Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

2.693

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Yustisia Lentera Hukum Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Jurnal Selat Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Panorama Hukum Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Res Judicata Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Media Iuris Notaire Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum HUKUM BISNIS Journal of Judicial Review Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Yuridika Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Perspektif Hukum Hang Tuah Law Journal Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan LamLaj

Ghansham Anand

Faculty Of Law, Airlangga University

Author-ID : 566910

Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Social Sciences

Published : 42 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2 3 4 5

Kedudukan Rumah Tinggal Anak Sebagai Objek Gugatan Harta Bersama dalam Hukum Islam: Perspektif Kepentingan Terbaik Budi, Kukuh Pramono; Anand, Ghansham; Septiningrum, Shintya Yulfa; Rahmat, Nur Ezan; Nugraha, Xavier
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 23 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v23i2.12278

Children hold a very important role in the development of a country. However, children are generally vulnerable; hence, protecting and ensuring children's rights must be a priority. One example of a condition where children’s rights are put at risk is when a child's residence becomes the object of a joint property lawsuit. In this case, the principle of the best interests of the child needs to be the main consideration in all matters of decision. This study aims to determine the characteristics of the best interests of the child principle in Islamic law and analyze the formulation of the judge's decision regarding the position of the child's residence, which is the object of a joint property lawsuit. This research is normative legal research, using primary and secondary legal materials. The result of this research shows that the principle of the best interests of the child initiated at the Convention on the Rights of the Child has become an important consideration in various laws and regulations in Indonesia, including the Compilation of Islamic Law to the Supreme Court Circular Letter (Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung, SEMA). As an important principle to be applied in the joint property lawsuit, this study provides three views of the judge's decision formulation, namely: 1) The lawsuit is admissible as there is no explicit norm; 2) It is inadmissible as it is waiting for the child to enter adult age; and 3) It is admissible; however, the distribution is postponed till the child enters adult age. Through this study, the author agreed that the lawsuit is admissible by postponing the distribution until the child reaches adulthood. However, there needs to be some refinement regarding the position of SEMA and the clarity of adult age.

Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Akibat Pencemaran Nama Baik melalui Media Elektronik terhadap Perseroan Terbatas Anand, Ghansham; Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma; Nugraha, Xavier
Notaire Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): NOTAIRE
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/ntr.v7i2.57309

This article aims to analyze the systematic legal framework in terms of law enforcement against alleged defamation through electronic media. law enforcement in the event of alleged defamation through electronic media against a Limited Liability Company, considering that in the event of defamation against a Limited Liability Company, there are generally 2 (two) legal remedies that can be used. Limited Liability Company, there are generally 2 (two) legal remedies that can be used: 1) Criminal legal remedies, through a complaint as stipulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law; and/or 2) Lawsuit for the unlawful act (onrechtmatige daad) due to defamation as stipulated in Article 27 paragraph (3) of the ITE Law; and/or 2) defamation regulated in Article 1372 Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW). This research is legal research with a statutory approach (statute approach), conceptual approach, and case approach. approach, and case approach. approach). The findings of this article are in the use of legal remedies and legal remedies against alleged defamation through electronic media against a Limited Liability Company, it must use legal remedies. against a Limited Liability Company, then it must use criminal legal remedies first because civil judges cannot use criminal legal remedies. criminal remedies first, because civil judges cannot seek material truth and are only bound to formal truth, so that civil judges cannot seek material truth. bound to the formal truth, so that civil case judges cannot judge whether there is assess whether or not there is defamation of a Limited Liability Company through electronic media. electronic media. The implication of this article is to resolve legal issues, related to legal vagueness regarding the systematic law enforcement order of defamation through electronic media against Limited Liability Companies. Limited Liability Company. This article is qualified, as an original article, because in Similar articles have not been discussed: 1) Qualification of PT as a legal subject that can be defamed through electronic media; and 2) electronic media; and 2) The systematic order of law enforcement against against defamation through electronic media against Limited Liability Companies. Limited Liability Company.

Proposing Notaries’ Deed Digitalization in Indonesia Agustin, Ika Yuli; Anand, Ghansham
Lentera Hukum Vol 8 No 1 (2021): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v8i1.21375

Along with emerging technology, a notary public's role should adjust this changing development, mainly dealing with a deed. Technological development inevitably impacts the role of a notary public and the future digitization of notarial deeds. To date, notaries in Indonesia remain implementing laws and regulations that have not been changed. In contrast, technological development has shifted rapidly, especially on the notaries' task in appearing, reading, signing, and using stamps. This study aimed to identify the challenges of implementing notaries’ deed digitalization by taking into account rapid technological development. With legal research, this study showed that as a consequence of technological development, notarial functions’ disruption in Indonesia evoked a concept of a cyber notary, an idea of notarial function through an online system. As it has flourished globally, digital disruptions had brought out an electronic system that changed the implementation of works, business, professions, and functions, mainly to notarial functions. Nevertheless, no specific rules were established to amend Notary Law 02/2014, particularly to the requisites of authentic deeds by a cyber notary. Indonesia applied some restrictions on technology to maintain the legality of authentic deeds to place the notarial profession as a public official consistently. KEYWORDS: Indonesian Notaries, Technological Development, Deed Digitalization.

GAGASAN PENGATURAN AUDITOR HUKUM DI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG SEBAGAI UPAYA MENINGKATKAN RULE OF LAW INDEX INDONESIA Anand, Ghansham; Nugraha, Xavier; Wibisono, Berardus Bilyarto
Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Vol 13, No 1 (2024): Fenomena Kepatuhan Hukum di Indonesia
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v13i1.1608

In Indonesia, there are legal auditors whose job is to conduct legal audits, so that they can improve Indonesia's RoL indicators, considering that one of the indicators is Regulatory Enforcement. However, it turns out that there is a legal vacuum (leemten in het recht) related to this legal auditor in Indonesia, so it is necessary to regulate this legal auditor in the law to fill the legal vacuum. The formulation of the problem in this article: First, what is the urgency of regulating legal auditors in law? Second, how is the formulation of legal auditor arrangements in statutory regulations? This legal research is a legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The legal data of this research is secondary data with primary and secondary legal materials. The results of this research. As for the results of this study, first, the urgency of regulating legal auditors in law, there are at least 4 (four): 1) Improving the Rule of Law Index (RoI) in Indonesia; 2) The realization of the function of law as a tool of social control (law as a tool of social engineering); 3) Provide standardized standards and criteria for auditors; and 4) Provide legal protection and realize legal certainty for business actors. Related to the formulation of legal auditor arrangements in this law is qualified into 2 (two), namely in terms of material and formal.

The Hidden Dangers of Land Disputes: Why Proof of Ownership Matters in Civil Lawsuits Anand, Ghansham
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 26 No. 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v26i1.9308

One of the legal issues regarding civil lawsuits related to land and building rights is "whether or not the description of evidence of ownership of land and building rights is mandatory in the description of the lawsuit". This still causes dualism because there is a legal vacuum in this regard. The objectives of this article are: 1) Analyze the position of the description of proof of ownership in a lawsuit regarding land and building rights issues; and 2) Analyze the ratio decedendi regarding the parsing of proof of ownership in a lawsuit regarding land and building rights issues. This research is doctrinal research with statute, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this study are, first, related to the description of evidence of ownership of land rights in the lawsuit as a formal requirement of the lawsuit in the issue of disputes over land and building rights is an obligation then the lawsuit can be qualified as an obscure lawsuit (obscuur libel), and of course the juridical consequence is that the lawsuit cannot be accepted (niet ontvankelijke verklaard). Second, from the consideration of the panel of judges in the Cibinong District Court Decision Number 216/Pdt.G/2023/PN Cbi. and District Court Decision 15/PDT.G/2011/PN. GORONTALO, it can be concluded that according to the Panel of Judges, the description of evidence of ownership of land rights in the lawsuit is a formal requirement that must be fulfilled.

Integrasi Sertifikasi Syariah dalam Profesi Notaris: Analisis Hukum Perbandingan, Tantangan, dan Peluang di Negara-Negara Muslim Asia Tenggara. Anand, Ghansham; Purnamawadita, Baiq Elma; Nugraha, Xavier; Rahmat , Nur Ezan
Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran Vol 24 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18592/sjhp.v24i2.14334

Southeast Asia is part of the Asian continent located in Southeastern part of Asia or around Indochina and the islands of the Malay Peninsula. Southeast Asia is home to a largely Muslim demographic, such as Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei Darussalam, Thailand, and the Philippines. Consequently, countries in Southeast Asia implement Islamic law into their national laws, either whole or partially. The primary sources of Islamic law are the Qur'an and Sunnah. Islamic law is frequently applied in business and banking transactions, requiring deeds or agreements. A notary is an authorised individual entitled to make authentic deeds and other documents as regulated in laws and regulations. In several Southeast Asian countries, notaries have the authority to attest an agreement or document. The making of these deeds and agreements also includes agreements based on Islamic law or Sharia law. Thus, notaries can make deeds and agreements based on Islamic law that is recognized and regulated by their respective national laws. However, in making Sharia deeds, not everyone understands the rules and principles of Islamic law, including notaries. There is a current urgency for the standardization of Sharia deed making. This serves as a crucial tool for achieving legal unification in the creation of Sharia deeds on a cross-border scale.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS PENGGANTI DALAM PEMANGGILAN BERKAITAN DENGAN KEPENTINGAN PERADILAN Utama, Wiriya Adhi; Anand, Ghansham
Jurnal Panorama Hukum Vol 3 No 1 (2018): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

Notaris Pengganti dalam pelaksanaan tugas jabatannya memiliki tanggung jawab yang sama dengan Notaris. Adanya tanggung jawab yang sama tersebut membuat Notaris Pengganti juga membutuhkan suatu perlindungan hukum dalam pelaksanaan tugas jabatannya sebagaimana perlindungan hukum tersebut diberikan kepada Notaris dalam Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN). Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut apakah ketentuan Pasal 66 UUJN berlaku terhadap Notaris Pengganti dan bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris Pengganti. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan dalam Pasal 66 UUJN hanya memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi Notaris saja tetapi tidak termasuk didalamnya Notaris Pengganti. Perlindungan Hukum bagi Notaris Pengganti berkaitan dengan pemanggilan dalam kepentingan peradilan masih mengikuti ketentuan yang bersifat umum yaitu melalui kewajiban ingkar dan hak ingkar.

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Para Pihak Yang Dirugikan Atas Penyuluhan Hukum Oleh Notaris Putra, Ferdiansyah; Anand, Ghansham
Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Vol 8, No 2 (2018): November
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Pasal 15 ayat (2) huruf e Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) memberikan kewenangan bagi Notaris untuk memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta, artinya Notaris berwenang memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan akta yang di buatnya. Berkaitan dengan kewenangan tersebut dapat terjadi permasalahan jika dikemudian hari penyuluhan hukum yang diberikan oleh Notaris tersebut kemudian di tindak lanjuti oleh para pihak dalam pembuatan akta namun ternyata akta tersebut dinyatakan batal dan bertentangan dengan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Penulis dalam penelitian ini ingin menelaah dan menganalisa lebih lanjut tentang bentuk penyuluhan hukum oleh Notaris serta tanggung gugat Notaris atas penyuluhan hukum yang merugikan para pihak Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau bahan hukum sekunder sedangkan pendekatan masalah dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa bentuk penyuluhan hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh Notaris hanya sebatas pada hal yang berkaitan dengan pembuatan akta saja. Notaris dalam memberikan penyuluhan hukum harus memahami substansi permasalahan yang akan diberikan penyuluhan sehingga mampu memberikan solusi yang benar. Notaris hanya sebatas memberikan penyuluhan hukum kepada para pihak namun hasil akhirnya dikembalikan kepada para pihak untuk membuat perjanjian tersebut sehingga Notaris tidak dapat dimintakan tanggung gugat atas kerugian para pihak.Article 15 section 2e Legal Constitution of Notary Public Profession (UUJN) provides authority for notary public to conduct legal counseling in related to publishing deed. In other words, notary public has authority to provide legal counseling about notarial deed. Concerning this authority, issue that might be occurred in the future is when the counseling given by notary public is regarded as breaching and the notarial deed is canceled by the court. The present study aims to examine and elaborate further about counseling material conducted by notary public coupled with accountability of notary public in related to legal protection of aggrieved parties in related to the legal counseling conducted by notary public. The method used in the present study is a normative legal research, namely legal research which is conducted by examining the library materials or secondary law while in finding and collecting the data is done by two approaches, namely the law and conceptual approaches. The present study concluded that notary public only has authorization in conducting legal counseling concerning publication of notarial deed. Notary public in providing legal counseling shall comprehend substantial issue that is discussed in order to provide proper solution concerning the issue. Despite the outcome of the counseling will be applied or not it depends on the parties that consult to the notary public. Notary public cannot be asked for accountability for all losses that are experienced by the parties.

Penerapan Asas Kehati-hatian Notaris dalam Menjalankan Kewenangannya Berdasarkan UU Jabatan Notaris dan Kode Etik Notaris Anand, Ghansham; Sudirman, Sudirman; Darmawan, Monica Caecilia; Nugraha, Xavier
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 15, No 2 (2024): JNH VOL 15 NO 2 NOVEMBER 2024
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v15i2.4399

One of the primary responsibilities of a Notary is to draft authentic notarial documents related to various legal acts, agreements, and determinations. In exercising this authority, a Notary must adhere to the principle of prudence, which is implicitly regulated in the Law on the Office of Notary (Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris) and the Notary Code of Ethics. However, these regulations need to explicitly define the principle of prudence, creating ambiguity in its application. This article addresses two key research questions: first, how does a Notary implement the principle of prudence in executing their duties as mandated by the Law on the Office of Notary and the Notary Code of Ethics? Second, what indicators can be used to assess this principle’s application in exercising a Notary’s authority? This research adopts a normative legal approach, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based methodologies. The findings of this study are twofold: first, the regulation of the Notary’s principle of prudence is not specifically defined, leaving it as an open norm subject to multiple interpretations. Second, to address these varying interpretations, seven indicators have been identified to evaluate whether a Notary has acted with prudence in carrying out their duties. These indicators should be comprehensively incorporated into the regulations through a Circular issued by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights or through revisions to the Law on the Office of Notary (hard law) and the Notary Code of Conduct (soft law). AbstrakSalah satu kewenangan Notaris adalah membuat akta autentik mengenai semua perbuatan, perjanjian, dan penetapan, dalam menjalankan kewenangan tersebut hendaknya Notaris menerapkan asas kehati-hatian, sebagaimana diatur secara implisit di dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Kode Etik Notaris. Permasalahannya, kedua peraturan ini tidak menguraikan secara konkret asas kehati-hatian tersebut sehingga perlu dianalisis mengenai penerapannya. Oleh karenanya, rumusan masalah di dalam artikel ini, yaitu pertama, bagaimana penerapan asas kehati-hatian oleh notaris dalam menjalankan kewenangannya sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan Kode Etik Notaris? Kedua, apa saja indikator yang dapat digunakan untuk mengevaluasi penerapan asas kehati-hatian oleh Notaris dalam menjalankan kewenangannya? Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Adapun hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pertama, karakteristik pengaturan dari asas kehati-hatian notaris tidak diatur secara spesifik atau sifat pengaturannya dapat dikatakan sebagai open norm, sehingga dalam penerapannya terjadi multitafsir. Kedua, untuk mengatasi keberagaman penafsiran maka ada 7 (tujuh) indikator yang dapat menjadi pertimbangan untuk menilai apakah notaris telah menjalankan kewenangannya dengan hati-hati atau tidak. Tujuh indikator tersebut hendaknya diatur secara komprehensif dalam Surat Edaran Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, dan penyempurnaan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (hard law), serta Kode Perilaku Notaris (soft law).

Pengawasan Terhadap Notaris dalam Kaitannya dengan Kepatuhan Menjalankan Jabatan Anand, Ghansham; Syafruddin, Syafruddin
Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 (2016): March
Publisher : Program magister Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/abc.v1i1.17

Pengawasan sebagai salah satu cara meningkatkan kepercayaan dan akuntabilitas Notaris dalam kaitannya dengan kepatuhan menjalankan jabat-annya. Pengawasan terhadap Notaris dilakukan oleh Majelis Pengawas Notaris agar Notaris dalam menjalankan tugas dan wewenangnya sesuai dengan koridor yang telah ditentukan dan patuh pada Kode Etik Notaris, agar terjamin perlindungan dan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat. Majelis Pengawas Notaris berwenang melakukan pengawasan preventif, pengawasan kuratif dan pem-binaan. Ruang lingkup pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Notaris meliputi peng-awasan terhadap pelaksanaan tugas jabatan Notaris; menyelenggarakan sidang terhadap adanya dugaan pelanggaran Kode Etik Notaris dan pengawasan ter-hadap perilaku Notaris.

Co-Authors Adisti Pratama Ferevaldy Afifah, Dyah Ismi Agus Yudha Hernoko Agustin, Ika Yuli Ajrina Yuka Ardhira Angelina Uirianto Antonius Gunawan Dharmadji Bambang Sugeng Ariadi Subagyono Budi, Kukuh Pramono Cindy Fransisca Subagijo Darmawan, Monica Caecilia Dinda Silviana Putri Dyah Ismi Afifah Emil Cahyo Prasojo Erni Agustin Faizal Kurniawan Ferdiansyah Putra Ferevaldy, Adisti Pratama Fiska Silvia Raden Roro Gabriele Edria Tjoputra Julienna Hartono Karina Megawati Lintang Yudhantaka Lintang Yudhantaka Manik Lingkar Katulistiwi Mariano Putra Prayoga Sumangkut Melati Ayu Pusparani Mokhamad Khoirul Huda Mudjiharto Mudjiharto Nugraha, Xavier Prasojo, Emil Cahyo Purnamawadita, Baiq Elma Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Rahmat , Nur Ezan Rahmat, Nur Ezan Romadhona, Mochamad Kevin Septiningrum, Shintya Yulfa Sudirman Sudirman Syafruddin Syafruddin Syafruddin, Syafruddin Tantri Noviana Herawati Utama, Wiriya Adhi Vitto Odie Prananda Wibisono, Berardus Bilyarto Yohanes Sogar Simamora

Title

Found 42 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 42 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 42 Documents
Search