Indonesian Perspective
IP (Indonesian Perspective) is a scholarly journal published by the Department of International Relations, Diponegoro University. Appears two volumes a year, the journal covers broad subject areas ranging from international politics, global security, global political economy, diplomacy and foreign policy, transnational relations, to theoretical debates concerning contemporary global challenges. The name ‘Indonesian Perspective’ implies that all article submissions must meet requirement to connect their analysis to Indonesia foreign relations, either how Indonesia perceives global politics or how global politics affects Indonesia.
Articles
124 Documents
<![CDATA[Kejahatan Lintas Negara Perdagangan Orang: Studi Kasus Pekerja Migran Asal Nusa Tenggara Barat ]]>
<![CDATA[Rustam, Ismah]]>;
<![CDATA[Sabilla, Kinanti Rizsa]]>;
<![CDATA[Rizki, Khairur]]>;
<![CDATA[Estriani, Heavy Nala]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2022), hlm. 1-137 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i1.48597
<![CDATA[This article examines victims of human trafficking from the province of Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB). Existing research on human trafficking has been studied in general terms and rarely includes Indonesian migrant workers. In fact, perpetrators of human trafficking targeted migrant workers. This research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive method and literature study which aims to describe human trafficking of migrant workers from NTB. In addition, this study analyzes underlying factors of human trafficking within the circle of migrant worker groups from the province of NTB. This article employs several concepts as analytical tools, such as the concept of human trafficking and transnational organized crime. This articles contributes to provide recommendation for policy makers in regulating Indonesian migrant workers.]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Indonesia dalam Mendorong Prioritisasi Perekonomian Negara Berkembang melalui G20: Perspektif Hyper-Globalist ]]>
<![CDATA[Imannulloh, Ervin Ramadhan]]>;
<![CDATA[Rijal, Najamuddin Khairur]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2022), hlm. 1-137 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i1.48596
<![CDATA[This study aims to discuss the role of Indonesia in the G20 as a representative of developing countries in designing global economic policies with priorities for developing countries. In addition, this study examines Indonesia’s involvement in the G20 which has always been pro-active in drafting global economic policies. Furthermore, this article will discuss Indonesia’s strategic position in the 2022 G20 Presidency. This article also tries to prove that the cooperation carried out by countries in the world benefits all parties. This is a rebuttal to the skeptics’ statement that cooperation only benefits developed countries. The concept used in this research is the globalist concept using the neoliberal institutionalism theory. This article uses a descriptive method with literature study research techniques. The results of this study found that the designs of Indonesia’s economic policies in the G20 had a major impact on the sustainability of the economic growth of other developing countries. In addition, the results of this study will also prove that cooperation in the form of an international forum such as the G20 benefits all parties, as stated by the hyper-globalists.]]>
<![CDATA[Music Matters: Diplomasi Budaya Indonesia terhadap Negara di Kawasan Pasifik Melalui ‘the Symphony of Friendship’ di Selandia Baru ]]>
<![CDATA[Bernadette, Sophia]]>;
<![CDATA[Septiana, Rizka]]>;
<![CDATA[Kusumawardhana, Indra]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2022): 134-255 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i2.50779
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine Indonesia's strategy in implementing cultural diplomacy and soft power diplomacy through the cultural event ‘The Symphony of Friendship’ by the Indonesian Embassy in New Zealand. Using a descriptive qualitative research method with data collection techniques through semi-structured in-depth interviews, which are then analyzed in depth supported by trust checking techniques through triangulation of data sources. The findings in this study are cultural diplomacy aimed at building Indonesia's image in the South Pacific region in dealing with separatist issues in Papua, which have been raised internationally by several countries, namely Fiji, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea. The TSF was conducted to build a perception of Indonesia in the Pacific community as a colonialist against Papua, presenting a positive perception so that Indonesia is not seen as carrying out repression in Papua through a cultural approach and embracing the community to work together and encourage togetherness through a musical approach. ]]>
<![CDATA[Ekonomi Politik Jepang di Asia Tenggara: Resensi Buku ]]>
<![CDATA[Alunaza, Hardi]]>;
<![CDATA[Putri, Anggi]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2022), hlm. 1-137 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i1.48599
<![CDATA[Bab pertama dalam buku ini merupakan paparan mengenai politik yang dilakukan Jepang di Kawasan Asia Tenggara. Pembahasan secara menyeluruh berfokus kepada hubungan yang dibangun Jepang dengan ASEAN. Bab kedua dalam buku ini membahas sejarah singkat atau awal mula dari hubungan Jepang dengan ASEAN, diikuti dengan bagaimana Jepang memandang ASEAN terhadap hubungan-hubungan yang dijalinnya dalam kerangka politik luar negeri Jepang itu sendiri. Bab selanjutnya dalam buku ini membahas mengenai perihal yang tertera pada judulnya yaitu tentang kontestasi ataupun persaingan aktor-aktor politik akan ekonomi-politik ataupun proses pembuatan kebijakan luar negeri Jepang khususnya terhadap Kawasan Asia Tenggara. Bab terakhir dari buku ini memberikan pembahasan berupa paparan terhadap pergeseran ataupun perubahan kebijakan politik internasional Jepang. Adanya anggapan bahwa Jepang pada dasarnya adalah politik yang reaktif karena anggapan ini tidak menghiraukan beberapa kebijakan proaktif yang telah pernah diambil Jepang. ]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Paradiplomacy dalam Presidensi G20 Indonesia: Studi Kasus Diplomasi Kota Jakarta pada Urban 20 ]]>
<![CDATA[Fathun, Laode Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2022), hlm. 1-137 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i1.48595
<![CDATA[This article aims to explain the role of paradiplomacy in utilizing the Indonesian presidency in the G20. Using the case study of the Provincial Government of DKI Jakarta, this article argues that the role of DKI Jakarta’s paradiplomacy through city diplomacy has the opportunity to get positive results. This can be seen from the role of Jakarta as an actor in city diplomacy capable of conducting city-level diplomacy at U20. This diplomacy aims to discuss strategic issues at the city level such as mobilization, health, labor, Covid 19 and other issues. With city diplomacy, it is able to become a means of sharing experiences between cities in the world to solve a number of strategic problems at the city level. In addition, Jakarta can play a role as a safe, comfortable place to live through a number of strategic policies, especially in the environmental field. The role of this paradiplomacy through urban diplomacy is a form of motivation, strategy, level of collaboration and level of involvement to assist the central government in solving increasingly complex world problems.]]>
<![CDATA[Kisah Selera dari Negeri Rempah: Memahami Gastrodiplomasi dari Perspektif Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Baskoro, Riski M.]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2022): 134-255 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i2.50780
<![CDATA[The paper complements various theories and practices that have been elaborated by gastrodiplomasi experts and it is also a prolongation of my previous published paper by the theme of conceptualization in gastrodiplomasi. This paper emphasizes on the context of Indonesian gastrodiplomasi. This paper aims to trace back the origins of gastrodiplomasi in Indonesian history. The study found that gastrodiplomasi is an elusive theory where many people fail to understand it holistically. In addition, the savory of Nusantara, as the root of Indonesian gastrodiplomasi, cannot be separated from the role of spices which has been quested for many foreign explorers for hundred years ago. ]]>
<![CDATA[Realisme versus Liberalisme: Suatu Perbandingan Paradigmatis ]]>
<![CDATA[Rosyidin, Mohamad]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2022): 134-255 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i2.50775
<![CDATA[Realism and liberalism are the most dominant paradigms in the study of International Relations. Both are often positioned diametrically because they have basic assumptions that contradict each other. Even though comparing the two paradigms violates the principle of incommensurability, it doesn't mean it's not useful. This paper attempts to map the two paradigms based on their underlying assumptions. Although in many respects realism and liberalism are opposites in viewing the phenomenon of international relations, both of them basically have similarities in viewing the nature of the international system and the nature of actors. This paper attempts to see what are the strong and weaknesses of each paradigm to see how far both are able to explain the phenomenon of international relations. Nevertheless, this paper does not pretend to judge one paradigm as better than another. ]]>
<![CDATA[Aplikasi Model Diplomasi Ekonomi Indonesia terhadap Brasil dalam Meningkatkan Ekspor Minyak Nabati Periode 2017-2021 ]]>
<![CDATA[Annef, Al Bahits]]>;
<![CDATA[Darmastuti, Shanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Kurniawan, Andi]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 1: (Januari-Juni 2022), hlm. 1-137 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i1.48594
<![CDATA[This paper mainly tries to explore the new Model of Indonesian Economic Diplomacy to Non-Traditional Market by Setiawan & Sulastri (2020) with a study case of increasing vegetable oil export to Brazil. Brazil is one of the main targets of Indonesia’s export-development policy to non-traditional markets. The main concern of this paper is how economic diplomacy plays a role in reacting to the declining trend of vegetable oil exports as Indonesia’s leading export product to Brazil during 2016-2020. This paper is a descriptive qualitative research using simple trade calculations to justify Indonesian exports orientation. This paper found there are at least 6 driving factors for the implementation of economic diplomacy, 3 prominent actors for conducting economic diplomacy and 8 processes of economic diplomacy. Indonesia has successfully increased the export trend of vegetable oil to Brazil in the period of 2017-2021, however specific economic diplomacy efforts to encourage vegetable oil exports were identified as minimum.]]>
<![CDATA[Konsep, Strategi, dan Realita Poros Maritim Dunia: Sebuah Resensi Buku ]]>
<![CDATA[Hudaya, Maula]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2022): 134-255 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i2.50781
<![CDATA[Buku ini menyoroti visi sekaligus kebijakan utama Presiden Joko Widodo pada periode pertamanya yakni Poros Maritim Dunia (PMD) melalui sudut pandang yang unik. Penulis membedah PMD ke dalam tiga tataran yang berbeda namun saling berkesinambungan yaitu konsep, strategi, dan realita bagaimana visi tersebut berusaha untuk dicapai. “Kita sudah terlalu lama memunggungi laut, samudera, selat, dan teluk”, potongan pidato pelantikan Presiden Joko Widodo tersebut menyiratkan keinginan kuat untuk mengembalikan Indonesia pada kodratnya sebagai negara maritim. ]]>
<![CDATA[Indonesia’s G20 Presidency 2022: Connecting Soft Power and Digital Diplomacy Practice on Instagram ]]>
<![CDATA[Intentilia, Anak Agung Mia]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Perspective Vol 7, No 2: (Juli-Desember 2022): 134-255 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Diponegoro ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14710/ip.v7i2.50776
<![CDATA[The purpose of this paper is to answer two research questions. The first one is how Indonesia utilizes culture as the soft power resource in G20 Presidency 2022 and the second one is the practice of Indonesia’s digital diplomacy on Instagram in G20 Presidency 2022. This research utilizes two conceptual frameworks, the concept of soft power and its cultural element, as well as the concept of public and digital diplomacy. The methodology used in this paper is a qualitative method. The primary data are gathered from Indonesia’s government statements and an official Instagram account that has been verified, @indonesia.g20, as a purposive sample. The secondary data of this article are taken from academic journals and e-books. All data used in this research are limited from December 2021 until May 2022 as part of the early phase of Indonesia’s G20 Presidency. The findings of this research are: (i) Indonesia uses the element of culture as part of promoting its soft power at the global stage through G20 by using cultural element in the G20 Presidency logo; (ii) the strategic issues regarding culture are combined with performances to showcase the variety of Indonesia’s cultural actors and communities; (iii) the practice of digital diplomacy, in terms of agenda-setting, has used three methods to spread information regarding the G20 agendas: by providing technical information, explaining substantive messages of G20 priority areas, and inviting active engagement through quizzes on G20 issues; and (iv) digital diplomacy on @indonesia.g20 Instagram account has covered the involvement of non-state actors. ]]>
