Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.386
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mustashfa MAHKAMAH: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam UIR LAW REVIEW Taqnin: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Al-Muqayyad JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) LEGAL BRIEF Strata Law Review Zona Law And Public Administration Indonesia Journal of Islamic economics Perspectives (JIEP) Al-Mustashfa: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah PEPAKEM: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Nursyamsudin, Nursyamsudin
UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
When Marriage Guardians Refuse: Can Religious Courts Ensure Justice? Salma, Salma Mis Aziziah; Muamar, Afif; Nursyamsudin, Nursyamsudin; Ezzerouali, Souad Ahmed; Fuad, Ibrahim Ahmed
UIR Law Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2026.vol10(1).25090

Abstract

This study analyzes the judicial reasoning and legal implications of a wali adhol (unjustified refusal of a marriage guardian) decision in the Sumber Class 1A Religious Court, Case Number 83/Pdt.P/2025/PA.Sbr. The case concerns the appointment of a wali adhol to authorize the marriage contract on behalf of a prospective bride whose legal guardian refused without valid justification. The research addresses two main questions: how the concept of wali adhol is applied within the court’s decision, and how the ruling affects the legal validity of marriage and the protection of the parties’ rights. Using an empirical juridical method, this study examines court documents, judicial considerations, and procedural practices as primary data. The findings show that the court’s decision is grounded in Islamic legal principles as codified in the Compilation of Islamic Law and the Indonesian Religious Court Law. The judge determined that the refusal of the original guardian constituted adhol, thereby justifying the transfer of guardianship authority to a state-appointed guardian to ensure the validity of the marriage. The ruling confirms that the appointment of a wali adhol is legally valid and results in a lawful marriage under Indonesian Islamic family law. This article contributes to the discourse on Islamic family law in Indonesia by demonstrating how Religious Courts function as corrective institutions to prevent guardianship abuse, while ensuring both legal certainty and protection of women’s marital rights within the framework of state-administered Islamic law.
Co-Authors Aan Jaelani Abdal Afif Muamar Azizahtul Khasanah Burhanudin Burhanudin Chaerul Saleh, Chaerul Chaniago, Jafar Daya, Aan Desi Fitri Ramadhani Edy Setyawan Ezzerouali, Souad Ahmed Fauzan Ali Rasyid Fuad, Ibrahim Ahmed Izzuddin Izzuddin Izzudin Izzudin Kusdiyana Kusdiyana Leliya Leliya Muhamad Mujahidin Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Nadila Sari, Dini Nur Rizki Amalia Penanjung, Rd R. Agus Abikusna Rachmawati, Luthfiah Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Reka Rosalina Salma, Salma Mis Aziziah Samud Samud Shodiqin, Akhmad Silverius Y. Soeharso Sufiarina Sugianto Sugianto Syaeful Bakhri Syafrida Syafrida, Syafrida Tajul Arifin Wardah Nuroniyah