cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota denpasar,
Bali
INDONESIA
JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA
Published by Universitas Udayana
ISSN : 25023101     EISSN : 2302528X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana adalah jurnal ilmiah hukum yang mempublikasikan hasil kajian bidang hukum yang diterbitkan secara online empat kali setahun (Februari-Mei-Agustus-Nopember). Redaksi menerima tulisan yang berupa hasil kajian yang berasal dari penelitian hukum dalam berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yang belum pernah dipublikasikan serta orisinal. Jurnal ini selain memuat tulisan / kajian dari para pakar ilmu hukum (dosen, guru besar, praktisi dan lain-lain.) juga memuat tulisan mahasiswa Magister Ilmu Hukum baik yang merupakan bagian dari penulisan tesis maupun kajian lainnya yang orisinal. Tulisan yang masuk ke Redaksi akan diseleksi dan direview untuk dapat dimuat
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 664 Documents
 42   43   44   45   46 
Penanganan Dugaan Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilu (Studi Kasus Putusan Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar Nomor: 001/ADM/BWSL/17.04/PEMILU/XI/2018) Pande Putu Ekayana Dharma Putra; I Gede Pasek Pramana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p13

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the mechanism for handling suspected election administrative violations in Bawaslu of Gianyar Regency, as well as knowing and analyzing the inhibiting factors in the implementation of handling the alleged administrative violations of the Election at Bawaslu, Gianyar Regency. This study uses an empirical legal research method, with data and data sources coming from the chief informant and members of the Bawaslu Gianyar Regency. The results of this study explain that mechanism for handling alleged administrative violations of the General Election in Gianyar Regency begins with public reports and then determines the type of violation and is registered by Bawaslu of Gianyar Regency. Furthermore, a preliminary hearing and preliminary decisions are held, then an examination session, and finally a final decision is made by the examining panel. There are 3 (three) obstacles in the handling of alleged election administrative violations, namely bringing in witnesses in trials, the authority to execute decisions, and the lack of institutional personnel to carry out trial duties in conjunction with supervision of the Election stages. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mekanisme penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar, serta mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor-faktor penghambat dalam pelaksanaan penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dengan data dan sumber data yang berasal dari informan ketua dan anggota Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Teori negara hukum digunakan untuk menjawab pertanyaan pertama, dimana mekanisme penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif Pemilu di Kabupaten Gianyar diawali dari laporan masyarakat lalu ditentukan jenis pelanggaran dan dilakukan registrasi oleh Bawaslu Kabupaten Gianyar. Selanjutnya dilaksanakan sidang pendahuluan serta putusan pendahuluan, lalu sidang pemeriksaan, dan terakhir pembuatan Putusan akhir oleh majelis pemeriksa. Permasalahan kedua digunakan teori sistem hukum, dilihat dari struktur hukum, terdapat 3 (tiga) hambatan dalam penanganan dugaan pelanggaran administratif pemilu, yaitu mendatangkan saksi dalam perisdangan, kewenangan eksekusi Putusan, serta kurangnya personil lembaga untuk melaksanakan tugas persidangan yang berasamaan dengan pengawasan tahapan Pemilu.
Surveillance Function in Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Integrated Criminal Justice System Perspective Ni Nengah Adiyaryani; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p04

Abstract

This study aims to determine the role of law enforcement officer in integrated criminal justice system and to find the concept of surveillance patterns that need to be established for law enforcement officer for the future integrated criminal justice system (ius constituendum). This is normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Analysis using qualitative methods and the results are presented in descriptive analysis report. The results show that the integrated criminal justice system did not have an integrated surveillance system in a special form that was implemented by the law enforcement officers and its society yet. It still applying an internal and conventional surveillance pattern. Hence, empowering the existing surveillance pattern and creating an integrated surveillance pattern could be a solution to overcome the weakness of the surveillance system in the Integrated Criminal Justice System nowadays which caused by the fragmented surveillance system without any external-cross institutional surveillance.
Hak Subrogasi Penanggung dalam Borgtocht Luh Made Asri Dwi Lestari; Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i03.p09

Abstract

The guarantee agreement (borgtocht) creates legal consequences such as subrogation rights for the guarantor who has borne debtor's debt to creditor. The provisions of Article 1820 of Civil Code and other articles related to borgtocht in other laws and regulations relating to guarantees show that there are no regulations for the protection of subrogation rights that the guarantor obtained in the guarantee agreement, resulting in a vacuum of norm against this matter. Determining the guarantor’s legal standing in guarantee agreement according to the Indonesian guarantee legal system and the binding strength of the authentic deed in protecting the subrogation rights of guarantor in the guarantee agreement are the goals from this research. The normative juridical research method is used in this paper by carrying out legal construction through the argumentum per analogiam method to solve the vacuum of norms, implemented by expanding the meaning of statutory provisions on similar issues and the existence of community interests that demand the same assessment. This research shows that the legal standing of guarantor are implicitly regulated in Articles 1831-1843 Civil Code and based on the argumentum per analogiam method the provisions of the authentic deed formulation in subrogation that occur because the meaning of the agreement is expanded to be applied to this issue, therefore the third parties obtain legal protection for the rights of subrogation that arise, after bearing repayment of debtor's debt. Perjanjian penanggungan (borgtocht) menimbulkan akibat hukum berupa hak subrogasi bagi penanggung yang telah melakukan penanggungan utang debitur terhadap kreditur. Ketentuan Pasal 1820 KUH Perdata dan pasal-pasal lainnya terkait dengan penanggungan serta pasal-pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya terkait dengan jaminan tidak terdapat pengaturan perumusan hak subrogasi yang diperoleh penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan, sehingga terjadi suatu kekosongan norma (vacuum of norm) terhadap persoalan ini. Mengetahui kedudukan hukum penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan menurut sistem hukum jaminan Indonesia dan kekuatan mengikat akta otentik dalam melindungi hak subrogasi penanggung dalam perjanjian penanggungan menjadi tujuan dalam penelitian ini. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif digunakan dalam penulisan karya tulis ini dengan melakukan konstruksi hukum melalui metode argumentum per analogiam untuk mengatasi kekosongan norma, yaitu perluasan makna ketentuan perundang-undangan terhadap persoalan yang mirip serta adanya kepentingan masyarakat yang menuntut penilaian sama. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kedudukan hukum bagi penanggung diatur secara implisit pada Pasal 1831-1843 KUH Perdara serta berdasarkan metode argumentum per analogiam ketentuan perumusan akta otentik pada peristiwa subrogasi yang terjadi karena persetujuan diperluas maknanya untuk diterapkan pada persoalan ini, sehingga pihak ketiga memperoleh perlindungan hukum atas hak subrogasinya yang timbul setelah dilakukannya penanggungan utang.
Disfungsi Dispensasi Kawin dalam Upaya Pencegahan Perkawinan Anak Irma Suryanti; Dewa Gde Rudy
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p09

Abstract

This legal research purposes to examine the dysfunction of marriage dispensation to prevent child marriage. This scientific article uses a socio-legal research method which combine doctrinal legal research methods and empirical legal research methods through statutory approach, conceptual approach, and facts approach. This study results indicate that Law 16/2019 has not been able to prevent child marriage. The court was expected as last effort in preventing child marriage, but in the end failed to carry out its function. The lack of judge’s courage in legal finding efforts causes judges to prioritize legal benefits, however judges neglect to consider the child marriage negative impact, so that the majority of marriage dispensation applications were granted. The urgency of standardizing the marriage dispensation regulation and ratification needed of the Draft Law on the Religious Courts which regulates criminal sanctions and fines for perpetrators of child marriage and the party carrying out child marriage. The demand for the government role as a policy maker to prevent child marriage needs to be maximized, so that society can obey the law in order to avoid the impact of child marriage which will harm children a lot. Apart from the roles of various parties, the role of parents is the main role in preventing child marriage in the child protection update as mandated by Law 23/2002 in conjunction with Law 35/2014. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengkaji disfungsi dispensasi kawin dalam upaya pencegahan perkawinan anak. Artikel ilmiah ini menggunakan metode penelitian sosio-legal yang menggabungkan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal dan metode penelitian hukum empiris melalui pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan fakta. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan UU 16/2019 belum dapat mencegah perkawinan anak. Pengadilan yang diharapkan sebagai upaya terakhir dalam pencegahan perkawinan anak, namun pada akhirnya gagal menjalankan fungsinya. Minimnya keberanian hakim dalam upaya penemuan hukum menyebabkan penetapan hakim lebih mengutamakan kemanfaatan hukum, namun hakim lalai untuk mempertimbangkan dampak negatif dari perkawinan anak sehingga mayoritas permohonan dispensasi kawin dikabulkan. Urgensi standarisasi regulasi dispensasi kawin dan perlunya pengesahan RUU Hukum Terapan Peradilan Agama yang mengatur sanksi pidana dan sanksi denda bagi pelaku perkawinan anak dan pihak yang melangsungkan perkawinan anak tersebut. Tuntutan peran pemerintah sebagai pembuat kebijakan upaya pencegahan perkawinan anak perlu dimaksimalkaan, sehingga masyarakat dapat patuh dan taat pada hukum guna menghindari dampak perkawinan anak yang akan banyak merugikan anak. Terlepas dari peran berbagai pihak, maka peran orang tua adalah peran yang utama untuk mencegah terjadinya perkawinan anak dalam upaya perlindungan anak sebagaimana diamanatkan oleh UU 23/2002 jo UU 35/2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
Kepastian Hukum Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Terhadap Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Mengenai Domein Verklaring Putu Satria Satwika Anantha; Ibrahim R.
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p14

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to find out and analyze the legal certainty of the Job Creation Law against the LoGA on land clusters and the power of law against the conflict between the Job Creation Law and the UUPA on the land cluster. This research used normative research where a review of applicable laws and regulations is carried out and uses secondary data as the main data. The study indicated that, the following conclusions can be formulated: (1) Article 137 paragraph (1) of the Job Creation Law has deviated from the provisions of Article 2 paragraph (4) of the UUPA which explains that the State's right to control above its implementation can be empowered to the community customary law; and (2) The establishment of the Job Creation Law can serve as a red carpet for private entrepreneurs to get land cheaply and even free of charge, by making plans to increase investment in Indonesia, which is contained in Article 127 of the Job Creation Law. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kepastian hukum Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja terhadap UUPA pada klaster pertanahan dan kekuatan hukum terhadap konflik Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja terhadap UUPA pada klaster pertanahan tersebut. Penulisan jurnal ini digunakan jenis penelitian normatif dimana dilakukan pengkajian peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku serta menggunakan data sekunder sebagai data utama. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat dirumuskan kesimpulan sebagai berikut : (1) Pasal 137 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja ini telah menyimpang dengan ketentuan Pasal 2 ayat (4) UUPA yang menjelaskan Hak menguasai dari Negara tersebut di atas pelaksanaannya dapat dikuasakan kepada masyarakat-masyarakat hukum adat; dan (2) Pembentukan UU Cipta Kerja ini bisa sebagai karpet merah pada pengusaha swasta mendapatkan tanah secara murah bahkan gratis, dengan menggadang-gadang untuk peningkatan insvestasi di Indonesia, yang termuat pada pasal 127 UU Cipta Kerja.
Reformulasi Pengaturan Penambangan Bawah Laut di Wilayah Perairan Indonesia Dhiana Puspitawati; Teddy Minahasa Putra; Rangga Vandy Wardana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p05

Abstract

Ocean is the largest place where natural resources can be found. With the continuing decrease of land resources, nations are now lying their hopes to the ocean in providing more natural resources. As the largest archipelagic state in the world, Indonesia is blessed with rich ocean resources. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982) provides comprehensive provisions in ocean usage, and principally divides ocean space into various maritime zones, which include zones under national jurisdiction and beyond national jurisdiction. Furthermore, with regard to ocean mining, coastal states should also regulate nationally their ocean mining both on waters under their jurisdiction and beyond their jurisdiction. This research focuses on ocean mining in the ocean space within national jurisdiction of Indonesia. Using normative method, this research finds that although there has been Mining Act in Indonesia, however, provisions on ocean mining needs to be reformulated. While there has been Presidential Regulation which regulates ocean sand mining, it is argued that ocean resources not only consist of sand. Thus, this research recommends reformulation of national regulations on Mining that is to include ocean mining; and distinguish between ocean mining in ocean within and outside national jurisdiction. In addition, it should also provides for and clustering other ocean resources and not only limited to ocean sand mining. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS 1982) membagi wilayah laut kedalam zona-zona maritim lengkap dengan ketentuan tentang hak dan kewajiban negara pantai dan negara pengguna, pada masing-masing zona maritime tersebut. Berkaitan dengan penambangan bawah laut, tentu saja jika dilakukan di wilayah territorial Indonesia, maka Indonesia mempunyai kedaulatan penuh dalam pemanfaatan sumber daya laut yang terkandung di dalamnya. Dengan menggunakan metode yurisdis normatif, tulisan ini akan menganalisa apakah pengaturan penambangan bawah laut di Indonesia telah membedakan antara wilayah perairan dan wilayah diluar yurisdiksi Indonesia. Tulisan ini menemukan bahwa meskipun Indonesia sudah mempunyai hukum nasional tentang penambangan, khususnya tentang mineral dan batubara, akan tetapi belum secara eksplisit mengatur tentang eksplorasi dan eksploitasi sumber daya mineral di laut; dan belum memisahkan antara wilayah perairan didalam dan di luar yurisdiksi nasional Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini merekomendasikan reformulasi pengaturan penambangan bawah laut di wilayah perairan Indonesia. Pengaturan penambangan bawah laut di wilayah perairan Indonesia juga harus mengatur penggolongan (klasterisasi) sumber daya mineral di wilayah perairan Indonesia.
Keputusan Elektronis Pada Layanan Perizinan Pendirian Perguruan Tinggi Swasta (Studi Kasus Putusan PTUN Nomor 521/K/TUN/2018) Siti Labiba Fathin; Anna Erliyana
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p10

Abstract

This study was conducted with a normative research that provides answers to two issues in this research, first, electronic decree regulation in the government administration law and omnibus law; second, analyzing the decisions of judges from the first level verdict to cassation verdict, related to electronic decree on licensing services for the establishment of private higher education at the Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology. Regarding the first issue, an answer was found that Electronic Decree are regulated in UUAP, especially Article 38 in conjunction with the Omnibus Law, where Electronic Decree have the same legal force or are not different from written decree. However, there is a change in the Omnibus Law regarding this electronic decree, namely the change occurs in the deletion of paragraphs 5 and 6 of Article 38, so that electronic decree no longer have to be made in writing, and there is an electronic system that is centralized in the central government. Regarding the second issue, the TUN verdict Number 53/B/2018/ PT.TUN.JKT, could not be implemented by the Kemenristekdikti because the judex facti of the Judges in the decision was wrong, and besides there was an ultra petita in the decree, so the Kemenristekdikti putted on appeal to the Supreme Court for the verdict of TUN Number 53/B/2018/PT.TUN.JKT. the Supreme Court granted the appeal and canceled the verdict of TUN Number 53/B/2018/PT.TUN.JKT Kajian ini dilakukan dengan penelitian normatif yang memberikan jawaban dua permasalahan dalam penelitian ini, pertama, pengaturan keputusan elektronis di undang-undang administrasi pemerintahan dan omnibus law; kedua, menganalisa putusan majelis hakim dari putusan tingkat pertama sampai dengan tingkat kasasi terkait keputusan elektronis pada layanan perizinan pendirian perguruan tinggi swasta di Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Riset, dan Teknologi. Terkait permasalahan pertama, ditemukan jawaban bahwa Keputusan Elektronis diatur di UUAP khususnya Pasal 38 juncto Omnibus Law, dimana Keputusan Elektronis mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang sama atau tidak berbeda dengan Keputusan tertulis. Namun, terdapat perubahan pengaturan dalam Omnibus Law mengenai keputusan elektronis ini, yaitu perubahan terjadi pada penghapusan ayat 5 dan ayat 6 dari Pasal 38, sehingga Keputusan elektronis, tidak lagi harus dibuat Keputusan tertulis, dan adanya sistem elektronis yang terpusat di pemerintah pusat. Terkait permasalahan kedua, putusan TUN Nomor 53/B/2018/ PT.TUN.JKT, namun putusan tersebut tidak dapat dilaksanakan oleh pihak Kemenristekdikti karena judex facti Majelis Hakim pada putusan tersebut telah keliru, dan adanya ultra petita dalam putusan tersebut, sehingga pihak Kemenristekdikti mengajukan permohonan kasasi ke Mahkamah Agung untuk putusan TUN Nomor 53/B/2018/ PT.TUN.JKT. Majelis Hakim Agung mengabulkan permohonan kasasi tersebut serta membatalkan putusan TUN Nomor 53/B/2018/PT.TUN.JKT.
Towards a Self-Reliance of Small and Medium Tourism Industry in 2040: How Bali’s Government Makes Efforts? I Nyoman Suyatna; I Ketut Sudiarta; Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p01

Abstract

Bali Provincial Regulation No. 8 of 2020 concerning Bali Province Industrial Development Plan Year 2020-2040 was created to balance the structure and fundamentals of the Balinese economy which includes three pillars, namely tourism, agriculture, and industry. Besides, it also reflects an effort to reduce the dependence of the Balinese economy on tourism. This article assesses the process of the creation of Bali Provincial Regulation No.8 of 2020 concerning Bali Province Industrial Development Plan Year 2020-2040 and its content, mainly regarding the position of the small and medium tourism industry. It also offers a lens on the future legal framework of the tourism industry in Bali. It is a normative legal study that uses the statute, conceptual, and analytical approaches. This article argues that the future legal framework of the tourism industry should deal with, at least, the following five issues: mass tourism; degradation of nature and environmental quality; meeting the perception and expectation of travelers; the quality of tourism services; and protection to the tourists as a costumer.
Status Hukum Perempuan dalam Keluarga Akibat Perceraian pada Perkawinan Nyerod Di Bali Ni Nyoman Sukerti; I Gusti Ayu Agung Ariani
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p15

Abstract

This study aims to find and analyze the legal status of women who marry into the family in the event of a divorce and society's views on their nationality. This is an empirical legal research with a non-doctrinal approach, which emphasizes field data. The data were collected using interview techniques, the data were processed and analyzed in a qualitative way and the findings were presented in descriptive analytical form.The findings of the study show that women suffer from divorce, have clear and unclear legal status. Obviously, accepted by parents and family, returned as family members. It is not clear because the parents and their families did not accept returning to their original home so that their status was floating (ngambang). It is not clear who will have a very fatal impact in the future in terms of his death, who is responsible, especially according to custom and religion. The public's view of their nationality varies greatly, namely a small proportion is still extreme by considering that they are no longer a tri-wangsa dynasty, but those who are more do not question it. This is reflected in the Balinese language used to communicate, there is no change. Against the extreme conditions where there are still Balinese people who uphold outdated customary values, it is not in line with the State law on Human Rights (women). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan dan menganalisis tentang status hukum perempuan kawin nyerod dalam keluarga dalam hal terjadi perceraian dan pandangan masyarakat terhadap kewangsaannya. Ini penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan non doktrinal, yang menekan pada data lapangan. Data dikumpulkan dengan teknik interview, data diolah dan dinalisis dengan cara kualitatif serta temuannya dipresentasikan dalam bentuk deskriptif analitis.Temuan penelitian menunjukan bahwa perempuan nyerod yang bercerai, status hukumnya ada yang jelas dan tidak jelas. Jelas karena diterima oleh orang tua dan keluarga, kembali sebagai anggota keluarga. Tidak jelas karena kembali ke rumah asal tidak diterima oleh tua dan keluarganya sehingga statusnya menggatung (ngambang). Tidak jelas membawa dampak yang sangat fatal ke depannya dalam hal kematiannya, siapa yang bertanggung jawab terutama secara adat dan agama. Pandangan masyarakat terhadap kewangsaannya, sangat bervariasi yakni sebagian kecil masih bersifat ekstrim dengan menganggap bukan lagi sebagai wangsa tri wangsa, tetapi yang lebih banyak tidak mempermasalahkannya. Hal tersebut tercermin dari bahasa Bali yang dipakai berkomunikasi tidak ada perubahan. Terhadap kondisi yang ekstrim dimana masih adanya warga masyarakat Bali yang menjujung tinggi nilai-nilai adat yang sudah usang, tidak selaras dengan hukum Negara tentang Hak Asasi Manusia (perempuan).
Perlindungan Karya Cipta Fotografi dalam Perspektif Internasional dan Nasional Cokorda Istri Ilma Sisilia sari; I Made Sarjana; A.A Istri Ari Atu Dewi
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 10 No 4 (2021)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i04.p06

Abstract

Indonesia regulates Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), the purpose of which is to protect a person's thoughts or ideas resulting from a person's intellectual abilities and must be protected. Photography works of art are certainly protected in Indonesia, namely in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (UUHC). However, the regulation regarding photographic artwork in UUHC can be said to focus more on portrait art. This study discusses the legal protection of photographic copyrights and the resolution of disputes over photographic copyrights. The purpose of this study is to examine the legal protection of photographic works of art based on UUHC. The type of research in this research is normative juridical using a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study explain that according to the TRIPs Agreement there are 2 categories related to Property Rights, namely Copyright and Industrial Property Rights. Copyright is an exclusive right that is born automatically after a work appears in its original form, the right is in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 of Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. If there is a violation of a copyrighted work, then the party who infringes the copyright will certainly have harmed the moral rights and economic rights of the creator. The results of the research conducted show that legal protection against copyright infringement can be in the form of preventive protection and repressive protection, as well as in resolving disputes related to photographic copyright infringement through litigation and non-litigation. Indonesia mengatur Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI), yang tujuannya adalah untuk melindungi pemikiran atau gagasan seseorang yang dihasilkan dari kemampuan intelektual seseorang dan harus dilindungi. Karya seni fotografi tentunya dilindungi di Indonesia yaitu di pada Undang-Undang No.28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta (UUHC). Namun pengaturan terkait karya seni fotografi di dalam UUHC dapat dikatakan lebih memfokuskan pada karya seni potret. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum karya cipta fotografi serta penyeleseaian sengketa terhadap hak cipta fotografi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji perlindungan hukum terhadap karya seni fotografi berdasarkan UUHC. Jenis penelitian dalam penenelitian ini yuridis normative dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil studi ini menjelaskan bhawa sesuai dengan TRIPs Agreement terdapat 2 kategori terkait Hak Kekayaan yaitu Hak Cipta dan Hak Kekayaan Industri. Hak cipta merupakan hak eksklusif yang lahir secara otomatis setelah suatu karya muncul dalam bentuk aslinya hak tersebut sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 1 Undang-Undang No 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Apabila terjadi pelanggaran terhadap suatu karya cipta maka pihak yang melanggar hak cipta tentunya telah merugikan hak moral dan hak ekonomi dari pencipta. Hasil dari penelitian yang dilakukan menunjukan perlindungan hukum terhadap pelanggaran hak cipta dapat berupa perlindungan preventif dan perlindungan represif, serta dalam penyelesaian sengketa terkait pelanggaran hak cipta fotografi dapat melalui litigasi dan non lititgasi.

Page 44 of 67 | Total Record : 664

 42   43   44   45   46 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 14 No 2 (2025) Vol 14 No 1 (2025) Vol 13 No 4 (2024) Vol 13 No 3 (2024) Vol 13 No 2 (2024) Vol 13 No 1 (2024) Vol 12 No 4 (2023) Vol 12 No 3 (2023) Vol 12 No 2 (2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 4 (2022) Vol 11 No 3 (2022) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) Vol 10 No 4 (2021) Vol 10 No 3 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 4 (2020) Vol 9 No 3 (2020) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 4 (2019) Vol 8 No 3 (2019) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 4 (2018) Vol 7 No 3 (2018) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 4 (2017) Vol 6 No 3 (2017) Vol 6 No 2 (2017) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 4 (2016) Vol 5 No 3 (2016) Vol 5 No 2 (2016) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 4 (2015) Vol 4 No 3 (2015) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 3 (2014) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 3 (2013) Vol 2 No 2 (2013) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue