Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.844
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Akta Jambura Law Review Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Pamulang Law Review
Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Reconceptualizing Good Faith in Digital Contracting: Comparative Perspectives from Indonesia and Japan Natasya Yunita Sugiastuti; Mariko Hattori; Erifendi Churniawan; Kadek Rama Maheswara Putra; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara
Pamulang Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Prodi Hukum S1 - Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/palrev.v9i1.63939

Abstract

The expansion of digital commerce has transformed contractual relationships by replacing conventional negotiation and consent with standardized interfaces, automated transactions, and platform-mediated contracting. These developments challenge the traditional application of good faith, particularly in addressing information asymmetry, opaque contractual terms, automated decision-making, and unequal bargaining power. This study aims to reconceptualize the doctrine of good faith in digital contracting through a comparative legal analysis of Indonesia and Japan and to identify regulatory principles capable of strengthening contractual fairness without undermining legal certainty. The study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. It examines contract law, electronic transaction regulation, consumer protection frameworks, and relevant legal doctrines in both jurisdictions through qualitative and systematic legal analysis. The findings reveal that Indonesia and Japan share a normative commitment to good faith but differ in its doctrinal articulation and regulatory implementation in digital transactions. Indonesia retains a relatively fragmented framework in which good faith, electronic transactions, and consumer protection operate across separate regulatory regimes, whereas the Japanese approach provides useful comparative insights into integrating good faith with consumer protection, transparency, and control of unfair contractual terms. The study argues that good faith in digital contracting should extend beyond contractual performance to encompass pre-contractual disclosure, meaningful digital consent, transparency of standard terms, platform accountability, and substantive fairness. It concludes that Indonesia requires a contextual reconstruction of good faith informed by comparative Japanese experience while remaining consistent with the distinctive foundations of Indonesian contract law.
Co-Authors Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara Agung Wijaya, Agung Andrian Triwahyudi Ani Purwati Anna Veronica Pont Ari Wahyudi Hertanto Dancar, Aleksander Dian Purnamasari Ditasya Aulia Putri Erifendi Churniawan Innash, Ar Rahiim Kadek Rama Maheswara Putra Kevin Mario Immanuel Mariko Hattori Muhaemin, Yosi Munira Na'afi, Septiana Nahla Samir Ahmed Shahin Putra, Ghayana Aditya Rafiqi Raka Haikal Anfasya Raka Haikal Anfasya Rakhmita Desmayanti Reza Kautsar Kusumahpraja Rizki Wahyudi Rudyanto, Bambang Sagalane, Andra Bani Salwa Faeha Hanim Selamat Lumban Gaol Setiawati, Anda Stelvia W. Noya Wardatul Fitri Zabidin