cover
Contact Name
Adam Mudinillah
Contact Email
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Phone
+6285379388533
Journal Mail Official
adammudinillah@staialhikmahpariangan.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jln. Batu Tujuh Tapak, Jorong Sungai Tarab, Kec. Sungai Tarab, Kab. Tanah Datar Prov. Sumatera Barat
Location
Kab. tanah datar,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Rechtsnormen Journal of Law
ISSN : 29884454     EISSN : 29884462     DOI : 10.70177/rjl
Core Subject : Social,
Rechtsnormen Journal of Law is a leading international journal focused on the global exchange of knowledge in Law as well as advancing research and practice across law disciplines. The journal provides a forum for articles reporting on original research, systematic and scholarly reviews focused on law from around the world. Rechtsnormen Journal of Law publishes national and international research in an attempt to present a reliable and respectable information source for the researchers.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 99 Documents
Implications of Government Policy on Investment and Economic Growth Khuan, Hendri; Aziz, Safiullah; Raza, Amir
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2069

Abstract

Background: Government policies play a significant role in shaping the investment climate and, consequently, in driving economic growth. Policies aimed at stimulating investments—such as fiscal incentives, tax policies, and infrastructure development—can significantly influence the flow of capital into various sectors, fostering economic activity and job creation. Conversely, restrictive policies or regulatory inefficiencies can stifle investment and hinder economic development. Understanding the implications of these policies is crucial for policymakers and businesses seeking to maximize economic growth potential. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of government policies on investment decisions and their subsequent effect on economic growth. The research seeks to identify the key policy factors that drive or hinder investment flows and assess their broader implications for long-term economic performance. Method: A mixed-methods approach was employed, utilizing quantitative data analysis of economic indicators and investment flows from government reports, along with qualitative interviews from business leaders and policymakers. The study examines a range of countries with varying policy environments to identify common trends and impacts. Results: The findings suggest that pro-investment policies significantly boost both domestic and foreign investment, leading to higher economic growth rates. In contrast, restrictive policies and regulatory uncertainties were found to negatively impact economic performance. Conclusion: The study concludes that effective government policies are essential for fostering investment and driving sustainable economic growth. Policymakers should prioritize creating stable, investment-friendly environments to achieve long-term economic benefits.
International Environmental Law and Climate Change Mitigation Efforts Dewi, Kemmala; Harmono, Harmono; Wei, Sun; Yang, Liu; Zani, Benny Novico
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2070

Abstract

Background: Climate change is one of the most pressing global challenges, with significant consequences for ecosystems, economies, and human societies. International environmental law plays a critical role in shaping global efforts to mitigate climate change by establishing legal frameworks for cooperation and action. However, the effectiveness of international environmental law in addressing climate change remains a subject of debate, particularly concerning the implementation of mitigation strategies at the national and global levels. Objective: This study aims to analyze the role of international environmental law in climate change mitigation efforts, with a focus on the key legal instruments and agreements that shape global climate governance. The research seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of these legal frameworks in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable environmental practices. Method: A qualitative research design was employed, using case studies, legal analysis, and interviews with environmental law experts, policymakers, and practitioners. The study examined major international agreements such as the Paris Agreement and the Kyoto Protocol to assess their impact on climate change mitigation efforts. Results: The findings indicate that while international environmental law has contributed to raising awareness and setting targets for climate change mitigation, the implementation of these efforts remains uneven, with many countries struggling to meet their commitments due to domestic challenges. Conclusion: The study concludes that international environmental law has been instrumental in global climate change efforts, but enhanced implementation mechanisms and greater international cooperation are necessary to achieve meaningful progress.
Implementation of International Law Principles in Indonesian National Law Prasetyo, Budi; Tan, Jaden; Chan, Rachel
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2071

Abstract

Background: The integration of international law principles into domestic legal systems is a complex and often contentious process. In Indonesia, the implementation of international law principles in national law involves balancing domestic legal norms with the obligations arising from international treaties and conventions. While Indonesia has ratified numerous international agreements, the actual incorporation of these principles into national law remains inconsistent and subject to various interpretations. The tension between adherence to international norms and the sovereignty of national law presents a unique challenge in the application of international law principles within the Indonesian context. Objective: This study aims to examine how international law principles are implemented in Indonesian national law, focusing on the mechanisms, challenges, and effectiveness of their integration. The research seeks to identify key areas where international law is applied or disregarded in Indonesian legal practice and to provide recommendations for improving alignment with international standards. Method: A qualitative research approach was used, combining legal document analysis, case studies, and interviews with legal scholars, policymakers, and practitioners. This allowed for a comprehensive assessment of the practical application of international law principles in Indonesia’s legal system. Results: The study found that while Indonesia incorporates international law principles in specific areas, such as human rights and environmental law, there is often resistance or inconsistency in their implementation, particularly in areas that conflict with national interests. Conclusion: To enhance the effectiveness of implementing international law principles, this study recommends greater institutional cooperation, clearer legal frameworks, and the establishment of stronger enforcement mechanisms.
The Role of Electronic Evidence in the Civil Case Evidence Process Joshi, Nikhil; Kumar, Rohan; Patel, Priya
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2090

Abstract

Background: The increasing reliance on digital technology has significantly impacted legal proceedings, especially in civil cases, where electronic evidence plays an increasingly central role. With the proliferation of digital communications, social media, and electronic transactions, the types of evidence available have expanded, leading to new challenges for legal professionals in managing and evaluating such evidence. Electronic evidence is now considered a crucial aspect of civil litigation, yet questions remain regarding its admissibility, reliability, and role in the broader evidence process. Objective: This study aims to explore the role of electronic evidence in the civil case evidence process, focusing on its impact on case outcomes, the challenges associated with its handling, and its integration into traditional legal frameworks. Method: A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing case studies, legal documents, and expert interviews. The data was analyzed to examine the practical applications of electronic evidence in civil cases and the associated legal and procedural challenges. Results: The findings reveal that while electronic evidence is essential in modern civil litigation, it often faces challenges in terms of authentication, privacy concerns, and its acceptance in court. The study also found that the increasing complexity of digital evidence requires enhanced legal procedures for handling and presenting such evidence effectively. Conclusion: Electronic evidence plays a pivotal role in civil litigation, but its integration into the evidence process requires further legal refinement to address emerging challenges effectively.
Effectiveness of Prison Sentences in Preventing Narcotics Crimes Nasution, Ingka Harsani; Suzuki, Ren; Fujita, Miku
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2091

Abstract

Background: Narcotics-related crimes continue to be a significant issue worldwide, with prison sentences often viewed as a primary deterrent. However, there is limited empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of incarceration in reducing the incidence of narcotics crimes. The question remains whether prison sentences lead to long-term reductions in drug-related offenses or merely function as a short-term punitive measure without addressing underlying issues such as addiction and socio-economic factors. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of prison sentences in preventing narcotics crimes, focusing on recidivism rates and rehabilitation outcomes for offenders. The research investigates whether incarceration contributes to long-term crime prevention or if alternative approaches, such as rehabilitation programs, offer more sustainable results. Method: A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining quantitative data analysis of recidivism rates from convicted drug offenders and qualitative interviews with legal professionals, offenders, and rehabilitation experts. The data collected spans a five-year period and includes case studies from various correctional facilities. Results: The findings indicate that while prison sentences temporarily reduce narcotics crime, they are less effective in preventing recidivism. Rehabilitation programs integrated into the prison system significantly contributed to reducing reoffending rates, particularly when combined with post-release support. Conclusion: Prison sentences alone are insufficient in preventing narcotics crimes. A more comprehensive approach, including rehabilitation and social reintegration efforts, is necessary for long-term success in reducing narcotics-related offenses.
Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights in the Digital Era Gunawan, Mohamad Sigit; Santos, Luis; Flores, Josefa
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i1.2092

Abstract

Background: The digital era has brought about significant advancements in technology, leading to an increased reliance on digital platforms for communication, transactions, and daily activities. While these technological advancements provide numerous benefits, they also raise concerns about the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights, particularly in terms of privacy, freedom of expression, and data security. Governments and legal systems face the challenge of ensuring that constitutional rights are upheld in an increasingly digital society, where the lines between public and private spheres are often blurred. Objective: This study aims to examine the protection of citizens’ constitutional rights in the digital era, focusing on the balance between technological innovation and individual rights. The research seeks to assess the effectiveness of existing legal frameworks in safeguarding privacy, freedom of speech, and other fundamental rights in the context of the digital landscape. Method: A qualitative research design was used, employing case studies, legal analysis, and interviews with legal professionals, policymakers, and technology experts. The data collected was analyzed to evaluate how well constitutional rights are protected in digital environments and to identify potential gaps in legal protection. Results: The findings indicate that while there are legal frameworks in place to protect constitutional rights, there are significant challenges in keeping pace with technological advancements. Privacy violations, surveillance concerns, and data breaches were highlighted as key issues. Conclusion: The study concludes that existing legal protections must be adapted to address the challenges posed by the digital era, with a focus on strengthening privacy laws, improving data security, and ensuring accountability in digital platforms.  
Effectiveness of Implementing General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in Public Services Sutrisno, Endang; Costa, Bruna; Silva, Pedro
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i2.2093

Abstract

Background: Public service quality is a crucial component of good governance, and the application of General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) plays a key role in ensuring effective public services. These principles, which include transparency, accountability, fairness, and efficiency, are essential for fostering trust between government institutions and citizens. However, there is a gap in understanding how effectively AUPB are implemented within public services and their impact on service delivery. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of implementing the General Principles of Good Government (AUPB) in public services. The research focuses on how these principles influence the efficiency, transparency, and quality of services provided by governmental institutions. Method: A mixed-methods approach was employed, combining qualitative interviews with public sector employees and quantitative surveys with citizens receiving public services. Data were collected from various government agencies to assess the practical application of AUPB principles and their impact on service quality. Results: The findings suggest that while AUPB are widely recognized, their implementation varies across institutions. Public services that effectively apply these principles show higher satisfaction rates among citizens, with increased accountability and transparency. Conclusion: The study concludes that implementing AUPB significantly improves the quality and transparency of public services, but challenges remain in ensuring consistent application across all governmental sectors.
The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in Law Enforcement and Human Rights Karina, Siska; Khan, Razia; Raza, Amir
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i2.2094

Abstract

Background: Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) play a pivotal role in the realm of law enforcement and human rights. In recent decades, their influence has expanded significantly, especially in areas where government action is either insufficient or absent. NGOs often bridge gaps in legal and human rights protection by advocating for vulnerable populations, monitoring abuses, and holding governments accountable. Their contributions in law enforcement vary, from providing legal assistance to victims of human rights violations to actively participating in the policy-making process. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the role of NGOs in law enforcement and human rights, with a particular focus on their contributions to legal reforms, advocacy for victims, and international collaborations. The research explores how NGOs influence law enforcement mechanisms and contribute to the advancement of human rights protections across different regions. Method: A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing case studies, interviews with NGO leaders, legal experts, and human rights advocates, and document analysis of reports and legal frameworks where NGOs have had significant influence. Results: The study found that NGOs significantly impact human rights law enforcement, especially in regions with weak legal frameworks. They provide essential resources for victims, influence policy changes, and sometimes fill gaps left by state institutions. However, challenges such as limited funding and political resistance affect their effectiveness. Conclusion: NGOs are indispensable in promoting human rights and enforcing laws in under-served regions. Their role should be enhanced through stronger partnerships with governments and international organizations.  
Empirical Legal Research Methods: Applications in Legal Research in Indonesia Widyani, Retno; Wei, Li; Jun, Wang
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i2.2095

Abstract

Background: Empirical legal research methods have gained increasing significance in legal scholarship, offering insights into the real-world application and outcomes of laws. In Indonesia, the use of these methods remains relatively underexplored despite the growing need for evidence-based policy and legal reforms. Legal research in Indonesia has traditionally relied on doctrinal methods, but empirical approaches have the potential to enhance the understanding of how legal systems function in practice and how laws impact society. Objective: This study aims to explore the applications of empirical legal research methods in legal research in Indonesia. The research focuses on examining how these methods can be effectively implemented in the context of Indonesian legal research to address pressing legal issues and improve the legal system's overall effectiveness. Method: A qualitative research design was employed, combining a review of existing literature, case studies, and interviews with legal scholars, practitioners, and policymakers. The study also analyzed existing empirical research on legal issues in Indonesia to identify current trends and gaps in research. Results: The findings suggest that empirical methods, such as surveys, interviews, and case studies, are increasingly being adopted in Indonesian legal research, though challenges remain in terms of resources, training, and institutional support. Conclusion: Empirical legal research holds significant potential for advancing legal scholarship in Indonesia. There is a need for greater integration of these methods to enhance the quality and relevance of legal research and inform legal reforms.
Effectiveness of Pretrial in Testing the Legality of Arrest and Detention Indraswari, Sri Primawati; Chan, Rachel; Lee, Ava
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Islam Daarut Thufulah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/rjl.v3i2.2096

Abstract

Background: Pretrial procedures play a vital role in testing the legality of arrest and detention, ensuring that individuals' rights are protected against arbitrary detentions. Legal safeguards such as judicial review of arrests are essential in preventing abuses of power by law enforcement agencies. In many jurisdictions, pretrial hearings serve as a critical mechanism to determine whether there is enough evidence to justify continued detention, thus promoting the rule of law and human rights protection. However, the effectiveness of pretrial procedures in safeguarding individuals from unlawful detention remains a topic of debate. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pretrial hearings in testing the legality of arrest and detention. The research investigates how these procedures influence the protection of individual rights and the overall functioning of the justice system. Method: A qualitative research design was employed, utilizing case studies, legal analysis, and interviews with legal professionals, detainees, and human rights advocates. Data were collected from multiple jurisdictions to assess the impact of pretrial procedures on the legality of detention. Results: The findings suggest that pretrial hearings are an effective mechanism for testing the legality of arrests and detentions, but their application is inconsistent, with some jurisdictions lacking adequate legal frameworks to ensure timely and fair reviews. Conclusion: The study concludes that while pretrial hearings can significantly contribute to the protection of individual rights, improvements in procedural consistency and access to legal representation are needed to enhance their effectiveness.  

Page 9 of 10 | Total Record : 99