Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.816
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Novum : Jurnal Hukum Yustisia Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Abadimas Adi Buana Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Awang Long Law Review Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Loyalitas Sosial: Journal of Community Service in Humanities and Social Sciences Pendidikan Multikultural LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal Evidence Of Law Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Justice Voice Begawan Abioso Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ipso Jure Rechtsvinding Ipso Jure
Bachrul Amiq
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research

 1 
Implementation of Labor Law in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 - Challenges and Solutions Bachrul Amiq; Wahyu Prawesthi; Noenik Soekorini; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Sri Astutik
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 2 No. 10 (2024): Oktober 2024
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr912

Abstract

The Industrial Revolution 4.0 has drastically transformed global industries, introducing advanced technologies such as automation, artificial intelligence, and digitalization into the workplace. This rapid technological shift has presented significant challenges for labor laws, which are often designed for traditional work environments. This study explores the implementation of labor law in the context of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, analyzing the challenges faced by both employers and employees in adapting to these new technological advancements. Using a qualitative methodology, this research employs a juridical review of existing labor laws, supported by an in-depth case study examining how these laws are applied in technology-driven industries. The findings indicate that labor laws often lag behind the technological advances, leading to gaps in legal protections for workers and ambiguities in employer obligations. The case study highlights specific instances where current labor regulations fail to address issues related to remote work, job displacement due to automation, and workers' rights in the gig economy. Solutions are proposed to modernize labor laws, ensuring they are adaptable to future technological developments while safeguarding workers' rights. The study concludes that there is an urgent need for legal reforms to balance innovation with fair labor practices in the era of Industry 4.0.
Legal Protection for Investors in Case of Stock Fraud in the Capital Market Neni Anggraeni; Dudik Djaja Sidarta; Renda Aranggraeni; Siti Marwiyah; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 11 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1394

Abstract

The Indonesian capital market plays a pivotal role in mobilising long-term financing for corporations and providing investment opportunities to the public. However, persistent stock fraud cases undermine market integrity and investor confidence. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the existing legal framework for investor protection against stock fraud, analyse its practical implementation, and recommend measures to strengthen both preventive and repressive mechanisms. Employing a normative legal research design with a qualitative approach, the study integrates statute, conceptual, and case approaches, focusing on Law No. 8 of 1995 on Capital Markets, OJK regulations, the Criminal Code, and notable cases such as PT Hanson International Tbk. The findings reveal that while the legal framework normatively aligns with the Legal Protection Theory, Justice Theory, and Legal Effectiveness Theory, substantial gaps remain between regulation and enforcement. Weak supervisory coordination, delayed intervention, lengthy judicial processes, and low investor legal literacy reduce effectiveness. Recommended reforms include adopting regtech and suptech, enhancing cross-agency data integration, implementing AI-based surveillance, establishing a specialised capital market court, and strengthening investor education. The study concludes that combining regulatory improvements, adaptive enforcement, and public legal empowerment is essential to safeguard investors, maintain market integrity, and promote sustainable economic growth.
Legal Safeguards for Justice Collaborators in Murder Cases: The Richard Eliezer Verdict Analysis Charles Ardani; Sri Astutik; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Siti Marwiyah; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 12 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1405

Abstract

Justice collaborators, or "crown witnesses," have become essential in modern criminal justice systems, particularly in dismantling organized crime and uncovering complex murder cases. This study explores the legal protections afforded to justice collaborators in Indonesia through a doctrinal analysis of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1704 K/PID.SUS/2022, commonly known as the Richard Eliezer verdict. The objective is to critically examine the adequacy and application of legal safeguards provided to individuals who cooperate with law enforcement while implicated in serious crimes. Employing normative legal research methods and a statutory and case approach, the paper reveals discrepancies in the implementation of protections for justice collaborators. While the Indonesian Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) offers procedural protections, this analysis identifies significant gaps in enforcement, judicial interpretation, and institutional coordination. The findings underscore a need for stronger legislative frameworks and consistent judicial standards to uphold the rights and safety of justice collaborators. The implications extend to criminal law reform and the balancing of retributive justice with restorative mechanisms. This study contributes to the legal discourse on human rights protections in criminal procedure, particularly concerning vulnerable individuals assisting the justice system under duress or threat.
Constitutionality Testing of Presidential Candidacy Thresholds in Elections Based on the Principle of Popular Sovereignty Munir; Noenik Soekorini; Sri Astutik; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1421

Abstract

This study critically examines the constitutionality of Indonesia’s presidential candidacy threshold under Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017 in relation to the principle of popular sovereignty in Article 1(2) of the 1945 Constitution. The threshold requiring a party or coalition to hold 20% of DPR seats or 25% of the popular vote has been controversial for limiting voter choice and reinforcing oligarchic dominance. Using a normative legal research method, the study applies doctrinal interpretation through grammatical, systematic, historical, and teleological approaches to evaluate whether the threshold is consistent with constitutional democracy. The analysis identifies a disconnect between the legislative rule and the constitutional concept of sovereignty residing with the people, informed by theories of democracy, sovereignty, and progressive legal thought. While procedurally legitimate, the threshold lacks substantive constitutional validity because of its exclusionary impact on political participation. The study proposes four reform options: repeal, proportional adjustment, judicial reinterpretation, and constitutional amendment. These reforms would realign electoral rules with democratic principles and restore voters’ political agency. A doctrinal reinterpretation model is offered, framing the threshold as a regulatory instrument rather than a rigid barrier, advocating a legal structure that promotes inclusivity and reflects the people’s general will.
Implementation of Justice Collaborators’ Rights in Obtaining Reduced Sentences in Murder Cases Dany Ardiansah Putra; Siti Marwiyah; Sukmana Dumayanti; Hartoyo; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1458

Abstract

The rights of justice collaborators (JCs) to obtain sentence reductions in murder cases remain inconsistently applied within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. This research addresses three core issues: the normative legal basis for JC rights, the consistency of judicial decisions in granting those rights, and the necessity for legal reform. Using a normative juridical approach supported by document analysis and expert interviews, the study examines Law No. 31/2014, SEMA No. 4/2011, and recent judicial decisions, including the high-profile cases of Richard Eliezer and Abdul Khoir. Findings reveal that while legal provisions exist, the absence of detailed indicators, formal mechanisms for status determination, and binding multi-institutional coordination leads to implementation gaps. Judicial discretion remains unchecked, resulting in unequal treatment of justice collaborators with similar contributions. The study concludes that a lex specialis law is urgently needed to standardize definitions, evaluation mechanisms, and inter-agency protection schemes. Recommendations include harmonization of technical norms, incorporation of JC recognition in verdicts, and alignment with UNCAC and UNTOC standards. This would strengthen legal certainty, uphold the principle of nulla poena sine lege, and enhance the effectiveness of the criminal justice system in addressing serious crimes through systemic cooperation.
Co-Authors Abidin, Bakti Achmad Rubaie Aimim-Tham, Sukanya Aminah Aminah Amisi, Andika Eka Putra Aranggraeni, Renda Ardan, Lukman Hakim Aribawa, Muhammad Yustino Bahri, Muhammad Syamsul Begishev, Ildar Borman, M. Syahrul Briantoro, Yuli Dwi Charles Ardani Dany Ardiansah Putra Dedi Hermawanto Diah Putri Meitasari Dudik Djaja Sidarta Dwi Muryanto Dwi Muryanto, Dwi Erlando, Angga Riki Argo Ernu Widodo, Ernu Fajar Fathony Gerdiman, Zevanya Hamdani, Fathul hananto widodo Handayat, Nur Handayati, Nur Hartoyo Hartoyo Hartoyo I Wayan Nuada Indah Sari, Evy Nur Indraswara, Frista Sonna Kibiantoro, Miraj Lie, Valensia M. Syahrul Borman M. Yustino Aribawa Mansyuri, Zaqiya Alfi Manusiwa, Ronny William Milandhikasyah, Putri Kharisma Mochamad Chotib Mochamad Chotib Muhammad Yusuf Munir Muzakky, Hikam Ndraha, Abdian Berkat Neni Anggraeni Noenik Soekorini Nuada, I Wayan Ocktavianti, Okky Pasaribu, Francisco Lundu Hesekhel Prawesthi, wa Prawesti, Wahyu Prawsthi, Wahyu PUDJI ASTUTI Rahmawan, Aris Ramba, Yunan Yunus Renda Aranggraeni Rohman, Ainur Satria Bimantara Burhan Sayudi, Moh Husen Siti Marwiyah Siti Marwiyah Sri Astutik SRI ASTUTIK Sri Astutik Subekti . Subekti Subekti Sugiono Sugiono Sukmana Dumayanti Sulfiarini, Wiwin Taufik, Moh Tober, Daud Tri Waluyo Utomo, Yusa Shabri Vieta Imelda Cornelis Wahyu Prawesthi Wahyu Prawesthi, Wahyu Wahyudin, Hari Wibowo, Marji Widodo, Dieno Hendro Yovan Iristian Zapetri, Novita Zulaikha Zulaikha Zulaikha Zulaikha Zulfikar, Achmad Setio