Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.929
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Selat Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran) Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education (JIME) JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Nurani Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Abdi Insani RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (RDJE) IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) jurnal hukum das sollen Jurnal Studi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Journal of Accounting Research, Utility Finance and Digital Assets (JARUDA) Al-Irsyad: Journal of Education Science Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Journal of Multidisciplinary Inquiry in Science, Technology and Educational Research Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Menulis: Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara Al-Kautsar: Knowledge Advancemenets in Teaching Strategies and Research
Muhammad Fajar Hidayat, Muhammad Fajar
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Selat

 1 
Politik Hukum Pengadilan Perikanan di Indonesia Hidayat, Muhammad Fajar
Jurnal Selat Vol 4 No 2 (2017): JURNAL SELAT
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (820.953 KB)

Abstract

The geographical condition of Indonesia as a country of two thirds is the area of marine waters which consists of coastal seas, loose seas, bays and straits which has 95.181 km long beach, with 5.8 million km / square of water. The sea waters are large and rich in various types of marine potential of approximately 4 billion USD / year. But unfortunately, who enjoy all the wealth of the sea is not only the people of Indonesia but foreign nationals as well. Starting from the Exclusive Economic Zone (ZEE) to the territorial sea is an area that is often the case of illegal fishing by foreign country, recorded 242 foreign ships caught in the territory of Indonesia which caused losses of up to 160 billion rupiah. The problem in this research is how is the Legal Politics of Fishery Court in Indonesia and whether Fishery Court has been quite effective in examining, hearing, and deciding criminal acts in the field of fisheries. The author uses normative legal research methods in this research. The results of research that the authors get is the legal politics of the Fishery Court in Indonesia can be seen from the birth of Law Number 45 Year 2009, Presidential Decree Number 15 Year 2010 and Presidential Decree Number 6 Year 2014. Fishery Court in Indonesia has not been effective enough in checking, Prosecute, and cutting of criminals offenses in the field of fisheries due to frequent overlapping or authority disputes with agencies or other agencies. Therefore, the Fishery Court needs to synergize with the Water Police, Navy, Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (DKP), and the society so that law enforcement efforts against theft of fish can be more effective. Keywords: Political Law, Fishery Court, Fishery Crime   Indonesia adalah salah satu negara kepulauan terbesar di dunia. Kondisi geografis Indonesia sebagai negara yang dua pertiganya adalah wilayah perairan laut yang terdiri dari laut pesisir, laut lepas, teluk dan selat memiliki panjang pantai 95.181 Km, dengan luas perairan 5,8 juta km/persegi. Perairan laut yang luas dan kaya akan jenis potensi kelautan kurang lebih 4 miliar USD/tahun. Namun sayangnya, yang menikmati semua kekayaan laut itu bukan hanya rakyat Indonesia tapi warga negara asing juga. Mulai dari Zona Ekonomi Ekslusif (ZEE) hingga laut teritorial adalah wilayah yang rawan terjadi pencurian ikan oleh negara asing, tercatat 242 kapal asing yang tertangkap di wilayah Indonesia yang menyebabkan kerugian negara hingga 160 miliar rupiah. Adapun yang menjadi permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimanakah politik hukum Pengadilan Perikanan di Indonesia dan apakah Pengadilan Perikanan sudah cukup efektif dalam memeriksa, mengadili, dan memutus tindak pidana di bidang perikanan. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian yang penulis dapatkan yaitu politik hukum Pengadilan Perikanan di Indonesia dapat dilihat dari lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009, Keputusan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 2010 dan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 2014. Pengadilan Perikanan yang ada di Indonesia belum cukup efektif dalam memeriksa, mengadili, dan memutus tindak pidana di bidang perikanan dikarenakan sering terjadinya tumpang tindih atau sengketa kewenangan dengan lembaga atau instansi lainnya. Oleh sebab itu, Pengadilan Perikanan perlu melakukan sinergi dengan Polisi Perairan, TNI AL, Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan (DKP), dan masyarakat sehingga upaya penegakan hukum terhadap pencurian ikan bisa lebih efektif. Kata Kunci: Politik Hukum, Pengadilan Perikanan, Tindak Pidana Perikanan
Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Transportasi Laut Terhadap Penumpang di Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Hidayat, Muhammad Fajar
Jurnal Selat Vol 3 No 1 (2015): "Kemaritiman & Perbatasan"
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (36.363 KB)

Abstract

The 95 % of Riau Archipelago Province’s territorial is an ocean and only 5% is land which gives an oportunity for businessman to provide sea transportation service, it is started from ferry which connect regency or cities in a far distance, Pompong ship which connect an island with another island in a short distance , and roro ship (roll on roll off) which is used by society to carry their vehicles to the outside area. Particially we still find a passenger (costumer) who are unprofitable with the sea transportation business such as overload passenger the lost or broken luggaeges which is put on the deck, the delayed schedule ship without notification to the passengers, and the scrratch of the passenger’s vehicles when they entered into the ship. The problems of this research is how the responsibility of sea transportation business to the passangers in Riau Archipelago Province, the author of this resaerch uses a normative legal of methodology the result which is found by the author of this research are, first if the businessman load the passengers over than capacity so that there will be a passenger who does not get any seat then, the businessman will get an absolute responsibility principle (absolute liability), second, if the passenger’s luggaes are lost or broken when they are put on the ship’s deck, then the businessman will get a punishment from the government based on their faults (the fault of liability or liability based on fault), third, if the passengers get a delay schedule ship without notification about it, then, the sea transportation businessman will be punished by presumption of liability principle, and, forth if the passanger’s vehicles scracthed when they enter into the roll on roll off ship which is cause by the ship crew while instructing the passenger to park their vehicles and arranging those vehicles, then the sea transportation businessman will punished by strict liability. Key words : Responsibility, Producent, Consume
Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Transportasi Laut Terhadap Penumpang di Provinsi Kepulauan Riau Muhammad Fajar Hidayat
Jurnal Selat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): "Kemaritiman & Perbatasan"
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (36.363 KB)

Abstract

The 95 % of Riau Archipelago Province’s territorial is an ocean and only 5% is land which gives an oportunity for businessman to provide sea transportation service, it is started from ferry which connect regency or cities in a far distance, Pompong ship which connect an island with another island in a short distance , and roro ship (roll on roll off) which is used by society to carry their vehicles to the outside area. Particially we still find a passenger (costumer) who are unprofitable with the sea transportation business such as overload passenger the lost or broken luggaeges which is put on the deck, the delayed schedule ship without notification to the passengers, and the scrratch of the passenger’s vehicles when they entered into the ship. The problems of this research is how the responsibility of sea transportation business to the passangers in Riau Archipelago Province, the author of this resaerch uses a normative legal of methodology the result which is found by the author of this research are, first if the businessman load the passengers over than capacity so that there will be a passenger who does not get any seat then, the businessman will get an absolute responsibility principle (absolute liability), second, if the passenger’s luggaes are lost or broken when they are put on the ship’s deck, then the businessman will get a punishment from the government based on their faults (the fault of liability or liability based on fault), third, if the passengers get a delay schedule ship without notification about it, then, the sea transportation businessman will be punished by presumption of liability principle, and, forth if the passanger’s vehicles scracthed when they enter into the roll on roll off ship which is cause by the ship crew while instructing the passenger to park their vehicles and arranging those vehicles, then the sea transportation businessman will punished by strict liability. Key words : Responsibility, Producent, Consume
Politik Hukum Pengadilan Perikanan di Indonesia Muhammad Fajar Hidayat
Jurnal Selat Vol. 4 No. 2 (2017): JURNAL SELAT
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (820.953 KB)

Abstract

The geographical condition of Indonesia as a country of two thirds is the area of marine waters which consists of coastal seas, loose seas, bays and straits which has 95.181 km long beach, with 5.8 million km / square of water. The sea waters are large and rich in various types of marine potential of approximately 4 billion USD / year. But unfortunately, who enjoy all the wealth of the sea is not only the people of Indonesia but foreign nationals as well. Starting from the Exclusive Economic Zone (ZEE) to the territorial sea is an area that is often the case of illegal fishing by foreign country, recorded 242 foreign ships caught in the territory of Indonesia which caused losses of up to 160 billion rupiah. The problem in this research is how is the Legal Politics of Fishery Court in Indonesia and whether Fishery Court has been quite effective in examining, hearing, and deciding criminal acts in the field of fisheries. The author uses normative legal research methods in this research. The results of research that the authors get is the legal politics of the Fishery Court in Indonesia can be seen from the birth of Law Number 45 Year 2009, Presidential Decree Number 15 Year 2010 and Presidential Decree Number 6 Year 2014. Fishery Court in Indonesia has not been effective enough in checking, Prosecute, and cutting of criminals offenses in the field of fisheries due to frequent overlapping or authority disputes with agencies or other agencies. Therefore, the Fishery Court needs to synergize with the Water Police, Navy, Department of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (DKP), and the society so that law enforcement efforts against theft of fish can be more effective. Keywords: Political Law, Fishery Court, Fishery Crime Indonesia adalah salah satu negara kepulauan terbesar di dunia. Kondisi geografis Indonesia sebagai negara yang dua pertiganya adalah wilayah perairan laut yang terdiri dari laut pesisir, laut lepas, teluk dan selat memiliki panjang pantai 95.181 Km, dengan luas perairan 5,8 juta km/persegi. Perairan laut yang luas dan kaya akan jenis potensi kelautan kurang lebih 4 miliar USD/tahun. Namun sayangnya, yang menikmati semua kekayaan laut itu bukan hanya rakyat Indonesia tapi warga negara asing juga. Mulai dari Zona Ekonomi Ekslusif (ZEE) hingga laut teritorial adalah wilayah yang rawan terjadi pencurian ikan oleh negara asing, tercatat 242 kapal asing yang tertangkap di wilayah Indonesia yang menyebabkan kerugian negara hingga 160 miliar rupiah. Adapun yang menjadi permasalahan dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimanakah politik hukum Pengadilan Perikanan di Indonesia dan apakah Pengadilan Perikanan sudah cukup efektif dalam memeriksa, mengadili, dan memutus tindak pidana di bidang perikanan. Penulis menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian yang penulis dapatkan yaitu politik hukum Pengadilan Perikanan di Indonesia dapat dilihat dari lahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 45 Tahun 2009, Keputusan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 2010 dan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 2014. Pengadilan Perikanan yang ada di Indonesia belum cukup efektif dalam memeriksa, mengadili, dan memutus tindak pidana di bidang perikanan dikarenakan sering terjadinya tumpang tindih atau sengketa kewenangan dengan lembaga atau instansi lainnya. Oleh sebab itu, Pengadilan Perikanan perlu melakukan sinergi dengan Polisi Perairan, TNI AL, Departemen Kelautan dan Perikanan (DKP), dan masyarakat sehingga upaya penegakan hukum terhadap pencurian ikan bisa lebih efektif. Kata Kunci: Politik Hukum, Pengadilan Perikanan, Tindak Pidana Perikanan
Implikasi Yuridis Penetapan Covid-19 Sebagai Bencana Nasional Dalam Pelaksanaan Kontrak Muhammad Fajar Hidayat; Desi Sommaliagustina
Jurnal Selat Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Jurnal Selat
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (14679.234 KB) | DOI: 10.31629/selat.v8i1.2431

Abstract

Corona Virus Disease 2019 or COVID-19 has been determined by President Joko Widodo to become a National Disaster with Presidential Decree No. 12 of 2020 concerning Determination of Non-Disaster in the Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a National Disaster in Jakarta on April 13, 2020. The President has issued Presidential Decree 11 of 2020 concerning Establishment of Community Health Emergency COVID-19. The spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had an impact on negative global economic growth, including engagement. Parties who cannot fulfill their achievements in an engagement because the covid-19 pandemic does not necessarily classify the condition of the covid-19 pandemic as a state of overmacht or force majeure. Must be assessed on a case by case basis in accordance with the circumstances and factual conditions that occur. Except if the parties in a contract agreed upon with the parties have described in detail about what is qualified as a force majeure.
Co-Authors Achmad Tito Rusady Agnes Rosalia Akmal Alwan Subhan Andi Kamal Ahmad Anis Retno Triana Anjelina Sitinjak Anjelina Sitinjak Annisa Amelia Putri Ardiansyah, Renaldi Athiifah Hanum Atiikah Hanum Ayu Efritadewi Criezta Korlefura Desi Sommaliagustina Dewi Haryanti Dwi Putri Hartiningsari Elvira Clarista Faiqah ENDRI ENDRI Faktio Aji, Heru Firdaus Firdaus Frengki Putra Ramansyah Gulo, Septi Puspitaria Hani Lavea Hanrizal Hanum, Atiikah Heni Widiyani Herzalina, Herzalina Irfan Harmain Irwandi Syahputra, Irwandi Kaloko, Ilhamda Fattah Kamala Mar’atussholikhah Marnia, Rani Meilisya salsabila Melpa Citra Bestari Sinaga Melpa Citra Bestari Sinaga Mila Sari Muhammad Yaumi, Muhammad Nahusona, Erick Suprianto Navyra Berlianny Nispa Octapiani Novri Yanti Elisabeth Sirait Novri Yanti Elisabeth Sirait Nuraini, Lia Nursalam Nursalam Putri Yanti Putri, Dewi Ananda Rachayu, Vika Rijam Syahfutra Rika Vintar Daluas Aritonang Ririen Ambarsari Rizky Ramadhani Romi Mesra Ronaldo, Ronaldo Salem, Veronike E. T Sari, Nila Permata Seli Fila Dwi Pratika Shara Anjani Situmeang, Nova Sumiati Sumiati Sumiati Sumiati Suryadi Suseno, Endriansah Tammardhia, Rodhia Tanase, Tasente Tanaya, Anang Mulya Tobroni Tobroni Verga Syaharani Sukma Vivin Mahenrato Yuli Andini Puspitasari Yuspiani