cover
Contact Name
Hariyanto
Contact Email
hariyanto@uinsaizu.ac.id
Phone
+6281328319197
Journal Mail Official
volksgeist@uinsaizu.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Syariah UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto Jl. Jend. A. Yani No. 40A Purwokerto 53126 Jawa Tengah - Indonesia
Location
Kab. banyumas,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi
ISSN : 2615174X     EISSN : 26155648     DOI : https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist
Core Subject : Social,
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi has published by Sharia Faculty of UIN Prof. K.H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto. Volksgeist has a focus in publishing the research, and conceptual ideas which specific in the sector of Law science. The topics which relate generally to Law issues in Indonesia and around the world. Articles submitted might cover topical issues in Constitutional Law, Islamic Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Islamic Law, Civil Law, International Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Civil Procedural Law, Adat Law, and Environmental Law
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 165 Documents
Strengthening Indigenous Welfare through the Role of Local Government Initiatives in Protecting Traditional Knowledge Ida Hanifah; Koto, Ismail; Faisal, Faisal; Zainuddin, Zainuddin; Imsirovic, Mirela
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.13332

Abstract

The communal culture of traditional societies fundamentally contrasts with the individualistic framework of intellectual property rights (IPR). Indigenous communities prioritize collective interests without negating individual rights. This study aims to examine and analyze the optimization of traditional knowledge protection as an effort to improve the welfare of communal societies. The research employs a normative juridical method by reviewing statutory regulations and related legal instruments. The findings reveal that communal intellectual property is recognized under both international and national legal frameworks. National regulations require each region to conduct an inventory of community intellectual property; however, public awareness of its importance remains limited. Therefore, renewed strategies are needed to ensure that communities fully understand the economic, social, and cultural value of their traditional knowledge. Local governments play a crucial role in disseminating information and implementing inventory programs through regional regulations. Furthermore, the development of traditional knowledge–based products can be advanced to the industrialization stage through Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), thereby supporting the welfare of indigenous peoples. The ideal model of local government intellectual property protection is to guarantee community ownership rights while ensuring a fair profit-sharing mechanism with third parties.
Revisiting Indonesia’s Zakat Law: Legal Analysis of Marine Product Zakat and Reform Proposals Muhasim, Ahmad; Amrulloh, Moh. Asyiq; Abdullah, Abdullah; Rahman, Azman AB
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.14169

Abstract

Research on the zakat (charitable giving) related to marine products in Indonesia is currently limited. Given the vast economic potential of these resources, the existing regulations have not adequately kept pace with developments in the marine sector. This study aims to examine the legal framework governing zakat on marine products in Indonesia, pinpoint weaknesses in the current laws, and suggest reforms to create a more equitable and functional zakat system. Using a normative juridical approach, the research primarily focuses on the statutory basis for necessary legal changes. The findings reveal that the existing regulations regarding zakat are encapsulated in Law No. 23 of 2011 on Zakat. A significant flaw identified in this law lies in Article 4, Paragraph (2), which fails to specifically recognize certain marine products as zakat objects. Notably, products such as coral reefs, salt, pearls, seaweed, and revenue from marine tourism are not listed among zakat maal (zakat on assets). To address this shortcoming, it is essential to amend the law by adding to Article 4, paragraph (2) the phrase "Other marine products that have high economic value, including but not limited to pearl shells, marine biota for pharmaceuticals and cosmetics, lobsters, mangrove crabs, seaweed, and other marine resources." This amendment is crucial to eliminate legal ambiguities, ensuring there are clear regulations and categorizing marine products as eligible for zakat.
Reassessing the Expiatory Sacrifice for Hajj Tamattuʿ in Indonesia: A Qur’anic Exegesis and Socio-Legal Perspective on Contemporary Practices Aswadi, Aswadi; Yusuf, M.; Jannah, Raudlotul; Tawwabuddin, Tawwabuddin; Ezzerouali, Souad
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 9 Issue 1 (2026) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v9i1.15220

Abstract

Scholarly discourse on the permissibility and governance of expiatory sacrifice (dām) for ḥajj tamattuʿ in Indonesia continues amid rapidly evolving social and regulatory contexts. Existing studies are largely dominated by normative fiqh arguments and administrative policy considerations, while integrated analyses combining contextual Qur’anic exegesis, socio-legal perspectives, and maqāṣid al-sharīʿah remain limited. Addressing this gap, this study critically reassesses the coherence between Qur’anic norms, evolving interpretive frameworks, and contemporary policy implementation concerning dām for ḥajj tamattuʿ. This study employs a qualitative, library-based approach by analyzing key Qur’anic verses on ḥajj tamattuʿ through Abdullah Saeed’s contextualist interpretive framework and evaluating them using maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as a tool of critical legal reasoning. The normative findings are then examined in relation to socio-legal realities, including fatwas, state regulations, and institutional practices governing ḥajj administration in Indonesia and Saudi Arabia. The findings indicate that the obligation of dām for ḥajj tamattuʿ is not intrinsically confined to the Haram area but is context-dependent in terms of location, timing, and distribution, provided that its core spiritual objectives and public welfare considerations are fulfilled. Consequently, this study argues that cross-border regulatory coordination constitutes a normative implication of the dynamic relationship between Qur’anic injunctions, ritual practice, and contemporary ḥajj governance.
Effectiveness of International Legal Instruments in Preventing and Eradicating Human Trafficking: Palermo Protocol Implementation Study Maharani, Natalia; Widagdo, Setyo; Istiqomah, Milda; Puspitawati, Dhiana; Anditya, Ariesta Wibisono
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 9 Issue 1 (2026) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v9i1.15370

Abstract

Human trafficking is a complex, transnational crime intrinsically linked to human rights violations, requiring a holistic legal response at both international and domestic levels. The Palermo Protocol has served as an essential international legal instrument; yet, it continues to face numerous problems. This research aims to assess the effectiveness of the Palermo Protocol as an international legislative instrument for the prevention and eradication of human trafficking by analyzing its implementation in Indonesia and the Philippines. The research methodology utilized is normative juridical, integrating legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal frameworks. The results indicate that the Palermo Protocol is relatively effective in promoting legal harmonization and establishing institutional frameworks in ratifying nations; yet, it has not completely bridged the gap between international standards and their practical implementation. In Indonesia, fragmented authority, the limited competence of law enforcement officials, and an inadequate integrated data system present substantial obstacles to victim identification and protection. The Philippines, on the other hand, has a more cohesive legal and institutional framework that makes it easier to adopt international norms. However, it still struggles to do so because it relies on external resources and faces structural problems such as poverty, labor migration, and gender inequality. This study finds that the Palermo Protocol works well as a global standard, but it hasn't done much to lower the number of people who are trafficked. Consequently, improving the protocol's effectiveness requires evolving from a passive, normative framework into an active, accountable, victim-centered legal system harmonized with extensive socio-economic policies.
Participatory Rational Justice in Criminal Law Reform as an Integrative Theory for Substantive Justice and Social Legitimacy Lesmana, CSA Teddy; Sulistiani, Lies; Putri, Nella Sumika; Dewi, Deshinta Arrova
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 9 Issue 1 (2026) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v9i1.15585

Abstract

The traditional criminal justice system, predominantly grounded in retributive and legalistic paradigms, has increasingly struggled to respond to contemporary social realities, including prison overcrowding, limited victim participation, procedural rigidity, and declining public trust in legal institutions. In many jurisdictions, retributivism prioritizes punishment over social restoration, restorative justice mechanisms remain fragmented and marginal, and economic analysis of law (EAL) often emphasizes efficiency while overlooking normative legitimacy and participatory justice. Responding to these practical and conceptual limitations, this article proposes a new integrative framework Participatory Rational Justice (PRJ) which reconceptualizes criminal justice as a collaborative, community-engaged, and outcome-oriented process. Employing an interdisciplinary approach through theoretical analysis and comparative perspectives on criminal justice reforms, this study situates PRJ within existing reform practices that seek to balance efficiency, accountability, and social welfare. PRJ combines policy rationality, active stakeholder participation, resource efficiency, and social restoration to produce justice outcomes that extend beyond formal legality toward substantive societal benefits. By bridging procedural justice, economic legal reasoning, and capability-based substantive justice, PRJ offers a conceptually grounded yet practically relevant alternative for criminal justice reform. This study argues that adopting PRJ can enhance institutional legitimacy, optimize resource allocation, and foster a more inclusive legal culture, thereby contributing to the adaptive and sustainable development of contemporary criminal justice systems.