Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.158
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MONOGRAF Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Jurnal Konstitusi JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT JURNAL UNIZAR LAW REVIEW Jurnal Jatiswara Sosio Dialektika Indonesia Berdaya Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Mataram Journal of International Law
Muh. Risnain
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search
Journal : Mataram Journal of International Law

 1   2 
Penerapan Prinsip Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Dalam Memerangi Tindak Pidana Siber Rusdianto, Rusdianto; Risnain, Muh.
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2532

Abstract

This research aims to determine the development of the regulation of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles in combating cybercrime and the application of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles. The research method used is normative research. The approach used is statutory, historical, and conceptual. The sources of legal material used are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The legal material collection technique used is in the form of library data. The analysis of legal materials used is a qualitative analysis method. The study result shows that the development of the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction regulation began with the birth of rules in background paper documents, then the emergence of the 1996 European Council regulations. Applying the principle of extraterritorial jurisdiction is urgently needed in combating criminal acts when cases intersect with state jurisdiction. So that a country can choose jurisdictional principles that can apply in resolving cases, such as the example of the case conducted by Abraham Ben Moses in the United States. Namely, law enforcement can be carried out in Indonesia based on active national principles and protection principles following the ITE Law and the Criminal Code.
Analisis Perjanjian Pengelolaan Wilayah Udara (Flight Information Region) Antara Indonesia dan Singapura Menurut Hukum Internasional Mithalina, Fatona Mithalina; Risnain, Muh.; Zunnuraeni
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2579

Abstract

ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis 1) Apakah perjanjian FIR tahun 2022 antara Indonesia dan Singapura telah sesuai dengan hukum internasional, dan 2) Apakah perjanjian bilateral tahun 2022 yang disahkan melalui Perpres Nomor 109 Tahun 2022 telah sesuai dengan hukum nasional Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah perundang-undangan, historis, dan konseptual. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang diperoleh melalui telaah studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Perjanjian Bilateral FIR antara Indonesia dan Singapura tahun 2022 tidak mereflesikan aturan yang sesuai dalam Konvensi Chicago 1944 dan Annex 11. Indonesia sebagai negara pemilik kedaulatan memiliki hak untuk menolak mendelegasikan pengelolaan FIR kepada Singapura. Selain itu, Peraturan Presiden Nomor 109 Tahun 2022 tidak sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerbangan . Undang-undang Nomor 1 tahun 2009 mengharuskan Indonesia mengambilalih FIR kepulauan Riau dan Natuna yang nyatanya masih dikelola sebagian besar oleh Singapura dalam jangka waktu 25 tahun mendatang. Dalam hal ini pendelegasian kewenangan kepada Singapura tersebut telah melanggar kedaulatan Indonesia yang bersifat penuh dan eksklusif. Aturan nasional Indonesia juga tidak memberikan kepastian hukum dalam penegakkan kedaulatan dan keamanan wilayah udara Kepulauan Riau dan Natuna. Hal ini ditandai dengan disahkannya Perpres Nomor 109 Tahun 2022 oleh Pemerintah yang harusnya menggunakan peraturan perundang-undangan sebagaimana yang telah ditentukan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2000. Oleh karena itu pemerintah Indonesia melalui Kementrian Perhubungan dan TNI AU mestinya mengkaji ulang perjanjian bilateral tahun 2022 dengan pemerintah Singapura. Masalah FIR kemudian dapat dijadikan bahan acuan bagi kalangan akademisi dan generasi mendatang untuk mempersiapkan diri menjadi orang yang profesional di bidangnya agar suatu hari dapat membela bangsa Indonesia dari segala bentuk masalah, termasuk problematika yang sedang kita hadapi saat ini mengenai ruang udara kepulauan Riau dan Natuna. Kata Kunci: Perjanjian Bilateral; Flight Information Region; Kepulauan Riau; dan Natuna. ABSTRACT This study aims to analyze 1). Is the 2022 FIR agreement between Indonesia and Singapore following international law? 2). Is the 2022 bilateral agreement ratified through Presidential Decree Number 109 of 2022 following Indonesia national law? The research method used is normative legal research. The approach used is statutory, historical, and conceptual. The sources of legal materials used are primary, secondary, and tertiary data obtained through a literature study. The study results show that the Bilateral FIR Agreement between Indonesia and Singapore in 2022 does not reflect the rules in the 1944 Chicago Convention and Annex 11. Indonesia is a sovereign country and has the right to refuse to delegate the management of FIR to Singapore. In addition, Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022 is not following the mandate of Law Number 1 0f 2009 concerning Aviation. Law No.1 of 2009 requires Indonesia to take over the FIR of the Riau and Natuna islands. Singapore still managed the FIR of these regions in the next 25 years. Therefore, the delegation of authority to Singapore has violated the exclusive and full soveregnty of Indonesia. National regulations do not provide legal certainty in upholding the sovereignty and security of the airspace above the Riau islands and Natuna. The legal uncertainty is marked by the ratification of the FIR Agreement year 2022 using Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022, instead, it should be ratified by statutory regulations as stipulated in Law Number 24 of 2000. Therefore, the Indonesian government through the Ministry of Transportation and the Indonesian Air Force should review the bilateral agreement year 2022 with the Singapore government. The FIR issue can then be used as reference material for academics and future generations to prepare themselves to become profesionals in their fields so that one day they can defend the Indonesian nation from all kinds of problems, including the problems we are currently facing regarding the Riau and Natuna airspace. Keywords: Bilateral Agreement, Flight Information Region, Riau Islands and Natuna.
Implementation of The Provincial Government’s Authority to Carry Out Sister Province Cooperation In The Perspective of International and National Law Case Study: Sister Province Cooperationbetween Province of NTB And Northern Province of Australia Tyanto, Amar; Risnain, Muh; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2846

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the position and strength of the LoI between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation from the perspective of international law and national law. Furthermore, this research also examines the implementation of government authority and dispute resolution mechanisms stipulated in the Letter of Interest in the context of Sister Province agreements according to international law. The research method used is normative empirical. The Letter of Intent (LoI) between the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government regarding sister province cooperation has limited power and does not have binding legal force in the perspective of international law and national law. However, in the implementation of the authority exercised, the West Nusa Tenggara Provincial Government and the Northern Territory Government have gone through the stages of exploration, formulation of texts, and negotiations. The mechanism for resolving differences as stipulated in Article 10 requires an amicable settlement of any differences arising from the interpretation or implementation of the contents of the agreement.
Studi Kasus Putusan Permanent Court Arbitration (PCA) Tentang Sengketa Kepemilikan Zina Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE) Laut Cina Selatan Antara Republik Rakyat Cina (RRC) And Philipina Wahyudi, Indra; Risnain, Muh.; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i1.2974

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis dasar pertimbangan Permanent Court Arbitration (PCA) dalam memutus perkara konflik Laut Cina Selatan antara Philipina dan Republik Rakyat Cina (RRC) serta untuk menganalisis dampak dari putusan tersebut terhadap perkembangan hukum laut internasional khusunya yang berkaitan dengan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif . Jenis penelitian dalam penulisan skripsi ini yaitu penelitian hukum normatif, dengan metode Pendekatan kasus (Case Approach ). Pendekatan Perjanjian Internasioanl, Pendekatan Historis, Pendekatan Konseptual ( Conseptual Approach). Adapun hasil dan kesimpulan dari penelitian ini yakni, Permanent Court Arbitration dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangannya terhadap putusan(Award) menyatakan bahwa, pengajuan pertama ini mencerminkan suatu keluhan tentang sumber hak maritim di Laut Cina Selatan dan tentang klaim RRC atas hak bersejarah. Bahwa Hak maritim RRC di Laut China Selatan, tidak dapat melampaui yang secara tegas diizinkan oleh Konvensi PBB tentang Hukum Laut. Apa yang disebut “ Nine Dash Line ” bertentangan dengan Konvensi dan tanpa efek hukum sejauh melebihi batas-batas geografis dan substantif hak maritim China yang secara tegas diizinkan oleh UNCLOS. Pasca putusan ( Penghargaan), perkembangan hukum laut internasional tidak mengalami perubahaan yang signifikan, khususnya yang berkaitan dengan Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE). Dalam putusannya PCA memberikan penegasan bahwa, Klaim Historis tidak serta merta dapat memberikan suatu Negara hak terhadap Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif (ZEE).
The Legal Force of the International Court of Justice Decision on the Appeals Dispute: (Case Study: ICJ Decision No. 173 on the Appeals Dispute between Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE versus Qatar) Hafina Haula Arsy; Risnain, Muh; Guna Nugraha, Lalu
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i2.3663

Abstract

The Statute of the International Court of Justice does not include provisions regarding the authority or jurisdiction of the International Court to handle appellate cases. However, in practice, the International Court of Justice has issued judgments on appeals related to the ICAO Council's jurisdiction in disputes over flight restrictions in Qatar imposed by Bahrain, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This study aims to analyze the nature of decisions related to these appellate disputes. The research methodology employed is normative research with a legislative, conceptual, and case study approach. The findings of this research indicate that decisions on appellate cases are deemed final and binding as stipulated in Article 60 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice and Article 86 of the Chicago Convention, and the obligation of UN member states to comply with the judgments of the International Court of Justice is regulated in Article 94 of the United Nations Charter.
THE AUTHORITY OF THE COUNCIL OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA (DPR RI) IN RATING INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS POST THE RULING OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT (MK) NUMBER 13/PUU-16/2018 Bah Jatun Nadrati; Risnain, Muh; Zunnuraeni
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.3862

Abstract

This research aims to find out and understand the meaning of the DPR RI's authority to ratify international agreements based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018 and to understand and analyze the direction of regulating the authority of the DPR RI in ratifying international agreements after Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018. This research method uses a type of normative legal research. The meaning of the DPR RI's authority to ratify international agreements based on Constitutional Court Decision No. 13/PUU-16/2018 expands the definition of DPR approval, which is not limited to the provisions of Article 10 of Law no. 24 of 2000 concerning international agreements, but in all international agreements which have the nature of having broad and fundamental consequences for people's lives related to the financial burden on the state, and requiring changes or formation of laws. The Constitutional Court's decision pertaining to the DPR's authority in ratifying international agreements, the Constitutional Court expanded the meaning of Article 10 by cancelling the Article and returning to the norms contained in article 11 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Constitutional Court interpreted it extensively. The direction of regulating the authority of the DPR RI in ratifying international agreements after the Constitutional Court decision no. 13/PUU-16/2018 is by changing or replacing the existing norms in article 10 of Law No. 24 of 2000 concerning International Agreements by regulating the substance of international agreements as intended in article 11 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and following the pattern of article 84 of Law no. 7 of 2014.
STATE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE DISPOSAL OF RADIOACTIVE SUBSTANCES IN THE ASIA-PACIFIC AREA (Case Study on Japanas Disposal of Nuclear Waste in Fukushima Waters) Annisa Raudlatul Rahmah; Risnain, Muh; Guna Nugraha, Lalu
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.4135

Abstract

This research aims to find out and examine Japan's responsibility for disposing of radioactive waste in the waters of the Asia Pacific region and to find out and understand the steps that the IAEA should take in resolving the disposal of radioactive waste in the waters of the Asia Pacific region by Japan. This research method uses a type of normative legal research, namely by taking a conceptual approach and a case approach. The actions taken by Japan give rise to responsibilities that must be fulfilled because they violate obligations in several principles and provisions of international law. Actions in disposing of radioactive by Japan have received approval from the IAEA because the level or content of radioactive waste disposed of by Japan is still classified as safe as per the results of laboratory research carried out by TEPCO and the IAEA.
BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN THE EXPLOITATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN INTERNATIONAL SEABED AREAS UNDER THE BIODIVERSITY BEYOND NATIONAL JURISDICTION AGREEMENT Ihdal Umam; Risnain, Muh; Zunnuraeni
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v2i1.4169

Abstract

This research aims to analyze and understand the conservation of biodiversity in international seabed areas based on BBNJ, and to analyze the urgency of the State of Indonesia to ratify the BBNJ Agreement. The research method used is normative legal research. The results show that conservation in the context of the BBNJ (Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction) Agreement includes protection and conservation of natural resources and management. Protection and conservation are regulated through the establishment of area-based management instruments and the requirement of environmental impact assessments for activities on the high seas and the international seabed. Meanwhile, conservation within management is addressed through equitable benefit sharing, technology transfer and capacity building. Therefore, the ratification of the BBNJ Agreement is very important for Indonesia because Indonesia's geographical situation as an archipelago with a large marine area requires effective protection of marine biodiversity, most of which is beyond national jurisdiction. Ratification of the BBNJ Agreement will strengthen national capacity in marine technology, provide better access to marine genetic resources, and strengthen Indonesia's commitment to sustainable ocean management and contribute positively to global ocean governance.
Analysis Of The World Trade Organization Panel Decision Between Indonesia And The European Union In Case Number Ds592 Of 2022 Concerning Restrictions On Exports Of Low-Grade Nickel Ore Zampara Mernissi; Risnain, Muh; Pitaloka, Diva
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v1i2.4221

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the suitability of Indonesia's nickel export restriction policy to international trade rules at the WTO and analyse the actions taken by the Indonesian Government following the WTO Panel Decision regarding the nickel export restriction policy. The research method uses the normative-legal research method. The legal approach methods use statutes, cases, international agreements, and conceptual approaches. The legal material sources or types of legal materials use primary and secondary legal materials. The legal material collection technique used is library data. The analysis of legal materials used is a review of statutory regulations and international agreements. The result of the study showed that the panel has decided that Indonesia has violated Article XI:1 GATT 1994 so Indonesia's policy cannot be justified by Articles XI:2 (a) and XX GATT 1994. Indonesia finally appealed the WTO Panel Report Number DS592. Researchers recommend considering the use of the Principles of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources and Special and Different Treatment as a defence for the Indonesian Government. Furthermore, Indonesia can connect the policy of limiting nickel ore exports to the Net Zero Emission’s mission. Retaliation against the EU could be an alternative solution, but with the caveat that the Indonesian Government must ensure that the retaliation is right on target and does not harm the country's economy and the country's politics.
Pembatasan Pembatasan Penggunaan Hak Veto Dewan Keamanan Melalui Mekanisme Uniting for Peace Majelis Umum Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa: Restrictions on the Use of Security Council Veto Rights Through the United Nations General Assembly's Uniting for Peace Mechanism Maya, Lailatil; Risnain, Muh; Nugraha, Lalu Guna
Mataram Journal of International Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Mataram Journal of International Law
Publisher : Department of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/majil.v3i1.6175

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk; pertama, menganalisis pengaturan hak veto dalam Piagam, dan kedua, menganalisis akibat hukum resolusi Majelis Umum bagi pembatasan penggunaan hak veto Dewan Keamanan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perjanjian internasional, konseptual dan sejarah. Pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan studi pustaka dengan memanfaatkan bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier yang kemudian dilanjutkan dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif preskptif untuk memberikan penilaian terhadap masalah yang sedang diteliti. Simpulan, mekanisme Uniting for Peace mampu mengatasi ketidakmampuan Dewan Keamanan dalam menjalankan tugasnya akibat dari pemberian veto oleh anggota tetap dan memungkinkan tindakan cepat dalam situasi darurat. Namun, resolusi yang dihasilkan bersifat rekomendasi dan tidak mengikat secara hukum, sesuai dengan Article 14 UN Charter dan berakibat pada pelaksanaannya yang tergantung pada negara anggota. Akibat hukum ini membuat kekuatan resolusi Majelis Umum terbatas dan tidak sekuat resolusi Dewan Keamanan, sehingga efektivitasnya dalam membatasi hak veto Dewan Keamanan menjadi lebih terbatas. Di lain sisi, meskipun mampu membatasi kekuasaan hak veto Dewan Keamanan namun dalam pelaksanaannya mekanisme Uniting for Peace memiliki tantangan dalam implementasinya seperti, tidak dilaksanakannya resolusi oleh semua negara karena tidak memiliki kekuatan mengikat, tingginya kepentingan politik diantara negara-negara, munculnya anggapan keberadaan mekanisme Uniting for Peace mengambil kekuasaan Dewan Keamanan yang terdapat dalam ketentuan Article 24 Paragraph one UN Charter untuk menjaga perdamaian dan keamanan dunia, dan yang terakhir adalah karena tidak ada aturan yuridis yang mengadopsi mekanisme ini dalam Piagam.
Co-Authors Abuzar . Annisa Raudlatul Rahmah Asmara, M. Galang Bah Jatun Nadrati Djumardin, Djumardin Dwi Putro, Widodo Erwin, Yulias Fani Shania Putri Farhan Farhan, Muhammad Ammar Galang Asmara Galang Asmara, Galang Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, Gatot Dwi Hendro Guna Nugraha, Lalu Hafina Haula Arsy Harun, Andi Ihdal Umam Ilham Ilham Imran Imran Indra Wahyudi, Indra Irawan Kusumahadi Kaharudin Kaharudin M. Galang Asmara Maya, Lailatil Mithalina, Fatona Mithalina Muhammad Sood, Muhammad Muhammad, Teguh Ernaldi Nata Legawa, Baiq Hemas Nugraha, Lalu Guna Parman, Lalu Pitaloka, Diva Rajab Fadli, Muhamad Rusdianto Rusdianto, Rusdianto Sekarningrum, Elvira Alya Sembiring, Rinawati Suadi, Amran Sukma W, Pebriana Putri Tyanto, Amar Wahyudi, Ikhsan Wardhana, Yunanto Estika Widodo Dwi Putro Yunanto Estika Wardhana Zampara Mernissi Zunnuraeni Zunnuraeni, Zunnuraeni