cover
Contact Name
Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda
Contact Email
penerbitdarulhuda@gmail.com
Phone
+6285280459234
Journal Mail Official
penerbitdarulhuda@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jln Pendidikan No. 1, Cot Seurani, Muara Batu, Aceh Utara,
Location
Kab. aceh utara,
Aceh
INDONESIA
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI)
ISSN : -     EISSN : 30326591     DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10995150
Core Subject : Social,
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Medical Law, Adat Law, Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law.
Articles 143 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September" : 143 Documents clear
Penyelesaian Sengketa Penyalahgunaan Keadaan dalam Perjanjian Kawin: Antara Wanprestasi dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dalam Putusan No 3/Pdt./2015/PN.Sos Silalahi, Riovaldi Paruntungan; Sembiring, Nirindah Daniella; Putri, Nabila Aulia Adek; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research discusses a case of misuse of circumstances (misbruik van omstandigheden) in an agreement, as occurred in District Court Decision Number 3/Pdt./2015/PN.Sos between Rugaya Hadadi (Plaintiff) and Achmad Zulfikar (Defendant). This study aims to analyze the judge's consideration in deciding the case as well as the legal consequences of the cancellation of the agreement due to misuse of circumstances. Using normative juridical research methods, the results show that this case is not a default, but a form of misuse of circumstances that causes the agreement to be canceled. The legal consequences of canceling the agreement are the restoration of the injured party's right to file a claim for compensation and the obligation of the party who has received the performance to return it. These findings emphasize the importance of the role of judges in assessing the validity of an agreement based on the principles of freedom of contract and good faith in order to prevent injustice in the practice of agreement law in Indonesia.
Analisis Podcast Mahfud MD Official dan Total Politik Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Hukum Simanjuntak, Max Doan; Ibran, Jevon Alama; Ladjar, Lidwina Tuto; Baransano, Jeremia; Dori, Evan; Mulya, Ilham Indra; Lazarus, Lazarus; Hayatuddin, Raihan Ramadhan; Hidayat, Muhammad Rahmadzani; Putra, Gilang
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15553312

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran kanal YouTube Mahfud MD Official dan Total Politik dalam mempengaruhi dinamika politik dan hukum di Indonesia. Dalam konteks transformasi media digital, kedua channel ini berfungsi sebagai ruang publik baru yang memungkinkan dialog politik dan hukum berlangsung secara lebih terbuka, reflektif, dan partisipatif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis isi terhadap episode-episode terpilih yang membahas isu-isu konstitusional, praktik kekuasaan, serta partisipasi politik masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mahfud MD Official cenderung bersifat edukatif, normatif, dan berbasis pengalaman institusional narasumber utamanya, sementara Total Politik lebih populis dan dialogis dalam mengangkat isu-isu politik kontemporer. Keduanya berkontribusi dalam membentuk persepsi publik terhadap supremasi hukum, etika kekuasaan, hingga ketegangan antar elite politik. Selain itu, kanal-kanal ini juga mendorong peningkatan literasi politik dan kesadaran hukum masyarakat melalui narasi yang bersifat informatif, kritis, dan inklusif. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa media digital seperti podcast memiliki potensi besar dalam memperkuat demokrasi deliberatif di Indonesia.
Manipulasi Kekuasaan dalam Pilkada Serang 2024: Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pelanggaran Pemilu yang Terorganisir Rahayu, Cantika Tresna; Revalina S. V, Ni Komang; Karaniya, Avishtya Siti; Nisa, Rifa Fadhilahtun
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The 2024 Serang Regional Election (Pilkada) drew significant attention due to allegations of electoral violations committed in a structured, systematic, and massive (TSM) manner, which led to a dispute in the Constitutional Court over the Election Results Dispute (PHPU). The purpose of this study is to examine how such TSM violations impact the principles of direct, general, free, confidential, honest, and fair elections (luber-jurdil), as well as how these violations affect the legitimacy of the election results. A normative and empirical juridical method is used in this research to explore the classification of violations, the effectiveness of relevant institutions in enforcing electoral law, and the challenges in proving and addressing organized violations within the existing legal framework.
Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Semarang Nomor 3/Pdt.Sus-HKI-Merek/2024/PN Niaga Smg Basyra, Tiara Putri; Permata, Rika Ratna; Sudaryat, Sudaryat
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15647229

Abstract

Merek merupakan identitas hukum yang berfungsi melindungi reputasi serta membedakan produk di pasar. Penelitian ini mengkaji Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Semarang Nomor 3/Pdt.Sus-HKI-Merek/2024/PN Niaga Smg terkait gugatan pembatalan merek “CHANTIQUE.ID” milik PT. Chantique Inti Decor (Tergugat), yang dinilai memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya dengan merek “CHANTIQUE” milik PT. Vitragraha Interia (Penggugat). Meskipun merek milik Penggugat telah digunakan lebih dahulu, Majelis Hakim menolak gugatan dengan alasan bahwa tambahan unsur “.ID” dianggap cukup sebagai pembeda. Melalui pendekatan hukum normatif, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa putusan tersebut belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan penerapan asas kepastian hukum dan asas keadilan.
Implikasi Pembatasan Waktu Eksekusi Jaminan Terhadap Kedudukan dan Hak Kreditor Separatis Dalam Undang-Undang Kepailitan Fauziyyah, Laila
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines the time limitation on collateral execution by secured creditors under Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and its implications for legal protection. Secured creditors are entitled to independently execute their security rights, but this right is restricted by a 90-day moratorium and a two-month time limit after insolvency is declared. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds that such restrictions contradict the absolute nature of property rights and potentially downgrade the secured creditor’s status to that of a concurrent creditor. This causes legal uncertainty and financial disadvantage. Therefore, legislative reform and clear procedural guidelines are necessary to ensure the optimal legal protection of secured creditors.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Sengketa Polis Asuransi Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 0332/PDT.G/2019/PA.SGLT) Ferdinan, Josua; Salsabila, Zhafirah; Putri, Fahda; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15593037

Abstract

Murabahah insurance is one of the main contracts carried out by Islamic banking, which is used to finance various customer needs, such as asset purchases, business financing, and others. In this case, there was a sharia economic dispute case at the Sungailiat Religious Court involving the Al-Murabahah financing agreement by the customer with PT Bangka Belitung Sharia People's Financing Bank (Defendant I), as well as the involvement of PT Jiwasraya Insurance (Defendant II) in providing credit life insurance. The purpose of the research in writing this article is to find out whether the Defendant is proven to have committed PMH seeing the existence of an unclear clause related to diseases that can disburse claims. The results of the analysis stated that Defendant II as having received premium payments and issued policies, but Defendant II rejected the claims submitted. So in this case Defendant II has committed a tortious act and must be responsible for the loss of customers.
Eksistensi OJK Sebagai Lembaga Surveuilance: Pembaharuan Hukum Perbankan Ulima, Ajeng; Isnugraheny, Rizqika Farah; Megawati, Zahra Ekasiwi; Fitrada, Azzahra Hifz Aldin; B, Baidhowi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15642885

Abstract

The establishment of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in Indonesia marks an important step in the effort to strengthen banking law and financial sector supervision. This paper examines the role of the OJK as a supervisory agency in the context of Indonesian banking law, with an emphasis on its contribution to regulatory reform and consumer protection. This study uses a normative juridical approach, supported by a comprehensive literature review, to analyze the functioning of the OJK based on Law Number 21 of 2011 and its impact on banking governance. One of the OJK’s main responsibilities is overseeing compliance with sound banking practices and ensuring compliance with regulatory frameworks among financial institutions. The organization is also proactive in adapting regulations to new financial technologies, so it can address challenges arising from the rapid development of the fintech industry. Despite achieving progress, OJK still faces challenges in effective enforcement, resource allocation, and interagency collaboration. The paper concludes that although the OJK has made significant strides in improving the stability and integrity of the Indonesian banking system, additional measures are needed to strengthen its monitoring capabilities and address emerging risks. Recommendations include strengthening human resources, utilization of technology for greater efficiency, and increased public participation to ensure financial literacy. By strengthening its role as a regulator, the OJK can effectively navigate Indonesia’s complex and dynamic financial services landscape, ultimately protecting consumers’ interests and driving economic growth.
Dualisme Peradilan Militer dan Peradilan Umum: Problematika dan Urgensi Reformasi (The Dualism Of Military And Civilian Courts: Issues And The Urgency Of Reform) Rahayu, Cantika Tresna; Triadi, Irwan
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15690834

Abstract

The dualism between military courts and general courts in Indonesia presents a serious issue within the legal system, especially regarding the administration of justice for military personnel who commit general criminal offenses. Military courts still hold the authority to try soldiers for crimes committed outside of official duties, creating a potential space for impunity and human rights violations. This research aims to examine the problems caused by this jurisdictional dualism and explore the urgency of reforming the military justice system in Indonesia. This study uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case study approach. The findings indicate that the authority of military courts to handle general crimes contradicts the principle of equality before the law and the spirit of legal reform. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 106/PUU-X/2012 serves as a critical foundation in pushing for military justice reform. Therefore, revising Law Number 31 of 1997 is urgently needed to ensure justice, transparency, and accountability within Indonesia’s judicial system
Perjanjian Baku yang di Atur Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Pada Pinjaman Online Danova, Muhamad Secha Aulia; Nugroho, Widhi Cahyo
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15582229

Abstract

The growth of online lending services in Indonesia faces a dilemma between expanding financial access and the proliferation of exploitative practices, such as unilateral interest rate hikes and unauthorized modifications of repayment deadlines. This study analyzes the regulations by the Financial Services Authority (OJK), specifically OJK Regulation No. 77/2016 (POJK 77/2016) and OJK Regulation No. 10/2022 (POJK 10/2022), in protecting consumers from unfair practices. It also examines the disharmony between OJK’s sectoral legal framework and Indonesia’s Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and Law No. 8/1999 on Consumer Protection. Using a normative legal research method, this study integrates legal analyses of conflicts between the principle of contractual freedom (Article 1338 of the Civil Code) and the prohibition of inequitable clauses under the Consumer Protection Law.The findings reveal that while OJK regulations normatively prohibit exploitative clauses, inconsistencies with national law create legal loopholes exploited by online lenders. Unilateral clauses, such as interest rate increases and repayment deadline alterations, remain widespread due to the lack of harmonization between contractual freedom and the principle of consumer rights balance. OJK’s administrative sanctions are deemed ineffective, as they are disproportionate to the economic gains of lending platforms, while disguised fee practices result in effective interest rates exceeding legal limits. An analysis of court rulings shows that abusive clauses are more frequently invalidated under the Consumer Protection Law than under OJK regulations, indicating weak enforceability of OJK’s sectoral rules.This study recommends regulatory harmonization by strengthening consumer protection principles in OJK regulations, enhancing corporate criminal sanctions, and adopting artificial intelligence-based audit technologies. The academic contribution lies in critiquing the paradox of contractual freedom in Indonesia’s fintech ecosystem, while policy recommendations aim to balance digital financial innovation with consumer.
Pelanggaran Etika dalam Ruang Sidang: Kasus Firdaus Oiwobo dan Implikasinya terhadap Sistem Peradilan Aulia, Fara; Jagistha, Farraz Vania; Suci, Indah Meisyana; Fadhila, Gusti Tiya Yolanda Nur; M, Mulyadi
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 3, No 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi secara mendalam mengenai pelanggaran etika dalam ruang sidang dengan menyoroti kasus Firdaus Oiwobo sebagai studi kasus. Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah untuk memahami faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan terjadinya pelanggaran, dampaknya terhadap kepercayaan publik, serta langkah-langkah yang dapat diambil untuk memperkuat mekanisme pengawasan kode etik di lingkungan peradilan. Pendekatan yuridis dan analisis empiris akan digunakan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas regulasi yang ada serta menawarkan rekomendasi kebijakan yang dapat meningkatkan kualitas penegakan kode etik profesi hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus normatif, yaitu metode yang menitikberatkan analisis pada norma hukum yang berlaku serta penerapannya dalam kasus konkret. Fokus penelitian ini adalah pelanggaran etika dalam ruang sidang yang terjadi pada kasus Firdaus Oiwobo serta bagaimana implikasinya terhadap sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Kasus Firdaus Oiwobo menjadi contoh konkret bagaimana pelanggaran etika dapat berdampak serius terhadap karier seorang advokat serta kepercayaan publik terhadap profesi hukum.

Page 1 of 15 | Total Record : 143