cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
+6282242226898
Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26214105     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2266
Core Subject : Social,
Social Sciences
Journal USM LAW REVIEW (JULR) is an academic journal for Legal Studies published by Master of Law, Semarang University. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. The focus and scope of this journal are legal problems in the fields of Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; International Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Business Law; Medical Law; Environmental Law; Adat Law; Agrarian Law; Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 561 Documents
 53   54   55   56   57 
Transnational Enforcement Through the Indonesia–Singapore Extradition Framework Against Corruption Wahyu Sinta Dewi Pramudita; Anis Widyawati
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13066

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Indonesia–Singapore extradition framework as a transnational law enforcement mechanism in combating corruption crimes with cross-border dimensions. The research is motivated by Indonesia’s longstanding challenges in recovering fugitives and assets located in Singapore, despite the existence of bilateral agreements and mutual legal assistance arrangements. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes the extradition treaty, implementing regulations, relevant case practices, and principles of international cooperation in criminal matters. The findings reveal that while the extradition framework provides a formal legal basis for cooperation, its practical implementation remains constrained by differences in legal systems, evidentiary standards, dual criminality requirements, and political considerations that may delay or impede extradition processes. Moreover, the effectiveness of extradition is closely linked to asset recovery mechanisms, which are not always synchronized with extradition procedures. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated analysis of extradition and transnational asset recovery within a single enforcement framework, highlighting the need for stronger procedural coordination and institutional synergy. This study recommends strengthening treaty implementation through clearer operational guidelines, enhanced mutual trust between law enforcement agencies, and closer alignment between extradition and asset recovery mechanisms to ensure effective, timely, and accountable transnational enforcement against corruption.
Kedudukan Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah Di Bawah Tangan Dalam Sengketa Boedel Pailit Aji, Pradistya Purnama; Candrakirana, Rosita; Surya Nagara, Airlangga
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13069

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal position of underhand land sale agreements in bankruptcy estate disputes by addressing the tension between legal certainty and substantive justice. The issue arises from inconsistent judicial reasoning in determining the legal consequences of privately executed land sale agreements concluded prior to bankruptcy declarations, as illustrated by the divergence between Supreme Court Decision No. 359 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024 and Decision No. 850 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches, this study examines legislation, court decisions, and relevant legal doctrines. The findings demonstrate that underhand land sale agreements are civilly valid when material contractual requirements are fulfilled; however, they do not automatically result in juridical transfer of land rights due to unmet formal land registration requirements. Consequently, such land objects are frequently classified as part of the bankruptcy estate, despite the buyer’s good faith and full performance. This study finds that judicial approaches emphasizing legal certainty alone risk marginalizing justice and producing legal imbalance. The novelty of this research lies in applying Gustav Radbruch’s theory of legal purposes to reconcile legal certainty, justice, and utility in bankruptcy adjudication. The study concludes that legal protection for good-faith buyers remains achievable through a justice-oriented interpretation without undermining land administration order, provided it is realized through final and binding court decisions.   Penelitian ini menganalisis kedudukan hukum perjanjian jual beli tanah di bawah tangan dalam sengketa boedel pailit dengan menyoroti ketegangan antara kepastian hukum dan keadilan substantif. Permasalahan muncul akibat inkonsistensi pertimbangan hakim dalam menilai akibat hukum perjanjian jual beli tanah yang dibuat sebelum debitur dinyatakan pailit, sebagaimana terlihat dalam perbedaan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 359 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024 dan Putusan Nomor 850 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus melalui analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, serta doktrin hukum yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perjanjian jual beli tanah di bawah tangan sah secara keperdataan sepanjang memenuhi syarat materiil perjanjian, namun tidak serta-merta menimbulkan peralihan hak atas tanah secara yuridis karena tidak terpenuhinya persyaratan formal pendaftaran tanah. Kondisi ini menyebabkan objek tanah kerap dimasukkan ke dalam boedel pailit meskipun pembeli telah bertindak dengan iktikad baik dan memenuhi seluruh kewajibannya. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa penegakan hukum yang semata-mata mengutamakan kepastian hukum berpotensi mengabaikan keadilan dan menciptakan ketidakseimbangan hukum. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penerapan teori tujuan hukum Gustav Radbruch sebagai kerangka analisis untuk menyeimbangkan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan dalam sengketa kepailitan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perlindungan terhadap pembeli beriktikad baik tetap dimungkinkan melalui pendekatan keadilan tanpa mengabaikan tertib administrasi pertanahan, sepanjang diwujudkan melalui putusan pengadilan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap.
Kewajiban Pelaku Usaha dalam Pencantuman Label Risiko Bisphenol A Pada Air Minum Kemasan Galon Pasca Peraturan BPOM Tahun 2024 Tabitha Fransica Romauli Nababan; Sylvana Murni Deborah Hutabarat
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13072

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal obligations of business actors in labeling BPA-related risks following the enactment of PerBPOM 6/2024 and to assess its implications for the fulfillment of consumers’ right to information. Public concern over Bisphenol A (BPA) exposure in polycarbonate gallon packaging has heightened the need to strengthen consumer protection measures. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this research conducts a qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The findings reveal that PerBPOM 6/2024 introduces a new legal consequence in the form of an explicit obligation to display BPA hazard warnings, thereby reinforcing business actors’ responsibility to provide accurate, clear, and honest information. The study further shows that the four-year transition period may lead to non-compliance among business actors and delay the realization of consumer rights, making strict BPOM supervision and early voluntary labeling crucial. The novelty of this research lies in its position as the first normative analysis specifically examining BPA labeling obligations after the 2024 regulatory reform, an issue not previously addressed in the literature.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kewajiban hukum pelaku usaha dalam pelabelan risiko BPA setelah berlakunya PerBPOM 6/2024 serta menilai implikasinya bagi pemenuhan hak informasi konsumen. Kekhawatiran publik terhadap paparan Bisphenol A (BPA) pada kemasan galon polikarbonat mendorong kebutuhan penguatan perlindungan konsumen. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual melalui analisis kualitatif bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa PerBPOM 6/2024 menciptakan konsekuensi hukum baru berupa kewajiban eksplisit mencantumkan label bahaya BPA, yang mempertegas tanggung jawab pelaku usaha untuk memberikan informasi yang benar, jelas, dan jujur. Temuan lainnya menunjukkan bahwa masa transisi empat tahun berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpatuhan pelaku usaha serta menunda pemenuhan hak konsumen, sehingga pengawasan BPOM dan inisiatif pelabelan dini menjadi sangat mendesak. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis normatif pertama yang secara spesifik mengkaji kewajiban pelabelan BPA pasca perubahan regulasi 2024, yang belum diulas dalam penelitian sebelumnya.
Implementasi Asas Keseimbangan Pada Perjanjian Pranikah Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Rivaldi, Chika Aurel; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13073

Abstract

This study analyzes the application of the principle of balance in prenuptial agreements as a form of legal protection for prospective spouses, based on the Denpasar District Court Decision Number 1308/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps. The research is motivated by the gap between the normative regulation of the principle of balance in contract law and the practice of prenuptial agreements, which often places one party in a vulnerable position, resulting in an imbalance of rights and obligations and affecting the validity and binding force of such agreements. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through an analysis of court decisions. The findings indicate that the principle of balance was not optimally applied due to defects of consent arising from differences in language comprehension, contradictory and biased contractual clauses, and the implementation of the agreement that concentrated economic benefits on one party while imposing risks on the other, thereby undermining the validity of the prenuptial agreement and justifying its annulment. The novelty of this study lies in formulating the principle of balance as a three-dimensional evaluative tool covering the formation process, the substance of contractual clauses, and the implementation of prenuptial agreements, examined comprehensively through judicial decisions. This study affirms that the principle of balance constitutes a substantive limit to freedom of contract and a fundamental basis for ensuring fair legal protection for both prospective spouses.   Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan asas keseimbangan dalam perjanjian pranikah sebagai instrumen perlindungan hukum bagi calon suami dan istri berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 1308/Pdt.G/2019/PN Dps. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada adanya kesenjangan antara pengaturan normatif asas keseimbangan dalam hukum perjanjian dan praktik perjanjian pranikah yang kerap menempatkan salah satu pihak pada posisi rentan, sehingga menimbulkan ketimpangan hak dan kewajiban serta berimplikasi pada keabsahan dan kekuatan mengikat perjanjian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus melalui analisis terhadap putusan pengadilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa asas keseimbangan tidak diterapkan secara optimal karena adanya cacat kehendak akibat perbedaan pemahaman bahasa, rumusan klausul yang kontradiktif dan berat sebelah, serta pelaksanaan perjanjian yang memusatkan manfaat ekonomi pada satu pihak sementara pihak lain menanggung seluruh risiko, sehingga melemahkan keabsahan perjanjian pranikah dan menjadi dasar pembatalannya. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada perumusan asas keseimbangan sebagai alat uji tiga aspek, yaitu proses pembentukan perjanjian, substansi klausul, dan pelaksanaan perjanjian, yang dianalisis secara komprehensif berbasis putusan pengadilan. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa asas keseimbangan merupakan batas substantif kebebasan berkontrak dan fondasi penting dalam mewujudkan perlindungan hukum yang adil bagi kedua calon mempelai.
Pertanggungjawaban Majikan atas Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Bawahan dalam Perspektif Vicarious Liability Ahmad Rosyad Ilyasa; Ridha Wahyuni
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13074

Abstract

This study examines the application and limitations of employer liability for unlawful acts committed by subordinates under Article 1367 of the Indonesian Civil Code from the perspective of vicarious liability, focusing on the South Jakarta District Court Decision Number 237/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Sel. The research is motivated by the ambiguity of the phrase “in the course of assigned duties,” which has led to multiple interpretations and legal uncertainty in judicial practice. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that employer liability cannot be narrowly determined solely by the existence of a formal employment relationship or compliance with standard operating procedures, but must be assessed functionally based on delegated authority, inherent occupational risks, and the effectiveness of supervision grounded in good corporate governance principles. The analyzed decision demonstrates an expanded interpretation of Article 1367 of the Civil Code, whereby failures in supervision justify imposing liability on the employer even when the subordinate’s acts exceed formal authority. The novelty of this study lies in formulating criteria for limiting employer liability by integrating the doctrine of vicarious liability, delegation theory, and corporate governance principles as evaluative instruments. This study recommends the enactment of explicit legislation defining the boundaries of employer liability to ensure legal certainty and substantive justice.   Penelitian ini menganalisis penerapan dan batasan pertanggungjawaban majikan atas perbuatan melawan hukum bawahan berdasarkan Pasal 1367 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dalam perspektif vicarious liability, dengan studi kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Nomor 237/Pdt.G/2022/PN Jkt.Sel. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh ketidakjelasan frasa “dalam menjalankan pekerjaan yang ditugaskan” yang menimbulkan multitafsir dan ketidakpastian hukum dalam praktik peradilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban majikan tidak dapat ditentukan secara sempit hanya berdasarkan keberadaan hubungan kerja formal dan kepatuhan terhadap standar operasional prosedur, melainkan harus dinilai secara fungsional melalui keterkaitan kewenangan yang didelegasikan, risiko jabatan, serta efektivitas pengawasan berbasis prinsip good corporate governance. Putusan yang dianalisis menunjukkan adanya perluasan penafsiran terhadap Pasal 1367 KUHPerdata dengan menempatkan kegagalan pengawasan sebagai dasar pembebanan tanggung jawab majikan meskipun perbuatan bawahan dilakukan di luar kewenangan formal. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada perumusan kriteria batas pertanggungjawaban majikan yang mengintegrasikan doktrin vicarious liability, teori pendelegasian, dan prinsip tata kelola perusahaan yang baik sebagai instrumen evaluatif. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembentukan regulasi yang secara eksplisit mengatur batasan pertanggungjawaban majikan guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi para pihak.
Consumer Protection Against Quantity and Price Fraud in MinyaKita Distribution Mouna Suez Sianturi; Heru Sugiyono
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13075

Abstract

This study examines the legal liability of business actors and the effectiveness of consumer protection against double fraud practices in the distribution of MinyaKita cooking oil, involving both quantity reduction and pricing above the government-mandated Highest Retail Price (HET). The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches, supported by limited institutional data from the Ministry of Trade, BPKN, and YLKI for corroborative purposes. The findings indicate that quantity manipulation and overpricing constitute violations of consumer protection law, legal metrology regulations, and trade policies, giving rise to business actors’ liability based on breach of contract, negligence, and semi-strict liability. Nevertheless, consumer protection remains ineffective due to regulatory overlap, weak distribution supervision, limited enforcement authority of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Board (BPSK), and low consumer legal awareness. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated analysis of consumer protection law, legal metrology, and distribution governance in addressing double fraud within a government-regulated commodity program. This study recommends strengthening BPSK’s authority, harmonizing regulatory frameworks, and enhancing distribution oversight and transparency to ensure effective and equitable consumer protection.
Reconstructing Notary Accountability for Unilateral Amendments of Authentic Deeds in the Context of Legal Certainty and Justice Aulia Putri Izzati; Surrahmad, Surrahmad
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13084

Abstract

This study examines notarial accountability for unilateral amendments (renvoi sepihak) to authentic deeds that undermine legal certainty and substantive justice for the parties involved. Although Articles 48–51 of the Indonesian Law on the Position of Notary (UUJN) regulate deed correction mechanisms, these provisions remain normatively vague and fail to clearly define the procedural limits regarding the timing, form, and scope of permissible amendments, thereby enabling potential abuse of authority. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by qualitative analysis of notarial doctrines, verlijden theory, administrative intervention theory, and Supreme Court Decision Number 1003 K/Pid/2015. The findings reveal that procedural ambiguity and weak supervisory mechanisms have created a structural gap that allows unilateral alterations to authentic deeds without adequate legal safeguards. The novelty of this study lies in proposing an integrative reconstruction model of notarial accountability that combines administrative, civil, and ethical dimensions through strengthened renvoi procedures, the use of digital verification technologies, and the enhanced role of the Notary Supervisory Council. This study concludes that reconstructing the notarial accountability framework is essential to ensuring legal certainty and substantive justice in notarial practice.
Urgensi Regulasi Pendampingan Psikologis dalam Eksekusi Putusan Hak Asuh Delzanty, Kayla; Taupiqqurrahman, Taupiqqurrahman
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13102

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of regulating psychological assistance in the execution of child custody decisions as non-material subjects within Indonesian civil procedural law. The absence of standardized execution mechanisms in the Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR) has resulted in low enforceability of custody rulings, repeated execution failures, and potential violations of the best interests of the child principle. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, with analysis of the Tsania Marwa–Atalarik Syach custody dispute and the Cibinong Religious Court Decision Number 5594/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Cbn. The findings demonstrate that children’s resistance during execution constitutes a psychological response that cannot be addressed solely through coercive legal measures; without professional assessment and assistance, custody decisions tend to become non-executable and risk causing psychological trauma. The novelty of this study lies in proposing a hybrid legal–psychological model that positions forensic psychological assessment as a judicial prerequisite for custody execution. This study concludes that institutionalizing psychological assistance through a Supreme Court Regulation is essential to ensure effective enforcement, safeguard children’s rights, and restore the credibility of civil justice.   Penelitian ini mengkaji urgensi pembentukan regulasi pendampingan psikologis dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan hak asuh anak sebagai subjek non-materiil dalam hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Ketiadaan mekanisme baku dalam Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR) menyebabkan rendahnya daya laku putusan, kegagalan eksekusi berulang, serta potensi pelanggaran asas kepentingan terbaik bagi anak. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, kasus, dan konseptual, melalui analisis terhadap sengketa hak asuh Tsania Marwa–Atalarik Syach dan Putusan Pengadilan Agama Cibinong Nomor 5594/Pdt.G/2020/PA.Cbn. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa resistensi anak dalam proses eksekusi merupakan respons psikologis yang tidak dapat diselesaikan melalui mekanisme koersif semata, sehingga tanpa asesmen dan pendampingan profesional, putusan pengadilan cenderung menjadi non-executable dan berisiko menimbulkan trauma psikologis pada anak. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada perumusan model hibrida hukum–psikologi yang memposisikan asesmen psikologis forensik sebagai prasyarat yustisial dalam eksekusi putusan hak asuh. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa pembentukan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung tentang pendampingan psikologis sebelum eksekusi merupakan kebutuhan mendesak guna menjamin efektivitas putusan, perlindungan hak anak, serta pemulihan kewibawaan peradilan perdata.
Dampak Penutupan TikTok Shop 2023 pada UMKM di Indonesia dan Kepastian Hukum Digital Daniel Avelino Jonna; Rafael Luciano Marturia Assan; Yehezkiel David Milano Gosal
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13107

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Minister of Trade Regulation Number 31 of 2023 on the sustainability of micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia and evaluates TikTok’s acquisition of Tokopedia as a legal adaptation strategy in response to changes in digital trade regulation. TikTok Shop, as a form of social commerce, has transformed consumer purchasing behavior and disrupted conventional markets, giving rise to unfair competition practices and declining MSME revenues. Previous studies have primarily emphasized the normative aspects of the regulation without assessing its post-closure impact on MSMEs and corporate adaptation strategies. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, complemented by qualitative analysis of legal and socio-economic implications. The findings indicate that the implementation of Regulation No. 31/2023 resulted in the temporary closure of TikTok Shop, but has not significantly restored conventional MSME sales due to enduring shifts in consumer behavior toward digital transactions. TikTok’s acquisition of Tokopedia represents regulatory compliance that creates a hybrid business model integrating social media and marketplace functions. The novelty of this study lies in its comprehensive assessment of regulatory effectiveness, digital legal certainty, and business adaptation strategies in fostering a more equitable and sustainable digital commerce ecosystem.   Penelitian ini menganalisis dampak penerapan Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor 31 Tahun 2023 terhadap keberlanjutan usaha mikro, kecil, dan menengah (UMKM) di Indonesia serta menilai akuisisi Tokopedia oleh TikTok sebagai strategi adaptasi hukum dalam menghadapi perubahan regulasi perdagangan digital. TikTok Shop sebagai bentuk social commerce telah mengubah perilaku belanja konsumen dan menimbulkan disrupsi terhadap pasar konvensional, yang memicu praktik persaingan tidak sehat dan penurunan omzet UMKM. Penelitian terdahulu cenderung berfokus pada aspek normatif regulasi tanpa mengkaji dampak empiris pasca penutupan TikTok Shop dan implikasi strategi adaptasi korporasi digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus, disertai analisis kualitatif terhadap implikasi hukum dan sosial-ekonomi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Permendag 31/2023 menyebabkan penutupan sementara TikTok Shop, namun belum secara signifikan memulihkan omzet UMKM konvensional akibat perubahan permanen perilaku konsumen menuju transaksi digital. Akuisisi Tokopedia oleh TikTok merupakan bentuk kepatuhan hukum yang melahirkan model bisnis hibrida antara media sosial dan marketplace. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komprehensif yang mengaitkan efektivitas regulasi, kepastian hukum digital, dan strategi adaptasi bisnis dalam membangun ekosistem perdagangan digital yang lebih adil dan berkelanjutan.
Implementasi GDPR Untuk Mengatasi Kekosongan Hukum Tindak Pidana Phishing melalui Whatsapp di Indonesia Prasetyaningtyas, Ivanna Damai; Zainsyah, Luthfillah Arrizqi
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.13114

Abstract

This article examines the legal regulation of phishing crimes conducted via WhatsApp in Indonesia and evaluates the relevance of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a normative model for strengthening personal data protection. Although Indonesia has established a legal framework through the Criminal Code, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection, these instruments do not specifically regulate preventive mechanisms, data controller obligations, or victim remedies for phishing based on social engineering. This study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, including an analysis of the Pekanbaru District Court Decision Number 958/Pid.Sus/2020/PN.Pbr. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s regulatory framework remains fragmented and predominantly punitive, limiting its effectiveness in addressing evolving digital phishing practices. In contrast, the GDPR provides a more preventive and accountable model through mandatory risk assessments, the appointment of Data Protection Officers, data breach notification requirements, and independent supervisory authorities. The novelty of this study lies in identifying regulatory gaps within Indonesian law and proposing a GDPR-based normative framework to enhance personal data protection against WhatsApp-based phishing crimes.

Page 55 of 57 | Total Record : 561

 53   54   55   56   57 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): - Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): AUGUST Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): APRIL Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): APRIL Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): AUGUST Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): APRIL Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MAY Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): MAY Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): NOVEMBER Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): MAY Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): NOVEMBER Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): MAY Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): NOVEMBER Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): MAY More Issue