Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal

Pengaturan Pengawasan Penggunaan Cryptocurrency untuk Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Widjoyo, Oktaviano Parulian Sugiharto; Mangesti, Yovita Arie
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18029788

Abstract

This study examines the regulation and supervision of cryptocurrency use in preventing money laundering by employing a normative juridical method through the analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and court decisions, including the Indra Kenz case as a concrete example of legal application. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s regulatory framework for digital assets remains fragmented, creating uncertainty in law enforcement, particularly regarding blockchain transaction tracing, compliance obligations for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), and the explicit recognition of digital assets as criminal objects. These conditions underscore the need for regulatory harmonization and integrated oversight to strengthen preventive and repressive measures against cryptocurrency-based money laundering.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Tenaga Medis Atas Kerugian Pasien Akibat Penggunaan Robot Medis Sagita, Rois; Mangesti, Yovita Arie
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 3, No 11 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17953504

Abstract

Medical robots with artificial intelligence (AI) are becoming more and more common in Indonesian healthcare, yet there are currently no laws limiting their use or legal accountability. The purpose of this study is to examine medical professionals' legal responsibilities for patient losses resulting from the use of medical robots and examine the legal protections available to patients. Using a juridical-normative method, the study shows that medical personnel can still be held liable for negligence in the use of robots, while losses due to system failure or product defects are the responsibility of the manufacturer and healthcare facility. Patients have the right to protection through informed consent mechanisms, medical device oversight, and the right to sue for damages. This study emphasizes the need for specific regulations to provide legal certainty and stronger protection for patients.