hominem attacks, and hasty generalizations. Each fallacy is interpreted within its political and situational context—revealing how historical references, ethical deflections, appeals to seniority, lack of mastery, and satire are strategically employed. The findings offer insight into how these inaccuracies diminish the integrity of public political discourse and obscure substantive discussion of policies. Furthermore, the study underscores the critical role of context in shaping the interpretation and reception of political arguments. It contributes to the growing body of work on cognitive-pragmatic approaches in political linguistics, and emphasizes the need for educational efforts to cultivate critical thinking and argumentative literacy among citizens and students alike. This research also suggests practical implications for debate organizers, moderators, and media analysts—calling for clearer standards to reduce manipulative rhetoric in public forums. Future studies are encouraged to apply computational methods to expand this work or examine comparative debate formats across cultures.
Politeness in Communicating in Podcast Media: An Integrative-Epistemological Pragmatics Perspective Rahardi, R. Kunjana; Noviance, Kristina Marta
Jurnal Gramatika Vol 11, No 1 (2025): Spring Issue (April-September)
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22202/jg.2025.v11i1.9350

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the meaning of politeness in communicating in podcast media with an integrative-epistemological pragmatic perspective. The data of this study are manifestations of the pragmatic meaning of politeness in communicating in podcast media. The substantive data sources are the texts in the transcribed podcasts and in them there are research data. The locational data source is the podcast media that can be accessed around the time of this study. Data were collected using the listening method with recording and note-taking techniques. The data that has been collected is then classified and typified to facilitate data analysis. The data reduction process is carried out in this research stage. Data are analyzed and interpreted to find the pragmatic meanings of politeness. The pragmatic meanings of politeness are found using the equivalence analysis method, especially extralingual equivalences. The analysis of extralingual equivalences plays the role of context as a tool for analysis and interpretation. The dominant context used as a tool for analysis and interpretation in this stage is the cybertext context, both visual, aural, gestural, spatial, and linguistic cybertexts. The stages applied in this data analysis are identification, reduction, classification, identification, and interpretation. This study has produced several findings of the pragmatic meaning of politeness in podcast media as presented below: (1) Gratitude, (2) Expression of Admiration, (3) Expression of Affirmation, (4) Personal Expression, (5) Expression of Disagreement, (6) Indirect Expression, (7) Expression of Direct Affirmation, (8) Personal Expression, (9) Expression of Covert Criticism.