Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

The Liability of Unilateral Termination by Government on Goods and Service Procurement Contract Anton Cahyono; Ninis Nugraheni; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda
Hang Tuah Law Journal VOLUME 2 ISSUE 1, APRIL 2018
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hang Tuah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30649/htlj.v2i1.78

Abstract

The increasing development in Indonesia, particularly the development of public facilities and infrastructures makes many public contracts, commonly called governmental goods and service contract, increase as well. It is a contract which one of the parties involves the government. In Indonesia, goods and service procurement contracts are not always well-conducted as expected. Lawsuits, which one of those is the liability from one party, may reveal in such contracts. Therefore, this study would discuss about an issue of unilateral contract termination on good-and-service procurement contract along with its solution. Referring to legal regulation related to governmental good-and-service procurement contract, President’s Regulation No. 54 Year 2010 on Governmental Goods and service Procurement and had been amended by President’s Regulation No. 4 Year 2015 about the Forth Amandment of President’s Regulation No. 54 Year 2010 about Governmental Goods and service Procurement.
Physician's Legal Responsibilities in Providing Medicines Outside the National Formulary to National Health Insurance Participants Vinandita Nabila Karina; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda; Mohammad Zamroni
SOEPRA Vol 8, No 2: Desember 2022
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24167/shk.v8i2.4773

Abstract

Abstract: Doctors who give drugs outside the national formulary to National Health Insurance (JKN) participants have caused several polemics. Due to complaints from JKN participants, the government issued regulations regarding the preparation of the implementation of the National Formulary in administering the health insurance program. This hierarchy caused the Minister of Health to issue Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 54 of 2018 Concerning the Preparation of the Implementation of the National Formulary. The purpose of this study was to analyze the legal ratio of the drug formulary in the National Health Insurance System and to analyze the liability of doctors who provide drugs outside the national formulary to National Health Insurance participants. This type of research uses a statute approach, a conceptual approach and a case approach. The statutory approach (statute approach) and the concept approach (conceptual approach). The legal material analysis method is deductive. The findings show that the legal ratio of drug formularies in the National Health Insurance System is caused by the existence of legal regulations regarding FORNAS due to problems that occur, including incompatibility with FORNAS and the e-catalogue, the FORNAS amendment rules apply retroactively violating the principle of legal certainty, there are no minimum rules of conformity. FORNAS in the Hospital/Region Formulary so that the Ministry of Health issues regulations regarding the preparation of drug lists with the issuance of regulations regarding FORNAS.; 2) The legal responsibility of doctors who give medicines outside the national formulary to National Health Insurance (JKN) participants includes the prescribing error stage regarding all requests for prescriptions based on the responsibility of doctors' ethical norms as well as legal responsibility based on civil, criminal and legal provisions. administration.Keywords: doctor, law, responsibility and JKN Abstrak: Dokter yang memberikan obat di luar formularium nasional pada peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) menimbulkan beberapa polemik. Adanya keluhan peserta JKN tersebut maka pemerintah menerbitkan aturan tentang penyusunan penerapan Formularium Nasional dalam penyelenggaraan program jaminan kesehatan. Hirarki tersebut menyebabkan Menteri Kesehatan telah mengeluarkan Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 54 Tahun 2018 Tentang Penyusunanan Penerapan Formularium Nasional. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis rasio legis formularium obat dalam Sistem jaminan Kesehatan Nasional dan untuk menganalisis pertanggungjawaban dokter yang memberikan obat di luar formularium nasional pada peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional. Tipe penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approch) dan pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach). Metode analisis bahan hukum adalah metode deduktif. Hasil temuan menunjukkan rasio legis formularium obat dalam Sistem Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional disebabkan dari adanya regulasi hukum tentang fornas disebabkan adanya permasalahan-permasalahan yang terjadi antara lain ketidaksesuaian FORNAS dan e-catalogue, aturan perubahan FORNAS berlaku surut melanggar asas kepastian hukum, belum ada aturan minimal kesesuaian FORNAS pada Formularium RS/Daerah sehingga Kementrian Kesehatan menerbitkan peraturan tentang penyusunan daftar obat dengan dikeluarkannya peraturan tentang FORNAS.; 2) Tanggung jawab hukum dokter yang memberikan obat di luar formularium nasional pada peserta Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (JKN) meliputi tahap Prescribing error menyangkut segala permintaan dalam resep didasarkan tanggung jawab norma etik dokter serta tanggung jawab hukum yang didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum perdata, pidana, dan administrasi. Kata kunci: dokter, hukum, tanggung jawab dan JKN
Legalitas Penjualan Obat Psikotropika Secara Online Di Indonesia Ernawaty Ernawaty; Dyas Witri Murtiningsih; Edwin Triwidianto; Gede Sanjaya; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 5, Nomor 1, Tahun 2023
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v5i1.120-135

Abstract

Saat ini, perdagangan online menjadi familiar bagi usaha bisnis masyarakat karena dapat memperluas cakupan bisnisnya. Di sisi lain, perdagangan online juga dimanfaatkan oleh beberapa orang sebagai platform untuk menjual obat-obat psikotropika. Penelitian ini legal normatif dengan pendekatan legal (pendekatan statuta) dan pendekatan kasus. Penelitian ini menjelaskan fakta perdagangan obat-obatan psikotropika yang tidak sejalan dengan hukum dan membahas aspek legalitas penjualan obat psikotropika secara online. Hasil penelitian bahwa peraturan perundang undang tentang psikotropika masih belum memenuhi kebutuhan hukum yang muncul akibat dari perkembangan transaksi online terutama terkait penjualan psikotropika secara online. Perlu melakukan pembaharuan hukum dengan cara melanjutkan amandemen dan mengesahkan RUU tentang Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan yang prosesnya terhenti di tahun 2019, dalam rangka pengendalian secara hukum penggunaan pasar online (marketplace) secara illegal untuk menjual obat-obatan psikotropika
The Responsibilities of General Practitioners in Hiring Internsip Doctors in Independent Practices Putu Bagus Redika Janasuta; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda
Kertha Patrika Vol 45 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2023.v45.i01.p06

Abstract

The government expects all health workers to be able to provide optimal quality health services without being forced into carrying out their duties and responsibilities, both in government and private hospital service facilities, independent clinics, and independent practice. When the general practitioner is unable to attend on a predetermined schedule, the replacement of medical services is replaced by an internship doctor. This study aims to analyze the legal norms and responsibilities of general practitioners who provide delegation to substitute doctors who are still with internsip program status if medical negligence occurs at an independent clinic. The research method used normative juridical with a conceptual and legal approach. There is still a void in the legal norms in the legislation regarding the duties and roles of internship doctors in replacing medical services in independent clinics. The responsibility of a general practitioner who delegates duties to a substitute doctor who is still in the internship program status is mandatory. Thus, if medical negligence occurs at an independent clinic caused by medical services performed by an internsip doctor, the general practitioner will also be responsible administratively, civilly, or criminally.
REKONSTRUKSI KEWENANGAN DEWAN JAMINAN SOSIAL NASIONAL DALAM MELAKUKAN MONITORING DAN EVALUASI PENYELENGGARAAN Made Maylisca Theresia Mulya Diprasta; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda; Sulaksono Sulaksono
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 12 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i12.p08

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis pengaturan kewenangan Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional dalam pengawasan dan evaluasi penyelenggaraan jaminan sosial serta memberikan pandangan tentang rekonstruksi kewenangan Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional dalam monitoring dan evaluasi Jamsostek. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan studi dokumen dan dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hasil monitoring dan evaluasi dari Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional tidak pernah disampaikan ke Deputi Dinas Kesehatan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan Kesehatan. Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional diharapkan memperdalam kewenangannya terhadap monitoring dan evaluasi, sehingga tidak hanya menerima laporan dan menyatukan kegiatan, namun dapat langsung ke masing-masing Kantor Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan. Abstract The purpose of this study is to analyze the regulation of the authority of the National Social Security Council in monitoring and evaluating the implementation of social security and to provide views on the reconstruction of the authority of the National Social Security Council in monitoring and evaluating Jamsostek. This study uses a normative, sculptural, and conceptual juridical approach. Collection of legal materials using document study and analyzed descriptively. The results of the study show that the results of monitoring and evaluation from the National Social Security Council have never been submitted to the Deputy for Health Sector of the Health Social Security Administering Body. The National Social Security Council is expected to deepen its authority in monitoring and evaluation, so that it does not only receive reports and integrate activities, but can go directly to each BPJS Health Office.
URGENSI PENGADILAN KESEHATAN SEBAGAI UPAYA SOLUSI MASALAH SENGKETA MEDIS DI INDONESIA Ahmad Fadhli Busthomi; Sutarno Sutarno; Ninis Nugraheni; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 11 No 11 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2023.v11.i11.p14

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis penyelesaian sengketa medis di pengadilan menurut peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia dan peran pengadilan khusus kesehatan dapat memberikan rasa keadilan bagi dokter yang diduga melakukan malpraktik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian perselisihan medis di pengadilan diatur oleh beberapa peraturan antara lain Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Undang-Undang Nomor 29 Tahun 2004 tentang Praktik Kedokteran, Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2014 tentang Tenaga Kesehatan dan Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Mengenai peran pengadilan kesehatan khusus, mereka memiliki potensi untuk memastikan keadilan bagi dokter yang dituduh melakukan malpraktik. Dengan memiliki pengadilan khusus yang disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan sektor kesehatan, kasus malpraktik dapat ditangani dengan perspektif dan standar yang relevan, bersama dengan para hakim dan ahli yang memahami masalah medis teknis dan kompleks yang terlibat. This research aims to examine and analyze the resolution of medical disputes in court according to the legal regulations in Indonesia and the role of specialized health courts in providing a sense of justice for doctors who are alleged to have committed malpractice. This research is a normative legal research and using several approaches, namely statutory approaches, conceptual approaches, and comparative approaches. The research findings indicate that the settlement of medical disputes in the courts is governed by several regulations, The Civil Code, the Criminal Code, Law Number 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice, Law Number 36 of 2009 on Health, Law Number 36 of 2014 on Health Workers and Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health. The establishment of health judiciary in Indonesia involving ad hoc judges with knowledge and competence in the medical field is an important and relevant step to address medical dispute issues. This is because malpractice cases can be approached through relevant perspectives and standards, supported by the presence of judges and experts with adequate technical and medical competence.
Hospital Responsibilities in Storing Electronic Medical Record Documents Sugianto Prajitno; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda; Asmuni
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i1.161

Abstract

Medical records in hospitals are data for compiling health information and every health service and every health service, whether providing outpatient or inpatient services, is required to make a medical record and sanctions are imposed for those who violate it in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The aim of this research is to analyze the norms for storing and destroying manual medical record documents and to analyze the legal responsibility of hospitals for storing electronic medical records in hospitals. The type of research used in this research is legal research. This type of research is carried out by examining legal norms in applicable laws and regulations related to guidelines and codes of ethics for a profession, especially in this case, medical laboratory technology experts in providing health services. Specifically, the type of research is normative juridical or doctrinal research. The findings of this research are that the legal responsibility of hospitals for storing electronic medical records in hospitals has been regulated by Minister of Health Regulation No. 24 of 2022, while the responsibility of hospitals in implementing electronic medical records is also outlined in the Ministry of Health in the form of ministerial supervision through the director general. If deviations occur, administrative sanctions will be given in the form of a warning or revocation of accreditation status.
Legal Protection for Patients Participating in Health Insurance Administering Agencies with Heart Disease with Medication Restrictions in Outpatient Services in Hospitals Suwondo Ariyanto; Mokhamad Khoirul Huda; Asmuni
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2023
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i1.162

Abstract

Health is a human right that must be realized in accordance with Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. BPJS patients have the right to get good health services and medicines according to their diseases, including heart disease. The administration of drugs in the National Health Insurance (JKN) program must be in accordance with the National Formulary (Fornas). There are rules regarding drug restrictions in Fornas that cause problems in outpatient services for BPJS patients with heart disease. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal protection of patients and the hospital's responsibility for drug restrictions. Research Methods: The type used in this study is normative juridical with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. Collection and processing of legal materials using document studies or library materials with added literature, journals and expert opinions related to legal issues and then read, studied and analyzed to arrive at a conclusion. Results: Legal protection for BPJS patients with heart disease is contained in the 1945 Constitution and the Law on Health in 2023. The hospital is also responsible for BPJS patients to get medicines according to medical examination. Conclusion: BPJS patients with heart disease have legal protection to get optimal therapy and the hospital is responsible for administering restricted heart drugs so that patients get therapy according to the guidelines.
Legal Norms and Principles of Decentralization of Authorities in Handling the Covid-19 Pandemic Wahyuni, Irma Indra; Huda, Mokhamad Khoirul
Lex Publica Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (240.714 KB) | DOI: 10.58829/lp.8.1.2021.31-50

Abstract

Covid-19 is a virus originating from Wuhan, China, which has spread throughout almost the world. In Indonesia, the virus spread began on March 2, 2020, allegedly starting from an Indonesian citizen who had direct contact with a foreign citizen from Japan. Over time, the spread of Covid-19 has experienced a significant increase. Due to the delay in anticipating and handling Covid-19 by the government, the government did not immediately determine the status of handling Covid-19, so the flow of coordination between the central government and regional governments became unclear in handling the substance, and technical aspects of Covid-19 in the Central Government and Regional governments experience overlapping authorities because there are arrangements in several laws that contradict each other and are not in harmony between the Central Government, Regional Governments and Duties and National Disaster Management Agency (Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana/BNPB) so as to allow for the handling of the Covid-19 disaster. Thus, it is important to study whether the government’s authority central and regional governments under the control of Covid-19 have been and are in accordance with the structure, duties, functions, as well as applicable regulations and the extent to which the consequences are due to the overlapping of central and regional authorities in the grip of the Covid-19 pandemic and how to deal with it. The legal responsibility of the Central and Regional Governments due to the slow handling of Covid-19. Abstrak Covid-19 merupakan virus yang berasal dari Wuhan, China yang menyebar di hampir seluruh dunia Di Indonesia Penyebaran virus ini dimulai sejak tanggal 02 Maret 2020, diduga berawal dari salah satu warga negara Indonesia yang melakukan kontak langsung dengan warga negara asing yang berasal dari Jepang. Seiring dengan berjalannya waktu, penyebaran Covid-19 telah mengalami peningkatan yang signifikan. Meningkatnya kasus Covid-19 salah satunya disebabkan Karena adanya Keterlambatan antisipasi dan penanganan Covid-19 oleh pemerintah, pemerintah tidak segera menentukan status penanganan Covid-19 sehingga alur koordinasi antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah menjadi tidak jelas Dalam penanganan substansi dan teknis Covid-19 di lapangan Pemerintah Pusat dan pemerintah daerah mengalami tumpang tindih kewenangan karena ada pengaturan di dalam beberapa Undang- Undang yang saling bertolak belakang dan tidak harmoni antara Pemerintah Pusat, Pemerintah daerah dan gugus Tugas serta Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana (BNPB) sehingga berpotensi memperpanjang birokrasi penanggulangan bencana Covid-19. Dengan demikian, penting untuk dikaji adalah Apakah kewenangan pemerintah pusat dan daerah dalam menangani Covid-19 telah efektif dan sesuai dengan struktur, tugas, fungsi, serta peraturan-peraturan yang berlaku serta Sejauh mana akibat yang ditimbulkan karena adanya Tumpah Tindih kewenangan Pusat dan daerah dalam menangani Pandemi Covid-19 dan bagaimana pertanggung jawaban hukum Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah akibat lambatnya Penanganan Covid-19. Kata kunci: Covid-19, Kewenangan ,Pemerintah Pusat, Pemerintah Daerah, Pertanggungjawaban Hukum
STATE AUTHORITY FOR HEALTH SERVICES FOR PATIENTS IN INDIGENT STATUS Sari, Betty Yunita; Huda, Mokhamad Khoirul; Nugraheni, Ninis
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol 5 No 3 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i3.257

Abstract

The objective of this research is to determine the legal framework regarding the role of the state in providing health services and to identify the legal safeguards available to impoverished individuals seeking healthcare in hospitals. This research employs normative juridical research methods, which involve a statutory and conceptual approach. The findings of this study indicate that the state's responsibility in fulfilling the right to health, as outlined in Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health and Law No. 24 on the Social Security Agency for Health (BPJS), lacks consistency in terms of the essence and substance of state responsibility. It has been demonstrated that there are still a significant number of economically disadvantaged individuals in Indonesia who qualify as recipients of contribution assistance (PBI). Additionally, patients are currently lacking legal protection in relation to their entitlement to receive services at a hospital, as stipulated in Article 189 of Law number 17. This refers to the state's obligation to ensure the right to health by offering sufficient and easily accessible healthcare facilities for all segments of the population. The state bears the primary obligation to ensure the fulfilment of its citizens' right to health as mandated by the constitution. States shall prioritise and ensure the realisation of the right to health without any kind of neglect or disregard.