Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS A CO-LEGISLATOR: THE IDEA OF HARMONIZING LAWS AND REGULATIONS TOWARDS SMART LAWMAKING Adhe Ismail Ananda
Domus Legalis Cogitatio Vol 3 No 1 (2026): Domus Legalis Cogitatio Vol 3 No 1 April 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law Atma Jaya Yogyakarta University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/dlc.v3i1.12662

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents new opportunities within legal systems, particularly in the harmonization of laws and regulations, which has long been challenged by complexity, regulatory overlaps, and normative disharmony. This article introduces the concept of AI as Co-Legislator, positioning AI not merely as a technical instrument but as a strategic partner in the process of lawmaking and regulatory harmonization. Through the capabilities of machine learning and natural language processing, AI can analyze thousands of regulations, detect potential normative conflicts, and provide data-driven recommendations to accelerate the creation of effective, efficient, and coherent legal frameworks. This idea aligns with the paradigm of smart lawmaking, which envisions adaptive, responsive, and technology-based legislation that upholds the principles of legal certainty, justice, and utility. The research employs a normative-juridical method with a conceptual approach, combining legal analysis with technological innovation perspectives. The findings suggest that while employing AI as a co-legislator has significant potential to enhance the quality of legal harmonization, ethical, juridical, and institutional challenges must be addressed, including issues of legitimacy, accountability, and data protection. Therefore, integrating AI into the harmonization of laws should be positioned as an innovative step toward building a smart legal system without diminishing the sovereignty of human legislators.
SOSIALISASI PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN DESA PARTISIPATIF BERDASARKAN PERMENDAGRI NOMOR 111 TAHUN 2014 DI DESA BOLOK, KABUPATEN KUPANG Jenny Ermalinda; Hernimus Ratu Udju; Cyrilius Wilton Taran Lamataro; Amirullah; Mardiana Hasbullah; Putri Mega Silvia Pa; Adhe Ismail Ananda; Yonas Benu; Muh. Taqwin Tahir
Jurnal Abdi Insani Vol 13 No 3 (2026): Jurnal Abdi Insani
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/abdiinsani.v13i3.3392

Abstract

The administration of village government requires a set of rules based on the authority of the village. These rules are not only established by the village collectively, but also by village leaders independently or through agreements between village leaders, while still taking into account the national legal framework and the dynamics of local community needs. In practice, there is still a lack of understanding among village officials regarding Permendagri No. 111 of 2014 concerning Technical Guidelines for Regulations in Villages. This condition is exacerbated by the lack of guidance and training from the local government, resulting in the village head and the Village Consultative Body (BPD) not having the optimal capacity to formulate participatory and high-quality village regulations. The community service activity was held in Bolok Village, West Kupang District, Kupang Regency, with the aim of strengthening the knowledge and abilities of officials in the formation of participatory regulations, with 41 participants. The activity method was designed to encourage the active participation of village officials and the community in the formation of village regulations through socialization and interactive discussions. In addition, technical training on the drafting of village regulations was conducted in accordance with the provisions of Permendagri 111 of 2014 to improve understanding and practical skills. The results of the activity were measured through feedback from the participants, which showed an increase in their understanding of the mechanism for drafting village regulations based on applicable legal norms. Participants understood the importance of community involvement in every stage of the formulation of village regulations. In addition, participants were able to independently identify problems and formulate local needs to be included in village regulations. This activity also strengthened the capacity of village officials and BPDs in applying participatory principles that comply with legal principles. Overall, the activity contributed to improving the quality of village regulation formulation to be more democratic and responsive to public interests.
Reforming Mining Governance in Indonesia’s National Strategic Projects: Lessons from Canada and Australia A. Muhammad Hasgar A.S.; Adhe Ismail Ananda
Global Journal of Law, AI & Ethics Vol. 2, No. 2, August 2026
Publisher : CV. Cognispectra Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65917/gjlae.v2.i2.48

Abstract

This study examines mining governance within Indonesia’s National Strategic Projects framework by comparing regulatory and institutional practices in Canada and Australia. It addresses the continuing gap between the acceleration of mineral-based development and the protection of environmental, social, and community interests. The research applies normative legal research through comparative and conceptual approaches. Legal materials are analysed using six criteria: institutional architecture, licensing and impact assessment, transparency, public and Indigenous participation, monitoring and enforcement, and mine closure. The findings show that Canada connects impact assessment with Indigenous rights, knowledge, and negotiated project obligations, while Australia combines federal environmental review, state mining authority, native title negotiation, and financial rehabilitation mechanisms. Both systems continue to face jurisdictional fragmentation, power imbalances, and inconsistencies in implementation. Indonesia possesses an extensive regulatory framework, but its effectiveness remains limited by fragmented coordination, formalistic participation, weak data integration, inconsistent enforcement, and inadequate post-mining accountability. This study proposes a contextualised mining governance model based on pre-design sustainability screening, integrated licensing, meaningful participation and benefit-sharing, and independent compliance monitoring. The model rejects direct legal transplantation and instead promotes the functional adaptation of comparative practices to Indonesia’s constitutional, administrative, and socio-ecological condition
STRENGTHENING INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ RIGHTS: INTEGRATING THE FPIC PRINCIPLE INTO INDONESIA'S MINING LEGAL FRAMEWORK La Ode Dedihasriadi; Adhe Ismail Ananda; Dewi Kania Sugiharti; Arie Ekawie Baskhoro; A. Muhammad Hasgar A.S
Cepalo Vol 10 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/cepalo.v10no1.4899

Abstract

Agrarian conflicts resulting from mining permits issued without the consent of local and indigenous communities expose a legitimacy gap in Indonesia’s mining legal regime. Unequal power relations between land rights holders and IUP holders reveal structural weaknesses in the protection of collective rights. This study identifies the absence of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) as a core deficiency that undermines substantive justice and meaningful participation in natural resource governance. Using a normative legal approach and conceptual analysis of relevant legal instruments, the study critically examines national regulations that remain procedural, transactional, and detached from community participation. The findings show that integrating FPIC is not merely a technical adjustment, but a legal, ethical, and social necessity to shift mining governance from a licensing-based to a consent-based regime. The study contributes academically by proposing mining law reform grounded in collective rights recognition, the creation of an independent FPIC verification body, and the repositioning of communities as legal subjects of development. These findings carry important implications for legal reform oriented toward environmental justice, social legitimacy, and the sustainability of mining investment in Indonesia.
The State’s Right to Control and Local Government Authority in the Mining Sector: A Legal-Policy Research Adhe Ismail Ananda; La Ode Dedihasriadi; Yeni Haerani
Administrative and Environtmental Law Review Vol 6 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/aelr.v6i1.4079

Abstract

The management the mining sector is under the state’s authority as mandated by the Indonesian Constitution. The principle of Hak Menguasai Negara (State’s Right to Control) grants the state comprehensive authority over mining activities, including policy-making, licensing, and supervision. However, decentralization policies have shifted the balance of power between central and regional governments. This paper analyzes the legal and policy frameworks governing this division of authority, focusing on the role of local governments. Employing normative legal research through the examination of statutes and legal principles, the research finds that the centralization of mining permits under Law No. 3 of 2020 has significantly diminished local governments’ authority, resulting in governance inefficiencies and economic imbalances. The paper further explores asymmetric decentralization as a potential approach to harmonize state control with meaningful local government participation.