cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Markus Suryo Utomo, S.H., M.Si
Contact Email
msu_atlaw@yahoo.co.id
Phone
+628122858770
Journal Mail Official
msu_atlaw@yahoo.co.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Pawiyatan Luhur, Bendan Dhuwur, Kota Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat
Published by Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
ISSN : 08542031     EISSN : 24609005     DOI : 10.36356/hdm.v17i1.1273
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat menerima artikel ilmiah dari hasil penelitian (original research article) dan telaah pustaka (review article)
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 321 Documents
 29   30   31   32   33 
Konstruksi Hukum Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) dalam Perkara Korupsi: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Mhd Hasbi; Muhammad Dhobit Azhary Lubis; Surya Hamdani; Annisa Danti Avrilia Ningrum
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Isu Sosial Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i1.7251

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal construction of Hand-Catching Operations (OTT) conducted by the Corruption Eradication Commission in Indonesia's criminal justice system, which faces a fundamental dilemma between law enforcement effectiveness and human rights protection. The practice of OTT, despite its significant success rate, often raises controversies regarding potential violations of suspects' constitutional rights. The problem becomes increasingly complex when OTT is conducted without an explicit and definitive legal framework in statutory regulations, thus opening wide interpretive spaces and potentially causing arbitrariness in law enforcement. The purpose of this article is to examine the existing legal construction of OTT in Indonesian legislation and its implications for suspects' human rights protection, to analyze how international human rights standards should be integrated into OTT mechanisms, and to formulate an ideal legal construction that accommodates substantive justice principles without sacrificing law enforcement effectiveness. This research employs normative legal research methods based on norm ambiguity, using statutory approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. Document study techniques are utilized for legal material exploration, with qualitative analysis applied to examine the meaning of legal norms systematically and teleologically. The research findings demonstrate that current legal construction of OTT suffers from significant normative gaps lacking explicit regulation of definitions, requirements, procedures, and limitations. This study offers an ideal legal construction formulation that integrates human rights perspectives through comprehensive regulation encompassing strict procedural requirements, independent oversight mechanisms, constitutional rights guarantees, publication limitations, mandatory audio-visual documentation, strict sanctions for procedural violations, and compensation-rehabilitation mechanisms for wrongful arrest victims, thereby creating a just corruption criminal justice system respecting human dignity.
Pendanaan Publik Partai Politik: Akuntabilitas Demokratis dan Otonomi Partai di Indonesia Istiqomah Fadlillah; Achmad Alfan Kurniawan; Carlos Afonso Barreto
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7160

Abstract

ABSTRACT: State financial assistance to political parties creates a complex set of relationships. On one hand, political parties emerge from the freedom of association and possess the autonomy to manage their own organizations. On the other hand, when funding is derived from the state or regional budget (APBN/APBD), the use of such funds must be accountable to the public. This article examines how Indonesian law positions state assistance—balancing the autonomy of political parties with the demands for accountability—and explores how these regulations can strengthen internal democracy without devolving into excessive state intervention. The research employs a normative approach, analyzing regulations concerning political parties and financial assistance, audit provisions by the Supreme Audit Agency (BPK), audit reports, and Constitutional Court Decision Number 194/PUU-XXIII/2025. The findings indicate that while the law provides a democratic orientation for public funding—specifically for political education, cadre development, and institutional strengthening—the existing accountability mechanisms remain primarily focused on bookkeeping, expenditure compliance, reporting, and auditing. Consequently, financial reports that meet regulatory requirements do not, in themselves, guarantee that public funds are fostering a healthier internal democracy. This article proposes five principles of democratic accountability to complement financial accountability: linking the use of funds to the democratic functions of the party; ensuring transparent and accessible information; prioritizing party members and cadre-building processes; preventing the concentration of benefits; and safeguarding the autonomy of political parties.
Sistem Kewarisan Pusaka Tinggi dalam Adat Minangkabau dan Relevansinya dengan Kompilasi Hukum Islam Albet Sarnubi; Dinda Riskanita
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7309

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In Minangkabau custom, pusaka tinggi (ancestral property) is understood as the collective wealth of a kinship group (kaum), passed down through generations along the matrilineal line; it cannot be subdivided into private ownership. This logic contrasts with the Compilation of Islamic Law, which governs the distribution of a decedent’s estate to individual heirs on a bilateral basis—a discrepancy that frequently leads to disputes when the status of such property is challenged in court. This paper examines how pusaka tinggi is constructed under customary law and how its status should be interpreted within the framework of the Compilation. Employing a normative legal approach, the study analyzes relevant regulations, key concepts, and Supreme Court precedents. The findings indicate that pusaka tinggi does not fall under the definitions of a decedent’s estate or inheritance as stipulated in Article 171 of the Compilation; because the property was never privately owned by the deceased, it does not constitute tirkah (an estate subject to faraid—Islamic inheritance distribution). This exclusion finds a basis in Islamic law through the recognition of valid custom (‘urf) and by drawing a parallel to family waqf (endowments), although the two concepts are not identical. While Supreme Court rulings generally uphold the authority of the kinship group over pusaka tinggi, instances still occur where such property is divided according to faraid. To address this, three steps toward harmonization are proposed: identifying the specific nature of the disputed property, applying the appropriate legal framework based on that classification, and registering the kinship group’s customary land (tanah ulayat) in the name of the customary collective.
Penipuan Investasi Saham dan Kripto Berbasis Phishing: Studi Kasus Platform JYPRX, SYIPC, dan LEEDXS Dara Durotul Afifah; Deriza Sultan; Syfa Putri Irmala; Clarinta Alda Fuadiyah; Rudi Nopiansyah; Antonino Pedro Marsal
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7394

Abstract

ABSTRACT; The rapid development of digital technology has increased the risk of cybercrime, particularly phishing, which exploits digital investment trends to defraud the public. This study examines phishing cases involving fake stock and cryptocurrency trading platforms operating under the guises of JYPRX, SYIPC, and LEEDXS, which were uncovered by the Criminal Investigation Agency of the Indonesian National Police in March 2025 and resulted in losses of approximately Rp105 billion for ninety victims. This study aims to analyze the fulfillment of the elements of Routine Activity Theory namely, the presence of a motivated perpetrator, a suitable target, and the absence of competent guards as well as to examine the legal framework and criminal liability of the perpetrators under Indonesian positive law. This study employs a normative legal method through legislative, jurisprudential, conceptual, and interdisciplinary approaches. The legal framework is based on the cumulative application of Article 35 in conjunction with Article 51(1), Article 28(1) in conjunction with Article 45A(1) of the ITE Law, and Article 492 of the Criminal Code, along with the doctrine of joint criminal liability under Articles 20 and 21. This study concludes that combating phishing requires strengthening preventive oversight and improving digital literacy, in addition to law enforcement.
Kepastian Hukum Penyediaan Guru Pembimbing Khusus dalam Pemenuhan Hak Pendidikan Inklusif di Sekolah Dasar Shinta Aulidafitri Zulfana; Kholifatul Muna
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7424

Abstract

Pendidikan inklusif merupakan bagian dari pemenuhan hak pendidikan anak penyandang disabilitas yang dijamin secara konstitusional dan diperkuat melalui peraturan perundang-undangan. Ketersediaan Guru Pembimbing Khusus (GPK) menjadi salah satu unsur penting dalam pemberian akomodasi yang layak bagi peserta didik penyandang disabilitas. Namun, jaminan normatif tersebut menghadapi persoalan dalam implementasinya, yaitu belum terpenuhinya ketersediaan dan pemerataan GPK pada Sekolah Dasar penyelenggara pendidikan inklusif. Kondisi tersebut menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara kewajiban hukum dan pemenuhannya dalam praktik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kepastian hukum pemenuhan hak pendidikan inklusif melalui penyediaan GPK serta implikasi yuridis ketiadaan GPK terhadap pemenuhan hak pendidikan anak penyandang disabilitas dan tanggung jawab pemerintah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan teori. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penyediaan GPK telah memiliki dasar hukum, tetapi belum memberikan kepastian dalam ketersediaan dan pemerataan GPK pada Sekolah Dasar. Keterbatasan GPK berimplikasi terhadap pemenuhan hak pendidikan inklusif dan akomodasi yang layak bagi anak penyandang disabilitas. Kata kunci: Kepastian Hukum, Pendidikan Inklusif, Guru Pembimbing Khusus, Penyandang Disabilitas, Hak Pendidikan.
Legislative Overreach dalam Pemanggilan Perkara oleh DPR sebelum Putusan Pengadilan Muhammad Amri Bintang; Hadi - Pratama; Hengko Hengko; Aditya Andela Pratama
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7423

Abstract

ABSTRACT; House of Representatives (DPR) commissions increasingly invite law enforcement officials, victims, and other parties to discuss cases that are still under adjudication and have not yet reached a final, legally binding status. This practice is often framed as the exercise of the House’s oversight function; however, the discussions frequently delve into specific facts, evidence, and even the prosecution’s demands in concrete cases. This article examines the threshold at which such summonses remain a legitimate form of oversight versus when they cross into "legislative overreach" that infringes upon the independence of the judiciary. Employing a normative-juridical methodology, this study utilizes statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The findings indicate that while the 1945 Constitution and the Law on the Composition and Status of the MPR, DPR, DPD, and DPRD (UU MD3) direct the House’s oversight toward institutional policy and performance—rather than the assessment of individual cases—there is no explicit written rule prohibiting the discussion of ongoing litigation. This regulatory gap allows public hearings to devolve into forums that resemble judicial proceedings, potentially shaping public opinion prior to a verdict and exerting pressure on judges and public prosecutors. This article proposes five parameters to distinguish legitimate oversight from legislative overreach—namely, the object, timing, substance, output, and impact—and suggests incorporating a *sub judice* rule into the House’s Rules of Procedure to ensure that oversight can continue without interfering with the judicial process.
Pemenuhan Hak Aksesibilitas Penyandang Disabilitas pada Layanan Suroboyo Bus Sherly Hana; Nurlaili Husna
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7318

Abstract

ABSTRACT; Law Number 8 of 2016 affirms the right of persons with disabilities to move about and utilize public services—including public transportation—on an equal basis. While Suroboyo Bus, a mass transit service in Surabaya, has implemented various facilities for passengers with disabilities, research and feedback from the disability community indicate that accessibility requirements have not yet been fully met. This article assesses the extent to which accessibility rights are upheld within the Suroboyo Bus service, while identifying obstacles stemming from both regulatory and implementation aspects. The study employs a normative legal approach, examining relevant regulations and legal concepts, and utilizes secondary data, including existing research and media reports. The findings reveal that the national legal framework is, in fact, quite comprehensive—encompassing provisions for persons with disabilities, traffic, public services, and technical standards set by the Ministry of Transportation. Gaps emerge during the implementation phase: many bus stops and sidewalks remain inaccessible; information is not provided in formats suitable for individuals with visual or hearing impairments; staff lack consistent training in inclusive service delivery; priority seating policies are not always enforced; and persons with disabilities have not been meaningfully involved in the planning process. This article recommends the establishment of local regulations that define accessibility standards across the entire journey, the creation of clear oversight and complaint mechanisms, and the active inclusion of organizations representing persons with disabilities in the planning and evaluation of the service.
Kepastian Hukum Frasa Kepentingan Negara dalam Naturalisasi Pemain Sepak Bola Kenneth Fabian Budimuljono; Jady Zaidi Hassim
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7319

Abstract

ABSTRACT; In recent years, the granting of citizenship to football players has increasingly been used as a tool to strengthen the national team, pursuant to Article 20 of the Citizenship Law. This provision allows the President to grant citizenship to foreign nationals based on their service to or the "national interest" of the state—subject to the consideration of the House of Representatives (DPR)—without requiring the residency period mandated for standard naturalization pathways. This article examines the legal certainty of the phrase "national interest" as applied to the naturalization of football players and proposes criteria to clarify its implementation. The study employs a normative legal approach, analyzing relevant regulations, legal concepts, and naturalization practices. While the law’s explanatory memorandum links "national interest" primarily to extraordinary contributions toward state sovereignty and progress—particularly in the economic sphere—it categorizes athletic achievements under the provision for individuals who have rendered "service" to the state (implying accomplishments already attained). In practice, however, the naturalization of players who have yet to contribute any achievements to Indonesia is often justified under the guise of "national interest." This broadens the scope for interpretation by the government and the DPR in the absence of specific, codified criteria, potentially undermining legal certainty and the clarity of the legal framework. This article proposes six parameters for defining "national interest" in the context of sports-related naturalization: the concrete needs of the national team, the player’s quality and career track record, eligibility under FIFA regulations, the player’s connection to Indonesia, their long-term commitment, and transparency regarding the rationale for the decision—all of which are recommended for inclusion in a government regulation.
Pembekuan Akun Penjual oleh Marketplace: Wanprestasi dan Batas Kebebasan Berkontrak Amirah Dwi Subarkah; Lizidia Dias
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7432

Abstract

ABSTRACT; This article aims to analyze whether the unilateral freezing of a seller's account by an online marketplace operator can be qualified as default (wanprestasi) and to determine the limits of freedom of contract in the standard-form agreement between the two parties. The issue is urgent because marketplace operators routinely reserve broad discretion to suspend accounts and withhold sales proceeds, while sellers, particularly micro and small businesses, depend economically on the platform and have virtually no bargaining position. This normative juridical research uses statute and conceptual approaches, drawing on the Indonesian Civil Code, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, Government Regulations No. 71 of 2019 and No. 80 of 2019, and the relevant scholarship. The analysis shows that the relationship is a valid standard-form electronic contract under Article 1320 of the Civil Code, yet the operator's discretionary power is limited by good faith (Articles 1338(3) and 1339), the requirement of a lawful cause, and the procedural duties of electronic system operators. A freeze constitutes default when it is not grounded in the agreed reasons, is not preceded by notice and an opportunity to clarify, is protracted beyond the promised period, or is disproportionate, especially when sales proceeds are withheld. A freeze based on a legitimate ground and a fair procedure is not default. Sellers may pursue a default claim, an unlawful-act claim, or simplified lawsuit procedures
Strategi HR-GA Berbasis Nilai Pancasila dalam Perlindungan Pekerja: Studi pada PT Steel Center Indonesia Eka Noorrahman; Arista Candra Irawati; Adrianus Bintang Hanto Nugroho
JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus (UNTAG) Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/hdm.v24i2.7395

Abstract

The constitutional guarantee of decent work only becomes tangible when translated into corporate policy; thus, the Human Resources–General Affairs (HR-GA) unit holds a pivotal role in transforming labor regulations into daily workplace practices. This article examines how the HR-GA unit at PT Steel Center Indonesia fulfills its function of protecting workers and explores how the values of Pancasila can serve as a strategic foundation for the unit. The study employs a normative approach, enriched by the first author’s professional experience, an analysis of internal documents, and a review of relevant literature, all synthesized through qualitative methods. The findings indicate that the HR-GA unit operates across several interconnected domains—compliance, labor union relations, workplace safety, and employee welfare—particularly as labor regulations continue to evolve following the Constitutional Court Ruling Number 168/PUU-XXI/2023. The five principles of Pancasila can be operationalized into specific guidelines, mechanisms, and success metrics for HR-GA policies—ranging from respect for workers' dignity and the establishment of bilateral dialogue forums to the implementation of transparent wage systems. This article proposes a three-layered model that integrates regulatory compliance, channels for employee input, and periodic assessment, ensuring that worker protection is not merely a formal requirement on paper, but a living reality within the organization’s daily operations.

Page 32 of 33 | Total Record : 321

 29   30   31   32   33 

Filter by Year

2005 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 24, No 2 (2026): Hukum dan Masyarakat Vol 24, No 1 (2026): Hukum dan Isu Sosial Masyarakat Vol 23, No 2 (2025): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 23, No 1 (2025): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 22, No 2 (2024): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 22, No 1 (2024): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 21, No 2 (2023): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 21, No 1 (2023): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 20, No 2 (2022): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 20, No 1 (2022): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 19, No 2 (2021): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 19, No 1 (2021): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 18, No 1 (2020): HUKUM DAN DINAMIKA MASYARAKAT Vol 17, No 2 (2020): Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 17, No 1 (2019): Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 16, No 1 (2018): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 15, No 2 (2018): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 15, No 1 (2017): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 14, No 2 (2017): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 14, No 1 (2016): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 13, No 1 (2015): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 12, No 1 (2014): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 11, No 2 (2014): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 10, No 1 (2012): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 9, No 2 (2012): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 9, No 1 (2011): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 8, No 2 (2011): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 7, No 2 (2010): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 5, No 2 (2008): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 5, No 1 (2007): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 4, No 2 (2007): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 4, No 1 (2006): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 3, No 2 (2006): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat Vol 2, No 5 (2005): Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat More Issue