Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Human-AI collaborative problem solving in middle school mathematics: an orchestration and learning review Nefrima Sartika Putri; Rudyanto Rudyanto
SCHOULID: Indonesian Journal of School Counseling Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): SCHOULID: Indonesian Journal of School Counseling
Publisher : Indonesian Counselor Association (IKI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23916/086845011

Abstract

Artificial intelligence, particularly generative AI, is increasingly positioned as an active participant in learning rather than a passive digital tool. This systematic literature review synthesizes evidence on human-AI collaborative problem solving in mathematics, with particular attention to AI roles, collaboration patterns, learning outcomes, and pedagogical orchestration. The review followed PRISMA 2020. A Scopus title-abstract-keyword search produced 369 source records; after 10 duplicates were removed, 359 records were screened, 125 full-text reports were assessed, and 10 studies were retained for qualitative synthesis. Because the original screening archive did not preserve reviewer-level decision logs, inter-rater agreement coefficients could not be retrospectively computed without reconstruction; this limitation and a prescribed dual-reviewer rerun protocol are reported explicitly. The synthesis identified four recurring AI roles: adaptive scaffold/tutor, cognitive or visualization tool, co-creative partner, and orchestration platform. Productive collaboration was most consistently associated with socially structured routines, shared agency, reflective activity, and explicit teacher orchestration, whereas unstructured use increased the risk of cognitive off-loading and over-delegation. Learning gains were reported for problem solving, conceptual understanding, motivation, self-efficacy, and related outcomes, but causal evidence remains limited by heterogeneous designs, levels, and measures. The review therefore treats orchestration—not model capability alone—as the principal design mechanism and recommends preregistered, longitudinal, middle-school studies with process-level measures, independent dual screening, and multi-database searching.
Transparency and trust in AI-driven mathematics learning: a systematic review of explainability frameworks Nefrima Sartika Putri; Rudyanto Rudyanto
SCHOULID: Indonesian Journal of School Counseling Vol. 10 No. 3 (2025): SCHOULID: Indonesian Journal of School Counseling
Publisher : Indonesian Counselor Association (IKI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23916/086846011

Abstract

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) is increasingly used to support prediction, assessment, feedback, and instructional decisions in mathematics education, yet evidence about how explanation affects transparency, trust, and learning remains fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesized evidence on explainability in mathematics and closely related STEM education, with particular attention to the under-studied middle-school learner. The review followed PRISMA 2020 and used a structured TITLE-ABS-KEY search of Scopus. The search returned 646 records; 550 were excluded during title/abstract screening, 96 reports were assessed at full text, and 10 studies were retained for qualitative thematic synthesis. Three themes emerged: interpretable prediction of performance and at-risk learners; transparency, trust, and adoption; and explainable scaffolding and feedback. The evidence base is dominated by 2025 studies and by educator- or institution-facing prediction, while direct learner-facing explanation and experimentally tested effects on achievement remain scarce. SHAP, feature-importance methods, neuro-fuzzy models, and explanatory feedback systems improve access to model reasoning, but explanation quality alone has not been shown to cause higher achievement. The review therefore distinguishes technical interpretability from pedagogical usefulness and identifies validated measurement needs for teacher decision quality, student self-regulation, calibrated AI trust, and equitable treatment. Because the archived screening and appraisal logs were not preserved, retrospective inter-rater coefficients and aggregate quality scores could not be reconstructed without inventing data; this limitation is reported explicitly. Future studies should use dual-reviewer screening, design-appropriate critical appraisal, classroom-embedded experiments, and age-appropriate explanations.
Wearable and Portable Psychophysiological Monitoring of Stress, Recovery, and Affective States in Competitive Athletes: A Systematic Literature Review of Evidence Published from 2021 to 2026 Rudyanto Rudyanto; Mario Febrian; Kristian Burhan
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036922000

Abstract

Wearable and monitoring can pair physiological signals with subjective reports, yet convergence between these channels remains unclear. This review synthesized evidence on (1) technologies paired with instruments; (2) convergence and divergence between physiological and subjective measures; and (3) interventions and strategies for optimizing athlete state. Following PRISMA 2020, Scopus was searched with TITLE-ABS-KEY strategy for studies during 2021 to 2026. After screening, 22 studies were included. Data used thematic synthesis and bibliometric analysis. Reporting quality was appraised using FICO, with retention at ≥12/16. No meta-analysis was conducted because designs, modalities, instruments, timing, and outcomes lacked an estimand. Four themes emerged: autonomic load, sleep and recovery, self-regulation, and individualized monitoring. HRV dominated. Physiological and subjective measures were often concordant but differed in magnitude and timing. Person-specific models were informative than group-level approaches. Dual-channel monitoring is more defensible. Future studies should use longer monitoring, standardized psychometrics, independent validation, and adequately powered interventions.
Cognitive performance determinants in competitive fencing: a systematic review Ade Zalindro; Rudyanto Rudyanto; M. Arie Desman
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036944000

Abstract

Competitive fencing is an open-skill combat sport in which perception, anticipation, decision-making, and action occur under severe temporal pressure. This review synthesised evidence on cognitive performance determinants in fencing, with emphasis on sport-specific anticipation and visual attention, reaction and response selection, and trainability. A structured Scopus search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 and identified 403 records; 15 duplicates were removed, 388 titles and abstracts were screened, 70 full texts were assessed, and 18 studies were included. Eligibility was defined using a PICOS framework, and study quality and relevance were appraised with a prespecified four-domain FICO rubric (Focus, Information, Context, Outcome). Because the included studies used heterogeneous designs and non-comparable outcome operationalisations, evidence was synthesised narratively and thematically following the Thomas and Harden approach rather than quantitatively pooled. The evidence indicates that expertise is expressed primarily through sport-specific anticipation, weapon-dependent visual search, and efficient response selection and inhibition, whereas generic simple reaction time is less discriminative. Training interventions improved attention or broader cognitive function, but transfer to isolated reaction-time outcomes was inconsistent. The current screening record does not contain a reproducible inter-rater agreement statistic; accordingly, no Cohen's kappa value is reported without verification. Larger longitudinal studies, standardised fencing-specific measures, and ecologically valid designs are needed.
AI, computer vision, and wearable sensing for psychological monitoring in racket sports: a systematic review Andre Igoresky; Ifdil Ifdil; M. Arie Desman; Rudyanto Rudyanto
JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia) Vol. 10 No. 4 (2025): JRTI (Jurnal Riset Tindakan Indonesia)
Publisher : IICET (Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/30036951000

Abstract

This systematic literature review examined how computer vision, wearable sensing, and multimodal artificial intelligence (AI) are used to infer psychological, affective, and behavioural states in tennis and related racket sports. Target constructs included the zone or flow-like states, emotion, stress, attention-related behaviour, and psychologically relevant performance states. Behavioural and perceptual studies were treated as indirect evidence when they supplied a plausible observable proxy rather than a validated psychological measure. Reporting followed PRISMA 2020. A structured Scopus search identified 309 records published from 2015 to 2025; 41 full texts were assessed and 10 studies met the archived eligibility criteria. Eligible studies were English-language peer-reviewed articles involving racket-sport contexts and digital sensing or computational methods with a behavioural, affective, or psychological target. Comparator conditions were extracted when reported but were not required for inclusion. The synthesis used descriptive and thematic analysis because constructs, labels, samples, settings, and performance metrics were heterogeneous. Multimodal approaches showed advantages in the few studies with direct modality comparisons, while naturalistic tennis affect recognition reached 68.9% accuracy in one match-footage study. However, no common external-validation benchmark was identified. Reviewer-level screening logs were not retained, so Cohen’s kappa cannot be reconstructed retrospectively; FICO was used as an internal appraisal rubric, not a validated risk-of-bias tool. Future work should prioritize naturalistic datasets, psychometric anchoring, subject-independent validation, transparent models, and privacy-preserving governance.
Movement variability and biomechanical performance in floorball: a systematic review Ardo Okilanda; Rudyanto Rudyanto; M. Arie Desman
Journal of Educational and Learning Studies Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Journal of Educational and Learning Studies
Publisher : Global Econedu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32698/03432

Abstract

Floorball performance depends on repeated cutting, sprinting, jumping, landing, and change-of-direction (COD) actions, yet evidence on movement variability and its relationship with performance and injury risk remains fragmented. This systematic literature review synthesized floorball biomechanical evidence addressing movement variability, performance, and noncontact injury risk. The review followed PRISMA 2020, using a structured Scopus TITLE-ABS-KEY search. Sixty-nine records were identified; 41 were excluded at title/abstract screening, 28 full texts were assessed, and 18 were excluded, leaving 10 studies for qualitative thematic synthesis. The evidence showed that inter-limb asymmetry and COD/curvilinear-sprint deficits can characterize individual movement strategies; knee valgus, trunk control, landing mechanics, and lower-limb strength are relevant biomechanical factors for performance and injury; and velocity-based, reactive-strength, screening, wearable, and video-based approaches offer promising tools for individualized monitoring. However, the evidence is heterogeneous in task definitions, samples, outcome measures, and competitive representativeness. Quantitative pooling was therefore not undertaken. The review identifies a need for standardized floorball-specific COD and sprint protocols, explicit measurement of variability, prospective validation against injury and match-performance outcomes, and ecologically valid wearable/computer-vision monitoring.
Behavioral and psychophysiological monitoring in elite beach volleyball: performance consistency under environmental stress Rudyanto Rudyanto; Eval Edmizal; Jeki Haryanto
Journal of Educational and Learning Studies Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Journal of Educational and Learning Studies
Publisher : Global Econedu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32698/03182

Abstract

Beach volleyball is an outdoor Olympic team sport in which heat, humidity, wind, sand, and tournament density can interact with psychological and physiological strain. This systematic literature review synthesized evidence on monitoring athlete state and performance consistency, with particular attention to psychometric, physiological/biometric, neuromuscular-load, environmental, and computational modalities. The review followed PRISMA 2020 and used a structured Scopus search of TITLE-ABS-KEY fields, identifying 144 records. Forty-eight full texts were assessed and 10 studies were retained for the core qualitative synthesis; 50 additional sources were used only for contextual comparison and were not treated as included evidence. Eligibility required beach-volleyball athlete or athlete-performance data, direct relevance to state monitoring or performance, and sufficient empirical information for extraction. Because the included studies differed substantially in design, population, exposure, timing, and outcomes, quantitative pooling was not considered methodologically appropriate and a thematic synthesis was conducted instead. The evidence indicates that session-RPE, heart-rate variability, perceived well-being, neuromuscular measures, salivary hormones, mental-fatigue measures, sleep-related indicators, and computational performance models can each capture meaningful components of athlete state, but they are usually studied in isolation. The central gap is the absence of prospectively validated systems that combine psychological, physiological, load, environmental, and computational streams to predict stable performance across tournament days. The review therefore supports a multimodal monitoring agenda while emphasizing that the proposed phenotyping framework remains a research model rather than a validated predictive system.
Digital biomarkers of psychological readiness in volleyball athletes: a systematic review of wearable, autonomic, and ecological measures Rudyanto Rudyanto; Ifdil Ifdil; Ardo Okilanda
Journal of Educational and Learning Studies Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Journal of Educational and Learning Studies
Publisher : Global Econedu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32698/03192

Abstract

This systematic literature review synthesised evidence on digital biomarkers relevant to psychological and autonomic readiness in volleyball, with particular attention to beach-volleyball contexts. The review followed PRISMA 2020 and used a structured Scopus search covering wearable sensors, heart-rate variability (HRV), autonomic regulation, well-being, recovery, monitoring, training load, and fatigue. The search identified 186 records; 45 full texts were assessed and 10 records were retained for the qualitative evidence map, including empirical studies and two secondary syntheses used for contextual benchmarking. Three themes were identified: autonomic regulation, wearable and inertial kinetics, and ecological psychological monitoring. HRV was sensitive to training and competition load, wearable measures characterized external and neuromuscular demands, and repeated self-report and sleep measures provided ecologically situated information about perceived readiness. However, the included studies did not establish construct equivalence for a single latent readiness variable, and direct multimodal criterion validation against performance outcomes was uncommon. Because independent screening logs and item-level appraisal sheets were not preserved in the source file, inter-rater agreement and retrospective risk-of-bias scores could not be reconstructed without introducing unverifiable data. The synthesis therefore emphasizes descriptive convergence and methodological heterogeneity rather than a pooled effect estimate. Future research should preregister readiness operationalizations, standardize HRV and ecological sampling protocols, synchronize psychological and wearable streams, and validate multimodal models prospectively in beach-volleyball environments.
Biomechanical and technology-based analysis of the lunge and attacking actions in competitive fencing: a systematic review Ade Zalindro; Rudyanto Rudyanto; M. Arie Desman
Journal of Educational and Learning Studies Vol 9, No 1 (2026): Journal of Educational and Learning Studies
Publisher : Global Econedu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32698/03402

Abstract

The fencing lunge is an explosive, distance-sensitive action whose performance depends on coordinated lower-limb mechanics, postural control, and rapid perceptual-motor timing. This systematic review integrated biomechanical determinants with technology-based approaches for measuring and enhancing lunge performance. A PRISMA 2020 systematic review was conducted using Scopus (2016–2026). The search identified 403 records; 15 duplicates were removed, 388 records were screened, 57 full texts were assessed, and 18 studies were included. Because the included studies differed substantially in populations, weapons, task constraints, outcomes, and designs, findings were synthesised narratively using an a priori thematic coding framework aligned with three research questions rather than pooled quantitatively. Methodological quality was revised to a design-appropriate JBI appraisal framework. The supplied manuscript does not contain the original independent screening/extraction audit log; therefore, the final submission must report the actual reviewer number and Cohen’s kappa values from that log rather than retrospectively estimating them. The evidence indicates that lower-limb power, joint coordination, postural control, target distance, footwear, and weapon-specific demands shape attack execution. Inertial and depth sensors, two-dimensional video, and deep-learning models show growing validity and practical feasibility, but evidence for transfer to competitive outcomes remains limited. The field supports an integrated biomechanical-technology framework, but conclusions remain constrained by small samples, heterogeneous protocols, cross-sectional designs, single-database searching, and limited ecological validation.
Anticipation and decision-making in fencing: a systematic review of neuromuscular and cognitive correlates Ade Zalindro; M. Arie Desman; Rudyanto Rudyanto
Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri
Publisher : Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/993730

Abstract

This review evaluated how neuromuscular, perceptual-cognitive, neural, and training-related markers are associated with anticipation and decision-making in fencing, and identified consistency and methodological limitations. Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect were searched using predefined PICOS-based terms. Of 114 records, 15 duplicates were removed, 99 records screened, 34 full texts assessed, and 22 reports included: 21 empirical studies and one narrative review for contextual synthesis. Study quality was appraised using the MMAT 2018. Participant totals were not pooled because a verified cross-study count was unavailable and overlapping cohorts could cause double counting. Meta-analysis was not defensible because outcomes, tasks, instruments, comparison groups, and reporting formats were heterogeneous; findings were synthesised narratively according to SWiM principles. Inter-rater kappa was not calculated and could not be reconstructed retrospectively. Expertise was associated with earlier muscle activation, more economical EMG coordination, faster or stable responses, stronger cortical preparation, and efficient visual search. Evidence for trainability remained limited.