cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Winsherly Tan
Contact Email
winsherly@uib.ac.id
Phone
+6281277621673
Journal Mail Official
winsherly@uib.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Internasional Batam, Jl. Gajah Mada, Baloi - Sei Ladi, Batam, Indonesia, 29442
Location
Kota batam,
Kepulauan riau
INDONESIA
Journal of Judicial Review
Published by Universitas Internasional Batam
ISSN : 19076479     EISSN : 27745414     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i2
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
JJR is a journal which aim to publish the manuscripts of high-quality research as well as conceptual analysis that studies in any fields of Law. Articles submitted to this journal discuss contemporary legal discourses in the light of theoretical, doctrinal, multidisciplinary, empirical, and comparative studies. The scope of the paper submissions includes constitutional and administrative law, corporate law, business law, criminal justice, adat law, Islamic law, law and society, international law, international economic law, human rights law, and intellectual property law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 272 Documents
 24   25   26   27   28 
Legal Analysis of the Advancement of AI and Blockchain Amid Lagging Digital Copyright Regulation in Indonesia Jubaidi, Didi; Khoirunnisa, Khoirunisa
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 (Forthcoming Issue)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i2.11069

Abstract

The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and blockchain technology has reshaped the digital landscape, particularly in content creation, storage, and distribution. Despite these innovations, Indonesia’s copyright law has not kept pace, creating a pressing research problem: the adequacy of existing regulations in addressing AI- and blockchain-based works. This study aims to examine the legal implications of these technologies and evaluate whether Indonesia’s current copyright framework, particularly Law No. 28 of 2014, can effectively respond to such challenges. Using a normative juridical methodology that combines statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the research examines Indonesian copyright law and contrasts it with developments in the European Union and the United States. The findings reveal critical regulatory gaps, including the absence of recognition for non-human authorship, insufficient mechanisms for decentralized content management, and the lack of clarity on smart contract-based licensing. These deficiencies create legal uncertainty that risks weakening the protection of creators’ rights in the digital era. The study contributes by emphasizing the significance of adaptive and technology-responsive reforms, recommending proactive legislative updates and the adoption of flexible legal doctrines to ensure Indonesian copyright law remains effective and relevant in the face of rapid technological change.
The Compatibility of Donald Trump’s Reciprocal Tariff with WTO and Indonesia’s National Interests Syariffudin, Muhammad Reza Zaki; Sadida, Muhammad Qaulan; Nugroho, Muhammad Adjie; Cason, Christopher Michael
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 (Forthcoming Issue)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i2.11274

Abstract

Donald Trump, President of the United States, implemented a reciprocal tariff international trade policy that aims to regulate commercial exchanges between countries. The reciprocal tariff policy has sparked controversy, where several countries have rejected this policy and considered it a violation of World Trade Organization (WTO) principles. Under this policy, countries deemed to have significant barriers to products originating from the United States will be subject to a minimum tariff of 10% with some countries are subject to much higher tariffs, such as Vietnam, which faces a 46%, including Indonesia which faces 32% increase in import tariffs to the United States. This study examines how Donald Trump’s Reciprocal Tariff policy aligns with World Trade Organization (WTO) principles and agreements, and how the Indonesian government has responded legally to this policy. The fundamental World Trade Organization (WTO) principles are based on non-discrimination, yet the tariffs imposed vary between countries. To determine the appropriate response, Indonesia must consider a strategic lens that balances risk, utility, and long-term national interest. By thoroughly analyzing these factors, this study aims to provide insights into the potential violations of World Trade Organization (WTO) principles by the tariff policy and recommend how Indonesia should respond effectively. Employing a normative juridical research method, the study combines statutory and case approaches, supported by secondary literature, and expert interviews. The findings show that the reciprocal tariff policy violates fundamental WTO principles, especially Most-Favored Nations principle under Article 1 GATT, tariff binding principle under Article II GATT, National Treatment principle under Article III GATT, and Publication and Administration of Trade Regulations provision under Article X GATT. The best legal steps that the Indonesian government can take in dealing with the reciprocal tariff policy is by initiating negotiation.

Page 28 of 28 | Total Record : 272

 24   25   26   27   28 

Filter by Year

2007 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 (Forthcoming Issue) Vol. 27 No. 1 (2025): June 2025 Vol. 26 No. 2 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 26 No. 1 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 25 No. 2 (2023): December 2023 Vol. 25 No. 1 (2023): June 2023 Vol 25 No 1 (2023): June 2023 Vol 24 No 2 (2022): December 2022 Vol. 24 No. 2 (2022): December 2022 Vol 24 No 1 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 24 No. 1 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 23 No. 2 (2021): December 2021 Vol 23 No 2 (2021): December 2021 Vol 23 No 1 (2021) Vol 22 No 2 (2020) Vol 22 No 1 (2020) Vol 21 No 2 (2019) Vol 21 No 1 (2019) Vol 20 No 2 (2018) Vol 20 No 1 (2018) Vol 19 No 2 (2017) Vol 19 No 1 (2017) Vol 18 No 2 (2016) Vol 18 No 1 (2016) Vol 17 No 2 (2015) Vol 17 No 1 (2015) Vol 16 No 2 (2014) Vol 16 No 1 (2014) Vol. 15 No. 1 (2013): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 14 No. 1 (2012): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 13 No. 1 (2011): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 12 No. 1 (2010): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 11 No. 1 (2010): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 10 No. 1 (2010): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2009): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2009): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2008): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2008): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 4 No. 1 (2008): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2007): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 2 No. 1 (2007): Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 1 No. 1 (2007): Journal of Judicial Review More Issue